Who are your favorite beautiful White women?

[Mike Jahn]

Who are some of your favorite beautiful White women? Here is a few of mine..

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/e...elishaC047.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/c...harlize133.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/C...aGugino007.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/b...ittanyD010.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/e...anuelle029.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/naomiW/naomiW045.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/stacyK/stacyK015.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/v...valeria070.jpg

http://www.famousbabes.com/pics118/josieM/josieM211.jpg

Thanks for constantly spamming porn sites Otto, I'm sure Mr. Weinstein & friends will be pleased

[Mike Jahn]

Originally Posted by luhwind

Thanks for constantly spamming porn sites Otto, I'm sure Mr. Weinstein & friends will be pleased

There isn't a single nude pic on there....

It's the old immature "You're a Jew" business again...grow up..

I was almost thrown out of a Pat Buchanan Republican Campaign Rally in 1996 because I started singing "The Horst Wessel" so oh yeah, I'm a Jew puppet, sure thing buddy...

[Gabrielle]

Originally Posted by OttoRemer

There isn't a single nude pic on there....

It's the old immature "You're a Jew" business again...grow up..

I was almost thrown out of a Pat Buchanan Republican Campaign Rally in 1996 because I started singing "The Horst Wessel" so oh yeah, I'm a Jew puppet, sure thing buddy...

OttoRemer, many of these women are barely dressed and this site has all kinds of links to porn. The jews use these white women like slabs of meat and you know damn well you are doing the work of the jews. Porn is a JEWISH business!

[Gabrielle]

Originally Posted by Colonel.Kurtz

Pictures of nude women doesn't necessarily constitute pornography, you wacky prudish xtian. There is nothing pornographic about the human form (maybe you're different, though). It's only when women (or men) are depicted with the intention of instiling erotic reaction does it cross the line. Is it your wacky holy book that makes you xtians so prudish and horrified at the sight of a nude human?

LOL. How dumb do you think people are? Colonel Liar, you should work for the jewish media.

[Linc]

Originally Posted by Colonel.Kurtz

Pictures of nude women doesn't necessarily constitute pornography, you wacky prudish xtian. There is nothing pornographic about the human form (maybe you're different, though). It's only when women (or men) are depicted with the intention of instiling erotic reaction does it cross the line. Is it your wacky holy book that makes you xtians so prudish and horrified at the sight of a nude human?

You are out of touch with reality in a big way. Although not Christian Identity, Grantley Morris provides the real Christian viewpoint on porn and nudity, and why it is necessarily that way. Christ said "If you commit adultery in your mind, I view it the same as if you actually went and did it". Noone acts first without considering what they will do. What good is praying for the Lord not to lead you into temptation, if you purposely trample into temptation on your own?

Soft porn: a celebration of a God-given gift? http://net-burst.net/porn/index.htm

Also, although not CI, Grantley gives a CI view on masturbation. It may even suprise some CI people who haven't investigated the matter thoroughly:

Masturbation: Moral Quicksand or God’s Provision for Singles? http://net-burst.net/sexuality/masturbation.htm

[Gabrielle]

Originally Posted by Colonel.Kurtz

LOL, in your case, the answer is obvious, no?. Hahahahahahaha

Colonel Pervert, if you really believe what you wrote in your previous post to me, you are either a lair, or as dumb a sneaker full of dung!! Hahahahahahaha, duh!

Porn is jewish. Nope. They did not invent it. Caveman artists did.

Porn has a diproportionate amount of diviant sicko jews, YES.

[Gabrielle]

Yeah, the Blond beast, one more piece of white meat. The jewish flesh merchants love race traitors like you. Just keep feeding the jewish coffers.

[Gabrielle]

It’s amazing how many single guys delude themselves into thinking that by dabbling in porn, filling the coffers of the flesh trade, they are only biding their time until they marry. The moment they marry they’ll be satisfied and that will end their lust for nudes. That’s as smart as eating drugs because you are hungry and then supposing your craving for drugs will vanish when you find wholesome food. If there were the merest wisp of truth in the ridiculous notion that a wife could satisfy someone’s craving for porn, then a fully explicit photo of one normal-looking woman would be all that anyone wants. Playboy would have published one, single-paged edition and gone out of business. Everyone knows that one photo merely increases a man’s desire for another, and another, and another. And seeing normally endowed women only increases the yearning to see abnormally endowed women.

Face it: looking at porn is not just selling your soul to a never-aging half woman, half illusion, it is lighting the match to an unquenchable burning for an endless lineup of technology-human hybrids.

Skin magazines train a man to get bored with a woman after a few seconds. Do you think anyone could go from that to being excited by the same body for 30 or 50 years? Someone with an eye for women has devoted years to nurturing an appetite for such enormous variety that such a person would be lucky if a thousand wives could hope to bring him life-long satisfaction. And they most certainly would fail if the thousand were all roughly the same age because they wouldn’t remain youthful – something else dealers in human flesh train their suckers to crave. And if you aren’t satisfied, who do you feel sorry for, yourself or your wife? Who do you blame, you or your wife? And who is really the sexually inadequate partner?

‘Rejoice in the wife of your youth,’ says the Word of God, ‘ . . . let her breasts satisfy you at all times and always be captivated by her love’ (Proverbs 5:18-19). What chance has a porn junkie got of fulfilling his marital obligation?

Gabrielle,

That picture the Blond Beast posted is very tame...additionally a very attractive white woman. So posting a picture of an attractive Nordish woman makes someone a race traitor? What is the problem? That picture is hardly pornographic. Your problem is you simply don't understand men period. It's not abnormal for a man to have several women lovers it's just a fact of nature that a man is obligated by evolution to spread his genes to as many women as possible. Germanic people were partial to polygamy, look at the Vikings of course this would only be socially and morally acceptable for males to partake of.

Even that old Hebrew pervert King Solomon you quoted supposedly had thousands of wives...personally I believe this to be another Hebrew/Semitic exaggeration as the glorious "Temple of Solomon" was most likely nothing but a God damn tent. You Christian Identity types are really bonkers.(Thanks VNN for free speech)

Originally Posted by Gabrielle

Skin magazines train a man to get bored with a woman after a few seconds. Do you think anyone could go from that to being excited by the same body for 30 or 50 years?

Getting bored with the same woman is good. It causes genetic variation in the populace, if the population is 100% homogeneous.

[Linc]

Originally Posted by Styrkar Nielsen

Getting bored with the same woman is good. It causes genetic variation in the populace, if the population is 100% homogeneous.

To the contrary, I've run simulations, and both POLYGAMY and PROMISCUITY in general leads to homogeneity about 3 times quicker. Monogomy helps preserve a diverse genome among a race, and keeps the race healthy and non-incestuous. Incest is a trait of all the mud races.

So a few powerful men have more than one woman. That isn't a big deal. The important thing is that it not be the general rule, and that there always be enough women to go around that you don't get a situation of lots of young men being angry and violent because a few dickheads have taken all the women for themselves.

[Linc]

Originally Posted by Colonel.Kurtz

Oh yeah, right, everyone knows this, this is common knowledge, yepper, no doubt about it, thousands of scientific studies have proven this beyond the shadow of a doubt. Nevertheless, can you please point us to just one scientifically recognized proof of your claim? Just one, thanks. No, that doesn't mean a link to your wacky religious beliefs.

Look inside your heart Kurtz. If you are at all honest with yourself, you will know that it is true. Gnosis doesn't need scientific proof; it is readily obvious to anyone with experience.

As for popular models, I think it has a lot to do with the particular photograph, but this woman has made some very-near-perfect images...

You people who are so uptight about girls being nude are yourselves closet fags. I look foward to the day when young girls will be going to the local mall totally naked.

Perhaps, but I can look at her friends. Seriously, if we all wore nothing, there'd probably be a lot less sexual perverts out there, since nothing would be left to the imagination.

[Australianrage]

I believe that Australian singer Sophie Monk is the most physically beautiful woman in the world today.
Judge for yourself.

http://new.channelv.com.au/page.asp?partid=237

[John in Woodbridge]

She's pretty, but her act seems pretty weird.