|
June 26th, 2008 | #101 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Quote:
If you think someone acts like a jew you can say "stop acting like a jew" If you think someone things like a jew you can say "stop thinking like a jew" but simply calling them a jew... think how words change meaning over time gay goes from meaning happy to sexual pervert, and now its used as a friendly insult example: person 1:bill is so gay person 2:wait is he really gay? person 1:no, hes just gay. person 2:huh? the same will happen with jew, bill doesnt leave a tip bill is such a jew is he really a jew? no, hes just a jew huh? its 1984 |
|
June 26th, 2008 | #102 | |
Made Billions that day
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wherever there's a sucker being born
Posts: 1,241
|
Quote:
**
__________________
"Which will you believe White Man, the trustworthy, innocent, upright, noble jew, or your own lying eyes and ears?" -anonymous- |
|
June 26th, 2008 | #103 | |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
|
Quote:
then should we do away with all other rules too? illegal activity allowed.. interracial porn? etc? If Alex says he doesnt care if you accuse members of being jews with no evidence anymore, then i'll stop enforcing it.. |
|
June 26th, 2008 | #104 |
Sexist Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,123
|
Well, I've never believed that. I don't think that's what free speech is. I don't accept that you have to take the bad with the good any more than you have to accept the nigger with the white.
__________________
. |
June 26th, 2008 | #105 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Evidence: You agree with the fag You post right after the fag You have the same shitty habits Conclusion: Same fag. Quote:
Last edited by psychologicalshock; June 26th, 2008 at 11:24 AM. |
||
June 26th, 2008 | #106 | ||
Made Billions that day
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wherever there's a sucker being born
Posts: 1,241
|
Quote:
Freedom of speech does not allow one to yell FIRE!!! in a crowded theater. It does grant one the right to convey himself, and his opinion verbally however... Surely you know the difference Varg... Quote:
It just occured to me... I may get banned for advocating illegal activity... Butting out and calling it even. **
__________________
"Which will you believe White Man, the trustworthy, innocent, upright, noble jew, or your own lying eyes and ears?" -anonymous- Last edited by RabbitNoMore; June 26th, 2008 at 11:32 AM. |
||
June 26th, 2008 | #107 | |
Sexist Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
All societies have rules. I'm not an anarchist. I do not believe people have some God given inalienable right to say whatever they want any more than people have some God given right to do whatever they want. There is no I in RACE. Be grateful for Varg and Mr Linder. If I were a mod, I'd make Joseph Stalin look like a boy scout leader - no question.
__________________
. |
|
June 26th, 2008 | #108 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896
|
You're equating calling someone who posts here a Jew with the criminal activity of faking an exigent circumstance via speech is ridiculous. Two totally different things. The latter involves putting peoples lives at risk while the former identifies those here who are likely enemies of our race.
|
June 26th, 2008 | #109 | |
Mene, Mene, Tekel Upharsin
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,588
|
Quote:
The irony is that the jew is well aware of this. It has never been the intention of the jew to allow "free" anything ultimately. It has always been its intention - as is becoming ever more evident day by day - for the commonly held standards and values to be perverted and turned around so that the jew evil is called good and the good is called evil. The jew non-standards and non-values were always intended to completely replace the positive values and, then, those jew perversions would be the "standards" and "values" enforced within the society. Look around ... you are there! . Last edited by yankee jane; June 26th, 2008 at 12:16 PM. |
|
June 26th, 2008 | #110 | |
Your Pro-White Neighbor...
|
Granted that I fully understand what you are doing, but aren't we taking this from the pages of Animal Farm ?
I hardly believe anyone here would want to snitch on another, but you know how our human frailty works. Quote:
|
|
June 26th, 2008 | #111 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 141
|
It does get ridiculous when people level the jew accusation against anyone who displays the slightest idealogical difference.
"You're a jew." "No i'm not, I think you're a jew." "No, you da jew." "No, I ain't the jew, i called you jew first." "No, you didn't. jew." "I ain't da jew, you da jew." "No, you da jew." etc. |
June 26th, 2008 | #112 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Squaresville
Posts: 7,502
|
Does anyone else notice that the people who are mourning the loss of being able to call other posters "jew" endlessly are the same people who openly proclaim to worship the jew's god? The same god who proclaimed the jews were his favorite people?
You are some seriously confused individuals. |
June 26th, 2008 | #113 |
Das Ende
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Midwestern "United States of America"
Posts: 1,488
|
Linder is right about this. Varg is right to enforce it.
__________________
An anti-semite is someone who knows what's going on. |
June 26th, 2008 | #114 | |
Adieu, Jews!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 571
|
Quote:
Banning somebody on a forum that decries and condemns the constant attacks by the enemy on our right to freedom of speech for merely calling somebody else a name -- a friggin' name! -- is not only the height of hypocrisy, it's fucking insane. We vituperate people outside The Movement for refusing to name the JEW, but, given the right circumstances, will go one better by banning our own when they dare to name somebody they suspect is a JEW. And why? Because they don't have any "proof". Exactly what constitutes proof has yet to be specified. I presume it would be nothing less than a signed confession or a DNA sample. It's analogous to not being allowed to call somebody a fag until he's fucked you in the ass. Anybody of average intelligence can assess what kind of person somebody is simply by reading his or her posts. We do it all the time. That's why there are people on the forum we like, and people on the forum we don't like. We base our opinions of them, far more often than not, solely on the things they write, because their posts tell us a great deal about them. Their postings reveal their intelligence, or lack thereof, religious beliefs, philosophical leanings, and, not infrequently, their racial make-up. When somebody like psychologicalshock boasts in his profile that his hobbies are killing Christians, it doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar to figure out WHAT he is and what his agenda is. But he knows that he can put it out there for all to see without having to worry about any negative repercussions, because Christians, even White Nationalist Christians, are the one group of people you may malign and seek to eradicate with impunity both offline and online. If psychoshatz had his way, there would be no Christians in The Movement. He'd kill the lot of us. That includes the late, great Yankee Jim, Pastors Wickstrom, Bob, and Visser, Randi from Michigan, members of the KKK, Aryan Nations, and Christian Identity, and many others who've had a positive impact on The Movement and are White Activists in the true sense of the term. But does psychoshatz get even a rap across the knuckles by the forum's overseers for his decidedly anti-White views? Nope. He's kosher because he hasn't broken any rules and he's careful -- well, as careful as a glaring [forbidden racial pejorative omitted] can be -- to intersperse he's anti-Christian [read: anti-White] posts with pro-White ramblings to con people into believing that he's for us and not against us. Melcur wasn't without his faults -- who is? -- but he was and is pro-White. And being pro-White should be the basis, the only basis, for whether somebody should be allowed to post in this forum or not. There ought to be one strictly enforced rule for this forum and one rule alone: Pro-White in, and anti-White out. Any and all other rules only create lawlessness where there was none. As for those people stamping their feet and bawling their eyes out because some of us like to call others names, even *gasp* JEWS in less Orwellian times, my advice is leave The Movement and don't come back. We're supposed to be mighty, fearless warriors prepared to die on the field of battle for our Race, but the enemy has only to call you a JEW and you'll run screaming. |
|
June 27th, 2008 | #115 | |
Mene, Mene, Tekel Upharsin
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,588
|
Quote:
Hahahaha ... but that IS VNN! Take out "jew" and fill in the epithet of choice - it will still continue . |
|
June 27th, 2008 | #116 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Squaresville
Posts: 7,502
|
Whites are not beyond criticism.
Pro-White is bullshit, out biggest most formidable enemies are White. Cultic thinking is for the retarded. And also, its one thing to use Christianity to deprogram White's or organize them, it's another to actually believe in that jewish middle eastern bullshit. |
June 27th, 2008 | #117 | |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
Quote:
|
|
June 27th, 2008 | #118 | |
Member
|
Quote:
interesting fact: When the Egyptian Pharoh was approached by pre-judaism Abraham, whom was leading his tribe all over the desert looking for a place to live, Pharoh had no real problem with jews using some of their land but did demand payment from Abraham's group - they didn't want to pay for the land; knew that they could not war against Egypt so Abraham offered Pharoh his wife, Sarai as a concubine. At first Pharoh was happy with that, but after spending some time with Sarai, whom, it seems, nagged at and generally pissed him off, Pharoh sent Sarai packing and ordered the jews off Egyptian land. Meantime, the jews were worshipping a motley crue of gods, goddesses ect that they had borrowed from other tribes during their travels. The jews did appear to have a fascination re Egypt at the time. Eventually deciding to go with the group whom was the most successful at establishing a sophisticated society. As we all know or have been taught, the jews ended up as slaves to Egypt - but their 'sojourn' in Egypt seemed to be enough to plant the seed of destruction of the original Egyptian. The jews taking over the Egyptian monotheism, and claiming that RA selected them - what B.S. Last edited by EireannGoddess; June 27th, 2008 at 01:06 PM. |
|
June 27th, 2008 | #119 |
Senior Member
|
Varg, could you likewise prohibit baseless allegations of being a gook?
Seriously though; methinks such ad hominem attacks ought to be discouraged, though I am not sure if the blunt instrument is prudent... Last edited by Cernunnos; June 27th, 2008 at 01:29 PM. |
June 27th, 2008 | #120 | |
The Epitome of Evil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
|
Quote:
Its a nice idea; and I am not knocking it, but when we get down to people being as they are nobody likes to told they are wrong but what the difference is what people do about it. What I am saying is simply that if somebody responds with arguments; rather than dismissive statements (jew etc etc) that person [you can just dismiss something of course but you just have to state a coherent reason why and then not be a hypocrite], regardless of whether you think them to be rational then that person is likely to be better quality and therefore more logical and reasonable (hence inherently worth more than the parrot who says the same thing over and over with no elucidation even when challenged). I've don't believe in 'free speech' personally; but that's irrelevant here because I am not a Mod. nor an Admin.
__________________
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|