|
September 14th, 2008 | #1 |
deken
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
|
Videos for people new to the Jewish question
Here are a series of videos useful for people just learning bout the Jewish problem or a brush up for those already aware.
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/howiz.htm |
December 18th, 2008 | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
|
Jew Control U.S. Foreign Policy
Quote:
In exchange for subsidizing Israel to the tune of Billion$ a year (with no interest and no strings attached) and underwriting various weapons systems that remain exclusive to Israel, and supplying them with munitions whenever they need them for their militaristic adventures the Israelis are exempted from supporting the US militarily (regardless of the cause), do whatever the hell they want, constantly spy inside the US and basically function as an ungrateful and demanding welfare case–Yet no politicians dare to examine just how the hell the US really benefits from this lopsided arrangement. |
|
December 19th, 2008 | #3 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
In Vino Veritas
this is a big deal. CIA kills people without getting caught under color of law. So does Israel. WOuldnt it be interesting if the CIA got tired of a "shitty little country" of 6 million Jews off in Palestine calling the shots for the worlds one remaining superpower, and decided it was time to rub out a few trouble making jews to teach em a lesson. I promise you if John Foster Dulles could have seen the trouble they would cause, he'd have swatted them like flies.
Evidently Tenet did not get the news that the USA govt is "ZOG" and he is supposed to be taking orders from the Jewboys. evidently he thinks he has a right to do his job, and that Jews were trying to start a fucking war and pin the lies on him. Which is true. What else can you infer? While the USA govt is unduly influenced by Jews, it is NOT owned by them. There IS the possibility of defeating Jews. It starts with naming them. Like George Tenet did on this occasion. IN VINO VERITAS. |
December 19th, 2008 | #4 | |
deken
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
|
Quote:
|
|
December 19th, 2008 | #5 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
Harry S. Truman 1947 Diary Quote:
Yeah , in their own minds how could anyone complain , besides who would listen ......... |
||
December 19th, 2008 | #6 | |
We're the Good Guys
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pediatric Burn Unit
Posts: 4,776
|
Quote:
Jews really are born raconteurs. And my how they love to smother their little smears with a sumptuous gravy of esoteric adjectives, odd adverbs, and unusual verb clauses. Neoconservatives are really just "the Jews"? What a discredited antisemitic canard. |
|
December 22nd, 2008 | #7 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Anyhow, Uncle Schmuely can just print more money right? Its not like theres anything backing it besides his promise to tax us more. Inflation will hit sooner or later like a tsunami folks, remember that. |
|
December 23rd, 2008 | #8 |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
They might have to be in a drunken state to gather up the courage they do not have when they are sober, yes.
|
December 23rd, 2008 | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
|
December 24th, 2008 | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
|
|
January 15th, 2009 | #11 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 312
|
Israel is Getting Away with Murder!
On 12 January 2009, The New York Times reported thus:
Quote:
Olmert said: Quote:
On 13 January 2009, the Israeli historian and Oxford University professor, Avi Shlaim, said this on Channel 4 News: Quote:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid7045912001 "Getting away with murder"? "Blind American support for Israel"? "Excessive Israeli brutality"? "Insane offensive". It's not just us saying it, is it? By 14 January 2009, 19 days after the Israelis began bombing the city, 1,013 Palestinians, more than 300 of them children, had been killed in Gaza. 4,500 people had been injured, 1,600 of them children. 3 Israeli civilians and 10 soldiers had lost their lives during the conflict. 3 of those soldiers were killed by Israeli tank fire. During the course of the confict, Israel's President, Shimon Peres, has said this: Quote:
Which might conceiveably have made a bit of a difference in the sums. Check out The Murderer, the Rapist, the Bully here: http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page....iParentId=1192 And The Israeli Invasion and Gaza's Offshore Gas Fields here: http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page....iParentId=1192
__________________
THE TRAITOR WITHIN http://traitor666.blogspot.co.uk/ ROGUES' GALLERY http://roguesgallery666.blogspot.co.uk/ RACIST! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C4jD8ijhSg |
||||
January 16th, 2009 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
I can say from personal experience, being able to demand that someone take your phone call immediately is the sure sign of a boss-subordinate relationship.
|
December 6th, 2009 | #13 |
Administrator
|
ha'aretz admits potential US government employees are vetted for pro-israel views
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=104656 |
February 27th, 2011 | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,690
|
Quote:
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
|
March 10th, 2011 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,690
|
The J Street Scam
by Philip Giraldi, March 10, 2011 J Street is seductive. Americans have been bombarded with propaganda about Israel ever since the foundation of the country over sixty years ago. More recently, the United States has been designated by the media and the chattering classes as the protector of the Jewish state with little regard for those actions undertaken by Tel Aviv that impact negatively on US interests. This is because the Israel Lobby is the most powerful foreign lobby in the United States by far. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has become the ugly side of the Lobby, has rightly drawn criticism for its bullying tactics and its alignment with extreme right-wing parties in Israel. Progressives and some conservatives in the United States who support Israel as a homeland for the world’s Jews have been eager to find a more respectable alternative lobby. That alternative is J Street. J Street, which recently completed its third annual conference in Washington, is a self-proclaimed kinder and gentler advocate of Israeli interests. It favors peace on equitable terms with the Palestinians and also with Israel’s Arab neighbors. It opposes expansion of the Israeli settlements on the West Bank because they are an obstacle to peace. It calls itself "pro-Israel, pro-American, and pro-peace." If one judges by the enemies it has attracted, including nearly all leading neoconservatives, J Street has to be considered a breath of fresh air and the best option for sustainable peace in the Middle East. Sounds good, doesn’t it? But somehow the parts don’t quite add up. J Street really only differs from AIPAC in tone, not in substance. It advocates continued and unlimited United States support for Israel, militarily, economically, and politically. J Street wants Israel to have an overwhelming military advantage over its Arab neighbors and it wants that margin to be provided by Washington. It wants Republicans and Democrats together to provide political cover for Israel when it attacks Lebanon or bombs the Gazans. It does not object when Israel exercises a military option against its neighbors. In spite of the fact that the United States is in deep trouble economically while Israel is one of the richest countries in the world and is enjoying an economic boom, J Street was one of the first organizations to complain when Senator Rand Paul called for an end to all foreign aid. J Street also believes that Israel is and should be a Jewish state with unlimited right of "return" for Jews from anywhere in the world and no such rights for Christians or Muslims who lived in the country before 1948. A Jewish state, by definition, would have limited rights for the 20% and growing segment of the current Israeli population that is Christian or Muslim. J Street quixotically supports a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, even though it knows that the half million Israeli Jews living in settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank cannot be moved and will make two states impossible. It does not accept a one-state solution, the only one likely to work, that would make the followers of all religions equal citizens in a unified state embracing both Arabs and Jews. J Street’s Executive Director Jeremy Ben-Ami has called a one-state solution a "nightmare." J Street seems a lot better than AIPAC, but much of what it advocates sounds familiar. Ben-Ami has criticized the highly acclaimed John Mearsheimer-Stephen Walt book on the Israel Lobby for its scholarship and refers to the authors as anti-Semites. J Street opposed Israel’s bloody incursion into Gaza, but only because it was disproportionate, and then rejected the UN’s Goldstone report that detailed the war crimes that were committed. When Israeli commandoes killed nine Turkish citizens on the Mavi Marmara ship trying to break the blockade of Gaza, J Street mourned the loss of life but blamed the victims for deliberately "using the media coverage to further damage Israel’s standing in world opinion." J Street supports military action against Iran as a "last resort" to incapacitate the country’s nuclear program and denies to Tehran the right to enrich uranium for any purpose. Supporters of J Street claim that its positions will become more nuanced as its influence grows, but one of the panels at the just-concluded convention debated "Is the Settlement Enterprise Destroying Israel’s Democracy?" One might well ask why there was a question mark at the end since it is well documented that the settlements bring with them every imaginable evil. Fifteen months ago, J Street sponsored a speaking tour by an Israeli general Danny Rothschild who was advocating a two-state solution with the Palestinians. He made the rounds in Washington arguing that demographics and common sense dictate that Israel must come to some kind of settlement. But then, he added, there is "Islamofascism" and also Iran, genuine threats that must be dealt with by force. So what was the real message, peace with the Palestinians (on Israel’s terms, it might be added), or expand the war against extremism while bombing Iran? But the real problem with J Street is that it exists at all. Why should there be a new and powerful lobby in Washington composed of American citizens arguing for a special relationship with any country? Why should the United States be providing unlimited support to a nation that claims to be a democracy but which limits rights based on religion? If J Street truly wants to fix Israel it should be working in Israel, not in the United States, because the settlers and hardline right-wing parties are Israeli problems. J Street knows perfectly well that Congress, the White House, and the media will not challenge the Israel status quo so, at best, it is a bit of scam designed to support Israel while making progressives feel more comfortable in lining up behind the effort. The United States already has too many special interest lobbies promoting policies that do absolutely nothing good for the American people. If Israel has become a rogue state, which it has, the problem must be resolved by the Israelis themselves and the diaspora Jews who believe that they have a stake in the outcome. If the latter really want to have an impact, they should turn in their US passports and move to Israel. From the American perspective, which should be the only one that matters to US citizens, the best policy for the United States is to disengage from the Arab-Israel conflict, not to become even more deeply involved from another, slightly more palatable perspective offered by J Street. http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/...j-street-scam/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
May 17th, 2011 | #16 |
Bread and Circuses
|
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
May 17th, 2011 | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,414
|
Currently, Israel is considering annexing the West Bank Settlements. So in retrospect, we can see why Israel was objecting at the time.
|
August 8th, 2011 | #18 |
Administrator
|
[2011]
A fifth of all congressmen taking paid-for holidays to Israel this summer A fifth of members of the House of Representatives will be taking their summer holidays in Israel this year with almost all the trips being paid for by one of America's most powerful lobby groups. The American Israel Education Foundation is shelling out to take around eighty congressmen to Israel during the summer recess period. http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=131242 |
August 8th, 2011 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
War On Error: How Israel Has Almost Bankrupted America.
By Paul J. Balles
August 06, 2011 "Information Clearing House" --Error is not a typo. Israel’s terror has been America’s error. I've never been much of a fan of conspiracy theories, though most raise questions that should be answered. In 2003, I questioned both the official story of 9/11 and several of the conspiracy theories advanced at the time. My concern then was who benefitted from 9/11? My conclusion? Israel. In January 2010, I repeated the fact that without 9/11, the U.S. had no excuse for invading Afghanistan. That made G W Bush's "war on terror" with Afghanistan and Iraq (with Iran in his gun sights) even more irrelevant. The battle against Al-Qaeda and bin Laden was the precursor to the invasion of Iraq; and the trumped up connection between Iraq and Al-Qaeda provided one excuse for invading Iraq. In an article entitled 9/11 revisited, I summarized 21 questions raised by David Ray Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor Revisited. In that work, Griffin pointed out unequivocally that virtually every dimension of the official account of 9/11 was false beyond a reasonable doubt. Ever since G W Bush proclaimed America's War on Terror we've had reason to question the veracity of many of the wars that have engaged America. The real evidence of who the terrorists are comes from several studies done on the roles played by Israel from its beginning through six decades to 9/11 and beyond. A video clip from a British-made documentary from 2002 titled ‘The Age Of Terror’ examines the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on 22nd July 1946 by Zionists. The south wing of the hotel, then occupied by British civil-military authorities, was bombed killing ninety-one people. Twenty-eight of the victims were British, forty-one Arabic, while seventeen were Jewish. The Zionists who carried-out the attack, known as the Irgun, were led by a future prime minister of Israel, Menachem Begin. The King David Hotel bombing was an act of terrorism widely-considered to be the first real incidence of 20th century terrorism. Since that time, Zionists with the complicit intelligence gathering and plots of Mossad have engaged in more terrorist acts against Israel's perceived enemies than those committed by the world's celebrated terrorists combined. In January of this year, Washington, DC-based investigative journalist, author and reputed syndicated columnist Wayne Madsen made a revelation that completely discredited the official story of 9/11. Madsen revealed that "British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government's 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair." The entire article should be read by all interested in the unveiling of a true conspiracy beyond theory: http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/01...gence-reports/. Madsen concludes his exposure with a comment that connects the terrorism of the 9/11 prime minister-to-be to the entire history of Israel. "Israeli Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu commented on the 9/11 attacks on U.S. television shortly after they occurred. Netanyahu said: 'It is very good!' It now appears that Netanyahu, in his zeal, blew Mossad's cover as the masterminds of 9/11." It's now well established that neo-cons in the Bush administration and Israel-firsters including William Kristol, Richard Perle, Ari Fleischer, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Douglas Feith were responsible for getting America into war with Iraq. Now, a decade after invading Afghanistan and continuing the costly game of protection for Israel in the Middle East, America is on the verge of bankruptcy. Israel has almost bankrupted America. China owns what’s left. http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle28773.htm |
August 9th, 2011 | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
JEWISH POLITICAL POWER
World Jewish Congress American Jewish Committee Global News Service of the Jewish People JEWISH POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES Neoconservative and Pro-Israel Activist Organizations · AEI: American Enterprise Institute—A neoconservative think tank; produces and disseminates books and articles on foreign and domestic policy; www.aei.org. · AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee—The main pro-Israel lobbying organization in the U.S., specializing in influencing the U.S. Congress; www.aipac.org. · CSP: Center for Security Policy—Neoconservative think tank specializing in defense policy; formerly headed by Douglas Feith, CSP is now headed by Frank Gaffney; the CSP is strongly pro-Israel and favors a strong U.S. military; www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org. · JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in promoting military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel; www.jinsa.org. · MEF: Middle East Forum—Headed by Daniel Pipes, the MEF is a pro-Israel advocacy organization overlapping with the WINEP but generally more strident; www.meforum.org. · PNAC: Project for the New American Century—Headed by Bill Kristol, the PNAC issues letters and statements signed mainly by prominent neocons and designed to influence public policy; www.newamericancentury.org. · SD/USA: Social Democrats/USA—“Left-neoconservative” political organization advocating pro-labor social policy and pro-Israel, anticommunist foreign policy; www.socialdemocrats.org. · WINEP: Washington Institute for Near East Policy—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in producing and disseminating pro-Israel media material; www.washingtoninstitute.org. · ZOA: Zionist Organization of America—Pro-Israel lobbying organization associated with the more fanatical end of the pro-Israel spectrum in America; www.zoa.org. Source: Understanding Jewish Influence |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|