<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Vanguard News Network Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.vnnforum.com</link>
		<description>This is an Uncensored forum for Whites. www.vnnforum.com</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:13:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>20</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103956&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>YouTube- Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier!.wmv</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="display: none;" id="ame_noshow_other_1258758830_1">
        <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxtMb5oKcd0" title="YouTube- Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier!.wmv" target="_blank">YouTube- Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier!.wmv</a>
</div>
<div style="display: inline;" id="ame_doshow_other_1258758830_1">
<div align="center">
<table class="tborder" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="425" style="margin:10px 0">
<thead>
        <tr>
                <td class="tcat" colspan="2" style="text-align:center">
                        <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxtMb5oKcd0" title="YouTube- Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier!.wmv" target="_blank">YouTube- Thierry Henry Handball Against Ireland in the World Cup Qualifier!.wmv</a>
                </td>
        </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
        <tr>
                <td class="panelsurround" align="center">
<object width="425" height="350">
<param name=''movie'' value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XxtMb5oKcd0&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XxtMb5oKcd0&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>
</td>
        </tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=50">France</category>
			<dc:creator>Tom McReen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103956</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sikh campaigner for BNP set to become party's first non-white member]]></title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103955&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
Sikh campaigner for BNP set to become party's first non-white member Rajinder Singh says he supports far-right party's anti-Islam stance 
 
A Sikh man who has campaigned for the BNP in support of its anti-Islam stance has been put forward to be the party's first non-white member. 
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Sikh campaigner for BNP set to become party's first non-white member Rajinder Singh says he supports far-right party's anti-Islam stance<br />
<br />
A Sikh man who has campaigned for the BNP in support of its anti-Islam stance has been put forward to be the party's first non-white member.<br />
<br />
Rajinder Singh, who is in his late 70s, has twice lent support to Nick Griffin during the British National party leader's court appearances and appeared in an election broadcast for the party in 2005. There have been suggestions that he could stand as a BNP candidate at next year's general election.<br />
<br />
Singh, who came to Britain in 1967, used to pen a regular column for the party's Freedom newspaper and has spoken at BNP meetings where he has been vehement in his criticism of Muslims, talking about his experiences at the partition of India in 1947. He was born in Lahore, which became part of Pakistan after partition, and blames Muslims for the death of his father during the bloody split of India.<br />
<br />
The BNP's senior members voted last weekend to hold a party-wide ballot on whether to allow non-white people to join. That followed the party's agreement to a court order last month to use all reasonable endeavours to revise its constitution so that it did not breach the equality bill in the face of a challenge to its membership policy by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.<br />
<br />
Martin Wingfield, the communications officer for the party's two MEPs and the its prospective parliamentary candidate for Workington, wrote on his blog in support of admitting non-whites, and Singh in particular. &quot;I say adapt and survive and give the brave and loyal Rajinder Singh the honour of becoming the first ethnic minority member of the BNP,&quot; wrote Wingfield.<br />
<br />
Singh, a former teacher from Wellingborough in Northamptonshire, said he would be &quot;honoured&quot; to become a full member of the BNP.<br />
<br />
&quot;I got in touch with the BNP on certain core policies that appeal to me,&quot; he told the Independent. &quot;I also admire them since they are on their own patch and do not wish to let anyone else oust them from the land of their ancestors.&quot;<br />
<br />
In 2001, after the September 11 attacks on the US, he said he wanted to set up an Asian Friends of the BNP group to act as a supporting body and conduit for funds for people sympathetic to the party's anti-Islamic stance.<br />
<br />
A BNP spokesman said he would be &quot;quite happy&quot; to have Singh as a member, adding that the retired teacher recognised that he was a &quot;guest of ours&quot;. &quot;We have always maintained it's not really about skin colour, it's about ethnicity,&quot; he said. He emphasised that the party's membership list, suspended following last month's court order, remained closed for the time being.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>This what happens when you focus on religion and not race. You're sending a message to billions of non Muslim shit skin &amp; niggers of the world that they are OKAY as long as they aren't muzzies.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/20/sikh-man-bnp-member" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...man-bnp-member</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57">This Just In</category>
			<dc:creator>Marty Macaluso</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103955</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nubian fury at 'monkey' lyric of Arab pop star Haifa Wehbe]]></title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103954&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
Nubian fury at 'monkey' lyric of Arab pop star Haifa Wehbe 
 
• Black Egyptians sue and demand album be banned 
• Row casts fresh light on racism in region 
 
Haifa Wehbe, one of the Middle East’s biggest pop stars. Photograph: Joseph Barrak/AFP 
 
One of the Arab world's biggest pop...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Nubian fury at 'monkey' lyric of Arab pop star Haifa Wehbe<br />
<br />
• Black Egyptians sue and demand album be banned<br />
• Row casts fresh light on racism in region<br />
<br />
Haifa Wehbe, one of the Middle East’s biggest pop stars. Photograph: Joseph Barrak/AFP<br />
<br />
One of the Arab world's biggest pop stars has provoked a torrent of outrage after releasing a song which refers to black Egyptians as monkeys.<br />
<br />
Haifa Wehbe, an award-winning Lebanese diva who has been voted one of the world's most beautiful people, is now facing a lawsuit from Egyptian Nubians claiming the song has fuelled discrimination against them and made some Nubian children too afraid to attend school.<br />
<br />
The row has cast fresh light on the position within Egyptian society of Nubians, who are descended from one of Africa's most ancient black civilisations and yet often face marginalisation in modern Egypt.<br />
<br />
Wehbe, a 35-year-old model turned actress and singer, is widely regarded as the Middle East's most prominent sex symbol and has been no stranger to controversy in the past. Her skimpy outfits and provocative lyrics (one previous hit was entitled Ya Ibn El Halal, roughly translated as Hey, Good Little Muslim Boy) have earned her the wrath of religious conservatives and forays into the political arena have also sparked debate, including her very public praise for Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah during the 2006 conflict between Israel and Lebanon.<br />
<br />
The latest accusations of racism came after the release of her new song, Where is Daddy?, in which a child sings to Wehbe, &quot;Where is my teddy bear and the Nubian monkey?&quot;.<br />
<br />
Wehbe has since apologised profusely for the offending lyrics, insisting they were penned by an Egyptian songwriter who told her that &quot;Nubian monkey&quot; was an innocent term for a popular children's game. That hasn't stopped a group of Nubian lawyers submitting an official complaint to Egypt's public prosecutor and calling for the song to be banned.<br />
<br />
&quot;Everyone is upset,&quot; said Sayed Maharous, 49, the Nubian owner of a coffee shop in Cairo. Adul Raouf Mohammed, who runs a nearby store, agreed. &quot;To compare a human being to an animal is insulting in any culture. She has denigrated an entire community of people, and now some of our children are afraid to go into school because they know they will be called monkeys in the playground.&quot;<br />
<br />
The row over Wehbe's song has highlighted a growing sense of communal identity among Nubians in Egypt, a country where the government has traditionally promoted a very monolithic brand of nationalism, sometimes to the exclusion of religious or ethnic minorities.<br />
<br />
Despite breaking through into the cultural mainstream – several Nubian novelists are well-regarded within Egyptian intellectual circles and Nubian singers such as Mohammed Mounir are among the most popular in the country – Egypt's estimated two million Nubians remain largely invisible on television and film, except as lampooned stereotypes.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Even shit skins know niggers are nothing more than animals, but we still got whites in the US voting them in as POTUS.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/17/nubian-fury-haifa-wehbe/print" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...fa-wehbe/print</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pixies/2009/11/17/1258482962234/Haifa-Wehbe-one-of-the-Mi-001.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57">This Just In</category>
			<dc:creator>Marty Macaluso</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103954</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Salon writer former $PLC employee on Beck and WN movement</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103953&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Good stuff!  :D 
 
 
---Quote--- 
http://salon.com/news/glenn_beck/index.html?story=/news/feature/2009/11/20/glenn_beck_and_stormfront 
 
Thor357, a Stormfront sustaining member who has posted on the site more than 3,500 times, had this to say: 
 
 
"Glenn Beck and Alex Jones [a controversial...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Good stuff!  :D<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				<a href="http://salon.com/news/glenn_beck/index.html?story=/news/feature/2009/11/20/glenn_beck_and_stormfront" target="_blank">http://salon.com/news/glenn_beck/ind...and_stormfront</a><br />
<br />
Thor357, a Stormfront sustaining member who has posted on the site more than 3,500 times, had this to say:<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;Glenn Beck and Alex Jones [a controversial conservative media figure who believes 9/11 was an inside job] are the front line in the war of Ideals we grapple with, they are far from perfect and are somewhat compromised. But every person in the last 2 years that I have introduced to the WN [White Nationalist] Philosophy have come largely from Alex Jones, Glen Beck and the Scriptures for America founder Pastor Pete Peters ... Baby steps are required for people like these, but the trio Beck, Jones, Peters are the baby food that feeds potential Nationalists&#8230; Glenn Beck is not far behind as his Mormon background indicates to me as most Mormons I have met are not friends of Jews like the Church was years ago. Most Mormons I know are arming themselves, with guns, bullets and food.&quot;<br />
<br />
Later in the same discussion thread, Thor357 added:<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;I have talked to 6 people in two days because Glenn Beck woke them up, it's amazing how angry they are. They are pissing fire over Obama, this is a good thing. Now I educate them. If out of 100 of the Glen Beckers I keep 20 then I have won 20 more to cover my back side. I never lost the 80 as they never were.&quot;<br />
<br />
<br />
Carolina Patriot, whose member picture features a kitten aiming an assassin's rifle, was conflicted but admiring:<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;Every now and again when an infomercial takes the place of hunting or fishing, I'll turn over to Glenn Beck if he's on and watch his show. Sometimes it is amusing, sometimes it is informed, and sometimes, I think he comes to SF [Stormfront] to steal show idea's&quot;<br />
<br />
UstashaNY offered up an analogy to substance abuse, with Beck as the soft-stuff hook:<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;Beck, Dobbs etc. are like gateway drugs. If it wakes up one person to learn something about whats really going on and that person does the research, looks deeper and deeper into WHO and WHAT is behind all of this, then its a win for the movement. NOBODY in the msm is reporting the stuff Beck does, let him keep talking. It will wake people up, believe me&#8230; He is more of a help to us then you may think. Until we have a REAL voice in the msm, guys like him and Dobbs are a stepping stone right into our laps. Its only a matter of time...&quot;<br />
<br />
<br />
Even those who don't think Beck understands what he&#8217;s doing appreciate his instincts. According to WhiteManMarchesOn88:<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;There is no doubt that Beck is not a WN [white nationalist], but I have to agree that he does raise a lot of really good questions that do promote White survival. I'm sure he would go a lot farther with a lot of his questions, but ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] would more than likely kick him off television if he did.&quot;<br />
<br />
ZOG or no ZOG, Beck is clearly doing something right from the point of view of the average white nationalist.<br />
<br />
&quot;By no means do I think [Beck] is aware of the racial issue, and for the moment that is ok,&quot; wrote Stormfront member QHelios. &quot;He is stirring the pot, and I thank him for that.&quot;
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57">This Just In</category>
			<dc:creator>Kievsky</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103953</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rabbi offered cocaine for sex</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103952&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/rabbi-offered-cocaine-for-sex-1822917.html 
 
 
---Quote--- 
A wealthy rabbi financed a drug dealing business and offered cocaine to girls in exchange for sex, a court heard today. 
 
Rabbi Baruch Chalomish, 54, rented an apartment where he could "relax...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/rabbi-offered-cocaine-for-sex-1822917.html" target="_blank">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...x-1822917.html</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				A wealthy rabbi financed a drug dealing business and offered cocaine to girls in exchange for sex, a court heard today.<br />
<br />
Rabbi Baruch Chalomish, 54, rented an apartment where he could &quot;relax and have a party&quot;, Manchester Crown Court heard.<br />
<br />
When police raided the apartment, and his home in an area of Salford heavily populated with Orthodox Jews, they discovered a total of 101 grams (3.6oz) of cocaine and more than £17,000 in cash.<br />
<br />
Prosecutor Michael Goldwater also told the jury of five men and seven women that Chalomish's business partner, Nasir Abbas, 54, had failed to turn up for the trial and is sought by police.<br />
<br />
The pair are both charged with possession of cocaine, and possession of cocaine with intent to supply.<br />
<br />
Chalomish faces two charges on both counts, and Abbas faces one charge on both counts, which he denies.<br />
<br />
The rabbi, of Upper Park Road, Salford, admits two counts of possession of cocaine but denies intent to supply.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said police found both defendants at the one-bedroom apartment when they raided it at 9am on Monday 5 January.<br />
<br />
Abbas was discovered sleeping on the floor of the sitting room, and Chalomish was using the toilet.<br />
<br />
He said: &quot;Our case is that Abbas and Chalomish were dealing in controlled drugs. They were running, we say, a commercial cocaine supply operation from an apartment-hotel in Shudehill, Manchester.<br />
<br />
&quot;Rabbi Chalomish also had a substantial store of drugs, cocaine, and cash at his home address.&quot;<br />
<br />
Officers found forms which showed that the apartment was rented from the firm Premier Apartments in Abbas's name.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said officers discovered evidence of a &quot;substantial drug supply operation&quot;.<br />
<br />
Drug paraphernalia found in the bedroom included a glass tray with 3g (0.1oz) of cocaine on it and a silver spoon, a bowl containing more than 3g (0.1oz) of cocaine, rolled up notes for snorting the drug and credit cards used for chopping the drug into lines.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said the purity of the cocaine varied in strength from 29 per cent to 82 per cent.<br />
<br />
Cutting agents to dilute the drug were also discovered, along with around £2,400 in cash, he said.<br />
<br />
Similar paraphernalia, and quantities of cocaine, were also found at Chalomish's home, mainly in a rear bedroom, along with £15,345 in cash.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said the jury may find it &quot;significant&quot; that the purity of the cocaine was higher than average.<br />
<br />
He suggested it could have been cut with legal substances to achieve the average purity level of 28 per cent for cocaine sold in the UK.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater also told the jury that police seized a mobile phone containing a text message from Abbas to an unknown recipient.<br />
<br />
He said: &quot;That's a drug dealer's message and we say that was sent by Abbas from his phone to somebody who has not been identified and is essentially a statement of account with reference to grams and money and setting out who owed who what.&quot;<br />
<br />
The jury heard that when interviewed by police Abbas said he knew the rabbi as &quot;Shell&quot; and rented the apartment on his behalf and received money from him for the rent.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said: &quot;He said Shell wanted to relax and have a party at the flat.<br />
<br />
&quot;He said there had been a lot of people come through the flat in the last 10 days, most of them girls. He mentioned one particular girl, called Emma from Stockport, who stayed for seven days.<br />
<br />
&quot;She was the only one allowed to go into that bedroom apart from Shell.&quot;<br />
<br />
Abbas told detectives his role was to keep the flat tidy and said that although Shell did not sell drugs, he did not mind if others wanted to consume them and that he liked to impress girls.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater continued: &quot;He said he had seen Shell putting white powder in a glass dish and mixing it with another substance, and anyone visiting was free to help themselves.&quot;<br />
<br />
Abbas also claimed that he and Chalomish were planning to open a restaurant together, funded by the rabbi.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater told the jury that Abbas had a previous conviction for conspiracy to supply Class A drugs in March 1996.<br />
<br />
The jury heard that the rabbi gave &quot;no comment&quot; interviews to police until his final interview, where he admitted he was a wealthy man who liked to assist less fortunate people.<br />
<br />
Chalomish said he bought large quantities of cocaine for his own personal use and often used it when he could not sleep.<br />
<br />
Mr Goldwater said: &quot;The prosecution case is these two men were concerned in a commercial drug supply operation.<br />
<br />
&quot;We don't completely exclude the possibility that there might be some truth in what Abbas told the police, that some of the drugs were given to young women who came to the flat and that one or more of those young women may have provided sexual services.<br />
<br />
&quot;We do say that it was essentially a commercial operation. We say their roles were different. Nasir Abbas had the know-how, knew the drugs business, had the contacts, he would know where to obtain the drugs, how much to pay and how to find customers.<br />
<br />
&quot;Rabbi Chalomish would not have necessarily had the knowledge, we say Chalomish was the financier, he put up the money.<br />
<br />
&quot;We've been informed that Chalomish is a wealthy man, we've got no reason to doubt that. Nor do we have any reason to believe that his wealth was not achieved perfectly legitimately.<br />
<br />
&quot;How he got in the drugs business is unclear. He may have got into the drugs business as a drugs user but may have realised there were substantial profits to be made.<br />
<br />
&quot;A supply on this scale would need a source of capital for financing the purchase of the drugs and rental of the flat so dealing could go on off the street and not at his address.&quot;<br />
<br />
The case was adjourned until 10.30am tomorrow at Manchester Crown Court.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30">United Kingdom</category>
			<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103952</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Pate: The Anthrax Mystery: Solved</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103951&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:05:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Anthrax Mystery: Solved 
13th July 2009 
 
Image: http://www.anthraxattacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/anthrax_spores_microphotogr-300x279.jpg  
A microphotograph of anthrax spores 
 
by Robert Pate 
 
ON OCTOBER 4, 2001, reporters in Florida announced the first case in 25 years of a person...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Anthrax Mystery: Solved<br />
13th July 2009<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.anthraxattacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/anthrax_spores_microphotogr-300x279.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
A microphotograph of anthrax spores<br />
<br />
by Robert Pate<br />
<br />
ON OCTOBER 4, 2001, reporters in Florida announced the first case in 25 years of a person contracting the deadly bacterium anthrax. The following day, Robert Stevens, the photo editor of the Florida-based tabloid Sun, died. His death was the beginning of the Anthrax Mystery, America’s worst—and most baffling—case of bio-terrorism. Days later, four other persons in the New York City and Washington, DC areas would die from anthrax spores that leaked from tainted letters sent through the mail. Seventeen others would become infected, and hundreds of millions of dollars would be spent on cleaning up contaminated office buildings and postal facilities. All of these events came just a few days after the tragedy of September 11. It appeared the terrorists had struck again, but this time the attack was biological.<br />
<br />
Investigators believe seven letters containing anthrax spores were mailed. Four of the seven are thought to have been mailed on the same day and addressed to major media outlets in New York City: ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, and the New York Post. Of these, only the NBC and New York Post letters were recovered. Letters believed to be addressed to ABC News and CBS News offices caused two persons to develop anthrax infections. One was a seven-month-old boy brought in by his mother, a producer at ABC News; the other was an assistant to Dan Rather at CBS. These letters were never found and were likely discarded.<br />
<br />
The two recovered letters did not have a return address but were postmarked September 18, 2001 in Trenton, New Jersey. These letters contained identical messages tending to indicate that the perpetrators were Islamic terrorists. The notes read, “09-11-01, THIS IS NEXT, TAKE PENACILIN [sic] NOW, DEATH TO AMERICA, DEATH TO ISRAEL, ALLAH IS GREAT.”<br />
<br />
It is also believed an anthrax-laced letter was mailed to the National Enquirer’s old mailing address and forwarded to their new offices at American Media Inc. in Boca Raton, Florida. Anthrax spores were found at the postal facility that held the National Enquirer’s old P.O. Box address. American Media also publishes the tabloid Sun where Mr. Stevens worked. Investigators have never been able to located the anthrax letter addressed to the National Enquirer.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://anthraxattacks.net/wp-images/ams01.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Interestingly, hoax letters claiming to contain anthrax were mailed days later from St. Petersburg, Florida. However, instead of anthrax spores, these letters contained a harmless substance described by some as looking like talcum powder. One of these hoax letters was again addressed to NBC News in New York City. In addition, Judith Miller, the author of a book on bio-terrorism and a reporter on the Middle East for the New York Times, received an anthrax hoax letter at her office. The St. Petersburg Times and Fox News also received similar hoax letters.<br />
<br />
The mailing of hoax letters cannot be considered the work of a copycat. For example, the NBC News hoax letter was mailed on September 20. This would have been two days after the NBC News letter containing anthrax was mailed from Trenton, New Jersey. The remaining hoax letters were mailed between October 5 and 9. News reports naming media outlets that received the original anthrax letters were on October 12 and 13. A copycat mailer could have acted only after October 12, when the public first became aware of the media anthrax letters. The person who sent the hoax letters was aware of the mailings of the original anthrax letters. The apparent purpose of mailing the hoax letters was to foster the anthrax scare and create a media frenzy.<br />
<br />
The mailings of anthrax-laced letters from New Jersey and the Florida hoax letters that followed were probably coordinated. It is likely that least two individuals were involved in the mailings. Experts who have seen the block lettering on the envelopes of the hoax letters and anthrax letters have concluded two different persons were responsible.<br />
<br />
The mailing sites of Trenton, New Jersey and St. Petersburg, Florida were chosen, perhaps, to emphasize an Arab or Islamic connection in the minds of Americans. Trenton is the home of a large Arab-American community. Also, several of the September 11 hijackers had lived in both areas. The mailers of the anthrax and hoax letters wanted the public to think that remnants of al-Qaeda were still around and active.<br />
<br />
However, the mailing of the anthrax letters shows a degree of media savvy that would be unusual for foreign Islamic terrorists. The persons who sent the letters knew which media outlets would have the greatest influence on the public. Even today, with the advent of cable and satellite television, the three major television broadcast networks remain as the primary source of news for most Americans. The New York Post and the National Enquirer are tabloid papers and were likely chosen for their sensational headlines. Of all the papers in New York City, the New York Post would have screamed the loudest concerning the threat from Islamic terrorists. For Americans who don’t follow the news, the National Enquirer, with its presence at every checkout stand in America, would convey the message. The desired effect in choosing these media outlets was to alarm the public and to remind them these terrorists wanted to destroy both America and Israel.<br />
<br />
But only five of the seven anthrax letters were sent to media outlets. The remaining two were addressed to members of the United States Senate. These letters were posted on Tuesday, October 9, exactly three weeks from the first anthrax mailings, and four weeks from September 11. The letters were addressed to two of America’s most liberal Democrat Senators: Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Patrick Leahy of Vermont.<br />
<br />
An aide opened the Daschle letter on October 15. A puff of powder quickly flew out of the letter. Capitol police were called and a Hazmat team sealed off the Senator’s office. This letter had a different note that read, “09-11-01, YOU CAN NOT STOP US. WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX. YOU DIE NOW. ARE YOU AFRAID? DEATH TO AMERICA. DEATH TO ISRAEL. ALLAH IS GREAT.”<br />
<br />
Once tests confirmed the Daschle letter actually contained anthrax, all Capitol mail was stopped and impounded for further investigation. The Leahy letter would be found on November 16 in the impounded mail. It also contained anthrax spores and an identical note. It is believed the Leahy letter was delayed and misdirected due to an initial misreading of the letter’s zip code.<br />
<br />
The Senate letters had a fictitious return address indicating they came from school children. The return address read, “4th Grade, Greendale School, Franklin Park NJ 08852.” Apparently, it was thought a letter coming from school children would have a better chance of reaching the intended targets without raising suspicions.<br />
<br />
The envelopes and notes have yielded few clues leading to the true identities of the persons who were responsible for the anthrax attacks. Obviously, the senders tried to mask who they were and to hide their true motives. Investigators turned to analyzing the anthrax material itself.<br />
<br />
Anthrax is a spore-forming germ, Bacillus anthracis, and can be found in livestock such as sheep or cattle. Analysis of the spores from the letters reveled them all to be of the same strain. This particular strain, known as the Ames strain, was first researched at the Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick, Maryland. This strain of anthrax bacteria originally came from a single cow that had died in Texas in 1981. Ames has the reputation of being deadlier than other anthrax strains. Some have called Ames the “gold standard” of anthrax.<br />
<br />
From Fort Detrick, the Ames strain was sent to researchers in at least fifteen laboratories within the United States and six laboratories abroad. It is not known how many other universities and labs may have had access to the strain, but according to one law-enforcement official “more labs than you think” could have obtained the Ames strain.<br />
<br />
In the past, microbiologists attending conferences on infectious diseases would take vials of various strains and simply swap them with each other to aid in their research. Martin Hugh-Jones, a scientist at Louisiana State University, stated that during this period deadly pathogens were traded “like playing cards.” In the real pre-9-11 scenario, any microbiologist in the world might have obtained the Ames strain.<br />
<br />
Investigators examining the anthrax spores within the letters found them to be of different grades, with the best among them considered by some to be “weapons grade” material. A modern spray drying technique was used in preparing these spores, instead of the older method of milling. Also, radiocarbon dating found the spores to be releatively newly-created—not more than two years old.<br />
<br />
Of the two anthrax letters that were recovered in New York City, the New York Post letter was found unopened and still contained the anthrax material. The NBC News anthrax letter tested positive for anthrax, but only a trace amount remained after it was opened. Major General John Parker, with the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, said one of his scientists described the New York Post sample as, “looking like Purina Dog Chow.” It had coarse brown granules but was densely packed with anthrax spores and highly concentrated.<br />
<br />
In contrast, the anthrax in the Daschle letter was like a fine white powder; General Parker compared it to talcum powder. Under the microscope the Daschle sample was ten times denser in anthrax spores when compared to the New York Post sample. The New York Times described the anthrax from the Daschle letter as consisting of nearly pure spores, with a concentration of a trillion spores per gram. However, the spores tended to cluster together, creating particles of variable size. Some of these particles would have been too large to penetrate human lungs.<br />
<br />
A team of scientists at USAMRIID opened the Leahy letter on December 5. This letter also contained a very fine powder which was easily made airborne. The Leahy letter had particles that were smaller and more uniform in size compared to the Daschle letter. This made the anthrax spores in the Leahy letter even deadlier: Smaller spores of a uniform size have a better chance of entering the respiratory system and causing death.<br />
<br />
It was reported the quality of the anthrax spores found in the Leahy letter surpassed previously known state-sponsored bio-weapons programs. According to Newsweek, “The Leahy anthrax…was coated with a chemical compound unknown to experts who have worked in the field for years; the coating matches no known anthrax samples ever recovered from biological-weapons producers anywhere in the world, including Iraq and the former Soviet Union.” The anthrax in the Leahy letter has proven to be a superior product. Bio-defense experts assisting the FBI have so far been unable to duplicate the anthrax material through any reverse engineering processes. Investigators are left with the uncertain choice of deciding if this was the work of a lone brilliant scientist—or a state-sponsored bio-weapons program.<br />
<br />
So who sent the anthrax? Some, like Barbara Hatch Rosenberg with the leftist Federation of America Scientists (FAS), have a suspect. In her report, “Analysis of the Anthrax At tacks,” Rosenberg presents her profile of the anthrax attacker, accompanied by her own political biases. Rosenberg believes the attacker has connections with the U.S. government. She believes he is being protected by the FBI and has information on secret programs the government does not wish to be disclosed.<br />
<br />
In her profile, Rosenberg identified the attacker as a bio-defense insider with a doctoral degree. He is a middle-aged American who is skilled in working with dangerous pathogens. She boldly claims he is also a CIA contractor based in the Washington, DC area. There is no mystery as to the identity of Rosenberg’s suspect. Her suspect is the person around whom she has built her profile: Dr. Steven J. Hatfill.<br />
<br />
Barbara Rosenberg began her mission to ‘bring Dr. Hatfill to justice’ by giving a series of lectures and media interviews accusing the FBI of stalling the investigation. Eventually, she was able to arrange a meeting with Senate staffers and FBI agents in attendance. Several of the staffers worked for Senators Daschle and Leahy, the recipients of the anthrax letters. Without revealing his name, Barbara Rosenberg indicated to everyone there that her suspect, Dr. Hatfill, was responsible for the anthrax attacks.<br />
<br />
A week later—apparently as a result of Senate pressure—the FBI brought Dr. Hatfill into public view. In an investigation that had previously been out of the spotlight, the media was now alerted to the FBI’s scrutiny of Rosenberg’s suspect. When the FBI searched Dr. Hatfill’s apartment, the media, with helicopters overhead, covered it live on national television. The whole world was now aware of the public pursuit (and some would later say the public persecution) of Dr. Hatfill.<br />
<br />
When questioned by reporters concerning the attention Dr. Hatfill was getting, Attorney General John Ashcroft declared Hatfill to be not a suspect but a “person of interest.” A few commentators who follow legal issues have noted this “person of interest” expression is not referenced in any law books and, until recently, has not been a term used in investigations. Jonathan Shapiro, an attorney for Dr. Hatfill, referred to the term and said, “It’s a way for the Justice Department to tiptoe around the fact they’re crushing someone, ruining their lives, and not get sued by it. [sic]”<br />
<br />
In response to this attention, Dr. Hatfill was forced to hold two press conferences and declare his innocence. On Aug. 11, 2002, Dr. Hatfill said, “After eight months of one of the most intensive public and private investigations in American history, no one—no one—has come up with a shred of evidence that I had anything to do with the anthrax letters.”<br />
<br />
Whatever their motives, the FBI was certainly having problems connecting Dr. Hatfill to the crimes: They could not place Hatfill in Trenton, New Jersey at the time of the mailings, and no residue of anthrax material could be found anywhere he had lived or visited. There was no physical evidence whatsoever connecting Dr. Hatfill with the anthrax mailings.<br />
<br />
Hatfill is said to be one of perhaps 30 scientists who could have carried out this attack. His background as a former researcher at USAMRIID Fort Detrick, Maryland placed him on the list. However, Dr. Hatfill claims to be an expert on viruses such as Ebola and Marburg, and not on anthrax bacteria. Dr. Hatfill has publicly stated that he has never worked with anthrax.<br />
<br />
The FBI initially interviewed Dr. Hatfill in January 2002, apparently as part of the investigation’s broader look at scientists with a connection to the bio-defense community. At that time, Dr. Hatfill took a lie-detector test in an effort to clear his name. The agent who gave him the test reportedly said, “I’m satisfied. I believe you had nothing to do with the anthrax.”<br />
<br />
Steven Hatfill was born in St. Louis, Missouri, and grew up in Mattoon, Illinois. In the early 1970s he studied biology at Southwestern College in Winfield, Kansas. During this period, he left his studies and traveled to Kapanga, Zaire, where he worked with Dr. Glenn Eschtruth as a medical missionary. After graduating from Southwestern in 1975, Hatfill enlisted in the United States Army. In October 1976 he married Caroline Eschtruth, the daughter of his mentor.<br />
<br />
It would be only a few months after their marriage when Cuban-led mercenaries based in Angola attacked Dr. Eschtruth’s mission. The mercenaries captured Dr. Eschtruth and later executed him, a tragedy which left a strong impression on Hatfill. He and his wife Caroline were divorced in May 1978. Shortly thereafter, Hatfill returned to Africa and continued his medical education.<br />
<br />
Hatfill attended the Godfrey Huggins Medical School in White-ruled Rhodesia, graduating in 1984. While in Rhodesia, Hatfill claims to have served with the Selous Scouts. The Selous Scouts were Rhodesia’s crack counterinsurgency troops used against the terrorists who wanted to overthrow the White government. In 1980, as a result of international pressure, Rhodesia was turned over to the Black Mugabe government, which still rules there today. The country would later have its name changed to Zimbabwe. In 1984, Hatfill moved to the Republic of South Africa to further his medical studies and research.<br />
<br />
While in South Africa, Hatfill was in contact with Aquila, the paramilitary wing of the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB) or Afrikaner Resistance Movement. The AWB was the largest White resistance group active in preventing the Black takeover of South Africa. Some have labeled the AWB a neo-Nazi organization. One has only to look at their political banner to come to this conclusion: It is very similar to National Socialist Germany’s swastika flag but, instead of a swastika, uses a triskelion—an ancient symbol which resembles three “sevens” arranged in a spinning design.<br />
<br />
A colleague of Hatfill’s at Stellenbosch University’s radiobiology laboratory saw a newspaper photo of AWB leader Eugene Terre’Blanche surrounded by Dr. Hatfill and members of the Aquila Brigade. This colleague—in an apparent effort to expose Hatfill—placed the photo on the lab’s notice board. When confronted, Hatfill made no secret of his AWB ties. The colleague claimed, “This photo was put up on the lab notice board—and led to Hatfill boasting that he was the weapons trainer of the Western Cape Branch of Aquila.” Since that time, the photo has not been seen by the public.<br />
<br />
Several amazing coincidences have contributed to the intense interest in Hatfill shown by investigators. They also help to explain why some, like Barbara Rosenberg, are so convinced Dr. Hatfill was responsible for the anthrax attacks.<br />
<br />
One coincidence concerning Dr. Hatfill and his times in Africa is the “Greendale School” reference that appeared as the return address on the anthrax letters sent to Senators Daschle and Leahy. There was an upscale suburb of Salisbury, Rhodesia, known as Greendale; the neighborhood school was informally known as Greendale School. The school was actually named after White Rhodesian patriot Courtney Selous, after whom the Selous Scouts were named. A mentioned previously, Hatfill claims to have served with this group.<br />
<br />
Another coincidence involves Dr. Hatfill’s commissioning William Patrick, an expert on weaponized anthrax, to write a report on the proper procedures to be used if an anthrax letter arrived in the mail. Hatfill’s employer at the time, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), saw a need for emergency responders to know exactly what to do if this were ever to occur.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://anthraxattacks.net/wp-images/ams02.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
In the SAIC report, written two years before the anthrax mailings, Patrick describes how a few grams of anthrax spores could be sent in envelopes and details the proper emergency procedures that should be followed if this were to take place. The report was provided to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. They, at the time, were working on a similar report and provided the information they assembled to police and fire departments via the Internet. Dr. Hatfill’s attorney Victor Glasberg denies the Patrick report was any type of “blueprint” for an anthrax mailing. Glasberg said, “There is zero data in the report. It shows you what you do after it happens.”<br />
<br />
Perhaps the most suspicious coincidence was the mysterious anthrax hoax letter mailed from London, England, in November 2001, and addressed to Senator Tom Daschle. Within the envelope were a powdery substance and a threatening note. At the time of the mailing, Hatfill was in England training to be a United Nations bio-weapons inspector for a future mission in Iraq. As previously mentioned, several anthrax hoax letters were mailed to media organizations. This hoax letter was the first and only one sent to a Senator. Some within the FBI wonder if the London letter may have been an attempt to frame Dr. Hatfill.<br />
<br />
One outfit that has spent a great deal of time and energy in blaming Dr. Hatfill for the anthrax attacks is the Jewish Defense Organization (JDO). This group has labeled Hatfill a “Nazi” because of his ties to the Afrikaner Resistance Movement. In The Weekly Standard article, “The Hunting of Steven J. Hatfill,” David Tell claims the JDO is responsible for spreading many of the damning accusations that now surround Dr. Hatfill. The JDO is an offshoot of the terrorist Jewish Defense League, founded by the late Rabbi Meir Kahane. Today, the JDO spends most of its time feeding reporters and commentators hateful and misleading information concerning Dr. Hatfill. Tell describes the JDO as the “central clearinghouse of Hatfill demonology.” He claims mainstream reporters will use the JDO material on Hatfill but will never acknowledge their source. It is interesting that a small extremist group like the Jewish Defense Organization appears to have been the first to “document” the background and personal history of Dr. Steven Hatfill.<br />
<br />
Since the anthrax attacks, Dr. Hatfill’s life has been radically changed. The Justice Department had him fired from a $150,000 a year teaching job at Louisiana State University, and, to date, he has not found other employment. Though a spokesman Hatfill said, “My life has been completely and utterly destroyed by John Ashcroft and the FBI. I don’t have a job and 20 years of training has gone down the drain… My professional reputation is in tatters. All I have left is my savings and that will be exhausted soon because of legal bills.” The evidence is mounting that Dr. Hatfill is an innocent man and had nothing to do with the anthrax attacks. Reporters and investigators will realize this when those responsible for the anthrax mailings are identified.<br />
<br />
There are two other bio-defense scientists who have received some attention in the anthrax investigation. But, unlike Hatfill, these scientists have rarely been mentioned in the press. Some believe one of these scientists may be responsible for the anthrax attacks.<br />
<br />
On October 3, 2001, Dr. Ayaad Assaad, an Arab-American scientist and a former researcher at USAMRIID Fort Detrick, Maryland, was called into the Washington, DC offices of the FBI and was confronted with an anonymous letter that accused him of being “a potential biological terrorist.” The author of the letter claimed to be a former colleague of Dr. Assaad, and accused him of having a vendetta against the government. The meeting between Assaad and the FBI took place two days before it was known that Robert Stevens, the first victim of the anthrax attacks, had died. The letter was postmarked September 21 and was addressed to “Town of Quantico Police” in Virginia. Quantico is 25 miles south of Washington, DC and is home to both Marine Corps and FBI facilities.<br />
<br />
A number of questions have arisen surrounding this letter. The timing of the letter is suspicious, given that it was written before there was public knowledge concerning the anthrax attacks. Dr. Assaad believes the letter was devised to implicate him in the coming attacks and to set him up as the ‘fall guy.’ He believes the person who sent the letter may also be responsible for the anthrax attacks. The FBI determined Dr. Assaad was not involved with terrorism and that the accusatory letter must have been a hoax.<br />
<br />
But Dr. Assaad had reason to be concerned. A decade earlier, he, along with two other Arab-American scientists, all of whom were working at USAMRIID, were targeted and harassed by another group of scientists working there. The group that was harassing the Arab-Americans called themselves the “Camel Club.” One of the “Camel Club” members was Dr. Philip M. Zack, Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army. The apparent objective of the “Camel Club” was to drive the Arab-American scientists out of the bio-defense facility.<br />
<br />
Shortly after the Persian Gulf War in 1991, Dr. Assaad found an eight-page poem in his mailbox authored by the “club.” The poem contained lewd and obscene remarks and was written in an attempt to harass and mock the Egyptian-born scientist. The authors of the poem referred to a rubber camel supposedly outfitted with various sexual appendages. A portion of the poem read: “In [Assaad’s] honor we created this beast; it represents life lower than yeast.” The letter states that each week the camel will be given “to who did the least.” Dr. Assaad reported these incidents to Fort Detrick’s commander, who at the time did little or nothing to stop the harassment. Dr. Assaad later sued the Army, claiming “discrimination.” Was this a case of “racism”—or of something going on at the lab which the harassers might not want an Arab scientist to see?<br />
<br />
The Hartford Courant has been the only paper to have covered this story in detail. They reported that “Zack left Fort Detrick in December 1991, after a controversy over allegations of unprofessional behavior….” The paper later reported Dr. Zack was observed entering the lab after hours on January 23, 1992. A surveillance camera recorded Dr. Marian Rippy, one of the “Camel Club” members, letting Dr. Zack inside the building.<br />
<br />
Lab technicians noticed a late-night intruder was tampering with their equipment. A 1992 inquiry found someone was conducting unauthorized research involving anthrax during the evening hours. An audit of the lab showed 27 sets of specimens—including anthrax spores—were unaccounted for or missing. One former commander at the facility said he did not believe any of the missing specimens were ever found.<br />
<br />
Dr. Zack is said to be Jewish, and for some this makes him the leading anthrax suspect, particularly among those in Internet discussion groups. They see the harassment of Dr. Assaad, the late night research on anthrax, and the accusatory letter all pointing in Dr. Zack’s direction.<br />
<br />
Ed Lake, the leading amateur investigator of the anthrax attacks, has done some important research concerning the letter sent to the authorities naming Dr. Assaad as a potential terrorist. Lake found that, after September 11, a great deal of speculation ensued concerning the possibility of another terrorist attack. The consensus was that the next attack would likely be biological in nature, and anthrax could be the weapon of choice. Lake did an analysis of how many times the word “anthrax” appeared in Internet discussion groups from September 8, 2001 to October 7, 2001. Not surprisingly, discussions concerning anthrax and a possible biological attack increased dramatically after September 11. Lake concluded, given the circumstances, it would not be unusual for someone to warn authorities concerning potential terrorist activity.<br />
<br />
This is the most likely explanation for the anonymous letter. A former colleague of Dr. Assaad sent the letter out of genuine concern in preventing a biological attack. This person may or may not have been a participant in the “Camel Club” shenanigans but could have been influenced by them. It is unlikely Dr. Zack sent the accusatory letter, since it would have brought immediate attention upon himself and his suspicious activities a decade earlier. Also, it is equally difficult to believe Dr. Zack was responsible for the anthrax mailings.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://anthraxattacks.net/wp-images/ams03.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
So what other suspects remain? Our best-known suspect or “person of interest” is Dr. Steven J. Hatfill. But after an extensive investigation by the FBI, no physical evidence connects Hatfill with the mailings. Other possible suspects can be dismissed as easily as they are mentioned. Iraq and al-Qaeda are not responsible, even though some within the Bush administration and the news media would like to blame them. There have been suggestions the CIA could have sent the anthrax letters, if a hidden bio-weapons program existed within the agency. But what purpose would such an attack serve? It is hard to imagine a motive for the CIA to commit such an act. Were neo-Nazis, anti-abortionists, or right-wing militias the culprits? There are plenty of off-the-wall theories about possible suspects—even one involving a pagan cult in the Midwest—but nothing has panned out. There is, however, another possibility that needs to be considered.<br />
<br />
“Who had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to have brought about these attacks?” is a basic question that needs to be asked. An extensive and well-developed biological warfare program exists within Israel today. A motive for the anthrax attacks would be to blame Arab terrorists or a ‘rogue nation’ for this atrocity and to help launch the United States into war against Israel’s enemies. Lastly, Israel had prior knowledge of the planned attacks on September 11.<br />
<br />
Israel’s bio-weapons programs dates back to the earliest formation of the Zionist state. Dr. Avner Cohen documents Israel’s program in his paper, “Israel and Chemical/Biological Weapons: History, Deterrence, and Arms Control.” Cohen begins by describing how Zionists during the 1948 war poisoned the wells and water supplies of Arab villagers. According to Israeli military historian Dr. Uri Milstein, the typhoid epidemic that spread throughout the costal town of Acre in May 1948 was the result of Zionist Jews contaminating the Arabs’ water supply. In Gaza the Jews failed in a similar attempt. The Egyptian Army found four Jews disguised as Arabs near the water wells. The four terrorists were caught with a canteen filled with dysentery and typhoid bacteria. All four were tried, convicted, and hanged within a three-month period. Dr. Cohen questions if the two incidents were isolated or part of a larger program of bio-warfare during the 1948 war.<br />
<br />
Israel’s bio-weapons facilities are located at the Israel Institute of Biological Research (IIBR) in Ness Ziona (also Nes Ziona, Nes Tona) a few miles southeast of Tel Aviv. In 1952 the IIBR consisted of a single building hidden in an orange grove. Today, the IIBR has grown into a massive 14-acre compound with several hundred employees surrounded by high walls and electronic sensors. What goes on behind those high walls is something Israel would prefer to be kept secret.<br />
<br />
Dutch journalist Karel Knip has researched the IIBR and came up with some interesting findings. Knip began by going through medical literature he found on the Internet. Specifically, he focused on the papers of 140 scientists affiliated with IIBR over the last five decades. With the help of experts on chemical and biological weapons, Knip developed an overview of the various programs that exist at IIBR. Knip found IIBR research began in the 1950s involving plague, typhus, and rabies. Dr. Avner Cohen discusses Knip’s findings in his paper and states, “… a significant number of studies at IIBR focused on anti-livestock agents, following the path of other national BW [bio-weapons] programs at the time.” ‘Anti-livestock agents’ is Cohen’s cryptic reference to Israel’s anthrax programs.<br />
<br />
A motive for Israel in launching the anthrax attacks would be to bring America into war against Iraq and to remove that country as a potential threat to the Jewish state. When Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the United States Senate was thrown into a heated debate as to whether or not this country should go to war. Senator Tom Daschle took the lead in being against American involvement. In order for Israel to achieve her war objective, this time Senator Daschle would have to be removed—or turned toward Israel’s position. Either way, Israel would win.<br />
<br />
Likewise, Senator Patrick Leahy ran afoul of the Israelis when he introduced his Leahy Amendment to the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act. The Leahy Amendment, also called the Leahy Law, prohibits American arms sales to foreign security or military units that systematically violate human rights. The Israeli military routinely tortures Palestinian prisoners, assassinates Arab political figures, and fires American-made rockets and missiles into civilian crowds and apartment buildings. If an American administration ever decided to enforce the Leahy Law, Israel would find herself under an arms embargo. Eliminating or ‘turning’ her Senatorial adversaries—a gamble she couldn’t lose— would be powerful motives for Israel to target Senators Daschle and Leahy for political assassination by anthrax.<br />
<br />
For Israel to have initiated the anthrax attacks, prior knowledge of the al-Qaeda plot was essential. The Mossad, Israel’s external intelligence service, has made it their mission to track Arab terrorists around the world. Indirect evidence of Mossad’s surveillance of the al-Qaeda hijackers prior to September 11 can be found in the Drug Enforcement Agency report, “Suspicious Activities Involving Israeli Art Students at DEA Facilities,” and in an investigative report from Fox News.<br />
<br />
In March 2001, an alert was issued by the National Counterintelligence Executive, a branch of the CIA, warning federal employees to be aware of “suspicious visitors to federal facilities.” There had been reports of Middle Eastern persons showing up at government buildings—many of them DEA offices—claiming to be Israeli art students. At first it was thought the Israeli art students might be Arab terrorists planning an attack. However, it later turned out the art students were indeed Israelis.<br />
<br />
The Israelis would appear unannounced at various government offices or at the homes of federal officials. They would falsely identify themselves as art students from the University of Jerusalem or Bazala Academy in Israel and attempt to sell their artwork on canvas. Astute government employees soon discovered the Israelis were more interested in obtaining information than in selling artwork. The students, in the course of their conversations, would ask for business cards and inquire about the officials’ work activities and those of their associates. At times, the Israelis were found breaching government entrances through back doors and parking garages. Others appeared at government offices that were hidden or undisclosed to the local community. Some were found with diagrams of government buildings showing entrances and offices of various employees—indicating prior surveillance. Others were found with photographs of government agents. One Israeli had a computer printout with the heading “DEA groups.”<br />
<br />
The DEA, with the help of the FBI, began to compile a report on the Israeli art students. The report, prepared in June 2001, listed over one hundred Israelis by name along with their personal identifying information. After the Israelis were arrested, the government, for sensitive political reasons, was reluctant to prosecute any of them for espionage, so they let them go.<br />
<br />
One DEA agent, in an apparent attempt to prevent a government cover-up, had the report posted on the Internet in March 2002. The report provides information obtained from the Israelis during their interrogations. In a general assessment of the Israelis, the report states, “Most admit to having served in the Israeli Military. This is not surprising given the mandatory military service require [sic] in Israel, however, a majority of those questioned has [sic] stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance units.”<br />
<br />
Within the various agencies of the U.S. government, there was a debate regarding the entire Israeli art student phenomenon. Most were convinced this was an intelligence operation, but at the time its purpose was unclear. The best clue in understanding the mystery was their main target: the Drug Enforcement Agency. Although the Israelis penetrated other federal facilities, such as military bases, the spies seemed focused on the DEA.<br />
<br />
During this period, the DEA was investigating the activities of Israeli organized crime. Israeli mobsters, along with the Russian Mafia, control the distribution of the drug Ecstasy in America. It should be noted there is no real difference between these two criminal organizations. It has been known for a long time that the Russian Mafia is made up of Russian Jews from the former Soviet Union. Questions still remain: Why were Israeli spies posing as art students interested in the activities of the DEA? What connection does the Mossad have with the Russian Mafia? The conclusion that best fits the known facts is that Israeli intelligence launched an operation against the DEA to protect their new intelligence asset, the Russian Mafia, from prosecution.<br />
<br />
After September 11, the activities of Israeli art students were seen in a new light. The FBI began to investigate the trail left by the Arab hijackers and found many of them had residences in Florida. Interestingly, one third of the art student spies were also based in Florida. It was discovered that some of the Israeli art students had addresses in the same locations as the hijackers. One commentator said that, at times, they were just yards apart.<br />
<br />
Carl Cameron with Fox News was the first major reporter to break this story, in a four-part series that aired in December 2001. In the series, Cameron gives several examples of Israeli espionage activities in America. In his first report, Cameron focuses on the Israeli surveillance of the Arab hijackers. Cameron reported, “There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9/11 attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it.”<br />
<br />
Cameron based his reporting on information he obtained from investigators in the FBI, DEA, and the INS. In his report, one investigator acknowledged there were “tie-ins” between the Israelis and the Arab hijackers. However, it appears Carl Cameron was unable to present on Fox News all that he learned concerning these “tie-ins.”<br />
<br />
Alan Simpson, in a short piece that he wrote for his own online publication, Spies Magazine, picked up the story where Fox News left off. In an article entitled, “Art, Espionage and Cover Ups,” Simpson appears to have obtained the unaired portions of Carl Cameron’s report concerning the Israelis’ monitoring of the hijackers. Simpson cites the following as coming from “the original investigative report [Carl Cameron’s] breaking the story.” The following are direct quotes from Alan Simpson’s article.<br />
<br />
“According to the FBI list, the Arab terrorist and suspect cells lived in the same neighborhoods as the Israeli cells in Irving, Texas and Hollywood and Miami, Florida from Dec. 2000 to April 2001. In the case of Irving, the Israeli cell used a rental mailbox in a shopping center just one block away from an Arab suspect’s apartment. In Hollywood, the terrorists, including lead hijacker Mohammad Atta, the Egyptian who piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center, used a rental mailbox drop two blocks from an apartment rented by an Israeli ‘art student’ team leader.”<br />
<br />
“It is not the only case where the Israelis were found to be in the same location as the Saudi cells. According to the DEA Report, another Israeli team operating out of Hollywood, Florida, led by team leader Hanan Serfaty lived at 4220 Sheridan St., #303, Hollywood, Florida 33021 (Emerald Greens Apartments) while the Saudi hijackers Khalid Al Midhar, Abdulaziz al Omari, Walid Al Shehri, and UAE national Marwan al Shehri, operated from a mail drop at Mailbox Rentals, 3389 Sheridan St. #256, Hollywood, Florida 33021-3608. Another Serfaty residence at 701 S. 21st Ave., Hollywood was located near the homes of Atta and Al Shehri, including a residence on Jackson Street, just a few blocks away, and the Bimini Motel Apartments, Apartment 8, at 1600 North Ocean Drive. On September 7, just days before their terrorist attack, Atta and Al Shehri spent several hours at Shuckums Oyster Bar and Grill at 1814 Harrison St., just blocks away form Serfaty’s 21st Ave. residence. A Miami-based Israeli unit, led by Legum Yochai, operated from 13753 SW 90th Ave., Miami while hijacker Al Shehri lived nearby at Horizons Apartments, 8025 SW 107th Ave.”<br />
<br />
Cameron’s reporting appears in part to be based upon a secret FBI document that shows the “tie-ins” between the Israeli spies and the Arab hijackers. The fact that a secret FBI document exists is also evident in the Die Zeit article, “Next Door to Mohammed Atta.” Die Zeit, a German paper, based their article on information obtained from the French intelligence agency. The FBI apparently shared their report on Mossad activity with the French. The following portions of the article “Next Door to Mohammed Atta,’ closely parallels Carl Cameron’s unaired report.<br />
<br />
“Not until after the attacks of September 11 did the consequences of the spy ring become clear. Apparently the agents were not interested in military or industrial facilities [sic], but were shadowing a number of suspects, who were later involved in the terrorist attacks against the U.S. According to a report of the French intelligence agency that Die Zeit examined, ‘according to the FBI, Arab terrorists and suspected terror cells lived in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as in Miami and Hollywood, Florida from December 2000 to April 2001 in direct proximity to the Israeli spy cells.’<br />
<br />
“According to the report, the Mossad agents were interested in the leader of the terrorists, Mohammed Atta, and his key accomplice, Marwan al-Shehi. Both lived in Hamburg before they settled in Hollywood, Florida in order to plan the attacks. A Mossad team was also operating in the same town. The leader, Hanan Serfati, had rented several dwellings. ‘One of Serfati’s apartments was located on the corner of 701st St. and 21st Ave. [sic] in Hollywood, right near the apartment of Atta and al-Shehi,’ French intelligence reported later. Everything indicates that the terrorists were constantly observed by the Israelis. The chief Israeli agent was staying right near the post office where the terrorists had a mailbox.”<br />
<br />
Le Monde, the French paper of record, in the article, “An Enigma: Vast Israeli Spy Network Dismantled in the U.S.,” also appears to have had access to the secret FBI document or at least the French intelligence agency’s version of it. The French paper provided a new detail and reported that six of the Israeli spies had cellular telephones bought by an Israeli ex-vice-consul. Another source reported some of the phones had a special walkie-talkie feature which made them difficult to intercept. This would indicate the spying was not some rogue operation—but was instead directed by Israel.<br />
<br />
The evidence is overwhelming that Israel, in the first half of 2001, launched an extensive intelligence-gathering operation within the United States. One part of their assignment was to learn as much as possible concerning the DEA investigations of the Russian Mafia and Israeli organized crime. Their other task was to monitor the al-Qaeda terrorists.<br />
<br />
Through electronic surveillance of the hijackers, the Israelis would have been able to learn the time and place for the September 11 attack. If the spies were monitoring the hijackers’ Internet activities, they would have known the date of the flights and airlines involved since the hijacker’s tickets were bought online.<br />
<br />
A newspaper article that appeared in Haaretz, an Israeli paper, further indicates prior knowledge of the coming attack. Haaretz reported two Israeli employees of Odigo—an instant messaging company with offices near the World Trade Center and also in Israel—received a warning two hours before the attack. This, roughly, would have been when the hijackers were seen boarding their planes. The Mossad, in order to minimize Jewish losses around the World Trade Center area, could have easily issued the warning via the instant message service. The Washington Post reported, “The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or demographics.” Those whose interests relate to Israel or Jewish topics could have received the message—even if the persons were unknown to the sender. On that day, the Odigo warning may have saved many Jewish lives.<br />
<br />
Another mystery surrounding September 11 concerns insider trading of “put” options days before the attacks. Put options, a variation on short selling of a stock, are investments that constitute a bet that a stock will decline in the near future. A few Israelis would have been in a position to make a great deal of money before the al-Qaeda attacks. An unknown number of insider traders made millions of dollars by buying puts during the three business days prior to the World Trade Center attack. United and American airline stocks had highly significant numbers of put options placed upon them, while other airline stocks were not affected in a major way. Only United and American planes were hijacked. A number of insurance and investment companies also had unusual put options placed on their shares. The names of the investors who profited from the tragedy of September 11 have never been released.<br />
<br />
Obviously Israel’s overarching objective in the anthrax mailings was to terrorize America. Once the people realized they were again under attack, panic and shock spread throughout the land. But Israel had a special reason for this type of bio-terrorism. For Israel the anthrax attacks had an important strategic purpose, namely shifting the new war away from al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and toward Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.<br />
<br />
Shortly thereafter, the cry went out concerning Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction and her supposed ties to terrorists. With the help of Israel’s neo -con servative allies within the Office of the Vice President, the Pentagon, think tanks (such as the American Enterprise Institute), and some media outlets (like the Wall Street Journal), the campaign for invading Iraq was launched. The campaign, for the most part, was based upon lies. Some of these lies came directly from Israel.<br />
<br />
Within the office of Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, a unit was established to prepare “intelligence” reports in English for a new group within the Pentagon known as the Office of Special Plans (OSP). In addition to the Israeli input, some of the OSP’s questionable intelligence came from Iraqi exiles. The Office of Special Plans bypassed the CIA and took the cooked intelligence directly to the Oval Office. The CIA, for the most part, tried to be professional in their analysis, but in the end the neocons and the Israelis got their war against Iraq.<br />
<br />
There was no massive intelligence failure that led America to go to war in Iraq. Instead, it was a massive intelligence fraud. Some suspect the forged Niger documents, concerning the allegation that Iraq tried to obtain “yellow cake” uranium oxide from that African country, may have originated with the Israelis. Also, the unconfirmed report on the alleged meeting of Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi agent in Prague was most likely disinformation on the part of Israel. In one bizarre aspect of the story, the London Times reported the Iraqi agent was seen giving Atta a vile of anthrax. The Times reported this as if it actually occurred—and said Israeli security sources observed the transfer.<br />
<br />
Israel’s objective was to bring America into a new war against Iraq. When the al-Qaeda plot was discovered, Israel let the terrorists proceed, thereby insuring America would go to war. The anthrax attack that followed was the bio-terror event needed to focus America’s attention upon Iraq and its alleged weapons of mass destruction. However, Israel had planed the anthrax attacks upon America years before the discovery of the al-Qaeda plot. The anthrax hoaxes that preceded the anthrax attacks were an integral part of the conspiracy.<br />
<br />
The planning for the anthrax attacks of 2001 goes back to at least 1997. In April of that year, the national headquarters of the Jewish organization B’nai B’rith in Washington, DC received a package that contained a petri dish labeled Anthracis Yersinia, implying the dish contained bacteria that could cause anthrax infections or plague. The dish had been broken and was leaking a red fluid. Tests later determined the petri dish to be relatively harmless, and it did not contain the bacteria Anthracis or Yersinia. However, it did contain Bacillus cereus, which is less dangerous and is sometimes used as an anthrax simulant.<br />
<br />
A two-page typed letter accompanied the petri dish. The letter was largely incoherent and contained comments on Jews, Nazis, and the ‘Holocaust.’ The letter was signed, “The Counter Holocaust Lobbyists of Hillel.” Months prior to the B’nai B’rith hoax, a movement was forming on college campuses calling for a debate to question some assertions concerning the ‘Holocaust.’ Those responsible for the mailing chose to blame historical revisionists or so-called “Holocaust deniers.”<br />
<br />
The B’nai B’rith hoax received a great deal of media attention. Television outlets like CNN and other networks broadcast the incident live to a national audience. The nearby area was evacuated, and for a period of time office personnel were quarantined. The case has never been solved, and the cost to the government was two million dollars.<br />
<br />
Israel’s Mossad most likely was responsible for the mailing. The hoax benefited Israel and the Jews in several ways. First, national publicity was generated in this first major anthrax scare. Second, sympathy was elicited for the Jewish organization that was attacked. Third, the persons supposedly responsible—namely, those who have questions concerning the ‘Holocaust’—were demonized. However, on another level, something more important was achieved: This would be the first anthrax hoax used to implicate Dr. Steven Hatfill.<br />
<br />
Dr. Hatfill was attending a terrorism seminar in Washington, DC the day the B’nai B’rith incident occurred. At the time, Hatfill was employed as a researcher at the National Institutes of Health where he likely had access to petri dishes containing bacteria. This, in all probability, was the reason a petri dish from a bioresearch lab was used this time, instead of a suspicious powder. This anthrax hoax, along with others that followed, would help to make a circumstantial case against Dr. Hatfill if a real anthrax attack ever occurred.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://anthraxattacks.net/wp-images/ams04.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Dr. Hatfill likely came to the attention of the Mossad when he first appeared in a photo with Afrikaner Resistance Movement leader Eugene Terre’Blanche and members of the paramilitary unit Aquila. The Mossad’s front organization, the South African Board of Jewish Deputies, would have taken notice of the newspaper photo. As an organization, they keep track of individuals and groups they consider hostile to Jews and their interests. The Afrikaner Resistance Movement would be the type of organization they would want to monitor. The information they obtained on Dr. Hatfill could very well have been passed onto the Mossad. In America, the sister organization to the South African Board of Jewish Deputies is the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).<br />
<br />
Don Foster, an English professor at Vassar and at times a forensic linguistic analyst for the FBI, reviewed several of the anthrax hoaxes in an article he wrote for Vanity Fair. Foster believes Hatfill is a good candidate for the anthrax perpetrator, and is impressed by the apparent relationship between Hatfill and the anthrax hoaxes. Foster said, “When I line up Hatfill’s known movements with the postmark locations of reported biothreats, those hoax anthrax attacks appeared to trail him like a vapor cloud.” In his article, Foster implies Hatfill was responsible for the B’nai B’rith hoax and suggests he may have been responsible for others that followed.<br />
<br />
Another hoax, that Foster thinks “trails” Hatfill, occurred in August 1998. In this incident, a white powder was dispersed throughout several floors of the Finney State Office Building in Wichita, Kansas. Foster suggests this was a re-enactment of a bio-terror scenario that Hatfill developed as a part of his responsibilities while employed at USAMRIID. Foster also implies Hatfill and his new mentor, anthrax expert William Patrick, were in the area of Wichita the day of the incident and later arrived together in San Diego to attend an anti-terrorism conference.<br />
<br />
An anti-government Christian Identity group claimed responsibility for the office building incident in a rambling 11-page letter. Christian Identity is an unusual religious sect that looks upon Jews in less than flattering terms. A basic tenet of Christian Identity is the claim that the “chosen people” of the Old Testament are the peoples of Europe and their descendants, with the Jews of today considered to be the offspring of Satan.<br />
<br />
The Wichita incident is similar to the B’nai B’rith anthrax hoax. Both were designed to implicate Dr. Hatfill solely by his presence in the areas where they took place. In both cases the Mossad wanted the public to know that groups thought to be hostile to Jewish interests had claimed responsibility for the terrorist acts. Also, the same type of rambling disjointed letters accompanied the attacks, probably written in an effort to mislead the FBI and other investigators.<br />
<br />
Several other anthrax hoaxes were designed to implicate Dr. Hatfill. The most important one was the anthrax hoax letter mailed from London and addressed to Senator Tom Daschle. Hatfill at this time was in England training with the United Nations weapons inspectors. The Mossad used the anthrax hoaxes to misdirect the authorities. By following these false leads the FBI and other law enforcement agencies wasted valuable time and resources investigating and shadowing Dr. Hatfill.<br />
<br />
Israel is perhaps the only country in the world that could have succeeded in the anthrax attack upon America. With the help of Jewish scientists from the former Soviet Union, Israel’s bio-weapons research has probably surpassed that of all other nations. The Soviet Union’s bio-weapons program had 32,000 scientists and staff working in 40 different research and production facilities. Two thousand of these scientists worked exclusively on the Soviet anthrax program. A significant number of these scientists may have immigrated to Israel and become employed in her bio-weapons programs.<br />
<br />
Anthony Cordesman with the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote a report, “National Developments of Biological Weapons in the Middle East: An Analytic Overview,” assessing Israel’s bio-weapons programs. Cordesman reports Israel has stockpiled anthrax at her bio-warfare center, and at times provides Israeli intelligence with deadly pathogens to be used for assassinations. Anthony Cordesman unknowingly has given us the “smoking gun” pointing to Israel’s responsibility in the anthrax attacks.<br />
<br />
On the day of September 11, 2001 the Mossad was waiting for al-Qaeda to strike. Soon the greatest bio-terror event in history would follow. Different grades of anthrax were prepared at Israel’s bio-warfare center at Ness Ziona. Coarse brown granules that would cause only skin infections were prepared for the New York media letters. The deadlier “weapons grade” anthrax was reserved for Senators Daschle and Leahy.<br />
<br />
The envelopes were pre-addressed and waiting for the letters and the anthrax material to be placed in them. The letters were written with only the date at the top to be added later. In his analysis, Ed Lake has suggested the “09-11-01” top portion of the letter seems to have been printed at a different time and perhaps by a different hand. This would be a necessary precaution if the terror flights were changed or delayed by a few days.<br />
<br />
On the day of September 11, or perhaps shortly thereafter, copies of the original letter were made at a publicly accessible copier in New Jersey. Through analysis of scratches on the glass, the FBI is certain they have found the copier used to produce the letters. The original letter used to make the copies may have been destroyed. The Mossad officer could have taken the copies to Israel the next day. The anthrax letters were likely prepared, taped, and brought back to America days later via Israeli diplomatic pouch into New York City or Washington, DC. This speculative scenario could have all occurred within the week that followed September 11. The first batch of anthrax letters was mailed in Trenton, New Jersey, exactly one week after the devastating airplane attacks.<br />
<br />
Israel took a huge gamble when she attacked America, but this was not the first time. In June 1967, at the height of the Six Day Arab-Israeli War, Israel deliberately attacked an American intelligence ship, the USS Liberty, in an attempt to destroy the vessel and to lay blame on the Arabs. They failed to sink the ship, but 34 navy crewmen were killed and 171 were wounded. A cover-up was ordered at the highest levels by the U.S. government.<br />
<br />
Israel must not be allowed to continue in her attacks upon America or in her misdirection of our foreign policy. Israel must be disarmed of all weapons of mass destruction. If not stopped, she may strike again, perhaps this time by exploding a radioactive “dirty bomb” in a major American city. Fake signal intelligence could be generated by Israel to indicate that a country such as Iran was responsible. Jewish neo-conservatives in America could then argue that since we were attacked by Iran with a radioactive weapon, our response against Iran should also be nuclear. If President Bush acceded to this advice, Israel would have destroyed yet another Middle Eastern country and brought us another step closer to global war. Israel is an enemy, not a friend. America and her political leadership must finally realize this important fact.<br />
<br />
<i>Robert Pate is an independent researcher and writer.</i></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Alex Linder</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103951</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Worried pimp called off rabbi's three-day drug-fuelled orgy]]></title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103950&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[*Worried pimp 'called off Rabbi Baruch Chalomish's three-day drug-fuelled orgy'* 
 
Image: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00647/Chalomish_185x360_647800a.jpg  
 
An eminent rabbi was so exhausted after three days of constant cocaine-fuelled partying with escorts that his pimp grew...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b>Worried pimp 'called off Rabbi Baruch Chalomish's three-day drug-fuelled orgy'</b><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00647/Chalomish_185x360_647800a.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
An eminent rabbi was so exhausted after three days of constant cocaine-fuelled partying with escorts that his pimp grew worried and cancelled that day’s supply of girls, a jury was told. <br />
<br />
Rabbi Baruch Chalomish, 55, who has a £6 million fortune, was a scholarly academic, an accomplished businessman, a charity giver and a dutiful family man until his first wife died of cancer and his world fell apart. <br />
<br />
He turned to alcohol in his depression, then took refuge in cocaine, spending up to £1,000 a week. He lived in squalor, seeking comfort from prostitutes, Manchester Crown Court was told. <br />
<br />
The prosecution said that Chalomish was the financier in a commercial cocaine supply business while Nasir Abbas, 54, a convicted drug dealer, provided the drugs and the customers.<br />
<br />
The pair rented a luxury flat in Manchester and for ten days over the new year enjoyed a non-stop party. Mr Abbas admitted to police that he procured a supply of girls from an agency called Pure Class. They were also offered cocaine. <br />
<br />
The court was told that on the ninth day, and after the rabbi had stayed up for three straight days, Mr Abbas was so concerned about his health that he scrapped that day’s supply of prostitutes. In a text message to a woman called Clio he wrote: “Hi Clio, I have tried to wake Shel up but I don’t want to wake him. He was very tired because he had no sleep for three days, needed to rest, because he is going to his office to work on Monday at 8. Please cancel the party today.” <br />
<br />
Michael Goldwater, for the prosecution, said that at 9am on January 5 police raided the flat finding evidence of a substantial drugs operation including cocaine, cutting agents and scales. Officers found an equal amount of the drug at Chalomish’s home in Prestwich, in the heart of Manchester’s Orthodox Jewish community, as well as cutting agents and more than £15,000 in cash. <br />
<br />
Chalomish denies supplying the drug but admits having it. Mr Abbas, who said that he was too scared to attend the trial after the rabbi “sent around some heavies” to threaten him, faces charges of having cocaine with intent to supply. <br />
<br />
Jonathan Goldberg, QC, for the defence, said that the rabbi’s fall from grace was a tragedy. He said that his client never supplied the drug but hoarded large supplies of pure cocaine to evade “unscrupulous dealers” known to use rat poison and other dangerous mixing agents. The trial continues. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6924293.ece" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6924293.ece</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57">This Just In</category>
			<dc:creator>TommyJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103950</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Radio Interview of Alex Linder</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103949&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Linder on MajorityRights Radio, 11/19/09: 
 
 *[Webpage]* (http://majorityrights.com/index.php/radio/index). 
 
 More: *[Here]* (http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103905). 
 
  
 
More... (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=6621)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Linder on MajorityRights Radio, 11/19/09:<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://majorityrights.com/index.php/radio/index" target="_blank"><b>[Webpage]</b></a>.<br />
<br />
 More: <a href="http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103905" target="_blank"><b>[Here]</b></a>.<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=6621" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>GoVNN.com</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103949</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rubashkin wants acquittal, new trial on federal charges</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103948&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Rubashkin wants acquittal, new trial on federal charges* 
 
Posted on Nov 20, 2009  
 
http://gazetteonline.com/breaking-news/2009/11/20/rubashkin-wants-acquittal-new-trial-on-federal-charges 
 
Former Agriprocessors vice president Sholom Rubashkin filed a motion today in U.S. District Court for...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><font size="3">Rubashkin wants acquittal, new trial on federal charges</font></b><br />
<br />
Posted on Nov 20, 2009 <br />
<br />
<a href="http://gazetteonline.com/breaking-news/2009/11/20/rubashkin-wants-acquittal-new-trial-on-federal-charges" target="_blank">http://gazetteonline.com/breaking-ne...ederal-charges</a><br />
<br />
Former Agriprocessors vice president Sholom Rubashkin filed a motion today in U.S. District Court for an acquittal on the 86 counts he was convicted of last week, and is also asking for a new trial on those charges.<br />
<br />
The motion contends there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction on the bank fraud, money laundering and other charges. Reasons cited in the brief include:<br />
<br />
Evidence presented in trial in regards to the non payment of livestock didn&#8217;t prove Rubashkin was responsible for the checks issued to cattle suppliers. <br />
<br />
The government didn&#8217;t prove the alleged laundering involved &#8220;proceeds&#8221; as required for a conviction. Rubashkin didn&#8217;t retain any profits, it all went to expenses, according to the motion. <br />
<br />
Merging the money laundering counts as part of the underlying frauds and false statements to the bank doesn&#8217;t meet the legal criteria for merging those counts. <br />
<br />
The conviction on more than one count of bank fraud violates Rubashkin&#8217;s right against double jeopardy for multiple convictions for the same act. <br />
<br />
Rubashkin, 50, former vice president of Agriprocessors, was convicted by a Sioux Falls, S.D., jury of 86 counts of bank, wire and mail fraud, non payment of livestock, making false statements to a bank and money laundering. The charges stem from the May 2008 immigration raid at the Postville meatpacking plant.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57">This Just In</category>
			<dc:creator>alex revision</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103948</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EasyJet grounds in-flight magazine after Holocaust gaffe</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103947&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[*EasyJet grounds in-flight magazine after Holocaust gaffe* 
 
Published 20 November 2009 
 
http://www.newstatesman.com/2009/11/holocuast-memorial-easyjet-magazine 
 
Image: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2710/4119475541_4d9b4a2e55.jpg  
An image from easyJet's inflight magazine's fashion shoot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><font size="3">EasyJet grounds in-flight magazine after Holocaust gaffe</font></b><br />
<br />
Published 20 November 2009<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/2009/11/holocuast-memorial-easyjet-magazine" target="_blank">http://www.newstatesman.com/2009/11/...syjet-magazine</a><br />
<br />
<div align="center"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2710/4119475541_4d9b4a2e55.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
An image from easyJet's inflight magazine's fashion shoot</div><br />
<br />
The airline easyJet is withdrawing all copies of its in-flight magazine, easyJet Traveller, after a row erupted over a tasteless fashion shoot at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin.<br />
<br />
The airline took the decision after being contacted by the New Statesman this afternoon.<br />
<br />
The latest issue of the in-flight magazine featured two unsanctioned photographs of models posing in designer clothes among the famous concrete blocks of the &quot;Field of Stelae&quot;, Germany's foremost memorial to commemorate the six million Jewish victims of the Nazi genocide.<br />
<br />
The magazine did not seek permission from the Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, which only became aware that the photographs existed when contacted by the New Statesman yesterday.<br />
<br />
In a statement, the Memorial's director, Uwe Neumärker, said it &quot;grants permissions only to projects which are related to the memorial, the Holocaust or some aspect of commemoration.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;The Foundation Memorial does not support commercial shoots, and fashion photography is considered to fall into this category.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;The Foundation Memorial will contact the easyJet airline company in writing in order to clarify the circumstances of the photo shoot.&quot;<br />
<br />
According to the Foundation, security personnel are on duty around the clock to prevent such incidents happening, but it was impossible to monitor the entire area due to its size and complexity.<br />
<br />
In a statement to the New Statesman, the airline said:<br />
<br />
&quot;easyJet profusely apologises to anyone who may be offended by the inappropriate fashion photo shoot at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin featured in this month's issue of the in-flight magazine.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;The magazine is produced by INK -- an external publishing house, and easyJet were not aware of the images until they appeared in print. As a consequence we are now reviewing our relationship with the publisher and are withdrawing this month's issue from all flights.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;easyJet prides itself on bringing together a wide range of cultures and beliefs and is appalled by this insensitive and inconsiderate photo-shoot, the aim of which was to highlight some of Berlin's iconic landmarks and certainly no offence was meant.&quot;<br />
<br />
But the Labour MP Denis MacShane, who heads the European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism, told newstatesman.com<br />
<br />
&quot;This is further evidence of the banalisation of anti-Semitism and the trivialisation of the genocidal massacre of Jews in the Second World War.&quot;</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30">United Kingdom</category>
			<dc:creator>alex revision</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103947</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Christianity</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103946&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[[No one benefits from Christianity but jews, swindlers and scum. This file will demonstrate the dangers to the White mind, spirit, and body the religion has historically posed.] 
 
BY THEIR FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM 
 
by Professor Revilo P. Oliver (Liberty Bell, August 1985) 
 
 
 
I have just...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>[No one benefits from Christianity but jews, swindlers and scum. This file will demonstrate the dangers to the White mind, spirit, and body the religion has historically posed.]<br />
<br />
BY THEIR FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM<br />
<br />
by Professor Revilo P. Oliver (Liberty Bell, August 1985)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I have just listened to a number of tape recordings made by the eminent Biblical scholar, John M. Allegro. Two of these tapes are speeches given when he visited this country in 1983-84, looking for a publisher brave enough to reprint on this side of the Atlantic his Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth, which had been published in England in 1979. The major publishers, who flood the bookstores with every kind of subversive and demoralizing tripe that can be vended to the semi-literate, were naturally afraid of a book that was not warranted Kosher. As I reported promptly in Liberty Bell in September 1984, a publisher was found, Prometheus Books, a small firm in Buffalo, who had nothing to lose, since they had already published a number of volumes that are bad for the spook-business.<br />
<br />
To a person already familiar with Allegro's work, the most interesting tape was a recording of an interview with the author followed by rejoinders from several of his former colleagues, now in France or Palestine.<br />
<br />
In 1953, thirty-two years ago, an international team, composed of learned men selected for their expert knowledge of early Semitic scripts and languages, was formed to expedite the editing and translation of the great mass of scrolls that then remained unstudied and unpublished. The members of the team divided the work among themselves, and everyone expected that many scrolls of which the contents was still undisclosed would be edited and translated as promptly and satisfactorily as were the scrolls discovered in 1947 and shortly thereafter, of which adequate translations in English, French, or German were made available to the general public between 1949 and 1952. (1)<br />
<br />
The papyri found in 1952, political rather than religious, evidently from the command post of Jesus ben Gilgolah, one of the captains of the Jewish insurrectionist, Simeon bar Kokhba, (2) whose revolt lasted from A.D. 132 to 135, were available in translation by 1954. (3) It was reasonable to expect, therefore, that the mass of scrolls entrusted to the international team would be edited and published in a steady stream, beginning no later than 1955.<br />
<br />
John Allegro began to publish from his share of the scrolls in 1954 and completed his work on all of them as promptly as could be expected, although it included what was by far the most difficult single task, the unrolling and reading of the now famous copper scroll which gave an inventory of cult treasures that had been concealed in some safe place, yet unfound; this required delicate work by expert metallurgists under his direction. But now, after thirty-two years, no other member of the team has published his part of the work or more than a few selected snippets. As Allegro says, they have been sitting on more than four hundred documents for more than thirty years. What is the reason?<br />
<br />
I cannot be a mere coincidence that Allegro was the only member of the team who was an independent scholar--I am tempted to say that he was the only scholar, for I should like to think that scholarship in the fullest sense includes more than erudition and implies a moral responsibility. All the other members of the international team were connected, in one way or another, with the Jesus-business. They all hold positions in corporations that vend holiness, from the Roman Catholic Church to various of the more literate Protestant sects, and some of them bear names that are Semitic and may indicate that they are Marranos. They are doubtless too learned and intelligent to take seriously the myths that are the stock-in-trade of the salvation-mongers, but they are employed by their corporations, and they are undoubtedly aware that the scrolls first published aroused grave doubts in the minds of many customers who had not before thought about the spiritual wares they were complacently buying. The scrolls they are withholding from publication would certainly undermine the business even more drastically and further reduce the market for invisible and impalpable merchandise. Allegro charges that the holy men are deliberately withholding publication in the hope that public interest in the scrolls, which was so lively in the 1950s, will soon entirely evaporate and the texts can eventually be published quietly in obscure learned journals that only professionals ever see.<br />
<br />
The rejoinders indignantly denied the charge. The other members of the team have been toiling with all due speed for thirty years, but haven't published the great mass of the scrolls because the work is difficult, and scholars are dilatory by nature, and anyway they have academic positions (as did Allegro, who held the equivalent of an American professorship in the University of Manchester), and anyway, well, they just haven't got around to it. It requires little knowledge of Christians to recognize the weasel words that are habitual, but what gives the whole show away is what happened in 1956, when Allegro published a text which showed that the Essenes had a &quot;Teacher of Righteousness&quot; who was crucified, c. 88. B.C., by Alexander Jannaeus, a Jewish king of the Maccabean family who had given himself a civilized name, and proved furthermore that the &quot;Teacher of Righteousness&quot; bore the extremely common name of Jesus. (4) This Jesus was recognized as a christ, at least after his death, so the Essene savior must have been at least one of the models for the tales in the &quot;New Testament&quot; about a Jesus who was crucified about a hundred and twenty years later.<br />
<br />
The parallel was sufficient to make even dullards think, and Allegro's colleagues on the international team accused him of &quot;recklessness&quot; in publishing such a text; they ostracized him; and they denied him access to the other scrolls. I refuse to call those shysters 'scholars.' I have no doubt that they are thoroughly proficient as palaeographers and masters of the tricky dialectical variations of Aramaic and cognate languages, but with them, obviously, business comes first. They are Christian holy men: truth is not in them.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(1. By 1956, two substantially complete English translations of all the texts then edited were published in the United States and rather widely sold: Millar Burrows, The Dead Sea Scrolls (New York, Viking, 1955), and Theodor H. Gaster, The Dead Sea Scriptures (New York, Doubleday, 1956). I wrote a brief review of these, together with a worthless book by Edmund Wilson on the same subject, for National Review; it is reprinted in America's Decline, pp. 114 f. I do not pretend to be a scholar in this rather abstruse field, but I take some satisfaction in this review, written at a time when it was believed that the scrolls had been hidden in caves for safekeeping in anticipation of the Roman siege of Massada in A.D. 69-70. I was, so far as I know, the first to suggest that the real explanation of the storage of scrolls in caves could be found in the gospel called &quot;The Assumption of Moses,&quot; which was partly preserved in a Sixth-Century Latin translation, first published in 1861. I indulge my vanity by remarking that that is the explanation accepted and set forth by Allegro in The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth (p.78) and many other scholars.<br />
<br />
Another English translation of the Scrolls, which included two letters from the files of Jesus ben Gilgolah, was appended to the English translation of Gather Geza Vermes's Discovery in the Judean Desert (New York, Desclee, 1956,) which reached me loo late for inclusion in my review.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(2. His real name was first learned from these papyri: Simeon ben Kosbah. The designation &quot;bar Kokhba ['son of the Star']&quot; comes form the famous Rabbi Aqiba, the most influential of the many contemporaries who recognized the rebel as the long-awaited christ--until he (like earlier christs) failed, when they, in keeping with the racial habit, rebaptized him &quot;bar Kozibha [&quot;the son of lies'].&quot; The spelling of proper names varies considerably among various scholars and writers; e.g., 'Simeon' is more properly 'Simon' in some writers. I try to use here the forms that are most easily recognized. It must be remembered that we are dealing with a language in which only consonants were written and vowels are now supplied on the basis of various linguistic considerations. If I rendered the names exactly as they appear in the original and transliterated the letters into their Roman equivalents, the result would be a series of consonants that would puzzle everyone who is not a scholar in Aramaic and Hebrew. Incidentally, scholars were surprised to learn from the papyri that the insurrectionist made an attempt to revive the use of Hebrew as a racial language.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(3. Including the letter to Captain Jesus which mentions 'Galileans,' which many take to be one of the early references to Christians, but which could represent, e.g., a contingent of revolutionaries from Galilee. The reading of the crucial words is uncertain, so we do not know what that Jesus was supposed to do with or to the 'Galileans.')<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(4. This Jesus appears to have been one of the eight hundred revolutionary conspirators who were crucified by Alexander Jannaeus after he had suppressed their attempted revolt, which was begun while he was away with his army and busy butchering Semites in Asia Minor as industriously as his modern successors in the bandit state of Israel. The Essene Jesus, therefore, cannot have been the Jesus ben Pandera, a thaumaturge and agitator who at first imposed on Alexander's widow, Alexandra Helene (Salome), but lost her favor and was hanged in 70 B.C. (He is mentioned by Ralph Perier in Religion and Race, which was first published in Liberty Bell, November 1980, and is now available in a reprint from the magazine; Perier, following Dr. Larson, thought Jesus ben Pandera identical with the Essene &quot;Teacher,&quot; but the difference in dates of execution makes that impossible.) The Hanging of Jesus ben Pandera probably took the form of binding him to a stake or tree and letting him die slowly as his body was desiccated by the hot sunlight. This was the favorite mode of execution, and was supposed to be especially pleasing to Yahweh, who, when he was dictating the appalling catalogue of his whims to Moses, was careful to frame his language in such a way as to preclude the chance that some recreant Jew might show the contemptible weakness of Aryan dogs and in pity cut short the agonies of the poor wretch tied to the tree, who must be made to suffer to the last moment as he dies of thirst while his body is baked by the blistering sunlight of Palestine. Yahweh's directions were taken down by Moses verbatim and the stenographic record is found on one of the longer Dead Sea scrolls, which was bought by the Jews and has now been translated by Yigael Yadin, The Temple Scroll (New York, Random House, 1985). Yadin believes that this repulsive document was known to the early Christians, as is, of course, quite likely.<br />
<br />
Incidentally, Perier is certainly quite right in following Celsus and recognizing 'Pandera' as the Greek (and Latin) word panthera ('panther, leopard') and in thinking that Joseph, the Jew who was the father of this Jesus, took the civilized alias because it had acquired a certain dignity from Pantheras ('huntsman'), the personal name of Macedonian soldiers in the armies of the Seleucids. Near Bingen on the Rhine was found the sepulchral inscription of an archer in a Roman army who died there at the age of 62 after 40 years of service. His name was Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera and he came from the territory of Sidon in Phoenicia. The first two words are the Roman name he obligatorily took when he was given Roman citizenship; 'Abdes' is the Semitic name with which he was born, and 'Pant(h)era' is the personal name by which he was generally known to his friends and comrades. For the inscription, see Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum, XIII, 7514 = Dessau, Inscriptiones selectae, 2571.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
Allegro thinks it likely that the early Christians were conspirators who used gospel stories as camouflage to hide their real purposes, specially their efforts to undermine the Roman Empire, and one of his earlier works, The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross (New York, Doubleday, 1970), presents cogent evidence that they made abundant use of the Amanita muscaria, the mushroom that is one of the world's principal sources of religious inspiration and is portrayed in some early Christian frescoes as the Tree of Life. (5) That the Christians used the hallucinatory drug to induce divine visions and belief in their god is indubitable, but I must here mention evidence, evidently unknown to Allegro, that this source of faith remained in use until relatively recent times. I owe a generous friend specimens of ornaments [pictured in the original--ed.] that are abundantly used to decorate Christmas trees in Bavaria during the Christian celebration of the Winter Solstice.<br />
<br />
These representations of the Amanita muscaria on the trees that are used in Germanic celebrations of the supposed birth of the supposedly authentic king of the Jews, who was also a piece of their god, are proof that through the Middle Ages, at least, some Christians knew why the sacred mushroom is sacred. One wonders how much use was made of it by theologians as well as mystics. For example, during the controversy over transubstantiation, when wicked sceptics insisted that the bread and wine of the Eucharist tasted like bread and wine and not portions of a cannibalized god, a judicious infusion of the sacred fungus would have convinced the most incredulous that they were really taking a bite of their Jesus, magic meat that gave them all sorts of delightful visions of the wonders they would see and the fun they would have when they retired from this world of unpleasant reality. Not for nothing was the sacred mushroom called &quot;the flesh of the gods&quot; by many primitive peoples. (6)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(5. The Amanita muscaria is probably the most common of all sources of religious faith, although, of course, many other hallucinatory drugs have been used for the same purpose. As R. Gordon Wasson (see my next footnote) has proved, it was the soma of the Vedas, which inspired the religions of India and Persia and hence had an enormous influence on the formation of ideas about the supernatural in a very large part of the ancient world, including, of course, Christianity. The fungus induces vivid hallucinations (e.g., the Apocalypse that was selected for inclusion in the &quot;New Testament&quot;), but it must be remembered that, as Baudelaire observed, the hallucinations are produced by an imagination set free from the control of waking consciousness, and therefore the hallucinations, as in dreams and the &quot;recollections&quot; of previous lives elicited by hypnosis, can take their departure only from images and ideas that were in the mind before it was alienated by the drug. The Amanita muscaria produces divine revelations from ideas already present in the mind by recombining and magnifying them. Infusions of the natural poison in the fungus are not lethal, even in large doses, because they contain both muscarine and atropine, but the muscarine, which can be extracted by a simple chemical process, is almost always deadly, unless atropine is promptly administered as an antidote; that is why muscarine is sometimes used instead of arsenic to resolve domestic difficulties. The sacred mushroom must not be confused with the Amanita phalloides, the most deadly of all mushrooms.)<br />
<br />
(6. See The Flesh of Gods, the Ritual Use of Hallucinogens, a symposium edited by Peter T. Furst (New York, Praeger, 1972). The articles deal principally with the savages of the Western Hemisphere, but include a summary of Wasson's identification of soma. It is often supposed that the Amanita muscaria was used in the early Christian's &quot;Love-feast,&quot; called agape in Christian jargon. It would be a neat irony if, as is entirely possible, the idea of such &quot;love-feasts&quot; arose from the scribe's error when he, by a slip of his own pen or by misreading the text he was copying, wrote in the second letter forged in the name of Peter (2.13) _________ instead of __________ [cannot render to ASCII script; see original--Ed.], so that the meaning 'in their trick' was replaced by a word meaning 'in their loves,' which, being unintelligible in the context, was then assumed to designate 'love-feasts' in which the darling little Christians cuddled one another. (The copyists wrote Greek uncials, of course, in which the misreading would be even easier than in the capitals by which I have had to represent them, since uncial types are rare in modern printing.) The correct reading ('tricks') is preserved in some of the oldest manuscripts and is adopted in modern editions of the &quot;New Testament,&quot; The earliest datable reference to such &quot;love-feasts&quot; was made by Tertullian in his Apologeticum (39.16: &quot;cena nostra...id vocatur quod dilectio penes Graecos&quot;) written around 197 A.D. to claim, with a shyster lawyer's ingenuity, that Christians were innocent little lambs instead of political conspirators, as the Romans suspected (correctly, according to Allegro). The letter forged in the name of Peter had doubtless been concocted several decades before 197.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
Christian doctrine is deduced from the tales which Allegro believes to have been concocted as cover for the political conspiracy in which the cults or, at least, their leaders were secretly engaged. It is, of course, highly probable that Christianity was propagated as a conspiracy against the Roman Empire, as the historical evidence has always indicated. (7) It is significant that the scribbling of gospels seems not to have begun until quite some time after the year 112, (8) and the failure of the great Jewish conspiracy of 117, which finally gave conclusive evidence that old Yahweh couldn't argue with Roman Legions when they moved in. With the purposes and operation of that conspiracy, however, we need not concern ourselves here; a discussion of it would extend to an inordinate length, and we shall here consider only the exoteric doctrine.<br />
<br />
The Christian myths, as set forth in the gospels that were selected for inclusion in the &quot;New Testament,&quot; (9) are, as the Dead Sea Scrolls have now made indubitable, a sheaf of inconsistent narratives that represent the doctrines of the Jewish Essenes as modified by elements introduced to make them acceptable to goyim and to cover up their racial exclusiveness. It has long been a commonplace that Christianity is an Hellenized form of Judaism. The statement in that form has often been misleading.<br />
<br />
As Allegro bluntly says, no intelligent Greek or Roman could have believed those ridiculous tales. When we say that the Jewish notions were Hellenized, we mean that they were made acceptable to the multi-racial masses that were Hellenized by the conquests of Alexander the Great, after which the populations of all the Asiatic nations within his empire learned Greek, the language of civilization, to imitate the externals of Greek thinking and writing, and emulated the manners and customs of the Greek colonists who settled in their territories. They were no more Greek than English-speaking Hindus or Chinese are Englishmen. And under their veneer of Greek culture, they retained the mental proclivities of their various races and their propensity toward favorite superstitions, many of which had some superficial similarity to Greek myths. (10) The Greeks, like the Romans after them, were too intelligent to become fanatical about ghost stories; they were primarily interested in the real world, and while they in general thought it likely that gods did exist, they rationally saw that no one could know how many gods there were or what gods might exist in any given place. They were willing to tolerate and respect any cult, however absurd, so long as it did not menace them, and their Hellenized subjects developed all sorts of weird blends of native superstitions with Greek externals.<br />
<br />
When Christianity was being peddled to the proletariat in the Roman Empire, intelligent Greeks and Romans would have been merely amused by its bizarre doctrines. A god who stupidly got himself crucified and then arose from the dead and sneaked out of town? Well, every town in Asia Minor had its own local god, identified as an aspect of a Greek god or at least given a name that sounded Greek, and worshipped by the townsmen as the &quot;greatest of the gods&quot; (megistos t&quot;n the&quot;n), and some of them were almost ridiculous. Women are nasty creatures that should be avoided as much as possible? Well, the damned fools are depriving themselves of one of the great joys of life, but it would be a waste of breath to try to talk sense to the perverted idiots who are harming only themselves.<br />
<br />
Greeks and Romans, except a few neurotics, the tares of the race, who always try to attract attention by professing some grotesque eccentricity, would have had only an amused contempt for Christian doctrine, but by the middle of the Second Century, when the slightly disguised Jewish cult was being vended by apostles of ignorance, there were few Greeks and Romans left. They had destroyed themselves by miscegenation, internecine wars, and that fatuous tolerance with which they permitted themselves to be displaced by their subjects and slaves.<br />
<br />
The populations of the European provinces were Aryan and racially compatible. To Italy came Celtiberians from Spain, Germanic and Celtic peoples from Gaul, Germans from the western part of Germany. But they were outnumbered and outwitted by hordes that were unalterably alien. To Rome from northern Africa came Berbers and Semites; from Egypt, degenerate Greeks and Hamitic mongrels, many of them bearing some taint of Black blood; from Asia, partly Greek hybrids, Semites, and all the fermenting mixture of the racial compost heap that Asia Minor had become; and, of course, to the capital of the ancient world flocked the ubiquitous Jews. (11)<br />
<br />
The Hellenized aliens from the East spoke Greek and were the Graeculi of Cicero's sarcasms and Juvenal's satires; they multiplied and squeezed the Romans out of their own country. As Juvenal said, the mud that was drained out of Syria had polluted the Tiber; Rome had ceased to be Roman even in his time.<br />
<br />
The Orientals brought with them their own racial superstitions (&quot;Credat Iudaeus Apella, non ego, said Horace: a sexuality mutilated Jew may believe such stuff, but I can't); and they brought with them their cunning in peddling their superstitions to cheat the unwary. The Asiatic rabble could become Roman only in name. (12) Beneath a superficial acquaintance with Greek culture lay, innate and ineradicable, the slave mentality, devoid of self-respect, perfidious and obsequious to its masters, born to cringe and swindle, craving the despotism under which it flourishes. And with the slave mentality went the Sklaven-Moral which, as Nietzsche saw, was the essence of Christianity.<br />
<br />
The barbaric new religion, adroitly promoted by its professional holy men with the covert support of the Jews, (13) naturally appealed to the mongrel proletariat of the rotting empire with its talk of love and brotherhood to cover its hatred of all superiority, of civilization itself. It was to &quot;make folly of the wisdom of this world,&quot; thus negating all learning, all culture, and repudiating reason itself. It promised to envy and malice that the rich and prosperous would be tortured in Hell forever and forever, if they did not now make paupers of themselves, to the profit of the ranting witch-doctors. To the dregs of the Empire that was Roman only in name, Christianity was what catnip is to cats.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(7. The Romans were an eminently practical people who tried to disturb the native cultures of their various subjects as little as possible and certainly were not in the least interested in whatever silly superstitions the natives liked to believe. They tolerated all sorts of cults as absurd as Christianity and would have tolerated it, if they had not had good grounds for believing it to be politically subversive. Most of the evidence for the conspiratorial activities of the Christians has been lost together with the historical works in which it was recorded, which the Fathers of the Church were undoubtedly anxious to destroy as soon as they had cunningly climbed to political power. Their wish to find some evidence for the existence to their organized superstition as an impossibly earlier date preserved the record of the Jewish Bolsheviks who confessed to having set the great fire that destroyed much of Rome in A.D. 64, and who, together with their confederates, were condignly executed by Nero, although with deplorable cruelty. Those Bolsheviks were called Chrestiani at Rome, just as Marxists today take their name from the name assumed by the Jew who devised their superstition. A Jew who bore the Greek name Chrestos had incited among the Jews who had swarmed into Rome a riot or attempted revolt so formidable that the troops had to be called in to suppress it in the time of Claudius, so the followers of his revolutionary doctrine and conspiracy were naturally called Chrestiani and they obviously constituted a latent menace with which the responsible Roman government had to deal. Whether the Chrestiani eventually disguised themselves as Christiani or the latter were a separate cult is made uncertain by the loss of the relevant evidence. Tertullian, who was as brazen a liar as any of the Fathers, admitted that his Christiani were the same cult as the Chrestiani, but had the effrontery to claim that the latter were so called from the meaning of the Greek common noun, chrestos ('useful, efficient, trustworthy'), because they were such excellent citizens!)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(8. If the Christians who were interrogated by Pliny in Bithynia in 112 or the following year had had any written gospels, they would certainly have produced them in support of their claim that they were just innocent, law-abiding, innocuous members of the lower classes. Pliny was a kindly man, who like to think the best of everyone, and they did succeed in convincing him they were guilty of nothing but a debased and preposterous superstition, which was beneath the notice of a Roman government, and he was gratified when he saw that the cult lost its popularity after he took judicial notice of it. His letter, probably written in 113, is the earliest historical evidence for the existence of Christians (as distinguished form Chrestiani). The learned Leon Herrmann has argued that Pliny's famous letter was grossly interpolated, if not forged, by the later Christians to whitewash their cult (see his Chrestos, Bruxells, Latomus, 1970), but Herrmann is prone to extravagant theses of all kinds, and I do not find his arguments convincing. I regard the letter as genuine, since the Christians' apologies for their cult are precisely what they would allege in such circumstances, and if they had secrets, they were able to prevent Pliny from finding proof of them. (There is a serious textual corruption in Chapter 10 of the letter, but this is not the place to discuss emendation of it.) In his reply to Pliny's letter, Trajan clearly believes that the Christian cult covers a subversive conspiracy, but that most of the Christians are just ignorant and probably inoffensive proletarians who will come to their senses and leave the cult, if governmental action is directed only against the contumacious leaders, who probably are conscious conspirators. The analogy with Communism today is obvious. The text of Pliny's letter depends on a Sixth-Century manuscript of which only copies now survive, so it is quite possible that, as Professor Renahan has argued, Pliny's spelling of the word was Chrestiani.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(9. This is a necessary proviso, for obviously Allegro did not intend to consider, and we cannot here consider, the vast number of other gospels, most of which the Fathers of the Church succeeded in destroying when they got control and could start the savage persecutions that so delight Christian hearts. It is noteworthy that many of the Christian cults thus suppressed with fire and sword were overtly anti-Jewish ('Nazis,' no doubt!) and rejected the horrible god of the &quot;Old Testament.&quot; Their myths were necessarily quite different. Marcion, for example, had letters attributed to Paul, who seems to have been the Jew who started peddling the Jewish cult to goyim, but his letters must have differed from the letters in the &quot;New Testament&quot; written under Paul's name by a committee that was in general agreement about the line they were to follow. The committee's work, however, is probably the oldest part of the &quot;New Testament,&quot; for they seem to have worked before the leading gospels were composed, possibly even before A.D. 100 and certainly before c. 150. The earlier dates commonly given in reference works come from theologians and others who try or profess to believe as much of the Christian tradition as has not yet been exposed in detail as sheer mendacity.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(10. The learned Michael C. Astour, in a very erudite work, Hellenosemitica (Leisden, Brill, 1967), traces many Greek myths to Semitic prototypes and thinks he has accomplished great things. What he overlooks or ignores is the fundamental difference in mentality between the two races. If, for example, we grant that the Semitic belief he cites suggested the well-known myth of Zeus and Io, the similarity between the stories is less than the contrast. In the Semitic version, the supreme god, Baal, admires a cow, copulates with her, and engenders a son. In the Greek myth, Zeus seduces a beautiful princess, but transforms her temporarily into a heifer to conceal her from the jealously of Hera, who, however, is not deceived and sends a gadfly to drive the heifer to Egypt. In Egypt, Io recovers her human form, gives birth to Zeus's child, and herself becomes the Egyptian goddess Hathor, i.e., a woman who retains of the bovine shape only the horns on her head (which, in the Egyptian iconography, held the solar disk between them, as was appropriate for a goddess of the sky.) The myth is obviously a syncretistic fancy, not a religious belief. Christians, their minds twisted by having to believe somehow that the wild tales in their holy book actually happened and are historical truth, find it difficult to understand the more rational religion of Greece and Rome, which acknowledged the existence of certain gods who were personifications of natural phenomena, but never believed that the myths about the personal conduct of those gods were history or more than exercises of the imagination, which any poet or story-teller was free to revise or invent to suit his fancy or his literary purpose. (By the way, if you are interested in determining whether or not the Jews originally thought of their Yahweh as having the form or the head of an onager (wild ass), you should note as possibly relevant what Astour says on p.86 about the primary meaning of the Hebrew word in Genesis 16.12.))<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(11. By 179 B.C. the Jews had become so numerous in Rome and so active in spreading corruption and crime that P. Cornelius Scipio Hispalus, when he was Urban Pretor, tried to expel all of the Jews who had neglected to acquire Roman citizenship, but it is likely that for every one that he threw out of the front door, two crawled over the back fence, and the Jews were able to prevent his successors in that office from continuing the patriotic policy. In Cicero's time, the Jews in Rome were able to produce economic crises and profit from them, and to instigate, under various pretexts, political prosecution of provincial governors who impeded their spoliations. They naturally fostered subversion of the Republic and were, for their own purposes, devoted to Julius Caesar, whose revolution destroyed it. They bewailed his death as a calamity to their race, but of course, doubtless used it to gain more power and loot during the Civil Wars that followed it.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(12. Christian ideology, even more than Christian lies, long distorted our perception of even the established facts of Roman history. Consider, for example, the recently republished book by Alexander Del Mar, The Middle Ages Revisited, or The Roman Government and Religion and their Relations to Britain (London, 1899, Hawthorpe, California, Omni, s.a. [1984]). It begins: &quot;The corner-stone of the Empire was the worship of Octavius [sic] Caesar as the Son of God, Divus [sic, for 'Divi'] Filius. Augustus was worshipped not as a hero or demi-god, but as a Messiah, an incarnation of the Deity,...sent on earth...in pursuance of a heavenly design, which was to bring peace on earth, heal the wounds and iniquities of the past, restore the Golden Age to Latium, and fulfill the prophesies of the Cumaean Sibyl.&quot; Nonsense! To begin with, the statement is largely based on Vergil's famous fourth eclogue, which had nothing to do with Octavian (who, at that time, was only second in the Triumvirate and scheming to knock out his colleagues). The poem, which must be read in its context, a collection of poems dealing with the dream-world of the pastorals, is a fantasy that reflects extravagant hopes for an end to the Civil Wars that had racked and half-destroyed three generations of Romans. It is a romantic transfiguration of the hopes that contemporaries were able to cherish for a year or two, that domestic peace would at last be inaugurated by the fusion of rival ambitions in a son to be born of Mark Antony and Octavian's sister, Ocatavia. (On the identity of the child, see W.W. Tarn in the Journal of Roman Studies, XXII (1932), pp. 132 ff.) The confusion began when Eusebius, one of the most wily and mendacious of the Fathers of the Church, probably told his fellow directors of the business, &quot;Let's tell the suckers that Vergil's fourth eclogue was a prediction of our Jesus: that'll wow'em!&quot; He then proceeded to put that imposture in the mouth of Constantine, to whom he attributed it in one of his orations. The hoax was so successful that it was still taken seriously by educated men (e.g., Alexander Pope) in the Eighteenth Century.<br />
<br />
There is nothing Jewish and &quot;messianic&quot; about the eclogue, which merely complemented the pleasing illusions of the pastoral poems that surround it. Redeunt Saturnia regna: we shall return to the simple and honest life of the shepherds in the Golden Age, before men became corrupted by greed and ambition. There is no nonsense about Salvation and the postmortem joys of spooks made immortal by magic.<br />
<br />
What is more serious, is the total misconception of religion and government at Rome. At Rome, Octavian, even after he attained sole power, had to content himself with the ambiguous title 'Augustus' and a tradition that the Julian family, into which he had been adopted, owed its origin, eight hundred years before, to a hero who was the child of a mortal man and goddess. And at Rome, Octavian Augustus exerted himself to make it seem that he was only the First Citizen of Rome, a man charged with administering the true will of the Roman people. At Rome, he never dared to pretend to superhuman distinction, but in Egypt he was a god ex officio, being the successor of the Egyptian rulers who are now called pharaohs because the ignorant Jew who composed the silly and well-known tale about Moses in the Jew-book didn't know what the Egyptian word meant and was too lazy to find out. Like Egyptian rules, the monarchs of the early Orient, especially the Semites, liked to impress their ignorant subjects by posing as Sons of Gods and Gods themselves, and after the conquests of Alexander, the Greek-speaking Orientals were glad to flatter any ruler by calling him a god and worshipping him, and they naturally worshipped Roman emperors, and tried to worship even Roman governors, in the hope that the adulation would bring them some baksheesh.<br />
<br />
It is true that after his death, Augustus was deified by a transparent hoax that made Romans chuckle, and the newly created divinity was placated by the Augustales, a kind of priesthood that was instituted for freedmen and others whose low birth prevented them from attaining any of the respectable quasi-religious distinctions.<br />
<br />
It became customary to deify emperors who were adroit enough to die in their beds, and the cynical Vespasian died with a jest on his lips, &quot;Hell! I guess I'm becoming a god!&quot; And for a very long time the rulers of Rome, though great gods in the Orient, had to content themselves with a post-mortem apotheosis that was no more deceptive to rational men than the mummery of the elaborate funerals, at which a caged eagle was placed atop the high funeral pyre and, when the flames mounted, released and, as he flew aloft, identified as the soul of the deceased on its way to Heaven. Deification was a kind of posthumous honor that at Rome the Senate awarded to emperors who had deserved it or had successors who extorted it. During their lifetimes, prudent emperors before the time of Diocletian, no matter how absolute their power, at Rome claimed to be only principes and imperatores: the ruler was only First Citizen and General of the Armies.<br />
<br />
But would you guess the facts from Del Mar's generalization, which I quoted above, or what you will find in comparable works?)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(13. It cannot be a coincidence that the brand of Christianity that the Fathers put over was one which lugged with it the &quot;Old Testament&quot; and identified Yahweh, the big Jew up in the clouds, as the Christian god, or that the first concern of the fathers, as soon as they got their hands on governmental power, was to exterminate the Marconists, the Manichaeans, and all the other Christian sects that refused to accept as their god the fiend of the &quot;Old Testament.&quot; By utilizing some passages in the gospels that sprang from antagonism between rival Jewish factions and stigmatized opponents as a &quot;synagogue of Satan,&quot; the Fathers could serve the Jews by promoting a factitious antagonism between the Jews and their Judaized goyim. That was simply in keeping with the Hegelian principle of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. It was comparable to the factitious animosity between &quot;Trotskyites&quot; and &quot;Stalinists,&quot; between &quot;Communists&quot; and &quot;Capitalists,&quot; between &quot;Fabian&quot; and &quot;Soviet Socialists,&quot; and currently between the government in Washington and the one in Moscow. Such spurious animosities, which are genuine enough among the small fry, serve to keep the victims confused and to conceal the direction of both factions by the same occult power behind both. In the Roman Empire, the Christians served as a perfect screen for the Jews, whom they professed to hate, thus conciliating the sympathies and soliciting the adherence of all the people of every other race who naturally hated the Jews, and at the same time keeping the attention of the Roman government focused on the Christians while the Jews professed to be innocent of all revolutionary designs.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
The facts of race explain the success of the Christian sect headed by the Fathers of the Church in taking over the decaying Roman Empire. We have a different racial problem when we ask why our Germanic ancestors, the barbarians who invaded and conquered the western half of that empire, succumbed to the same epidemic.<br />
<br />
The most pervasive arguments for Christianity were the monuments of greatness that the sect had not destroyed: the great Roman roads, the amazing bridges and aqueducts, the amphitheatres, the massive baths and other edifices, the sculpture and painting that had escaped proletarian righteousness, the literature that could by its sonority delight even those who could not understand it, the elaborate system of laws and social organization, the technology which was faltering but still impressive, and the tactics and discipline that made formidable armies recruited largely from the Germanic barbarians. All these achievements the marvelling invaders credited to the Christians, who also adapted ancient showmanship to their own impressive ceremonies.<br />
<br />
The Northern mythologies, although they reached sublimity in their grim pessimism and prevision of the Gotterdammerung, were, like the Classical, inventions of poetic imaginations in their reports of the activities of the various gods, obviously fanciful and subject to revision by the skalds who recited them or alluded to them. Some were overtly unbelievable, (14) and many, unlike the Classical myths, were so crude and grotesque that they may have been devised to excite ribald laughter rather than to charm by a sensuous grace. (15) They could not be, and did not purport to be, reports of ascertained fact.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(14. E.g., the famous story that Heimdall created the human race by successively visiting three households and enabling the wives to conceive, whether by their husbands or himself is not clear. The story is obviously a fanciful account of two successive Aryan migrations into a land occupied by Lapps. Heimdall, by the way, did better than Jesus: he was born, not of just one, but of nine virgins (meyja), which, you must admit, is nine times as miraculous.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(15. E.g. the trick played on Odin, who drank from a horn connected with the sea and was able to gulp down only part of the ocean, or the adventures of Thor when he put on a skirt and women's ornaments and pretended to be a blushing bride. (I suppose he shaved first!))<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
In opposition to the Northern religions, the Christians were able to offer the collection of pseudo-historical fiction called the Bible, which despite its many internal contradictions, purports to be a record of ascertained facts, history as distinct from mythology.<br />
<br />
It seemed to be true history, written down in an enormous book and in a language, much more cultivated and exact than Norse, which the holy men could read, and it referred to places in the real world, such as Rome and Egypt, of which everyone had heard, and to historical persons, such as Augustus, who had ruled the empire that had once ruled the world. And if the terrible god whose deeds were recorded in imperishable writing by eye-witnesses, behaved capriciously, unjustly, and brutally, so, according to traditions that had been handed down by word of mouth in many versions, had Odin; and if the Christians' old god had an eccentric son, who chose to sacrifice himself to himself, why Odin had done that, too -- so some verse-singer said, who didn't name a time and place, as the written history did so precisely!<br />
<br />
One can understand why our ancestors took the bait offered them by the zealous Christian missionaries, some of whom were prestidigitators who could demonstrate magic, and all of whom were skilled in dialectical subtleties and the clever sophistries of theologians. Then there was the practical side, too. If you got yourself spattered with magic water and ate a filet de J‚sus washed down with some of his divinely invigorating blood, you, if you had a good army, could invade the land of some pagans or, better yet, heretics, and the Christians' god would help you, if your army was much larger and better equipped, and you could not only carry off a lot of booty and have a lot of fun plundering for the Lord, but you would be lavishly rewarded for your piety when you zipped up to Heaven after death. That was a real bargain. Odin never gave you a deal like that!<br />
<br />
It happens all the time. Nice people, their minds aglow with all the nice things the fast-talking salesman has told them, sign of the dotted line, without reading the two pages of small print. Our simple-minded ancestors mortgaged their future and ours without knowing what they had done. And those remote ancestors never suspected what they had done. Jewish holiness was imposed on our people only slowly, much as the American boobs today are being subjected to Soviet-type Communism by easy stages and never guess how each little surrender of personal liberty to achieve some righteous purpose tightens the bonds they put upon themselves, and do not even now perceive that they have already made themselves virtually helpless.<br />
<br />
Christianity was imposed on the barbarian &quot;converts&quot; gradually. At first, it was only a matter of learning to say &quot;Christ&quot; (supposed to be the personal name of a god) instead of &quot;Thor,&quot; and to fee a different priest. Established customs and conventions were not radically changed but slowly eroded. Transgressors of the new rules were at first told, &quot;You really shouldn't, but if you will do penance by paying for a new altar in the church, we'll make it all right with the boss.&quot; It was not until the monopoly of the international holiness business was broken by Protestant competitors that a strict enforcement of the &quot;Thou shalt not&quot; rules was attempted.<br />
<br />
The erosion of our racial mentality can be neatly summarized by noting three stages from &quot;paganism&quot; to the present. If you invade a country because you want to take it over for your own people and annex it, your act may not be prudent, but it is at least honest. If you invade a territory to occupy and annex it because you know that Jesus is of the same substance as his daddy and want to save the souls of the poor wretches who will be fried for all eternity if they continue to hold to the damnable opinion that Jesus's substance is only like his papa's, well, you have become a pious hypocrite and may even endanger your own sanity by lying to yourself, but at least you get the territory after you have killed enough of the miscreants to convince them you know more about the physiology of gods. But if you invade a country you do not intend to annex, and impoverish your own nation genetically by squandering the lives of your young men, and economically by wasting its resources, just to slaughter enough of another country's inhabitants to redeem them from the sins of Arminianism or Militarism or Nationalism and to convince them of the superior righteousness of your &quot;democracy,&quot; you may succeed in sacrificing your own people to impose your brand of holiness on people who don't want it, but you have become a homicidal maniac and menace to all the rest of the world. And such insanity is the terminal phase of the disease our ancestors ignorantly contracted so many centuries ago.<br />
<br />
One could fill many volumes by tracing the decay of our racial mentality, but one example will suffice.<br />
<br />
In the seventeenth Century a considerable number of Englishmen, who had read the Jew-book until their minds were so warped they couldn't get along with their neighbors in England, migrated to what is now New England. We have all heard about the &quot;stern and rockbound coast&quot; and the land they made &quot;holy ground&quot; by their determination to worship their god in their own way, and it is true that they bore many hardships bravely and that, although they wasted some time by preaching to Indians instead of killing them, they did acquire the territory they wanted. They are said to have shown a certain admirable commercial honesty, although it is not clear how that is to be reconciled to the reputation of Yankees as being second only to Jews in diddling unwary customers. The Puritans had an especially Judaic form of Christianity, but so long as they were content to harass only each other with their righteousness, we have no reason for censuring them. De gustibus and all that.<br />
<br />
The Puritans, however, soon felt the religious itch to spread their holiness by meddling in other people's affairs, and they doubtless have some responsibility for accelerating the progress of the disease in this country and bringing it to the stage of high fever and delirium. When their malice and envy was excited by the prosperity and culture of the southern states and, no doubt, the contrast between the climate of the South and the harsh winters of the bleak land they had chosen for themselves, their Christian lust to destroy became acute, and from New England came the plague of Abolitionists, who hypocritically pretended love for niggers to cover their yearning to impoverish and ruin the South.<br />
<br />
The hate-crazed fanatics were eventually able to instigate an armed invasion of the Southern states, with, of course, the clandestine but powerful help of the Jews, who know how to profit richly from every disaster to the nation in which they have lodged themselves. And they do so righteously, for, as all Christians know, old Yahweh promised (Exod. 23.27-30 et passim) to help his pet bandits destroy every people whose territory they infiltrate, and to do it by stages until the Jews have multiplied sufficiently to take the whole territory for themselves.<br />
<br />
I shall now quote three pages from the booklet, The Black Death, by Andrew Grayson, which, reproduced photographically from typewritten copy, has been distributed by the Southern National Party.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
     <br />
<br />
    Beginning in the early years of the 19th Century and rising to a crescendo by mid-century, a veritable theology of hate came to be espoused in the North Meetings were held throughout the Northern states--especially in New England--and from the pulpits, rostrums, stumps, and public halls enemies of the South called for a grand crusade of extermination against the Southern people.<br />
<br />
    Lamar Fontaine, C.E., Ph.D., of Lyons, Mississippi, who lived through Reconstruction, wrote: &quot;Thus it was that for two years after the close of the Great War [the War of Southern Independence] in every hamlet and convention hall in the North thousands of preachers, orators, and teachers dinned into the ears of the listening multitudes their fiendish venom until a wild wave of fanatical, insane New England Puritan hate swept like an East Indian hurricane over the entire North... Then a species of Negro insanity raged among the Negrophiles of the New England states and it too spread like a prairie fire and took possession of the unthinking masses. Books and pamphlets fell from the New England presses like hail from a passing cloud. Men and women, from the pulpit and rostrum, advocated the mixing of the Negro and the White races and the establishment of a Negro Republic in the South after its conquered people had first been destroyed and the land rendered, as Parson Brownlow expressed, 'as God found it, without form and void.' &quot;<br />
<br />
    Within eight hours of U.S. President Lincoln's death, a caucus of radical Republicans under Thaddeus Stevens went to work setting into motion the evil machination which would come to be called &quot;Radical Reconstruction&quot;--an experience which would be lasered into the mind, heart, soul, and fibre of the Southland and her people forever.<br />
<br />
    During the era of rabid, all-consuming hate, Henry Ward Beecher asserted: &quot;The Negro is superior to the White race. If the latter do not forget their pride and color, and amalgamate with the purer and richer blood of the Blacks, they will die out and wither away in unprolific skinniness.&quot;<br />
<br />
    Judge Salmon P. Chase, a member of Lincoln's Cabinet, paid a visit to the South after the surrender. Returning home, he said: &quot;I found the Whites a worn out, effete race, without vigor, mental or physical. On the contrary, the Negroes are alive, alert, and full of energy. I predict in 25 years the Negroes of the South will be at the head of all affairs, political, religious, the arts and sciences.&quot;<br />
<br />
    From the pulpit of Beecher's church, Wendell Phillips delivered the following words: &quot;You may plant a fort in every district of the South, you may take possession of her capitols and hold them with your armies, but you have not begun to subdue her people. I know it means something like absolute barbarian conquest, but I do not believe there will be any peace until 347,000 men of the South are either hanged or exiled.&quot;<br />
<br />
    At a New York convention, Parson William G. Brownlow, one-time Carpetbag governor of Tennessee, said: &quot;If I had the power, I would arm every wolf, panther, catamount, and bear in the mountains of america, every crocodile in the swamps of Florida, every Negro in the South, and every devil in Hell, clothe them in the uniform of the Federal Army and turn them loose on the Rebels of the South and exterminate every man, woman and child south of Mason and Dixon's Line. I would like to see Negro troops, under the command of (U.S. General Benjamin F.) Butler, crowd every rebel into the Gulf of Mexico and drown them as the Devil did the hogs in the Sea of Galilee.&quot;<br />
<br />
    In another spot Brownlow said: &quot;I am one who believes the war ended too soon. We have whipped the South, but not enough. The loyal masses [of the North]...intend to march again on the South, and they intend this [second] war shall be no child's play. The second army will, as [it] ought to, make the entire South as God found the Earth--without form, and void.&quot;<br />
<br />
    Following Brownlow's speech, Governor Yates of Illinois rose from his seat and said: &quot;Illinois furnished 250,000 troops to fight the South, and now we are ready to furnish 500,000 more to finish the good work.&quot;<br />
<br />
    Even as late as 1875--ten years after the end of the war--William Gray, Mississippi Governor Ames' right-hand man, &quot;assailed the Whites before his Colored audiences asserting that the Republicans would win [the next election] even if it were necessary 'to kill every White man, woman, and child in the state.'&quot;<br />
<br />
    With the support and approval of such fine Christian men--expressing as they were such beautiful sentiments of humanitarian compassion and brotherhood--the Congress of the United States of America forged ahead in pursuit of fulfilling these Yankee dreams of morbid utopia. The Union President, Andrew Jackson, and the Union Supreme Court were castrated and nullified in quick succession, and the Republican Party, which was for all intents and purposes the government of the United States of America, set about constructing a stacked deck in every southern state, built upon a solid base of Negroes, and enforced by federal bayonets. Behind even the pettiest local Carpetbagger, Scallawag, or Negro, there stretched an obscene hierarchy leading to the very highest layers of the government of the United States of America; a hierarchy which encompassed all local and state government including the governor and the Federal government, including the Army, the Congress, and, after the election of 1868, the President of the United States of America.<br />
<br />
    The institution of radical Reconstruction marked the beginning of the largest, most malicious and most malignant social, political, and racial experiment in the history of the Northern European White race up to that time. It was a premeditated program of economic colonialism, social and political Africanization, and racial and national genocide.<br />
<br />
    Never before had one White government, people, or nation sought to subjugate another White people or nation, and make of that second nation a colony to be bled bone dry, rather than employing the standard practice of developing a colony into a source of long-term return on investments.<br />
<br />
    THIS the Government of the United States of America DID.<br />
<br />
    Never before had one White government, people, or nation sought to place the whole multi-million population of another White people or nation under the heel, rule, and tyranny of a non-White people.<br />
<br />
    THIS the Government of the United States of America DID.<br />
<br />
    And never before had one White government, people, nation sought to place another White people or nation in a position of absolute defencelessness so as to enable and ensure that the second White people or nation would be bred and butchered out of existence by a non-White people or race.<br />
<br />
    THIS the Government of the United States of America DID.<br />
<br />
    Under this malevolent experiment, the South very nearly perished in a maelstrom of hate and corruption, terror, and vampirism. As it took shape, this toxic policy exposed to the South an indescribably evil fact of the U.S. Government; a facet which the U.S. Government would keep hidden from the rest of the Union, and from the world, for another seven to ten decades; a facet which would spread during those seven to ten decades until it came to dominate every other facet of the U.S. Government and deeply influence its every thought and act, its every policy and deed.<br />
<br />
    The government of the United States of America was to become to the South what Attila the Hun had been to the nations of Eastern Europe: &quot;The Scourge of God.&quot; Had the South intentionally conjured up the worst possible enemy imaginable, it could not have invented one worse than the government of the United States, not even in its most fevered dreams and nightmares.<br />
     <br />
     <br />
     <br />
<br />
<br />
You will have noticed that in the foregoing excerpts from Mr. Grayson's booklet, all of the screams of righteous blood-lust that he quotes were uttered after the conclusion of an iniquitous war in which the aggressors also suffered, although their homes were not destroyed and their country made desolate. About a million men were killed or grievously wounded (losing arms or legs or suffering other permanent injuries) in that catastrophe--approximately 21% of all men of military age in both the North and the South, and 60% in the South alone. That was not enough blood to slake the lusts of the diseased creatures he quotes.<br />
<br />
Let me particularly and emphatically call your attention to the fact that none of the homicidal maniacs he quotes was a Jew, and, so far as can be determined, none of them had a drop of Jewish blood. They were all Anglo-Saxons whose minds had been rotted by a disease as deadly as kuru and more disastrous, for it did not prevent them from gesticulating and talking and inducing nitwits to listen to them as with foaming mouths they raved in their pulpits or university chairs or the governmental offices to which fools elected them. What was even more disastrous, they infected with their loathsome disease generations of men and women of our race, whose multitudinous descendants you hear every day as they howl about &quot;brotherhood&quot; and &quot;civil rights&quot; and, whether consciously or subconsciously, obey their murderous yearning to exterminate the race to which they and we belong.<br />
<br />
If any of the quotations in the excerpt above astonished you, remember that for generations venal &quot;American historians&quot; most of them also Anglo-Saxons, have been as ready as the Fathers of the Church to lie and forge for sweet righteousness's sake, and &quot;educators&quot; have injected their lies into the minds of school children, who are told about our glorious &quot;Civil War&quot; and how noble it was to emancipate those darling savages by killing so many of the young men who included the best blood of our race and thus genetically impoverishing our nation and our race forever.<br />
<br />
As a result of that great catastrophe, the level of intelligence in America sank so low that, instead of learning from the terrible Holy War against the South, hordes of nitwits rushed to Europe in 1917 and 1941 to fight more insane Holy Wars and destroy what was left of civilization.<br />
<br />
It is true that the American herds were stampeded into those frantic jihads by the Jews, but let me remind you again that while you may deplore or resent the Jews' manipulations of our people, you cannot reasonably condemn them for advancing the interests of their race by all means authorized by their racial morality. If you belong to a race that is now so far inferior to the Jews that it does not even want to defend itself, it was your misfortune to be born into a species that is joyfully headed for extinction.<br />
<br />
If our race was not made inferior to other races by its evolutionary origins--and its accomplishments for some centuries makes that seem unlikely--it must have been made so by an epidemic disease. And if you trace that plague back to its ultimate source, you find it in the sect of Jewish fanatics whose morbific godliness was recorded in the Dead Sea Scrolls, most of which, as John Allegro charges, are now being hidden from you by Christian holy men in the interests of the corporate swindles to which they belong. Enough has been published, however, to prove that the Essenes' grotesque doctrines, mixed with other Oriental delusions to conceal its racial animus, produced the mental poison, commonly called righteousness, that paralysed in our race the instincts that are a race's immune system, its racial will to live, to survive and increase and dominate.<br />
<br />
So now, when Christians try to tell you how glorious was the victory of their cults over 'paganism,&quot; and what a blessing Christianity has been to us, answer them by quoting the words of their own god, &quot;By their fruits ye shall know them.&quot;<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
THE RIGHTEOUSNESS SYNDROME<br />
<br />
In the foregoing comments I suggested that the celebrated Bishop Eusebius may have invented the canard about Vergil's (1) fourth eclogue and, as the proud inventor, may have told a close coadjutor, &quot;Let's put it over on the suckers.&quot; The reader will not need to be told that while Eusebius is, so far as I know, the first to have recorded the hokum in a writing that has come down to our time. I have no evidence that it was really he who first devised it. The clever idea may first have occurred to some clever evangelist who propagated it orally or in some pious scribble now lost, and Eusebius may have taken it from that now unknown vendor of otherworldly dreams.<br />
<br />
As for the words that I attribute to Eusebius (who would, of course, have spoken the decadent Greek that was the common language of the fathers), they may be too candid. He might have conveyed the idea with circumlocution, such as was used by Clement in a letter that, to the consternation of our Christian contemporaries, was partly preserved and discovered in a remote monastery by Professor Morton Smith. (2) In the letter, S. Clement says, in substance, &quot;We holy men have a duty to conceal the facts and lie to our congregations, under oath if necessary, perjuring ourselves to help disseminate the True Faith.&quot; That was certainly as much as it was prudent to put down in writing, even in a private letter. In conversation with a close associate, the Saint might have used the same words, accompanying them with a wink, or, so far as we can tell now, feeling so full of righteousness that he thought the statement self-evident. Likewise, we have no means of knowing whether Eusebius knew that he was a scoundrel or was buoyed up by a conviction of his own righteousness. That is a problem in psychology that is ordinarily insoluble.<br />
<br />
As for Thaddeus Stevens (3) and other rabid beasts whose howls for White blood were quoted above, it is possible or even likely that most of them felt themselves Apostles of the Lord and just sizzling with righteousness. Such mental states are common in evangelical religions and may be termed 'the righteousness syndrome.'<br />
<br />
It is the form of mental alienation that occurs when an individual's overheated imagination convinces him that he has become a satellite or lieutenant of a powerful and terrible god, who has instructed him to &quot;preach the gospel to every creature&quot; and thus make the whole world conform to that god's will, which, by a happy coincidence, coincides with the individual's own innate or acquired itches and appetites. The preaching of the god's spiel is, of course, a device for effecting social changes that the promoters do not have the power to impose by force. (4) And since the changes supposedly represent the will of god, promotion of them is imagined to be righteous, whence, of course, it follows that opposition to them is wickedness, which must be suppressed by all means, which, whatever they are, are righteous since they promote righteousness, which supersedes all natural morality. And, needless to say, a little ego, inflated by the god's spiel, expands like the envelope of a simple balloon as it is filled with hot air.<br />
<br />
Gospels do effect changes. When they are promulgated, they carry conviction only to adults whose proclivities and desires they flatter, but when they are administered to children in their formative years, when growing minds are still unformed and their innate powers will be developed only by a kind of mental adolescence in later years, the gospels, inculcated by fear of the terrible supernatural monster whose will they are supposed to represent, commonly so distort the child's understanding that he becomes an adult whose mentality is limited by the hokum that molded it. Thus gospels persistently administered to children for generation after generation can and do produce drastic changes in nations and races that may eventually simulate a biological evolution.<br />
<br />
The righteousness syndrome is, of course, characteristic of Christians. It has been their inspiration from the first, and they often describe it in terms of a muddled sentiment they call &quot;love.&quot; (5) This usually takes the form of a morbid doting on everything that is inferior, debased, diseased, and degenerate, which is simply the obverse of a proletarian rancor against all physical, mental, or moral superiority. It is a festering lust for equality, which, as is obvious, can be attained only be reducing the whole world to a uniform level of degradation. But Christians are elated by their own righteousness, because they love everybody so much that they want to rip the guts out of everybody who doesn't love everybody as much as they do.<br />
<br />
Two aspects of the syndrome are obvious. Evangelism necessarily involves some hypocrisy and simulation to &quot;win souls for Jesus&quot; and, given the highly immoral basis of Christianity, (6) it implicitly authorizes whatever chicanery, lying, and forgery may be useful in herding the saved sheep into their fold. It also provides a perfect disguise for any intelligent scoundrel who simulates belief in the superstition in order to fleece the sheep or to appease his own organic hatreds. And if he is clever, acts consistently in public, and eschews accomplices who may betray him, it is usually impossible to determine whether or not he actually believes all or part of the nonsense he professes, although a significant discrepancy between his intelligence and his professions may gives us good grounds for suspicion.<br />
<br />
It is also clear that the syndrome does not depend of the identity of the suppositious god, but the bivalent meaning of 'religion' often obscures the fact that the Christian syndrome does not require a god at all. The Marxian Reformation has shown the Big Daddy in the clouds to be as dispensable as the Protestant Reformation proved the Pope to be. When the Marxian cult is called &quot;the social gospel&quot; or &quot;liberation theology,&quot; it makes a claim, not entirely unjustified, that it revives the subversive doctrines of the Jewish revolutionary agitator commemorated in the &quot;New Testament,&quot; but when the same superstition is called &quot;Communism,&quot; it explicitly dispenses with Jesus and his papa, and excites equal or even greater fanaticism and righteousness in its votaries. Paul Knutson's article, &quot;Aryan Asses,&quot; includes a vivid description of the Bolsheviks in Russia when, having captured the country, they used iron crow bars to split open the skulls of Russians who wickedly did not love God's Race or evinced an odiously high level of intelligence and culture. Many or most of the happy wielders of crow bars were Jews, who were merely expressing the characteristic idealism of their race, but in all probability some of the social reformers were Russians inspired by their faith in Marx and his gospel. And we may be sure that they felt every bit as much righteousness as did the Christians who, in Fifth-Century Alexandria, at the behest of the pious S. Cyril, seize the too beautiful and intelligent Hypatia and held her down while they used oyster shells to scrape the flesh from her bones.<br />
<br />
A typical case of modern righteousness appears in a quotation I have noticed in the American Sunbeam for 3 June. It is attributed to Dr. C.M. Pierce of Harvard and purportedly comes from his address to the Childhood Education International Association in 1973. I have made no efforts to verify the quotation: it is simply typical of the mentality of the educational gangsters who operate the boob-hatcheries to which Americans are forced to send their children, and is no more surprising than would be a quotation of &quot;Praise the Lord&quot; attributed to a different kind of evangelist. Pierce is quoted as having said:<br />
 <br />
<br />
         <br />
<br />
        &quot;Every child in American entering school at the age of 5 is insane, because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, towards his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity...It's up to you teachers to make all of these sick children well, by creating the international children of the future.&quot;<br />
         <br />
         <br />
<br />
<br />
The international children of the future will, of course, fulfill the ideals of old Brock Chisholm, whose enormous brain, forever fizzing and popping with &quot;mental health&quot; like an overheated tea-kettle, demanding that the globe be populated by a mass of uniformly coffee-colored mongrels--except, as it goes without saying, the holy race that must be maintained in the purity required by the Jew god.<br />
<br />
Pierce, to judge by his name, must be an Aryan infected with the insane hatred of his own race that is so often induced by depraving superstitions, but what should interest us here is that his statement shows that he repudiates belief in a supernatural being. He therefore believes that he is not a Christian. It is also quite obvious that he repudiates the rational alternative, biological evolution, from which he would have learned that human beings are the product of a long evolution that eliminated as biological failures any proto-human species of which the individuals were not members of a pack. (7) The several races evolved differently even in the stage of homines erecti, but, greatly as the races now differ from one another, they are all species of mammals that are tribal by nature. Every child is born with a biologically necessary membership in his family, his tribe of kinsfolk in the larger sense, and his nation, an aggregate of tribes of the same race. This may be regretted by big-brained do-gooders, just as they may regret that when children come into the world they do not have gills, which would do so much to reduce the risks of swimming. But the improvement in the species they desire is impossible: several million years of biological evolution cannot be reversed by the squawkings of addle-pated intellectuals.<br />
<br />
The conspirators who call themselves &quot;educators&quot; are disappointed that some children escape from the tax-supported boob-hatcheries with instincts and minds that have not been effaced, and they are now openly demanding that children be taken from their mothers as soon as they are weaned and raised in pens in which expert &quot;educators&quot; can leach out their brains and prepare them for the mindless bliss of &quot;One World.&quot; Whether creatures produced in such pens would be a viable species of animals may be doubted; they certainly would not be human.<br />
<br />
It is clear that the mighty-minded Dr. Pierce repudiates both &quot;creation science&quot; and Darwinian evolution. What he would propose in their stead, if indeed his thinking goes so far, it is hard to imagine. But since we shall do him the courtesy of supposing he believes what he says, we must see in him an evangelist, inflated, like a hot-air balloon, with some irrational faith, perhaps the Marxian version of Christianity or something equivalent. And so we may assume that his zeal to destroy our families, our nation, our race, and, indeed, our civilization gives him a delicious sense of being just chock-full of righteousness.<br />
<br />
For decades the United States has been afflicted with swarms of nasty little creatures that come pouring out of the sewers of our society whenever our rulers ring the bell and summon them to &quot;demonstrate&quot; and create disorders that will hold the attention of the boobs and prevent them from noticing what new treason is being committed in Washington. Currently the creatures are creating an uproar and disturbances that are almost riots (8) to exhibit their righteous indignation at apartheid in South Africa, evidently ignorant that the stupid White population of Africa has already surrendered and opted for suicide. (9) The majority of South Africans have shown themselves too feeble-minded to understand the awful lesson of Rhodesia and have elected to undergo the same fate, submitting to what one of their reputedly &quot;conservative&quot; jewspapers called &quot;the will of the Creator.&quot; It is true that they hope to defer their end for some years, in order to enrich more Jews and cadge a few rand themselves, and that they even express surprise at the present plight of the United States, (10) but they are already showing symptoms of the folie circulaire that appears among trapped animals that are crowded together, (11) and the White men and women who do not escape in time will, before long, be massacred by the Black savages, who are now biologically superior to a race that has been rotted by a poisonous superstition that the Jews concocted for the White races long ago. (12)<br />
<br />
There could be nothing more absurd and pointless than the hysterical indignation over apartheid by the zombie-like creatures that are &quot;demonstrating&quot; against it, but while it is not easy to guess what may go on in their dim consciousness, it is only too likely that the trained geese preen themselves on their righteousness and provide us with another example of the syndrome of our racial disease.<br />
<br />
For fifteen centuries the members of our race have had constantly injected into them, from the cradle onward, the virus that came out of the fermenting compost-heap in Palestine, and the only vital question now is whether, after so many generations, the righteousness syndrome has become endemic and hereditary, and hence incurable, so that for it, as for kuru, the only remedy is extinction.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(1. The poet's name was P(ublius) Vergilius Maro, but during the Dark Ages the spelling Virgilius became prevalent, probably because Christians wanted to derive the name for virgo, which, when applied to a male, was taken to mean a man who had never polluted himself by intimacy with one of those nasty females, i.e., a male homosexual, corresponding to the monastic ideal. Thus the English word was spelled &quot;Virgil&quot; for a long time and is so spelled today by persons who feel that one should maintain a spelling that became traditional in English. I incline to correct the English spelling for the correct Latin word, but you may decide for yourself which spelling is to be preferred.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(2. For the text of the letter accompanied by a full commentary, see Smith's Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark, Harvard University Press, 1973. For an English translation, see his The Secret Gospel, New York, Harper &amp; Row, s.a. (1973?).)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(3. It may be worthy of note that Stevens was physically deformed and so morally deformed that he kept a mullatta as a servile concubine to avoid marrying a White woman, who would have expected to be treated with some respect.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(4. Evangelism, needless to say, is not a native Jewish idea. The Jews' racial religion, of course, is only for members of the Master Race with which Old Yahweh made the famous deal (b'rith) that gave them title to the whole earth; and the methods by which Jews should enslave or destroy goyim are outlined in myths in the Jew-book which have no relation to any historical events, but are exemplary tales devised to show later Jews how to go about the good work of taking possession of the world Yahweh bargained to give them: note especially the tales about the first Jesus (whom the Jews called Joshua by changing the unwritten vowels after they wanted to differentiate themselves from the Christians), the Joseph who cleverly enslaved the whole population of Egypt, and Hadassah (who took the alias of 'Esther' when she masqueraded as a White woman.)<br />
<br />
The whole pernicious idea of evangelism almost certainly comes from a man, said to been an Aryan, who is commonly known as Zoroaster, Zaraustra, Zaratustra, Zaradost, Zarahust, etc. According to the tradition, he made himself a nice cup of homa (i.e., a broth or tincture of the sacred mushroom, Amanita muscaria) and went to see the supreme god, who told him what gospel he should preach to all the world to enlist mortals, regardless of their race, on the side of the good god in his desperate war with the anti-god of evil. I consider Zoroaster's hallucinations one of the world's epochal catastrophes, but the whole question of Zoroastrianism is too intricate for discussion here. That religion contributed essential elements to the Christian amalgam, and the reader will remember that, according to a tale in the &quot;New Testament,&quot; Zoroastrian priests (Magi) came post-haste to salute the new-born Jesus who was to become another Saviour and who, like Zoroaster, had been born of a virgin, as is customary for Saviours.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(5. This is, of course, a great abuse of language, since love must be a special affection that one person feels for another individual. The Christian perversion of the word accounts for the nonsense uttered by unthinking people who claim &quot;to love all mankind,&quot; and for the barbarous jargon of school girls, who used to say they &quot;love ice-cream&quot; and now say they &quot;love sexual intercourse,&quot; although they often designate their favorite exercise by some expression from the gutter dialect that is used in low-class brothels and public schools.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(6. Perhaps the most demoralizing effect of Christianity has been the imposition of its morality on the higher morality that is instinctive in our race. We, for example, have an innate racial quality that makes us feel compassion for thousands of impuberate and barely puberate girls who, after their parents had been slaughtered before their eyes and they had been sexually manhandled by grinning Jews, were sold to become slave prostitutes in water-front brothels, but we are required by our religion to harden our hearts and affirm that they were treated justly and as they deserved, since they were merely goyim, like us. The &quot;Old Testament&quot; that Christians are required to accepts as the &quot;inerrant&quot; transcription of &quot;God's Word&quot; is filled with accounts of the foulest crimes, from treacherous assassinations to insane butchery and rape, that are repugnant to our morality, but which were approved by the Christian god, who was an accomplice in most of them. With that revolting record of his god's viciousness before him, even the sainted Thomas Aquinas, although he is much admired for his mastery of theological double-talk, had to admit that it is entirely proper and right to murder innocent persons, rob people of their property, and rape women, if that god wanted it done, and William of Occam and the Nominalists came to the only possible conclusion for a Christian: their god is not just and indeed has no conception of justice, so we are obliged to call 'justice' whatever that god does or ordains. And that is a conclusion that the Aryan mind cannot accept without strangling its own instincts and rationality. Jack Bays has assembled a few examples of the atrocious crimes committed by the Christian's god or carried out with his help as a supernatural accomplice, and from these he draws the entirely plausible conclusion that the Bible has suggested and thus instigated many appalling crimes and is probably the most morally corrupting book ever printed.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(7. Some anthropologists conjecture that the pre-human species called Proconsul, which was a relatively huge stature, was a solitary creature like the orang-outang, with each individual living by and for itself and having no relation to others of the species except for copulation during the mating season. If that is so, it is also significant that the Proconsul became extinct. It is virtually certain that even the Australopitheci hunted in packs and that a male and his females cared for their offspring for some years, thus forming a family that was probably as permanent as that of gorillas today. The succeeding species in the evolutionary line of all races formed tribal societies as they evolved to the present. And while our &quot;Educators&quot; labor so hard to prepare the United States for the eventual amalgamation with the Jews' other large colony, the Soviet, by making White children young punks and sluts who hate their parents and their race, thus severing their natural biological ties and making them proletarians who will be spiritually solitary creatures, like the Proconsul, having no real relation to others, even when they meet for copulation, those righteous idealists should remember that their Bolshevik precursors eventually found that it was not feasible completely to abolish families in the Soviet--not even after the more cultivated and civilized part of the White population had been exterminated.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(8. Creatures with strong exhibitionist tendencies appear to riot just enough to make sure they will be arrested. It was amusing to see in the press a photograph of a bedraggled female, identified as the daughter of the peanut-headed peanut-vendor who did the star turns in the White House until he was replaced by the actor from Hollywood. She was being felt over, purportedly to ascertain whether her dress conceal a weapon, by an unkempt creature, dressed as a lout, but identified as a nigger policeman. Like the famous picture of Reagan's wife on the knee of a burly black ape, the picture of the Carter female and her captor was a perfect epitome of the &quot;democracy&quot; of which the boobs are so proud.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(9. I commented on the South African referendum in Liberty Bell for December 1983 and May 1984. Since then, the toboggan has picked up velocity in its slide to the abyss. Most recently, a great majority in the Parliament repealed the law against miscegenation legalized by marriage, thus accelerating the breeding of diseased mongrels inflamed with a justified hatred of the authors of their schizophrenic existence. And now the Jews' stooges in the government, who were elected by White morons, are clamoring openly for an end to &quot;Social injustice&quot; by an &quot;equal partnership&quot; with the darling Blacks, which, of course, means delivering the government to the savages, who are in an overwhelming numerical majority.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(10. The White boobs' attention was caught by a recent incident. In a relatively innocuous &quot;beauty contest&quot; promoted by some of the principal newspapers, a White South African girl, quite pretty to judge from the photographs, was chosen as &quot;Miss South Africa&quot; to compete in Florida for the modest title of &quot;Miss Universe,&quot; although, so far as is known, no contestants from other planets (if any) in our galaxy, to say nothing of the many others galaxies, are to appear. The unfortunate &quot;Miss South Africa&quot; was forbidden to compete in Florida because the authorities there announced that their state was so filled with venomous vermin, indignant because she is a White woman and not a beauteous negress, that her life would be in danger. The South African newspaper hypocritically expressed surprise at our multi-racial barbarism, while, of course, yelling daily for its speedy establishment in their own country. To the impudence of editorial hirelings there is no limit.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(11. The current issue of News of the World, published in Honeydew, Transvaal, reports that an ostensible &quot;conservative&quot; Afrikaans newspaper, Die Stem, is demanding the immediate expulsion from South Africa of all persons of British descent. One can only infer that the supposedly intransigent Afrikaners (who are of Dutch descent), not daring to look up at their Jewish captors, are working off their despair by biting the English-speaking persons who have been trapped with them. It is true that twenty-five years ago most of the big-brained boobs who were yelling for &quot;civil rights&quot; for the sweet niggers were of English descent, but since that time the Afrikaners, most of whom are godly folk who believe that it rains whenever Yahweh personally turns on the faucet upstairs, have shown themselves as venal and feckless as Americans, and the Jews had only to hold a bundle of inflated counterfeit currency in front of the curs' noses to make them sit up and beg. Today, the political parties that think White men have a right to continue living in their own country find it impossible to elect a member of Parliament from districts in which Afrikaners form the overwhelming majority and the local newspapers are printed in Afrikaans (a dialect of Dutch). It is true that there has been a smouldering animosity between the English and the Dutch ever since an English degenerate, crazed with envy and hatred of his betters, the Reverend Dr. John Philip, was sent to South Africa by the London Missionary Society to cuddle niggers and harass White men. See my 'Populism' and 'Elitism', pp. 49 ff. -- The News of the World does not say who really owns Die Stem, the newspaper which is launching the insanely divisive campaign, and perhaps could not find out, but its current issue, undated but published late in May, comes close to overt despair. Under the heading, &quot;Weep, For You Will Surely Die!,&quot; is published an excellent summary of the present plight of White men in South Africa, including, of course, the open pressures and covert intrigues of the Jews' government in Washington and the slightly disguised Communist churches in the United States.)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<br />
(12. The biological superiority of the Blacks was recently demonstrated by one of the &quot;homelands&quot; which befuddled Whites set up for them, giving the territory to the Blacks and then building towns, schools, &quot;universities,&quot; hospitals, roads, etc., for them and providing Whites to do the work of teaching and administration. One of the nominally independent &quot;homelands&quot; has just enacted a law which restricts ownership of property within its territory to niggers. The other &quot;homelands,&quot; I am informed by a correspondent, will take the same action in the near future. Naturally, big-brained &quot;Liberals&quot; in South Africa emitted a few feeble squawks about such &quot;racism&quot; because they wanted to seem consistent, but they rejoiced in their own hearts, because as everyone knows, the biological imperative of racial loyalty is abominably wicked only when it appears among White owners. Needless to say, the White imbeciles in South Africa will continue to tax themselves ever more heavily to provide necessities and luxuries for the Blacks, who are, of course, multiplying like guinea pigs in their &quot;independent homelands.&quot; And that is only natural, for, as has happened throughout all history, biologically superior peoples always enslave the biologically inferior peoples whom they choose not to exterminate.)<br />
  <br />
<a href="http://revilo-oliver.com/rpo/By_Their_Fruits.html" target="_blank">http://revilo-oliver.com/rpo/By_Their_Fruits.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=95">Scams</category>
			<dc:creator>Alex Linder</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103946</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sir Rolf & Status Quo team up for Christmas single!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103945&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Rolf Harris teams up with Status Quo Ho Ho for festive single Christmas In The Sun* 
 
 
 It has been 40 years since Rolf Harris (http://explore.dailymail.co.uk/people/harris_rolf) topped the Christmas charts.   
And in a market dominated by young acts he has chosen an unlikely partner to help...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b>Rolf Harris teams up with Status Quo Ho Ho for festive single Christmas In The Sun</b><br />
<br />
<br />
 It has been 40 years since <a href="http://explore.dailymail.co.uk/people/harris_rolf" target="_blank">Rolf Harris</a> topped the Christmas charts.  <br />
And in a market dominated by young acts he has chosen an unlikely partner to help repeat the 1969 success of Two Little Boys.  <br />
The Australian entertainer has teamed up with Status Quo singer and guitarist Rick Parfitt - who is a relatively young 61 years old - to record Christmas In The Sun in a bid to score a lucrative festive hit. <br />
The song, due to be released on December 7, has been written by Harris, 79.<br />
Talking of the collaboration, due for release on December 7, Harris said: 'It&#8217;s a positive, hard-driving sound, lively and bouncing with good times, laughter and tons of fun. I couldn&#8217;t ask for more.' <br />
<br />
Parfitt insisted the duo&#8217;s effort was destined to become a festive classic.<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1228462/Rolf-Harris-teams-Status-Quo-Ho-Ho-festive-single-Christmas-In-The-Sun.html#ixzz0XQS7sVIS" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...#ixzz0XQS7sVIS</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Gotto be a Christmas number 1 :D<br />
<br />
<div align="left"><font color="#000000"><br />
</font></div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30">United Kingdom</category>
			<dc:creator>SidW UK</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103945</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Formal complaint lodged against QT</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103944&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
British National Party chairman Nick Griffin has lodged a formal complaint with the BBC over the gross breaches of that organisation’s charter during the infamous bullying fest that was Question Time last month. 
 
The full text of the complaint includes a formal letter to Director...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				British National Party chairman Nick Griffin has lodged a formal complaint with the BBC over the gross breaches of that organisation’s charter during the infamous bullying fest that was Question Time last month.<br />
<br />
The full text of the complaint includes a formal letter to Director General Mark Thompson and a carefully scripted explanation of charter breaches, prepared by BNP Projects Coordinator Paul Golding and BNP Legal Director Lee Barnes.<br />
<br />
The document outlines the outrageous and unfair treatment of Mr Griffin on Question Time and threatens legal proceedings if a second appearance is not granted during the General Election period.<br />
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Text of the complaint can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://bnp.org.uk/pdf_files/BBC-Complaint.pdf" target="_blank">http://bnp.org.uk/pdf_files/BBC-Complaint.pdf</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30">United Kingdom</category>
			<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103944</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Carjacker' who mowed down woman and dragged her 65ft under car convicted]]></title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103943&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/20/article-1229575-074CB8B0000005DC-593_468x638.jpg  
 
Image: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/20/article-1229575-074CB210000005DC-137_224x300.jpg  
 
Image:...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/20/article-1229575-074CB8B0000005DC-593_468x638.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/20/article-1229575-074CB210000005DC-137_224x300.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/20/article-1229575-074CB210000005DC-354_224x300.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				A carjacker was today convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent to a mother-of-four by running her over in her own vehicle.<br />
<br />
Caroline Johnson was scraping ice from the windscreen of her Citroen Picasso people carrier outside her home in Langley, Berkshire, on December 2 last year when Kevin Richardson, 34, and passenger Karen Napper, 37, jumped in and drove off.<br />
<br />
She was dragged up to 65ft down the road, suffering serious injuries which have left her wheelchair-bound for the foreseeable future.<br />
<br />
Mrs Johnson was preparing to take her son to school just before 8am when Richardson and Napper, who had spent the previous night at a drug house, leapt into the car which was parked outside her home.<br />
<br />
She described the moment the car hit her as it suddenly moved forward, telling the court: 'All I could hear was the engine and the accelerator and the power to the car was revving and then I felt this thud.<br />
<br />
'I could feel my body floating in the air and landing on the floor and I was thinking &quot;S***, he's really run me over and he's really hurt me&quot;.'<br />
<br />
She was discovered moments later lying on the tarmac, fighting for her life.<br />
<br />
An ambulance took her to Wexham Park Hospital in Slough, where she remained for two months.<br />
<br />
Mrs Johnson was given a blood transfusion and treated for cardiac arrest, a fractured pelvis, an open fracture to the right femur, fractures to both ankles and fractured ribs.<br />
<br />
Richardson was arrested on December 9 when officers spotted him riding a bicycle. Interviewed by police, he claimed not to remember where he had been on the morning of December 2.<br />
<br />
Nearly five months later, on May 1, police arrested Napper, who also denied any knowledge of the crime.<br />
<br />
Prosecutors claim a hair found in the Picasso linked her to the scene and she was arrested again on May 14, this time admitting that the pair had discovered the car with its engine running, after they had been out all night in search of drugs.<br />
<br />
She told officers they had 'clipped' Mrs Johnson as they left the scene.<br />
<br />
The vehicle, which other drivers described as 'weaving' across the road as it left the scene, was later found abandoned nearby.<br />
<br />
Richardson, who had already admitted a lesser charge of grievous bodily harm, aggravated vehicle-taking and dangerous driving over the incident, was found guilty by a jury at Reading Crown Court today of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.<br />
<br />
Napper admitted one charge of aggravated vehicle-taking.<br />
<br />
Richardson did not react as the guilty verdict was read out two hours and 41 minutes after the jury was sent out.<br />
<br />
Mrs Johnson, watching proceedings from the public gallery with husband Mark Collins and father Maurice Johnson, sobbed as she heard details of his previous offences following the conviction.<br />
<br />
The court was told that Richardson has a string of previous convictions, including offences of grievous bodily harm and common assault dating back to 1988.<br />
<br />
He will be sentenced on December 11.<br />
<br />
Judge Stephen John told Richardson: 'I think you should recognise at this stage that my view is that this offence can only be described in one way - absolutely despicable.'<br />
<br />
He said he will now have to decide whether Richardson poses such a risk of serious harm to other members of the public that he should serve an indeterminate prison sentence.<br />
<br />
The judge praised Mrs Johnson and her family, saying: 'I would like to say that it seems to me she and her family and friends have behaved with conspicuous courage and dignity throughout what must have been an ordeal for them this week.'<br />
<br />
He thanked the jurors for their efforts in a 'highly distressing case'.<br />
<br />
Prosecutor Charles Ward-Jackson said: 'This was a particularly shocking case.<br />
<br />
'For Mrs Johnson, it was an ordinary winter's morning as she was rushing to take her son to school.<br />
<br />
'From nowhere appeared the two defendants, who had been up all night looking for drugs. They pushed her aside, leapt into the car and, with Richardson in the driving seat, deliberately drove at her, causing her horrific and permanent injury.<br />
<br />
'We welcome the jury's decision and would like to pay tribute to the courage of Mrs Johnson in giving her evidence in court from her wheelchair.<br />
<br />
'I would also like to give praise to the police investigation and, in particular, to DC Bryant for helping the prosecution to build a strong case in difficult circumstances, resulting in the defendants admitting most of the charges and the guilty verdicts today.'<br />
<br />
Both defendants are from Slough, Berkshire.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229575/Carjacker-mowed-woman-dragged-65ft-car-convicted-GBH.html" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...icted-GBH.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30">United Kingdom</category>
			<dc:creator>Tom McReen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103943</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Heads Up! Very Nice Rifle for Sale.</title>
			<link>http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103942&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*DPMS LR-308 Stainless (http://www.armslist.com/posts/14755/birmingham-alabama-rifles-for-sale-dpms-lr-308-stainless-with-extras) 
* 
If anyone is interested in an awesome .308 semi-auto (AR10) that is deadly accurate out of the box this is it. Stainless steel barrel, quality construction, and one...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><a href="http://www.armslist.com/posts/14755/birmingham-alabama-rifles-for-sale-dpms-lr-308-stainless-with-extras" target="_blank">DPMS LR-308 Stainless</a><br />
</b><br />
If anyone is interested in an awesome .308 semi-auto (AR10) that is deadly accurate out of the box this is it. Stainless steel barrel, quality construction, and one of the most accurate AR10s made.<br />
<br />
I don't know if the scope is included but I think it is. He's put a collapsible stock and pistol grip on this one. For $1400 it's a steal.<br />
<br />
Be advised that this is not a light rifle. It's 11.xx pounds without scope. It's considerably heavier than an AR15 carbine or a garden variety hunting rifle. However, it's damn sexy, a lot of fun to shoot, and as stated .308.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.armslist.com/images/posts/633939123295855000vjdb2uio.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=27">Fighting</category>
			<dc:creator>OTPTT</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=103942</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
