Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadding
I don't know if Kurtagic says this or not, but if it's supposed to be what I say, it's a strawman.
|
I believe he's in UK. So he's not even free to say what he actually believes.
Quote:
The problem isn't that Whites are convinced that anti-White policies are right. The problem is that, regardless of how they may feel, they don't know what to say. The political tradition in the USA is entirely liberal. Political arguments in the USA generally have to be couched in liberal principles -- built around individual rights/equality, or some kind of argument that individual rights/equality are being violated -- to be accepted as legitimate.
|
I think people like the market and generally lean toward individual responsiblity. And in America, they don't like socialism, at least, the 2/3 of white who are most competent. That doesn't mean they want to be browbeaten and discriminated against as a race. Nor does it mean they want the white stock of the country swapped out for muds via immigration policies they never voted for. They've made all these feelings apparent repeatedly since the late sixties, to no avail.
Quote:
When there is an argument to be made on the marginally pro-White side, it is usually because the anti-White agenda itself has abandoned liberal principles and crossed over into illiberalism. At that point you get the plea of "equal rights for Whites."
That's about as far as most White people will go.
But that's not really pro-White. It's just anti-anti-White, like the BUGSters.
|
That's just conservative weakness. That's what they hear from pro gasbags on radio and on Fox. Before the rise of cable tv and Limbaugh, the conservatism in the magazines was intellectuall deeper. That stuff is now long gone. The problem in WN is that its leaders like Duke can't think of a better way than copycatting the civil rightsters and whining for fairness and end to double standars. That won't work. As someone at my old TAS said, in a review I came across when I was cleaning up this summer, Duke isn't big enough for the forces he's trying to evoke. I think that's right. You have to go for hate, for emotion, not just the obvious rational points that conservatives have made since the 1970s. The PhDs have an instinctual aversion to this. Hitler shows how it's done correctly. The reason is there, but them crowds aint come out to see the chickenwire hoss. Theys here for the pretty flowers.