Full Thread: a jane white portfolio
View Single Post
Old October 7th, 2005 #56
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Yes the cartoons show disgusting behavior. No I would not call them pornography because they are clearly intended to satirize the sickening, disgusting behavior of sodomites. They should be accompanied by warnings and they were. I dont see a rule violation.

These are hard-hitting cartoons that expose the sickening sexual perversion that is now being taught as "normal" or an "acceptable lifestyle" in many public schools. We need to fight that wickedness with as much force as we can muster and if that means using Streicheresque cartoons, if it will help then I am for it.

I also appreciate Rounder's point of view that there mere presence of them will turn many people off. I would NOT recommend those for TAA as TAA is being delivered to large numbers of households which may have children who could be scandalized by this sort of thing. However VNNforum is a much more inaccessible medium aimed at an adult audience not children, so I think that we can discuss them here.

I see you people who want to jump Rounder at every turn. Quite un-necessary as Jane defended her work and choice to share it herself quite adequately. I empathize with Rounder's reaction, and yet I concur with White Will's response as well. Strong foes call for strong critique.

Rounder's got the fire in the belly that we need to win. That fire gives him a strong reaction to things he thinks are wrong. Give me more men with the fire in the belly, the eye of the tiger anyday. We need more such men with starch in their sails as he.