Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

View Poll Results: Who will win in November?
Obama 48 61.54%
Romney 30 38.46%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old November 7th, 2012 #541
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John in Woodbridge View Post
Maybe Rick Santorum is the answer for the republican party.



Calling Jeboo.
People with thin noses are often criminals and nearly always untrustworthy.

That greasy fuck is exactly what Ted Bundy would have turned into if he'd been a little better socially adjusted.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #542
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

[have to admit, it was good to see the Massachusetts illiberal go down after all the dirty tricks his feebs pulled on Ron Paul]

GOP in Deep Trouble, Ron Paul Looking Good
Posted by Ryan W. McMaken on November 7, 2012 01:35 AM

Romney lost today to a guy who is overseeing a horrible economy, prosecuting unpopular wars, and who can barely string 5 words together without a teleprompter. This was the best the Republican Party can do. Not only are the Republicans evil, they're evil and contemptible losers, which is far worse.

The biggest losers tonight are of course people who value peace and freedom, but we would have also lost if Romney won. The GOP is right up there in the loser category, however. The GOP lost seats in the Senate, and did little to improve its position in the House. It has served up two ridiculously bad nominees in a row, claiming "electability" and then going down in flames.

Rand Paul certainly came out of this looking very bad as well. He fell in line behind the party masters, banking on some advantage to be gained through an endorsement of Romney. He ended up just looking politically un-savvy and unprincipled. There is little to be gained either, from playing ball with a Party that as inept as the GOP at this point.

It's not beyond the realm of possibility that the GOP may actually show sign of disintegration in the next several years. The GOP has ceased to present any sort of actual alternative, and worse yet, it can't run a winning candidate. Once that happens, the coalition that makes up your political party will begin to fall apart.

The Ron Paul movement is a big winner here. The GOP told the libertarians in the party to get lost, and the GOP paid for it. Interestingly, both Iowa and Nevada, where Ron Paul supporters gained control of the state party, both went to Obama after the Romney campaign actively fought to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters. I guess the GOP got what it wanted there.

There is exactly one movement that offers any real opposition to the status quo, and it ain't the conservative movement, which is on life support and entering a permanent vegetative state. Ron Paul's libertarian movement, brimming with well-educated young people is the only thing left standing. The GOP operatives who predicted a big victory tonight just look pathetic.

On foreign policy, if it proves to be true that Obama is truly reluctant to engage in the mass murder of Iranians, that may be a victory there all by itself. Time well tell on that one.

And finally, when the economy enters a deep recession in a couple of years (or sooner), it will be good that Obama will be in office. You all know how it would have gone otherwise: After a couple of years of Romney misrule, the media will decide that Romney was the candidate of "free markets." Then, mired in a depression, our wise overlords will declare that "we tried that free market thing, and look what happened."
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #543
Whitefist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 470
Arrow "It's the White vote stupid..."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The Ron Paul movement is a big winner here. The GOP told the libertarians in the party to get lost, and the GOP paid for it. Interestingly, both Iowa and Nevada, where Ron Paul supporters gained control of the state party, both went to Obama after the Romney campaign actively fought to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters. I guess the GOP got what it wanted there.

There is exactly one movement that offers any real opposition to the status quo, and it ain't the conservative movement, which is on life support and entering a permanent vegetative state. Ron Paul's libertarian movement, brimming with well-educated young people is the only thing left standing. The GOP operatives who predicted a big victory tonight just look pathetic.
Maybe the Romney campaign should have had a sign hanging in campaign headquarters like Clinton's campaign in '92, except Romney's should've read, "it's the White vote stupid..."

The reality is the GOP told working class Whites to fuck off, they used to be called Reagan Democrats, and Nixon called them the Silent Majority. If libertarians in the GOP were/are so significant, the Ron Paul revolution wouldn't have fizzled back in 2008 and gone nowhere in 2012.

I think Kirkpatrick has a more relevant take on Nevada:

Quote:
Romney, The White Working Class, And The Limits Of “Economism”
By James Kirkpatrick on November 5, 2012 at 10:54pm


Unfortunately, the new post-America has reached the point where who is the better economic manager may no longer matter.

Take Nevada. While ostensibly a swing state, it is all but guaranteed to go Democratic despite having the worst economy in the country. The housing crisis, fueled by mass immigration and Bush's mortgage Hispandering, has devastated the state. Unemployment is well over 11 percent, and has actually increased considerably from when Barack Obama took office.

But the state's high concentration of Hispanics combined with blacks means that there is a large percentage of the population simply beyond economic appeals. In fact, Hispanic voters in Nevada may even flip a Senate seat to the Democrats, despite the fact that their candidate is under investigation for corruption and wasn't even expected to be competitive.
Brimelow also makes a compelling argument as well:

Quote:
Romney's White Share Fell Short Of 2010, So He Lost
By Peter Brimelow on November 7, 2012 at 3:50am


Only one metric really matters in the close 2012 Presidential race: according to CNN's exit polling (scroll down), Mitt Romey's share of the white a.k.a. American vote was just 59%, . . .

In comparison, the Congressional GOP got a 60% white share in 2010. Ronald Reagan got a 64% white share in 1988. George W. Bush won, narrowly, with a 58% white share in 2004, but of course the electorate is shifting a point or two against the GOP each election cycle because of America's ongoing post-1965 immigration disaster, supported by Bush, McCain—and Romney. . . .

The real target in American politics: the white vote, especially the Northern working class.

This is all too clear in the case of Ohio, whose loss was the death blow to Romney. CNN reports he lost the state by just two percentage points, 50-48. But he only got 57% of the white vote, for a mere fifteen point lead over Obama among whites. And whites were 79% of the Ohio electorate. Simply by reaching his national average among Ohio whites, Romney would have won.
The problem is, as time goes by there are less and less White folks, and more and more black, brown and yellow retards...
__________________
The mob was heading in, to ransack and loot the apartments of the terrified old men and women. When the troopers arrived, M-16s at the ready, the mob threatened and cursed, but the mob retreated. It had met the one thing that could stop it: force, rooted in justice, backed by courage.-1992 Republican National Convention Speech, Houston, Texas, by Patrick J. Buchanan August 17, 1992
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #544
Robin King
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Default

It's good to see Romney lose another large chunk of his fortune in another failed presidential race.

Run again, Romney!
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #545
vladmir
Why are JEWS at my table?
 
vladmir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 1,526
Default

Romney as I predicted would be the selected LOSER on election night.

Although many zionist kikes wanted Ole Greasey Mitt to win last night so they could get their long awaited war on Iran, bought and fought on us of course,... they failed...once again they failed to get an absolute lunatic war mongering narcisisst into the white house.

So this is the best the so called GOP can do? Personally I'm not buying it.
First they try to ram that panty waste Rick Santorum down our throats, or that zionist cunt Michelle Bachmann,...then it was the eternally corrupt Newt Gingrich that actually claimed the Palestinians were not even a people in his televised grovel to the zionist overlords, that won major points!!!

Then we had that pizza nigger Herman Cain, the GOP needed to plant a corrupt nigger into the fray to prove they are not Rayciss!!! He proved to be nothing more than a corrupt nigger that could bankrupt a lemonade stand so out the door he went.

And Rick Perry
And John Huntsman
and so on and so on
So we ended up with Romney, unelectable corrupt corporate/zionist stooge Willard Romney.
and they spent 2.6 billion zog Bernake bucks to lose, the highest costing race in history, and Amerikwan fools actually believe they will fix all ills by voting?
I personally didn't vote, this was a lose/ lose battle we are facing here, now we get 4 more years of some street corner hustler nigger from Chi town that has done NOTHING in his 4 years in office but shred the constitution and with the help of CONgress basically turn the middle class into a low paid overtaxed SERF class, just like Shrub did during his 8 year stint in office.

Locally in my state we has such impotant issues to cast a vote on ,...
Queer marriage,....this comes up every single year in my state, either this or Indian Casinos(run by kikes of course) Last time they got their casinos so the focus was on queer rights to marry each other,...personally I'm sick of queers and they don't need nor deserve any special rights.

Then we had which local con artist will be sent to DC as the replacement for that pro zionist cunt Olympia Snowe.

No I didn't vote, I really don't care and on the presidential level my vote doesn't count anyhow, so why bother?

Mitt Romney PFFFFFTTT!!! Massachuesetts liberal hiding in a GOP cloak, even Massholes didn't vote for him, and they voted in Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy repeatedly.

This country deserves what it is about to get.
__________________
Let the fun begin!
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #546
John in Woodbridge
Senior Member
 
John in Woodbridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,749
Default

At least in Virginia the GOP ads ran for an expanded military. I didn't see that getting much play with folks (just like McLame playing the war hero).

I wasn't a big fan of George Allen but now I've got see that smarmy little faggot Tim Kaine on the news. Christ can't this cuntry just implode already? Anything has got to be better than this steady drip.
__________________
It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #547
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John in Woodbridge View Post
At least in Virginia the GOP ads ran for an expanded military. I didn't see that getting much play with folks (just like McLame playing the war hero).

I wasn't a big fan of George Allen but now I've got see that smarmy little faggot Tim Kaine on the news. Christ can't this cuntry just implode already? Anything has got to be better than this steady drip.
Allen qualifies under the Law of Return.

Kaine is loathsome. He is a nobody who married the daughter of the former governor of Va who 'led' the state during forced integration. Her daddy abused her and her siblings by sending them to nigger schools in Richmond to make a political point.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #548
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin King View Post
It's good to see Romney lose another large chunk of his fortune in another failed presidential race.

Run again, Romney!
I wonder if Jew Adelson is still going to cough up the 10 million he pledged to Romney's campaign.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #549
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefist View Post
The reality is the GOP told working class Whites to fuck off, they used to be called Reagan Democrats, and Nixon called them the Silent Majority. If libertarians in the GOP were/are so significant, the Ron Paul revolution wouldn't have fizzled back in 2008 and gone nowhere in 2012.
You're good at rewriting history.

Paul was by far more popular in 2012 than in 2008. And the Democrats who crossed over to the Republicans did so with Paul.

You're also a great one to blame the victims. It's not like the judeo-media and Romney dirty tricks had anything to do with the Paul loss. Nope. It's all their own fault.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefist
I think Kirkpatrick has a more relevant take on Nevada:

Brimelow also makes a compelling argument as well:
You're one of these 'VDARE' clowns. Brimelow's another slimy cadger. Kirkpatrick punch-pulls and reframes. No wonder you're humping for Patsy Decline.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #550
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rounder View Post
What's the matter with you allegedly jew-wise people ?? You know GD well that big jews will decide who wins. Big jews control the freakin media, and the media can easily sway a large percentage of voters, either way they want.

They simply aren't gonna allow a black, lame duck, commander in chief. Lame ducks, have nothing politically to lose.

Political conventions are little more than carnivals for the shabbaaz goyim - illusions of freedom and independence.

Didn't yaw'll notice in Obama's speech, that he did not, contrary to expectations, apologize to the jews for leaving Israel out of the party's platform, or make them more promises ?? He even made some strongly anti-war comments, to the delight of the largely anti-Israel audience.


Cheer for the coon, not for Israel's whore.
So Glenn, how did you make out betting against the "black, lame duck, commander in chief" that the Joos simply wouldn't allow to win?

Hope you still have your shirt.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #551
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Default

The Tea Party Got It Right, Mitt Got It Wrong

frontpagemag.com ^ | Nov 7, 2012 | Daniel Greenfield

In this election the Republican Party ran two wholly inoffensive blue state Republicans on a platform of jobs at a time when the economy was everyone’s chief concern and the incumbent had absolutely failed to fix the economy. And they lost.

The Monday — or Wednesday — morning quarterbacks will have a fine time debating what Mitt Romney should have done differently. The red Republicans will say that he should have been more aggressive and should have hit Obama on Benghazi. The blue Republicans will blame a lack of outreach to Latinos. Some will blame Sandy, others will blame Christie and many will point to voter fraud. And they will all have a point, but the makings of this defeat did not happen in the last two weeks; they happened in the last two years.

Mitt Romney won the primaries because he was electable. But, as it turned out, he really wasn’t electable after all. Not when the chief criteria of electability is having no opinion, no point of view and no reason to run for office except to win. Not when the chief criteria of being a Republican presidential nominee is being able to convince people that you’re hardly a Republican at all.

Romney was a star political athlete who had an excellent training regimen and coaching staff. But to win elections, you have to change people’s minds. It’s not enough to try hard or to fight hard; you have to fight for something besides the chance to round the bases. You have to wake people up to a cause.

The Republican comeback did not begin with innocuous candidates; it began with angry protesters in costumes and Gadsden flags marching outside ObamaCare town halls. The 2010 midterm election triumphs were not the work of a timorous establishment, but of a vigorous grassroots opposition. And once the Tea Party movement started the fire, the Republican establishment acted like the Tea Party had sabotaged their comeback and cut the ties with their own grassroots movement. Separated, the Republican grassroots and the Republican Party both withered on the vine.

The stunning 2010 midterm election victories happened because a conservative opposition loudly and vociferously convinced a majority of Americans that ObamaCare would be harmful to them. And then that fantastic engine of change was packed away and replaced with political consultants who were all focused on seizing the center and offending as few people as possible. But you don’t win political battles by being inoffensive. And you don’t win elections by avoiding conflict.

Is it any wonder that the 2012 election played out the way it did?

The Democrats in the Bush years were about as unlikable a party as could ever be conceived of. They were hostile, hateful and obstructionist. They spewed conspiracy theories at the drop of a hat and behaved in a way that would have convinced any reasonable person not to entrust them with a lawnmower, let alone political power. And not only were they rewarded for that by winning Congress, but they also went on to win the White House.

Why? Because dissatisfied people gravitate to an opposition. They don’t gravitate to a loyal opposition. They aren’t inspired by mild-mannered rhetoric, but by those who appear to channel their anger.

When the Republican Party sold out the Tea Party, it sold out its soul, and the only driving energy that it had. And there was nothing to replace it with. The Republican Party stopped being the opposition and became a position that it was willing to reposition to get closer to the center. Mitt Romney embodied that willingness to say anything to win and it is exactly that willingness to say anything to win that the public distrusts.

The elevation of Mitt Romney was the triumph of inoffensiveness. Romney ran an aggressive campaign, but it was a mechanical exercise, a smooth assault by trained professionals paid to spin talking points in dangerous directions. But, what if the voters really wanted a certain amount of offensiveness?

What if they wanted someone who mirrored their anger at being out of work, at having to look at stacks of unpaid bills and at not knowing where their next paycheck was coming from? What if they wanted someone whose anger and distrust of the government echoed their own?

Romney very successfully made the case that he would be a more credible steward of the economy. It was enough to turn out a sizable portion of the electorate, but not enough of it. He tried to be Reagan confronting Carter, but what was remarkable about Reagan, is that he had moments of anger and passion; electric flashes of feeling that stirred his audience and made them believe that he understood their frustrations. That was the source of Reagan’s moral authority and it was entirely lacking in Romney. And without that anger, there is no compelling reason to vote for an opposition party.

The establishment had its chance with Mitt Romney. The former Massachusetts governor was everything that they could possibly want. Moderate, bipartisan and fairly liberal. With his business background, he could make a perfect case for being able to turn the economy around. They had their perfect candidate and their perfect storm and they blew it.

The Republican Party is not going to win elections by being inoffensive. It is not going to win elections by going so far to the center that it no longer stands for anything. It is not going to win elections by throwing away all the reasons that people might have to vote for it. It is not going to win elections by constantly trying to accommodate what it thinks independent voters want, instead of cultivating and growing its base, and using them as the nucleus for an opposition that will change the minds of those independent voters.

The Republican Party has tried playing Mr. Nice Guy. It may be time to get back to being an opposition movement. And the way to do that is by relearning the lessons of the Tea Party movement. The Democratic Party began winning when it embraced the left, instead of running away from it. If the Republican Party wants to win, then it has to embrace the right and learn to get angry again.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenf...-got-it-wrong/

Last edited by Leonard Rouse; November 7th, 2012 at 09:12 AM.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #552
Robin King
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Default

Right now, Netanyahu is contemplating assassination of Obama, or waiting for another four years to invade Iran.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #553
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin King View Post
Right now, Netanyahu is contemplating assassination of Obama, or waiting for another four years to invade Iran.
If you want to know what kind of post makes the ears of government agents prick up like a terrier smelling bacon, the one above is a perfect example. Real stupid.

Why didn't Netanyahu simply install Romney as POTUS? He's omnipotent, right?
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #554
Whitefist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 470
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonard Rouse View Post
You're good at rewriting history.

Paul was by far more popular in 2012 than in 2008. And the Democrats who crossed over to the Republicans did so with Paul.

You're also a great one to blame the victims. It's not like the judeo-media and Romney dirty tricks had anything to do with the Paul loss. Nope. It's all their own fault.

You're one of these 'VDARE' clowns. Brimelow's another slimy cadger. Kirkpatrick punch-pulls and reframes. No wonder you're humping for Patsy Decline.
You're a curious one, in another thread you argue against Buchanan because he's not a WN, and that according to you he destroyed the Reform Party, which btw, assuming it was going to become a viable 3rd party option, which I contend it never would have regardless because of Ross Perot's involvement at its inception, the Reform Party was never a racialist political party anyway.

Now you're here in this thread to defend libertarian Ron Paul, the same Ron Paul that sees no reason to erect any barrier between America and Mexico, the same Ron Paul who favors the H-1B visa program, which has been a mud conduit from south asia, the same Ron Paul who has no problem with 100 million muds in America, so long as, like one of his biggest supporters, Alex Jones, the muds are "constitutionalists."

Paul's campaign was about as effective as the Ron Paul revolution of 2008, and while it certainly is true that the republican establishment sandbagged Paul in the early primary process, let's not exaggerate Paul's appeal to rank and file republicans, many of whom were more in agreement with Romney, Santorum, Bachman, and Gingrich on foreign policy.

The postmortem reality of the 2012 campaign is that because Romney and his republicans are too cowardly to even run a willie horton type add like Bush I did in 1988 against Dukakis, with much success, and to directly appeal to the White electorate on issues like "building the dang fence" (something McCain suddenly came around to after he lost to Obama and was fighting for his senate seat in AZ) and eliminating racial preferences, i.e. nonwhite advancement at the expense of more talented, qualified Whites, they lost. Moreover, because republicans don't defend White interests when in power, like for example, maybe challenging Obama's two Supreme Court appointments, wise latina Sotomayor and Dr. Zhivago cast member Kagan, and maybe even "borking" (Democrats term for blocking judicial appointment) them in the interests of White survival, they lost.

And because republicans, like Romney, support policy that continues to damage and wither away their only constituency, Whites, 2012 marks the end of the GOP as a contender for the White House, RIP GOP.

Both Kirkpatrick and Brimelow have stated that obvious reality, which apparently bothers you, because anyone who makes the obvious racial observations is the enemy, and I suppose in your upside down world, the deracinated libertarian Ron Paul is the savior of the White race... if only Ron Paul could bring back the Reform Party...

Btw, nice jewish source you cite above, telling us the problem for the republicans is that they need to embrace the "right"...and the deracinated Tea Party...you stink of kike, with 5,000 posts in 2 years and your fondness for things race neutral and jewish, like the Reform Party and Tea Party and Ron Paul...
__________________
The mob was heading in, to ransack and loot the apartments of the terrified old men and women. When the troopers arrived, M-16s at the ready, the mob threatened and cursed, but the mob retreated. It had met the one thing that could stop it: force, rooted in justice, backed by courage.-1992 Republican National Convention Speech, Houston, Texas, by Patrick J. Buchanan August 17, 1992

Last edited by Whitefist; November 7th, 2012 at 10:09 AM.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #555
Robin King
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie in Ohio View Post
If you want to know what kind of post makes the ears of government agents prick up like a terrier smelling bacon, the one above is a perfect example. Real stupid.
As if they're not crawling over VNN already.

Quote:
If you want to know what kind of post makes the ears of government agents prick up like a terrier smelling bacon ...
How would YOU know? Lemme guess ...

What's stupid about it? It's not like this would be the first American president Jews have assassinated.

Oops! I'm not supposed to say that. Government agents around.

Quote:
Why didn't Netanyahu simply install Romney as POTUS? He's omnipotent, right?
Install? You mean by rigging the electronic voting machines? Too obvious. Too many polls called Obama. It wasn't that close a race.

And it's not as if Netanyahu didn't try. The false flag attack on Benghazi US embassy workers and officials was timed to help Romney and hurt Obama. However, Romney didn't take advantage of it as he should have, and then Netanyahu made it worse by pulling out that childish Wile E. Coyote bomb chart.

It's no secret that Israel engages in false flag terrorism and covert assassinations as part of her geopolitical strategy. It's no secret Israeli Jews assassinated JFK, or they did the USS Liberty attacks, or they did 9/11, Donnie in Ohio.

Donnie in Ohio protecting the reputation of the Israeli Jews again (and Netanyahu in particular in this thread). How NOBLE.

His "You're crazy" tactic didn't work to shut me up; now he's trying the "Government agents are watching you" angle.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #556
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detective Robin King View Post

Install? You mean by rigging the electronic voting machines? Too obvious. Too many polls called Obama. It wasn't that close a race.
As much as I am loathe to feed into your obsessions in yet another totally unrelated thread....So Israel was able to carry out 9/11 but was NOT able to put Romney in the White House because it would be 'too obvious'?

Laughable. Romney was the hawk on Israel, not Obama. The Republicans made a point out of it.

The Jews aren't omnipotent, Detective King. They can be beaten, but it takes winners, and that ain't you.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #557
Robin King
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Default

You don't think 9/11 was done by Mossad?

Is that what you're saying, Donnie in Ohio?
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #558
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin King View Post

His "You're crazy!" tack didn't work; now he's trying the "Government agents are watching you!" angle.
Well, you are crazy, so I'm in the clear there. You're a self-admitted obsessive, remember?

I just think mentioning assassination and the sitting POTUS, in any context whatsoever on a WN message board, is a very bad idea.

My opinion only.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #559
Robin King
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Default

Well, keep your opinions to yourself.
 
Old November 7th, 2012 #560
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin King View Post
Well, keep your opinions to yourself.
You first, crank.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.
Page generated in 2.09302 seconds.