|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
February 19th, 2011 | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 47
|
Fighting for their rights in Egypt? Bahrain? Algeria? … No, Wisconsin! (video)
See the thousands of government workers fighting for their rights with an unbridled passion.
Madison-based photographer Matt Wisniewski nestled himself among the chanting crows inside the Wisconsin statehouse to capture their enthusiasm and spirit. Government employees, particularly teachers, are sounding off against newly elected Republican Governor Scott Walker’s plan to cut pensions and hike health insurance rates. Walker insists the concessions are essential to plug a $3.6 billion gap in the budget. Great video! http://neglectedwar.com/blog/archives/2824 |
February 19th, 2011 | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
|
Quote:
In Wisconsin someone who receives over $201,340 in annual income is only taxed 0.25% more than someone who works for $26,850. This is laughable!!! http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html#tx1b Republican Gov. Scott Walker: We're Broke!!! We don't have any money!! http://vodpod.com/watch/5603492-wisc...ker-were-broke |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #3 |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
|
February 19th, 2011 | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Quote:
Wisonsin Income Tax Rates: http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/pcs/taxrates.html 1) Single person, with taxable income of $26,850: $1,081.91 + (.0650 x ($26,850 - $20,130)) = $1,518.71 2) Single person, with a taxable income of $201,340: $9,588.46 + (.0675 x ($201,340 - $151,000)) = $12,986.41 The second person pays 8.55 times the amount in income taxes than the first. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #5 | |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
Quote:
Instead of going after some small business owner with an income of $200,000 per year, and who probably has created several other jobs in the process of making that 200 grand, why not go after the banking and financial institutions? That's where the real money is. Hudson seems to have the idea that a capable individual making a decent living should be penalized for the benefit of the less capable. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Quote:
Zealots like Hudson, have helped the Jews throughout history in destroying the finest of our White race, out of their jealousy of seeing someone doing well for themselves. They never go after the real culprits, the ones who swindle us all. They only go after those that they see in their daily lives, driving that new car, or live in the large home on the other side of town. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #7 | |
Hath not a Goy eyes?
|
Quote:
That's what America, along with the entire world, is all about now--plugging gaps in the budget. I don't think there's a single country out there that's actually paying off its national debt to the jew bankers. Not a one. Talk about a perpetual harvest.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
|
Quote:
You know it really blows me away how the masses will sell themselves into slavery if given the chance. I would like you to give me an example of some small shop owners who have $200,000 a year in net income over and above the cost of running their business (which includes payroll). You want me to imagine that some yahoo who runs a "mail boxes etc" franchise store or something like that who hires a helper or two is pulling in that kind of dough??? Really? $200k! Banks store money for the wealthy and try to make more money for their customers ie: the wealthy, how do you imagine that we should blame banks and believe that banks own all that money, and they should be gone after? WTF??? You've been duped, friend. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Quote:
Last edited by SmokyMtn; February 19th, 2011 at 10:07 PM. |
|
February 19th, 2011 | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
|
Quote:
You see nothing wrong with that? Traditionally wage was never considered "income" in the U.S.A, but after decades of the rich pulling the wool over the workers eyes, the workers have been duped into accepting that their WAGE is INCOME. And so it is assumed today that if you earn a wage you have income, and if you have income you must pay tax on it. Income was never considered to be a working man's wages and thus was never taxed prior to 1913 or so. This is the same as a slave owner charging his slaves for room and board. The common people create the conditions for which there is a stable society for this minority of people to become multiple times more enriched than the common man. So who should pay for the social expenses of this society? The men who benefit most or the men who benefit least? For if the rich could be rich anywhere, it would stand to reason that they could leave for Africa and dwell among the negroes if they don't like to be taxed to maintain the society that allows them to become wealthy. No wage earner should pay a dime in tax out of his wage, period. The man who uses another man then expects that man to chip in or get lost so that the rich man can keep more of the money he makes over and above that man, is a thief and a criminal. If we agree that a man needs (just a number for example) $60,000 to have a family and maintain a life, then he should not be taxed on anything below that amount. The men who have incomes over and above the money it takes to live comfortably should bear the entire expense that society costs to maintain, for they benefit the most, they should be happy to oblige in maintaining a society where they are so lucky. Problem is, the rich are greedy, and if the common people do not stick up for themselves they find themselves stepped on. And thus we have what we have today in this country. |
|
February 20th, 2011 | #11 | |
Mad Science
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,686
|
Quote:
/sarcasm
__________________
Thinking... Please wait. |
|
Tags |
kill the bill, wisconsin, workers rights |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|