View Single Post
Old April 6th, 2007 #73
Celtic_Patriot
Senior Member
 
Celtic_Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,670
Default

Oh you're "Slamin" alright 0 for 0.

Since you won't answer my questions about Treblinka, of where is your evidence, the teeth, of more than 305 dead, we will move on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slamin View Post
Celtic - I made no claims concerning Treblinka - I merely asked questions about your claims, thus I feel no compulsion to answer your questions.
It's not whether you feel compulsion or not, you simply have to.

Because if you don't and keep bumping this thread it will go up in the international rankings on search engines, with all it's data and links, and little White Kids from all over the world will be finding it and putting it into their School reports.

That is what your Phag Phora will cost you.



http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/t/6.html

Quote:
Chapter V:
Treblinka Trials

1. Confessions as a Basis for Historiography


In 1979, Gitta Sereny mounted a furious attack against revisionists, particularly against Arthur R. Butz. She made reference to her conversations conducted in 1971 with former Treblinka Commandant Franz Stangl, who was incarcerated in a Düsseldorf jail and who, according to her claims, had admitted the mass murders in that camp; she wrote:[476]
"Stangl is dead. But if [...] Butz [...] actually had been interested in the truth, Stangl 's wife and many others would have been at his disposal to bear witness."
Butz could have indicated in his response that G. Sereny was unable to prove what the actual statements of Stangl were, due to the lack of a taped record, but he nonetheless made an argument from an entirely different perspective:[477]

"We do not need 'confessions' or 'trials' to determine that the bombings of Dresden and Hiroshima, or the reprisals at Lidice following Heydrich 's assassination, really took place. Now, the extermination legend does not claim a few instances of homicide, but alleges events continental in geographical scope, of three years in temporal scope, and of several million in scope of victims. How ludicrous, then, is the position of the bearers of the legend, who in the last analysis will attempt to 'prove' such events on the basis of 'confessions' delivered under the fabric of hysteria, censorship, intimidation, persecution, and blatant illegality that has been shrouding this subject for 35 years. [...]
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/t/6.html

Appendix: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/13.html
The salon of the Phora Phags placate themselves, like dandies, with the vanity of rhetoric. We work with facts here.


Germar Rudolf, for his journal Viertelsjahrhefte für freie Geschichtsforschung (VHO)

____________________

References


[476] "The Men who whitewash Hitler," New Statesman, November 2, 1979.

[477] Butz's reply to G. Sereny was not printed in the New Statesman. Its text can be found in the lecture given by Butz in 1982 at the Conference of the Institute for Historical Review, which was published in a paper with the title "Context and Perspective in the Holocaust Controversy", reprinted in A. R. Butz, op. cit. (note 109), pp. 379-407, here p. 382.

[478] In a letter written on January 3, 1976, Kurt Franz, who continually protested his innocence, strongly denied having been camp Commandant. He wrote: "I served in Treblinka with the military rank of a Oberscharführer of the Waffen-SS responsible exclusively only for the guard detachment and with the men for the guarding of the camp. An Oberscharführer is a Technical Sergeant and not an officer!" The letter is printed in no. 44 of the Historische Tatsachen (note 105) on p. 23. Kurt Franz, who was charged with participation in the murder of 300,139 Jews, had lived in Düsseldorf under his own name up to 1959. (A. Rückerl, NS-Vernichtungslager..., op. cit. (note 62), pp. 44f.); therefore he obviously had a good conscience and it had never occurred to him that he could be accused of anything! Only in 1993 was he released, a gravely ill and broken man, after decades of imprisonment.