Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 1st, 2006 #61
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jozu
I've been to Poland and Germany... lots of fine, good looking white people in both countries. Germany is a lot more multicultural though of course.
There's a mostly Polish town in North Jersey called Linden, a lot of Poles from the old country, good-looking young chicks, one older guy from Poland I was talking to in a bar, without me even bringing it up, turned out to be very jew-savvy. It's a damn shame that both Germany and Poland took the jew bait when the kikes divided up Germany in the Versailles Treaty and started WWII.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #62
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
Writers posting on the Vanguard News Network forum refer to Erich as "Judas Gliebe" and "Gliebowitz."
If Linder doesn't start cleansing this forum, especially the 911 threads, of kike vermin and assorted other disinfo spooks we'll soon be calling him Judas Linder and Linderwitz!!!
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #63
J.P. Slovjanski
Marxist-Leninist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
If Linder doesn't start cleansing this forum, especially the 911 threads, of kike vermin and assorted other disinfo spooks we'll soon be calling him Judas Linder and Linderwitz!!!

Like Linder or any real WN gives a shit about what a bunch of nutcases call them. Perhaps you never heard of Frank Weltner?
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #64
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.P. Slovjanski
Like Linder or any real WN gives a shit about what a bunch of nutcases call them.
That's what Erich Gliebewitz thought.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #65
J.P. Slovjanski
Marxist-Leninist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
That's what Erich Gliebewitz thought.

Gliebe's leadership and honesty problems were real, I know this from PERSONAL experience. You're just mad because people keep demanding evidence of your idiotic theories on some forum- and you can't handle it. If you can't handle a debate with a pro-white individual, what good are you arguing in public or against an anti?
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #66
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.P. Slovjanski
Gliebe's leadership and honesty problems were real, I know this from PERSONAL experience. You're just mad because people keep demanding evidence of your idiotic theories on some forum- and you can't handle it. If you can't handle a debate with a pro-white individual, what good are you arguing in public or against an anti?
You still haven't answered my direct question from hours ago: What do you think is my theory?

Kikes aren't people.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #67
YANKEE_JIM
Broadcaster
 
YANKEE_JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: jew infested Catskill Mountains of NY
Posts: 6,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hateemall
What I was/am referring to is The Area, where this Gliebe was brought up in, Interviewed In, and My personal experiences with the dumb pollocks there. Its a City wide laughing ,long running Joke, So much so Its on Local TV every Sat.. And has been since I was a child..

The Ghoul even used to joke about it all the time!


AMRAP


-Jim
__________________
"Googo dat shit"


The Hudson Valley Freeman

Quote:
Carry a pocket knife ,wear steel toe boots and always make sure that you have the advantage or these savage simians will fuck you up! -- "White Minority" from VNNForum

“To destroy is always the first step in any creation.”

-E.E.Cummings

"We're seeing people wearing Skrewdriver (a white power band) shirts and sieg heil-ing around town."

-New Paltz, NY Mayor Jason West 08/18/2004
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #68
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown.
How does Playboy "foster homosexuality"?
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #69
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
If Linder doesn't start cleansing this forum, especially the 911 threads, of kike vermin and assorted other disinfo spooks we'll soon be calling him Judas Linder and Linderwitz!!!
1. You better familiarize yourself with the Abzug rule before you start calling people Jews.

2. Who is we?

3. I dont like your user name. I think it makes this forum look bad. What are you trying to say? You've got my attention now. You got a list of people you dont like, I'm sure you're not alone. We're not going to start banning people without reason -- just because "evilisgood" is saying the same thing Frank Weltner was saying right before he flamed out and he and his four sockpuppets got banned. Are you in danger of flaming out?
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #70
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
Gliebe's pretty dumb, he probably meant to say something like the jew-approved world.
Gliebe's choice of words may have been clumsy, but I think everyone can figure out what he meant, no? By "real world," he probably meant "mainstream society" or something to that effect.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #71
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hateemall
It is rather "odd" that the "Interview" was taking place in Broadview Hts, Yet The Gliebe was pictured In downtown Cleveland..
Maybe it was stock picture provided by the Gliebes themselves.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #72
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalekite
How does Playboy "foster homosexuality"?
Don't you know how to click on a link? Read the article and see if you get unconfused. http://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #73
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
Most 100% Germans or German-Americans I know on a personal basis, and it's a lot, are extremely dumb, too dumb to even suspect how dumb they are or how dumb they appear to others. Dumb Poles seem to know they're dumb and don't make themselves look dumber by over-reaching like the dumb Germans, ergo, the dumb Poles are smarter.
Wow! This is what WN is all about - taking a big dump on your fellow whites. After hearing the man on the televitz say what a bunch of vile sadistic perverts those GD Germans are, there's nothing I like better than coming to VNNF and hearing about how stupid they are as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
Just about everybody here on VNNF is pretty damn smart or they wouldn't be here.
Nice save.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #74
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
Don't you know how to click on a link? Read the article and see if you get unconfused. http://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html
Didn't want to read it. Henry Makow gets on my nerves.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #75
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
1. You better familiarize yourself with the Abzug rule before you start calling people Jews.

2. Who is we?

3. I dont like your user name. I think it makes this forum look bad. What are you trying to say? You've got my attention now. You got a list of people you dont like, I'm sure you're not alone. We're not going to start banning people without reason -- just because "evilisgood" is saying the same thing Frank Weltner was saying right before he flamed out and he and his four sockpuppets got banned. Are you in danger of flaming out?

It's about time I got your attention. What do you mods do anyway?

1) I didn't call Linder a jew but I think he's fucking up his forum and opening himself to closer examination in the process. He has an OPPS section for no apparent reason while kikes are running wild on this site, especially on the 911 threads.

2) "We" is about 20 WNs who are fighting these kikes day and night on the main forum, mostly the 911 threads. We shouldn't have to waste our time doing that.

3) I don't like your user name. There's plenty of reason to ban these disinfo agents. Suppressing debate on possible ZOG/jew involvement in 911 is as much reason to banish them to OPPS as a band of kikes suppressing debate on the holohoax.
About my username: I'll cut you a break on your lack of perception on this one but have you ever heard of Orwell?
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #76
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalekite
Didn't want to read it. Henry Makow gets on my nerves.
this is one of the jew' makow's better articles.

Quote:
Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
June 03, 2003

(Note to readers: During the summer I will be taking some weeks off. At these times, I will revise and present some important articles, which appeared before I started my web site. The following first appeared on Toogoodreports.com, Nov. 9, 2001.)

What kind of man is this?

He is fastidious about his appearance, his home and his possessions. He wants as much sex as possible and chooses sexual partners mostly on the basis of appearance. He is self-absorbed and doesn't want emotional involvement or commitment. He thinks a woman would stifle him and children would be a burden.

Does this sound like many gays? It is also the masculine ideal purveyed by Playboy magazine to men since the 1950's.

The essence of manhood is to lead and support a family. But in 1972, 3 out of 4 male college students got their ideas about masculinity from Playboy, at an incalculable price to themselves, women, children and society.

The similarity between the Playboy and homosexual ideal is no coincidence. "The Kinsey Report" (1948) shaped current mainstream attitudes to sex. It championed unfettered sexual expression and became the manifesto of the counterculture. It inspired Hugh Hefner to start Playboy in 1953.

Essentially "The Kinsey Report" said that aberrant sexual behavior was so common as to be normal. Thanks to psychologist Dr. Judith Reisman, we now know that Alfred Kinsey was a homosexual and the "Kinsley Report" was a fraud.

Kinsey, a University of Indiana zoologist, pretended to be a Conservative family man. In fact, he seduced his male students and forced his wife and associates to perform in homemade pornographic films. To prove that children have legitimate sexual needs. Kinsey and his fellow pedophiles either abused 2,000 infants and children and/or relied on data obtained in Nazi concentration camps. (Judith Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, 1998, p.312)

Reisman concludes: "America's growing libidinous pathologies...taught in schools...and reflected in our fine and popular arts, the press, law and public policy largely mirror the documented sexual psychopathologies of the Kinsey team itself."

Sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey's goal was "to supplant what he saw as a narrow procreational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous "anything goes" bi/gay pedophile paradise." Reisman, Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.4 He cruised Times Square looking for subjects. More than 25% of his sample were prostitutes and prison inmates including many sex offenders. Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with impotence and self-mutilation (orchitis, Reisman p. 278), said 10 per cent of American men were gay when in fact only two per cent were.

Hugh Hefner said the Kinsey Report "produced a tremendous sexual awakening, largely because of media attention..." This shows how the elite orchestrates social change using media hype. (See Reisman, Kinsey, p.307)

With messianic fervor, Playboy took its gospel of sexual freedom to the American male who in the 1950's-1960's still consecrated sex for marriage. Playboy's aim, the aim of all pornographers, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy. To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage.

In Reisman's words, "Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men's fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love." (Judith Reisman, "Soft Porn Plays Hardball," p 47)

Thus sworn enemies, Playboy and radical feminists, found common ground in hatred of the nuclear family. As a result, society now suffers from epidemics of family breakdown, pornography, impotence, child sexual abuse, sadosexual violence, teen pregnancy, a cocktail of STD's and, of course, AIDS. The birthrate has plummeted by 50% since 1960 and is barely at replacement level.

Homosexuality is a developmental disorder defined by the failure to establish a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex. Psychologist Richard Cohen, in "Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality" (2000) argues it is caused when a male child fails to bond with his father. By having sex with men, the adult gay is trying to compensate for father-love denied in adolescence.

Cohen was gay and is now married with three children. He attributes lesbianism to a woman's reaction to being rebuffed or abused by her father. He has assisted hundreds of homosexuals, but is under constant attack for undermining the gay political agenda, (i.e. to redefine societal norms.)

Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover has pointed to another cause of homosexuality. A 1990 survey of 1000 gays shows that an older or more powerful partner physically assaulted 37% of them before the age of 19. ("Homosexuality and American Public Life," 1999, p.24). In addition, according to Anne Moir in "Why Men Don't Iron," some men may be "born gay" due to foetal hormone imbalances. They seem to be a minority.

For many decades, gays were told that they were "sick" and cruelly and wrongly persecuted. The gay activist solution: convince the world that, in fact, it is heterosexuals who are sick. In 1973, they bullied the American Psychological Association into proclaiming homosexuality normal. Together with feminist activists (who believe heterosexuality is inherently oppressive) gay activists began to dismantle all heterosexual institutions: masculinity, femininity, marriage, the nuclear family, the boy scouts, sports, and the military.

Backed by the financial elite, gay activists and their supporters now largely dictate our cultural sensibility. They are responsible for the puerile pornographic obsession that pervades television, music videos and the Internet. This state of arrested human development is characteristic of many homosexuals. But straights have been homosexualized too. With women acting like men, and vice versa, we can't establish a "permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex" either. The elite's purpose is to promote social dysfunction and depopulation. See "Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda".

Gay liberation manuals talk about "normalizing" their sexuality and "de-sensitizing" straights by flaunting it. I was livid when I took my 10-year-old son to see Adam Sandler's movie "Billy Madison" and heard one teenage male youth in the film casually ask another: "Would you rather bone Pamela Anderson or a young Jack Nicholson?"

Last week, on TV's "Will and Grace," Jack who is gay dons an apron that says "Kiss the cook" pretending he thought the second "o" was a "c". Just as Communists once conned do-gooders to think radicalism was chic, gay activists define trendy for gullible liberals today.

Gay and feminist activists think traditional morality was invented to perpetuate an unjust status quo. In fact, morality is the accumulated wisdom of mankind regarding what is healthy and ultimately fulfilling. Perversion is deviation from what is healthy.

Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it is healthy and human. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. Promiscuous sex is a desperate plea for love. Love and marriage answer that call and provide for the natural and necessary outcome of sex, children.

With Hugh Hefner's help, Alfred Kinsey detached sex from love and procreation. He reduced it to another physical function like urinating. Homosexual activists champion anonymous sex: a majority of gays have 10s-100s of partners each year. In less extreme form, heterosexuals have adopted this model. Recently a social columnist enviously described straight friends whose relationships have ended: "they're out partying, having the time and the sex, it seems of their lives."

In conclusion, the "sexual revolution" was really a triumph of an elite program of arrested development. See also "The CIA, Homosexuality and Underdevelopment." The elite agenda is to redefine healthy as deviant and vice-versa and they have succeeded. In 40 short years, almost all sexual constraints have dissolved and heterosexual society is reeling. The cultural and social breakdown will only get worse unless there is a counterrevolution.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #77
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
It's about time I got your attention. What do you mods do anyway?

1) I didn't call Linder a jew but I think he's fucking up his forum and opening himself to closer examination in the process. He has an OPPS section for no apparent reason while kikes are running wild on this site, especially on the 911 threads.

2) "We" is about 20 WNs who are fighting these kikes day and night on the main forum, mostly the 911 threads. We shouldn't have to waste our time doing that.

3) I don't like your user name. There's plenty of reason to ban these disinfo agents. Suppressing debate on possible ZOG/jew involvement in 911 is as much reason to banish them to OPPS as a band of kikes suppressing debate on the holohoax.
About my username: I'll cut you a break on your lack of perception on this one but have you ever heard of Orwell?
Yes I have read Animal Farm and 1984. I dont favor the constant Orwell references for several reasons, firstly, that people are less and less familiar with Orwell, secondly, that he is overly alluded to and through overuse has been impotentized, thirdly, the loathsome HAC used to use the psuedonym "Winston Smith" who was the protagonist of 1984. So, I think the username is just confusing to people- at best.

As for JP, he is not a Jew. Neither is he an antiracist. That he disagrees with you about 911 does not prove he is a Jew or an antiracist. That he disagrees with you is not a sufficient reason for him to be banned.

What do we do? We don't hold your hands that is for sure. If you want heavy moderation you're in the wrong place.
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #78
evilisgood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
Yes I have read Animal Farm and 1984. I dont favor the constant Orwell references for several reasons, firstly, that people are less and less familiar with Orwell, secondly, that he is overly alluded to and through overuse has been impotentized, thirdly, the loathsome HAC used to use the psuedonym "Winston Smith" who was the protagonist of 1984. So, I think the username is just confusing to people- at best.

As for JP, he is not a Jew. Neither is he an antiracist. That he disagrees with you about 911 does not prove he is a Jew or an antiracist. That he disagrees with you is not a sufficient reason for him to be banned.

What do we do? We don't hold your hands that is for sure. If you want heavy moderation you're in the wrong place.
People here should be familiar with jew doublespeak.

It doesn't matter if JP is actually a jew, he tows their line on 911 and uses known disinfo tactics to shut down debate. If you read his posts it is obvious that he does not earnestly debate, it is obvious that his goal is to distract and disrupt-to waste our time. Why isn't towing the jew line on 911 equivalent to towing the jew line on the holohoax? Extreme views like these should only be discussed on in the Opposition forum. Do it.
I don't want heavy moderation but promotion and/or defense, of race-mixing, homosexuality and the "official" jew mythologies of the holohoax and 911 should only be tolerated in the Opposition forum.
Why doesn't Linder get this???
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #79
Walter E. Kurtz
Senior Member
 
Walter E. Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
People here should be familiar with jew doublespeak.

It doesn't matter if JP is actually a jew, he tows their line on 911 and uses known disinfo tactics to shut down debate. If you read his posts it is obvious that he does not earnestly debate, it is obvious that his goal is to distract and disrupt-to waste our time. Why isn't towing the jew line on 911 equivalent to towing the jew line on the holohoax? Extreme views like these should only be discussed on in the Opposition forum. Do it.
I don't want heavy moderation but promotion and/or defense, of race-mixing, homosexuality and the "official" jew mythologies of the holohoax and 911 should only be tolerated in the Opposition forum.
Why doesn't Linder get this???
(from the space shuttle Challenger):

"Roger, we are Go for throttle-up".
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #80
J.P. Slovjanski
Marxist-Leninist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood

2) "We" is about 20 WNs who are fighting these kikes day and night on the main forum, mostly the 911 threads. We shouldn't have to waste our time doing that.
LOL! "Fighting kikes the main forum"!! That's fucking hilarious. Just goes to prove that you live in a fantasy world online. Why don't you just by a copy of World of Warcraft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilisgood
There's plenty of reason to ban these disinfo agents. Suppressing debate on possible ZOG/jew involvement in 911 is as much reason to banish them to OPPS as a band of kikes suppressing debate on the holohoax.

Ah yes!! You're "fighting" in the main forum is so fierce that "ZOG" needs to provide "disinfo angents" in order to prevent your victory! Fucking fantasy warrior.

Read carefully:

1. You guys don't "debate" about 9-11. I've seen you. You'll accept any theory so long as it is a conspiracy. For example, Bernie says there were no Arabs on the plane, Skunk used to say that the "Arabs" were actually Israeli agents, and I believe MOMUS thinks they were on the plane but didn't fly it. They NEVER, EVER argue amongst each other about the details. So where is the debate? (If I am getting the theory of MOMUS wrong that is only because he refuses to explain his theory in detail, I've asked him plenty of times in the past).

2. We do not question "Jew involvement". What we are questioning is idiotic theories dreamed up by people who are themselves anti-WN, from whom you appropriated these theories. My rule when preaching WN or NS to someone is, "If you can't prove it, don't use it!"
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.
Page generated in 1.20104 seconds.