Full Thread: a jane white portfolio
View Single Post
Old October 8th, 2005 #59
Rounder
Senior Member
 
Rounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
Default

Thanks Will and A.E., for yaw'lls perspective on the question of whether or not graphic faggot images should be allowed on VNNF. Yes they have "shock value". And the lemmings who support gay rights sure as hell need to be shocked into realizing just what vile filth they support by having their noses rubbed into it.

For an example, I got a phone call from a soccermom awhile back, bitching at me about the Truth at Last newspaper she'd received in her driveway. Said she had a very nice gay guy living next door and was mad as hell about anti-gay articles in the TAL. And so I described in detail what fags do, and said that by supporting them, she was just as sick as they are. Blah, blah, blah. Anyhow, she paused quite a bit thinking over what I'd said which forced her to actually visualize fag sex, and we ended the lengthy conversation on a very friendly note. She has a teenage son too btw, and now views that "nice gay guy" in a different light.

Jane88's cartoons at posts 1 and 7 do not contain strong anti-faggot words though, if you ask me. Not effective enough. I'd apply something like, "Hey soccermom, why do you support this filth." Or "Faggots want your teenage sons." Or "Those who support gay rights support this."

Another thing too is that by allowing faggot cartoons on VNNF, the faggots will flock here and post faggot porn, accompanied by mildly anti-homo rhetoric, cleverly designed to promote faggotry, not condemn it. Which in my opinion, is what Jane88 is up to. She's trying to set a precedent.

Time will tell if I'm right. So mark my words.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire