Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > The Struggle > The Strategy
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old July 9th, 2010 #1
O*R*I*O*N
Pan-Aryan loyalist
 
O*R*I*O*N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Danmark
Posts: 63
Lightbulb The Importance of novel Ideas in the Struggle for White Survival and Improvement

If Hitler, Rosenberg, Drexler, Heydrich, Himmler et al returned tomorrow, I surmise they might be flattered and view with optimism how a considerable number of people choose to identify themselves as National Socialists and work with that philosophy as a touchstone; a working hypothesis.
I conjecture also that they may, after a while, come to appreciate that some successor groups tend to more original, revolutionary and dynamic than other.

In other words they might recollect the once youthful, revolutionary nature of NSDAP itself, observing the principle that wholesale plagiarism, even of a highly worthwhile weltanschauung such as National Socialism, is always a sign of weakness.

I must note here that many contemporary offshoots of National Socialism do manifest themselves with originality, adaptability and, most importantly, dynamic fortitude.

One such virile branch on the hitlerian tree is the revolutionary, unpredictable and dynamic NPD, with its sub groupings mostly in Germany proper.
The NPD has succeeded in creating a new esthetic appealing to the youth and has, with often sheer brilliance under heavy federal repression, sparked a chain reaction of highly energized youths, self-organizing into a myriad of splintergroups.
All with the common denominators of genuine benevolent racism, and german nationalism.

Another distinctive development with a new vigorously original approach is what, perhaps later, will come to be known as metzgerianism [LOL].
hopefully many decades will pass before such an honorary derivation is applied.
T.T. still bites with venomous fangs.
So we shall refrain from formalizing his living legacy into a rigid ism just yet.
Leaderless resistance, lone wolfism, and a complete lack of respect for obtuse tradition and convention, have all made W.A.R./The Insurgent a respected autonomous force moving forward (and rarely looking back).

A third exception to wholesale NS plagiarism is VNN itself.
A. Linder and company continuously cut new paths through the jungle of dogma with the sharp machetes of irreverence and humor.
Conservatism has certainly been reinvigorated through the racist redefining by Linder and VNNF.

*************************************************************************************

I have before me a copy of Das Programm der NSDAP und seine weltanschaulichen Grundgedanken, published originally in 1927 by Gottfried Feder, containing the well known Die 25 Punkte from February 1920.



This document is worthwhile to read and I can recommend the english translation The Programme of the NSDAP – The National Socialist German Workers’ Party and its General Conceptions, published by Preuss/Third Reich Books in 2003.

I will list a few relevant passages, and a few obsolete ones.
Relevant:

Point 4 (concise; to the point).
None but members of the nation may be citizens of the State.
None but those of German blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the nation.
No Jew, therefore, may be a member of the nation
.

Point 6 (Democratism pwned).
[. . .] We oppose the corrupting custom of Parliament of filling posts merely with a view to party considerations, and without reference to character or capability.

Point 11 (TARP, Wailing Wall Street, pwned).
Abolition of incomes unearned by work.
Abolition of the Bondage of interest.


Point 12 (Congoleezas, Dicky C’s. take note).
In view of the enormous sacrifice of life and property demanded of a nation by every war, personal enrichment due to a war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore ruthless confiscation of all war gains.

Point 18 (somewhat harsh, but very relevant).
We demand ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Sordid criminals against
the nation, usurers, profiteers, etc. must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

Obsolete:

Point 2 (Hall of Mirrors).
We demand equality of rights for the German People in its dealings with other nations, and abolition of the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.

Point 13 (National Bolshevism?).
We demand nationalisation of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (Trusts).

After having re-read the 25 points I must say, It actually kicks ass pretty much all of it.
A few exceptions more come across as somewhat north korean in their obligatory gymnastics and land confiscations, but over all, it’s a powerful document adressing matters still relevant today.

Still I maintain that it is crucial for our generation to write our own manifestos; to adapt to the peculiarities of this age with our own solutions and novel ideas.

I mentioned the hitlerian tree earlier, with the NPD, WAR/Insurgent and VNN branches with various splinter groups.
Perhaps it would be highly advantageous if the fruits growing on those branches would result in . . .

. . . new young trees, able to carry the fight of racial survival and ultimately racial improvement into the next millennia and to the stars.

We can look back (and up) at the old National Socialist Tree with admiration, for sure, and let us inspire, certainly.
But a lot has changed since 1920, primarily the WWW, Space Age Technology and the population explosion.

National Socialism was both revolutionary and deeply conservative. A paradox that changed the world forever.

We can take the best elements from it and fuse them into third millennium political dynamics.
It will be naïve, however, to believe that lasting solutions to the racial challenges of the 2010′s, 2020′s and beyond can be looked up in a manual, however sympathetic we may be inclined to its authors.

Similarly, Hitler would have been wrong to follow the exact example of german heroes of his past.
And perhaps he was wrong in precisely that; believing that the 18th century exploits of Frederick the Great could be instructive in 1945, for example.

Forward, Upward!
Keep on smashing dogmas and breaking idols.
We are neither left nor right. We are the front!
We shall lead History, not opt out and retreat.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.
Page generated in 0.21005 seconds.