Full Thread: Child Erotic Photos?
View Single Post
Old March 29th, 2004 #5
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.P. Slovjanski
Unfortunately I read this before reading the thread you are referring to. But I discovered it shortly after and put in two cents there.

The fact is there is simply no sexual connotation there. In fact I think the leggings were probably added just to ensure that things would not be misconstrued.
And I suppose these two are'nt assuming suggestive poses either? C'mon, when's the last time you saw girls this age looking like hookers leaning against a lamppost on E. 42nd Street? Not to mention the looks on their faces. Strange, how they're not smiling.....don't you think?

Sorry, I still believe sexual connotations - subliminal as they may be - were implied by the decision-makers here. But....maybe that's just my old-fashioned upbringing getting in the way.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope.
- Bugs