Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old May 7th, 2009 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default How to Keep Nigs Out of Your Restaurant or Bar

[The jews outlawed free association in the name of nigger liberation, but clever restauranteurs find legal ways to keep the noxious bushmen out of their dining establishments. Great article!]

Sociobiology
Stuff White People Like
by Robert Weissberg on May 07, 2009

The Subtle Art of Exclusion

Freedom of association, like private property, is a core American legal principle whose importance to liberty seemed so self-evident, so fundamental that the Founding Fathers apparently took it for granted. At best, the First Amendment alludes to it when it prohibits Congress from infringing on the right of free assembly. And, happily, for about 175 years, its bedrock status remained unchallenged. The 1964 Civil Rights Act that banned racial discrimination in public accommodations—hotels, movie theatres and restaurants—changed everything. This was soon followed by an avalanche of similar anti-discrimination laws and court decisions, and virtually no aspect of our existence—even choosing one’s neighbors—now escaped government meddling.

That increasingly precarious nature of this right is evident in recent Supreme Court decisions. In Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984) the Court acknowledged that groups (here the male-only Jaycees) enjoyed the right to determine its own membership, but—and there is always a but—a Minnesota public accommodation law required the Jaycees to admit women despite the Jaycee’s desires to be male only. Minnesota, the Court reasoned, had a compelling interest in providing Minnesota women the economic benefits that male Jaycee members enjoyed. Associate Justice O’Connor further added that the Jaycees were a commercial organization and thus subject to state regulation of its membership. And, in January of 2000 by only a single vote in a 5-4 split decision did the Court uphold the right of New Jersey Boy Scouts to exclude homosexuals. No doubt, this keep-the-gays-out issue will come before the Court again, and the outcome might well go the other way.

Meanwhile, the list of groups “protected” from discrimination likewise expanded, and it has become increasingly more difficult to insist that “freedom of association” has any meaning. The burden of proof now seems entirely on those wishing to exclude outsiders, and potential litigation costs alone often counsel surrender to the atheist anxious to join the campus Christian group. Worse, “freedom of association” had been publicly transformed into an alleged ruse to injure African Americans, women, homosexuals, the elderly, the childless and families with children, the odd appearing, the disabled, those of different faith and on and on. Government-mandated “inclusion” is now America’s passion, far out-shining freedom to choose one’s compatriots.

Nevertheless, freedom of association fans have some good news, though it is almost never admitted in public and is invisible to the untrained eye. A guerilla push-back war on behalf of homogeneity is one way to put it. As government shoves harder and harder to deprive, say, WASPy men from mingling with other WASPy men, below-the-radar but perfectly legal subterfuges evolve. An almost evolutionary back and forth adaptive quality informs this process in which bureaucrats impose new, more coercive inclusion edicts and targets subtly adjust to minimize the hated directives. This sabotage is not inherently anti-black, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-Semitic or whatever; it merely reflect an often economically driven effort to satisfy a clientele that prefers to mingle with its own. Everything is, moreover, absolutely neutral and totally legal in principle—tactics are about keeping unwanted people, regardless of stripe, away. Perchance, black lesbians will one day use the very same tactics to exclude white gay males from their favorite Dyke Bar.

At the risk of revealing hidden trade secrets, let me recount a few tactics derived from the restaurant business taught to me by a family member who must, naturally, be kept nameless. Disclaimer: I personally find all this tactics morally reprehensive but only report them to satisfy the public’s right to know. Imagine a restaurant anxious to attract middle-class female customers located within walking distance of a housing project populated by poor, hip-hop inclined young men. Though the “nice ladies” will vehemently deny it, they will go elsewhere if forced to mingle with these “threatening” young men. How, then, can the eatery survive without running afoul of discrimination complaints or, worse, a Denny’s-like hugely expensive lawsuit?

First, softly pipe in classical music, preferably of the Baroque style. It’s not that these women adore Vivaldi, or prefer it over Telemann; rather they find this sound “comforting.” Young black males, however, are almost unconsciously uncomfortable in its presence—classical music, Baroque in particular, is the very essence of “white.” Together with décor, age and ethnic staff composition, background music is an especially effective and legally bulletproof way to “shape” a clientele. It is no accident that successful retail chains obsess over background musical programming while inept rivals often permit staff to select music willy-nilly, a policy that almost always brings trouble given horrific teenager tastes. A jukebox entrepreneur friend once explained to me that his “white trash” bar owners insisted that his machines include at least one hardcore Stand-by-Your-Man country-western tune available to bartenders when undesired scruffy types asked for service.

The menu is also critical. Our devious proprietor will exclude any items known to be favorites among certain lower class types—inexpensive “fast food” fried dishes while pricing everything just a bit beyond what McDonald’s or Burger King offers. And no hamburgers or cheeseburgers, never! Further sprinkle a few intimidating foreign words on the menu—at least five types of Quiches. The coup de grace will be offering all sandwiches with “gourmet” five-grain bread, everything topped with alfalfa sprouts and arugula, only using low-sodium, low-fat deli meats, offering soups of the cream of broccoli or lobster bisque variety, plus a mind-boggling selection of exotic herbal teas, among other “white” delicacies. If a potato side-dish is to be offered, make it organic German vinegar/sour cream red potato salad, never French fries. Sit-down only service is also preferable help since restaurant owners recognize that lower-class blacks prefer counter-service or take-out, and view having to tip waiters a deal killer when making their choices.

Location is also vital, so a savvy restaurateur will avoid entrances through malls populated by rambunctious teenagers (black and Hispanic teenagers, even gangs, prefer enclosed, climate-controlled spaces for congregating). No middle-class customer wants to run this disconcerting gauntlet. The ideal location is one safely distant from where feral youth loll about and, at least I’ve been told, that new, more upscale California malls no longer have roofs or central meeting points that attract scruffy teenagers (McDonald’s overcame this “delinquent” problem by banning cigarette vending machines and with loitering teenagers gone, “nice” families arrived.).

Higher end urban establishments appealing to affluent males also enjoy a repertory of perfectly legal customer-shaping strategies. It is not that these establishments dislike blacks; rather, they realize that if certain minorities show up, their regulars will feel uncomfortable and this destroys business. Next time one enters a fancy bar catering to well-heeled patrons in an urban setting observe the liquors featured at the bar. Chances are there will be no conspicuous displays of certain super high-status Cognacs, especially Courvoisier “Initiale Extra” or Hennessy “Paradis Cognac” and even their lower-priced “VS” versions may be off to the side (more prominent might be Spanish brandies like Fundador). The reason is simple: wealthy whites might order a $200 bottle of French chateau-bottled wine at the meal but not, say, a $100 sniffer of Hennessy Paradis Cognac beforehand. These fiendishly expensive brandies are especially appealing to certain types of show-off customers, and while their lucre may be much appreciated, management seldom appreciates this clientele. As with public schools, a tip point exists—as more flamboyantly-dressed African American customers (and their ladies in tow) flock in for their $25 Hennessy XO’s, the atmosphere shifts, and the uneasy regulars drift elsewhere. Better to just not carry these items.

Subtle differences in pricing can be decisive. To keep an upscale whites, proprietors will price drinks high but also increase quantity to maintain decent value. If you charge $12 for a single malt scotch, pour an ounce and half (a very generous shot) but never, as cheap gin mills do, charge $5 for two-thirds of an ounce in a glass that magnifies content. This will invite the “wrong people.” Similarly, make sure that the cheapest menu item is relatively expensive, but not over-priced for what is provided. Lower-class patrons will reject a $25 for a hamburger even if quality and quantity justify price. For them, the absolute price—$25—is what counts, not the ratio of costs to benefits. The comparison is McDonald’s and they that a $25 burger is a swindle and thus never enter the establishment, let alone return.

Once this perfectly legal, actually benign approach to managing the social environment is understood, all sorts of oddities become apparent. Freedom of association is preserved but only on the sly. A standing joke concerns how WASPy clubs can exclude Jews, and avoid lawsuits: just serve bland, somewhat over-priced food (especially acquired taste dishes like creamed spinach or pot pies). Rest assured, no self-respecting Jew would clamor for membership. If that fails, forbid any menu substitutions and post multiple signs saying, “No loud talking And/Or Exaggerated Bragging About One’s Children.” Gays can also be kept outside the doors quite easily: There is nothing illegal about filling up the jukebox with classic 1970s rock—and removing all the Broadway show tunes. And then follow up with hors d’oeuvres of messy Buffalo wings, only inexpensive domestic beers on tap, and a TV permanently fixed on ESPN. It is hard to be sued by a gay rights group for one’s tacky hors d’oeuvres options.

Our examples are all from the food industry, but similar clientele management tactics undoubtedly exist elsewhere. Humans have an instinctive sense of “being welcome” versus knowing where it might be “dangerous” to tread, easily recognize the tell-tale signals and this is beyond government eradication. For half a century, whites (and Asians) have avoided court-order education micro-managing by simply moving, enrolling their children in private schools, or home-schooling. Even within a forcefully “integrated” school, racial and ethnic groups tend to self-segregate, and this is irreversible. Ethnic-based organizations resist Big Brother’s inclusionary intervention by conducting all business in Korean or Chinese (and their restaurants and other “public” places often follow the same keep-the-outsiders-out strategy). “Black only” establishments play the same discrimination game with music and ambiance, and whites never complain. Conceivably, a Fifth Avenue apartment building seeking “the right” clientele might decorate its lobby with oil paintings of sailboat, bronze statutes of thoroughbred horses and other WASPy decorations as its version of the (selective) welcome mat. Perhaps there are professionals who slyly specialize in this carefully hidden management—experts who will insure that the “right” glossy real-estate magazines are placed in an expensive doctor’s office to make some patients feel at ease while providing those on Medicaid nothing to read (and play only Bach for good measure).

Examples could doubtlessly be multiplied, but the point should be clear: no matter how forcefully government tries to homogenize society, create a colorful mosaic of the sort pictured on those multi-culti 8th grade geography textbooks, people will resist. This reflects biological instinct but is aided by economic self-interest. Those who can discern a way to make customers comfortable will prosper just as private school Headmasters who boast of superb golf and cross-country teams will attract the “right” students. Humans are devious, and thankfully so. The bad news is that today’s apparatchiki never cease in their quest to break down all the “artificial” barriers to inclusion. So, the games continue and let us hope that one of these inclusivity-driven bureaucrats does not discover that Vivaldi creates a hostile environment and should immediately be replaced by Public Enemy.
 
 

Tags
free association, free pork for jews, jewey jewstein, restaurants

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.
Page generated in 0.30714 seconds.