Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 19th, 2011 #1
Cordova
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 47
Default Fighting for their rights in Egypt? Bahrain? Algeria? … No, Wisconsin! (video)

See the thousands of government workers fighting for their rights with an unbridled passion.

Madison-based photographer Matt Wisniewski nestled himself among the chanting crows inside the Wisconsin statehouse to capture their enthusiasm and spirit. Government employees, particularly teachers, are sounding off against newly elected Republican Governor Scott Walker’s plan to cut pensions and hike health insurance rates. Walker insists the concessions are essential to plug a $3.6 billion gap in the budget.


Great video!
http://neglectedwar.com/blog/archives/2824
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #2
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordova View Post
...newly elected Republican Governor Scott Walker’s plan to cut pensions and hike health insurance rates. Walker insists the concessions are essential to plug a $3.6 billion gap in the budget.

In Wisconsin someone who receives over $201,340 in annual income is only taxed 0.25% more than someone who works for $26,850.

This is laughable!!!

http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html#tx1b

Republican Gov. Scott Walker: We're Broke!!! We don't have any money!!
http://vodpod.com/watch/5603492-wisc...ker-were-broke
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #3
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
In Wisconsin someone who receives over $201,340 in annual income is only taxed 0.25% more than someone who works for $26,850.
Hudson, is that .25% more total taxes or a tax rate which is .25% higher?
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #4
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Streed View Post
Hudson, is that .25% more total taxes or a tax rate which is .25% higher?
Anything that Hudson posts will be propaganda, intended to distort reality.


Wisonsin Income Tax Rates: http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html


1) Single person, with taxable income of $26,850:

$1,081.91 + (.0650 x ($26,850 - $20,130)) = $1,518.71

2) Single person, with a taxable income of $201,340:

$9,588.46 + (.0675 x ($201,340 - $151,000)) = $12,986.41

The second person pays 8.55 times the amount in income taxes than the first.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #5
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
Anything that Hudson posts will be propaganda, intended to distort reality.


Wisonsin Income Tax Rates: http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html


1) Single person, with taxable income of $26,850:

$1,081.91 + (.0650 x ($26,850 - $20,130)) = $1,518.71

2) Single person, with a taxable income of $201,340:

$9,588.46 + (.0675 x ($201,340 - $151,000)) = $12,986.41

The second person pays 8.55 times the amount in income taxes than the first.
That's what I thought.

Instead of going after some small business owner with an income of $200,000 per year, and who probably has created several other jobs in the process of making that 200 grand, why not go after the banking and financial institutions? That's where the real money is.

Hudson seems to have the idea that a capable individual making a decent living should be penalized for the benefit of the less capable.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #6
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Streed View Post
Tha
Hudson seems to have the idea that a capable individual making a decent living should be penalized for the benefit of the less capable.
To someone who probably never made over $12 an hour in his life, anyone making over $100,000 would look like a Jewish banker.

Zealots like Hudson, have helped the Jews throughout history in destroying the finest of our White race, out of their jealousy of seeing someone doing well for themselves.

They never go after the real culprits, the ones who swindle us all. They only go after those that they see in their daily lives, driving that new car, or live in the large home on the other side of town.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #7
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Walker insists the concessions are essential to plug a $3.6 billion gap in the budget.
You know a country's completely fucked when its politicians are having difficulties merely "plugging gaps in the budget".

That's what America, along with the entire world, is all about now--plugging gaps in the budget. I don't think there's a single country out there that's actually paying off its national debt to the jew bankers. Not a one.

Talk about a perpetual harvest.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #8
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Streed View Post
That's what I thought.

Instead of going after some small business owner with an income of $200,000 per year, and who probably has created several other jobs in the process of making that 200 grand, why not go after the banking and financial institutions? That's where the real money is.

Hudson seems to have the idea that a capable individual making a decent living should be penalized for the benefit of the less capable.

You know it really blows me away how the masses will sell themselves into slavery if given the chance.

I would like you to give me an example of some small shop owners who have $200,000 a year in net income over and above the cost of running their business (which includes payroll).

You want me to imagine that some yahoo who runs a "mail boxes etc" franchise store or something like that who hires a helper or two is pulling in that kind of dough??? Really? $200k!

Banks store money for the wealthy and try to make more money for their customers ie: the wealthy, how do you imagine that we should blame banks and believe that banks own all that money, and they should be gone after? WTF??? You've been duped, friend.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #9
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
I would like you to give me an example of some small shop owners who have $200,000 a year in net income over and above the cost of running their business (which includes payroll).
Here you go. Look at what owners of small manufacturing companies make on average. Six categories of small businesses exceed $200,000 in income.


Last edited by SmokyMtn; February 19th, 2011 at 10:07 PM.
 
Old February 19th, 2011 #10
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
Anything that Hudson posts will be propaganda, intended to distort reality.


Wisonsin Income Tax Rates: http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html


1) Single person, with taxable income of $26,850:

$1,081.91 + (.0650 x ($26,850 - $20,130)) = $1,518.71

2) Single person, with a taxable income of $201,340:

$9,588.46 + (.0675 x ($201,340 - $151,000)) = $12,986.41

The second person pays 8.55 times the amount in income taxes than the first.
The man who works for $26,850 has less than he needs, yet he is forced to give away what little he has, by rich men using the threat of violence. Yet the man who has $201,340 in income or above is satisfied in his needs, and yet still demands to pay less and less tax, asking the poorer man help to relieve the rich man from having to bear the burden to maintain a society where the poorer man struggles to stay above water and the rich man benefits multiple times over.

You see nothing wrong with that?

Traditionally wage was never considered "income" in the U.S.A, but after decades of the rich pulling the wool over the workers eyes, the workers have been duped into accepting that their WAGE is INCOME. And so it is assumed today that if you earn a wage you have income, and if you have income you must pay tax on it. Income was never considered to be a working man's wages and thus was never taxed prior to 1913 or so.

This is the same as a slave owner charging his slaves for room and board.

The common people create the conditions for which there is a stable society for this minority of people to become multiple times more enriched than the common man.

So who should pay for the social expenses of this society? The men who benefit most or the men who benefit least?

For if the rich could be rich anywhere, it would stand to reason that they could leave for Africa and dwell among the negroes if they don't like to be taxed to maintain the society that allows them to become wealthy.

No wage earner should pay a dime in tax out of his wage, period. The man who uses another man then expects that man to chip in or get lost so that the rich man can keep more of the money he makes over and above that man, is a thief and a criminal.

If we agree that a man needs (just a number for example) $60,000 to have a family and maintain a life, then he should not be taxed on anything below that amount.

The men who have incomes over and above the money it takes to live comfortably should bear the entire expense that society costs to maintain, for they benefit the most, they should be happy to oblige in maintaining a society where they are so lucky.

Problem is, the rich are greedy, and if the common people do not stick up for themselves they find themselves stepped on.

And thus we have what we have today in this country.
 
Old February 20th, 2011 #11
Leshrac
Mad Science
 
Leshrac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
The man who works for $26,850 has less than he needs, yet he is forced to give away what little he has, by rich men using the threat of violence. Yet the man who has $201,340 in income or above is satisfied in his needs and yet still demands to pay less and less tax, asking that poorer man help to relive the rich man from having to bear the burden to maintain a society were the poorer man struggles to stay above water, but the rich man benefits multiple times over.

You see nothing wrong with that?
That example is unamerican because we all know poor people, all around the world, are just slackers wanting to leech off welfare and rich people are the true hard working fellows who should get a break and be praised for their efforts to become 100% unproductive shareholders and attain economical parasite status.

/sarcasm
__________________
Thinking... Please wait.
 
Reply

Tags
kill the bill, wisconsin, workers rights

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.
Page generated in 0.11598 seconds.