|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
|
May 6th, 2008 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,216
|
NASA lies about Global Warming, but they'd never lie about the moon landing
Is the earth getting warmer, or cooler? NASA is fudging data to make it appear as though it's getting warmer, when in fact it is cooling down
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05..._thermometers/ |
May 7th, 2008 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,120
|
You never hear about it the kwa anymore but when I was a child many scientists stated that it was impossible to get to the moon with a living entity aboard a space capsule because of the Van Allen radiation belt surrounding the Earth which acts as a shield to prevent all but the most radiation resistant lifeforms to enter our bubble in space. At the time they also stated that there was no feasable way to build a space craft to shield the occupants from the radiation because it was able to penetrate through any kind of shielding and radiate the inside of the capsule more or less like putting the animals or people inside in to a microwave and hitting the start button. The space station is in between the Van Allen belt and Earth thus preventing it from being nuked is why it can stay up there.
|
May 7th, 2008 | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,216
|
Quote:
|
|
May 7th, 2008 | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
If you were really serious about looking into the Van Allen belts and the effects of radiation you would ask yourself a couple of simple questions. 1) What is the actual amount and nature of radiation present in the Van Allen Belts? 2) How long would an astronaut be exposed to that radiation while passing through the belts on a lunar trajectory, and what dose of radiation would he receive? 3) What would be the likely health effects? I recommend you look into the answers. You'll find that NASA engineers easily overcame the problem of the Van Allen belts....that is if you can tear yourself away from producing idiotic threads and polls about Bill White, dummy. |
|
May 7th, 2008 | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
The only ones I've heard question the moon landing up until I saw it on VNN a month ago were niggers. This great achievement of our race is not in question. |
|
May 7th, 2008 | #6 |
¡Confíeme en!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,136
|
Wow.
To put it in terms that folks can understand (since I have said it before in a few different ways,): If you don't believe that we landed on the moon, you are an incredible fucking idiot. Sorry, folks...but -damn.- Stop tilting at this particular windmill. I don't have a problem with people idealizing certain social and political efforts of the 30s and 40s....but stop using high school science books from the same era for fuck's sake.
__________________
James "Yankee Jim" Leshkevich 1955-2008 Email - [email protected] All The News That's Fit To Print |
May 7th, 2008 | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896
|
How do you all explain the apparent change of positions at NASA regarding the ability of the astronauts to see stars in space? For decades they say they can't see them for the lack of atmosphere and now they say that they can see them. Now they say that where there is no atmosphere that even with the sun shining one could see a heaven full of stars.
|
May 7th, 2008 | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896
|
Link.
The image above is at the NASA site, Astronomy Picture of the Day, for tomorrow, 21 June 2007: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070621.html It is a drawing of what the Earth's sky would look like during the daytime if the atmosphere did not scatter sunlight. From the NASA website: Quote:
Eric Hufschmid's Science Challenge asked if Apollo astronauts would be able to see stars while they were on the moon: www.EricHufschmid.net/Science_Challenge_24.html And would astronauts see stars as they traveled to and from the moon? Would astronauts in the space shuttle be able to see stars? NASA has been claiming for decades that it is nearly impossible for astronauts to see stars, but now the Astronomy Picture of the Day admits that without an atmosphere, we would see stars even when the sun was shining. Have you seen the Apollo press conference when Neil Armstrong and Mike Collins said they didn't see stars? The video is on this page: www.EricHufschmid.net/MoreInfoForScienceChallenge.html What is going on? The man who drew the picture is Jerry Lodriguss. He is a professional photographer, and his website is full of photographs of the universe: www.astropix.com/INDEX.HTM In Hufschmid's more detailed PDF file about the Apollo moon landing hoax, he mentioned this particular man on page 15: www.EricHufschmid.net/ApolloMoonHoax.pdf Hufschmid sent him an e-mail a couple years ago to "Get a clue!" Has Jerry Lodriguss finally figured out that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax? Or has he known it was a hoax for many years? Why would NASA put this on their website and admit that stars would be seen during daytime when there is no atmosphere to scatter the sunlight? Is it possible that people are starting to rebel against the corruption? Is it possible that people are tired of maintaining the Apollo moon landing hoax? Are American men finally behaving like men rather than frightened children? Or didn't NASA realize what they were doing when they put this page on their site? Will this particular page be deleted as soon as they realize what they just did? Will they frantically struggle to devise a flimsy excuse to explain this page? NASA to crash a probe into moon in 2008 They call it LCROSS. NASA wants to analyze the moon to see if there is water on it. Why don't they just analyze the hundreds of kilograms that they claim the Apollo astronauts brought back from the moon? NASA's excuse is that the astronauts only took samples near the surface! KQED has a video describing the LCROSS program: http://www.kqed.org/quest/television/view/26 Anthony Colaprete is the LCROSS "Principal Investigator". Does he and other people at NASA actually believe that they sent people to the moon? Or do they all realize that NASA is just a big hoax? www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/research/2007/colaprete.html What has NASA done in their decades of existence besides lie to us and waste our money? Are the two Mars rovers really on Mars? Or are they in an Australian desert? Who wants to become an astronaut? A lot of people might like to be an astronaut, but it requires keeping secret about NASA's many crimes. For example, have you noticed that none of the astronauts in the space station ever mention what the stars look like? Or what Mars looks like? How about this report that claims the son of astronaut Virgil Grissom accuses NASA of murdering his father: www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/2/11/00539 That link seems to have disappeared, try this: www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/astronaut_murdered.htm NASA cannot let an honest person become an astronaut. The only people they allow to be astronauts are people with psychotic obsessions to become astronauts. These mentally ill people will keep the secrets because they desperately want to be an astronaut. In other words, the astronauts are lunatics. This is why they exhibit so much psychotic behavior. Last edited by OTPTT; May 7th, 2008 at 09:36 AM. |
|
May 7th, 2008 | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,216
|
Great Post OTPTT, I'm sure they'll throw it into Nutzpah now.
|
June 30th, 2009 | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 21
|
Eric Hufschmid iis a shill or Jew.
He claims that 99.5% of "truthseekers" are "Zionist" agents. He also claims that Ernst Zundel, Frederich Toben and David Irving are Zionist agents. His sister is married to Rupert Murdoch's brother. For more information exposing these dirty jew/shill/pig named Hufschmid go to EricHufschmidExposed |
May 7th, 2008 | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
Get back to the jews and queers, moron.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
|
May 7th, 2008 | #12 |
VNNr since '05
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: africo
Posts: 1,956
|
I watched the 'four hour movie' or whatever, that was claiming to prove the astronauts never landed.. and I didn't see one item of 'proof' that convinced me... Unlike films I watch disproving 9-11, much of which convinces me completely.
|
May 7th, 2008 | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 162
|
This is a subject that has long interested me. On the one hand, I would not put any amount of deception or treachery past our government. So if the moon landing was in fact a hoax, it would not surprize me.
However after thinking on this for a number of years, I think that a conspiracy so large and involving so many people would be nearly impossible to maintain. Its kind of a hard call. I did not see the documentary mentioned here, so it would be unfair of me to make immediate judgement without looking at all the evidence myself, but it is a very intriguing subject nonetheless. If in fact all of these 'missions" to the moon and most recently to Mars are in fact a big pile of horseshit, I am sure all those hundreds of billions of dollars earmarked for the space program found it's way into the pockets of Israel in some way. Who knows? |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|