|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
|
November 10th, 2010 | #1 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
"The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure: a Child-lover's Code of Conduct"
Quote:
http://abcnews.go.com/m/screen?id=12111987
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
November 10th, 2010 | #2 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Anyone with an Amazon account who would like to comment on, rate or leave a "tag" for the book can do so here.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
November 10th, 2010 | #3 |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
Gods! This is sick. The only good news is that there are 35 comments and they are all brutally against the book.
Apparently, the US Amazon won't carry it. Wrong! I just checked, and the US Amazon carries the book. Still, on the US Amazon there are 470 comments, all brutally against the book. I do a lot of business on Amazon. It's time to re-think that. Mike Some even sicker news: The Amazon best seller's rank is such that they are probably selling thousands of these books a week.
__________________
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon" |
November 10th, 2010 | #4 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
I certainly won't buy anything from Amazon.
It's not so long ago (when the scat film "Centipede" came out) that I said the last two taboos still remaining were child porn and animal porn. With a bit of luck, this book will be pulled and won't contribute to breaking down one of the last two. Quote:
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
November 10th, 2010 | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,414
|
Anyone who peddles that kind of stuff doesn't need a kindle, they need a kindling.
|
November 10th, 2010 | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 630
|
Whoever wrote that filth ought to have the firing squad.
|
November 11th, 2010 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
|
Freedom of Speech
I believe that it is the first admnd. that we have freedom of speech. Whether we agree or not is not the issue. By law we are obligated to allow the freedom of speech. Also you must take into consideration the fact of the matter we allow other books, and video clips that are fit into the same catagory.
Example, you can purchase books that show step by step instructions on how to kill someone. Also we are able to have websites devoted to this.... http://www.linkbase.org/articles/How...ll-Someone.htm. Look on any youtube, or public video site and type in "decapitation," you can most likely find explicit materials that show directions, (if not the act itself.) Can we stop this..... No, unfortunantly, we have an obligation to hold our Constitutional Admnds. to their true words. Ethically, and morally we as a culture are shocked by this however, if you are offended by this DON'T READ IT.... We can only protect our kids from everything that does not match up with our core values. View points aside, If you were to write a book on everything you believed in and published it..... Would you want the Country to Ban the book just because they thought you were crazy? Literature is just that. It is a neutral body that is made up of everything that makes us human. To censor some of the bad literature is to silence all literature. This simple RIGHT is among the few that hold us in opposition against a Dictatorship that would silence even the best of intentioned books. If you do not want this book on the market you are basically stating, "You want to take away the rights of one person because you do not agree with what they have to say." Course it is a big problem around the world.... People want their rights but refuse to give rights to others. Or in this case take a Constitutional Right away. We as a society are to quick to take rights away from Homosexuals, and Imgrs. and people of different faiths. The real problem does not belong with the website or the book itself. Make a distinction to give an educated rebutle on the content. We can not bann the book but we can discuss the actual aspect of the book. I guess now should be the part where I tell you that I was just picking the opposite to do so. But I am not. I think we as a culture and a society need to use more logic, and think more critically as a whole. When we are trying to do something along this lines, we should see what kind of slippery slope we are headed down. I am against Child molestation and think we should have those who commit the act placed in a facility where they can receive psychiatric help and seek treatment for their "-philia." We as a culture want everyone to fit into a peg. The truth is what we should think as individuals and how we act are complete opposites and hold little to no meaning within the opposing settings. I am for taking a stance and voicing the opinion, however, we should approach the argument from the content, not on the book itself. |
November 14th, 2010 | #8 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
However, if anyone fancied moaning at Amazon and missed out, you can always have a go at them about these.
Amazon.com: Brothers and Sisters (Family Sex) eBook: Thomas Wainwright: Kindle Store: Reviews, Prices & more
Thaks to OTPTT for finding these. So if you're thinking about buying from Amazon again now that they have removed the paedophile book, you may want to rethink your decision.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
November 14th, 2010 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
The stablishment has long promoted the nabakov book lolita it is in the 100 best books of all time,as late as 1997 jeremy irons was playing the lead in a film of it and threatening to leave the UK as the uncut version was never released in the UK.I recall taking the later self confessed pedophile Strom to task on this issue of the film and book at the time 1997 at the old yahoo Instauration forum.Strom and his glee club ( much like antifaowens and his glee club here) claimed it was literature.I said they were all nonces who fantisised the same thing for themselves I was banned.
Amazon accounts used to be used by don black to recieve donations.
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
November 14th, 2010 | #10 |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
I've never read or seen "Lolita" though I've heard of it and heard of the fuss about it, obviously. If it is as I've heard and the girl in it was 13 then that classes as paedophiliac material as well, in my opinion, although I don't class it as being as bad as this book. Don't ask me why because I can't put it into words. Maybe because this book appears to contain a chapter on "how to get yourself out of it when nicked" and therefore offers more immediate danger. I don't know.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
November 14th, 2010 | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
|
Quote:
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion Chase them into the swamps |
|
November 14th, 2010 | #12 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Townsend probably lost all the "material" and "research" he had gathered for the book when he got nicked. Or something.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
August 31st, 2011 | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cumbria, England
Posts: 1,237
|
Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|