|
August 31st, 2013 | #161 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2013 | #163 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Just posted by 'Marcus' at Diggs' forum:
Quote:
The problem is that with a case so serious as his friend Diggs the rapist, you have to treat people, even obvious shit-stirrers, as if they're not just shit-stirring, and that their 'objections' are sincere and not just attempts to milk more drama out of these situations. Well, as I said: Marcus, you won't be missed. You're obviously happier with Diggs the rapist, Akins the paedophile, and Brenna Wolf the alcoholic liar. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #164 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2013 | #165 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
You have a non-political rape case. A jury finds the guy guilty. Unless you have some specific reasons to doubt, you have to assume the jury is right. You're "reserving judgment," oh ok. That's like a little kid trying on mommy's shoes. Yeah, we reserve judgment until the facts are in. The fact is, this man has been convicted of a serious felony. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #166 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
This is what she wrote 'over there'. In conversation with Akins, no less:
Akins first: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Did you really expect anything more? |
|||
August 31st, 2013 | #167 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: knee deep and surrounded
Posts: 1,764
|
what a fucking thread.
__________________
"OY,VEY ALREADY!!" Dr. William Pierce |
August 31st, 2013 | #168 |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
Damn shame. I'd been ignoring this thread, but I finally read the pertinent posts and links. Here, I'll solve shit for you.
1. Yes it is him - First name, middle name, last name, birthday - odds it's someone else, absolute zero. 2. Yes, he's guilty - appellate court changes a few words here and there. Trouble is, truth is truth; legalistic terminology, slightly altered after the fact is irrelevant. Damn shame. And don't worry about his forum where I have posted (Hell, I still have a way more than 10 year old membership on StormFront, 14 posts) -- His forum is about done. The main posters are him and Akins who he allows to shit all over the forum. Aspergers in full flame. The only reason anyone else goes there is to read from Craig. Now, I'm going to go read the new posts on the Golden Dawn thread, the most important thread on this or any other forum. Mike
__________________
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon" |
August 31st, 2013 | #169 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
More from the Diggs-the-rapist-apologist forum. I've bolded the more disgusting and relevant parts:
Quote:
Zzzt! I'm not Linder. The only similarity is that we're both about the same age, and are capable of writing quickly and correctly. I'll leave it to DiO and Varg to confirm that they, also, are not Linder - if they even care to give credence to such nonsense by addressing it. But ... my god! This is the kind of people that Diggs has surrounded himself with. Linder is everyone else on his forum. Why? Because Stanley said so. And because Linder was meen to me, and didn't let me express myself as I wanted to! You know what that is? Kindergarten and retard logic - 'oh, it doesn't matter what I say, just so long as I'm expressing myself.' No other evidence. Who needs evidence? Evidence and proof are for suckers! And even if Diggs was found guilt of rape, it's none of my business, man! Degenerates - all of them. Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; August 31st, 2013 at 11:14 AM. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #170 |
Administrator
|
That's some true and genuine lunacy over there. May all the nuts collect there and leave us alone. I'll give this thread another couple days, then it's locked, and Rapist Fred and his Furry Pals are forever dead to us.
|
August 31st, 2013 | #171 |
Administrator
|
I should be honored, actually. It's cool that I'm so powerful I can float among fifteen personalities, some posting at the same time, all writing in markedly different styles and tone...I can do all this while posting 100 other places on the internet under my real name... Apart from my being an Ashkenazi jew rather than Sephardic, and my proclivity for impregnating teenage black girls and smoking crack, they pretty much nailed me.
In conclusion, all I can say is, DON'T GO FISHING WITH FRED! YOU MIGHT END UP ON THE BOTTOM OF THE OCEAN WITH A BLOODY ASSHOLE! |
August 31st, 2013 | #172 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
It is inconceivable to believe that Alex would be arsed to make a few thousand profiles on his own forum. This has been done on others, such as Lindstedt's cesspool, but his kind of forum is microscopic compared to VNN.
It is much, much more improbable and beyond Alex's means than, say, a rapist with the exact same name, location and birth date being Fred O'Malley. I find it absolutely hilarious that Fred, Craig Cobb, and all of their allies were so sure of James Bowery's mathematical deduction that Donnie is some Mark Pitcavage character, while on the same token, these people refuse to believe Stanley Edward Diggs is in fact the Stanley Edward Diggs who brutally raped and battered a woman in Louisiana in 1986. It takes a cursory look and layman's understanding of mathematics to discover that Bowery's deduction is much more far-fetched than is the Diggs case, but they refuse to believe it is the same person. Like Alex said earlier, it isn't about principle, it is about appearances. Well, it seems that Fred and co. have neither.
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
August 31st, 2013 | #173 |
Administrator
|
On a more serious note, George Lincoln Rockwell described a type we see in WN today, and talked about how useless and destructive they are. This type defines WN by its own views, and anyone departing from those views thereby proves he is an anti. This form of bad reasoning is extremely common. Fred is a perfect example of this type.
|
August 31st, 2013 | #174 |
Administrator
|
The bigger point is not the superficial factual failure on my critics' part, it's the larger failure - they can't perceive my type. I've been the same type in WN for nearly fifteen years. You can infer from my actions I don't do the type of things they're saying. It's a very different type of character that does that. That's what's so double-dumb about what they're saying. There are people who fit their description, but I'm not one of them. In fact, several of them are. It's like the supposed French saying: you only look under the bed you hide under. Because they enjoy the cloak and dagger of multiple personas, they assume everyone else does too - even when ALL evidence shows otherwise. Like I say, they're refried dumb.
|
August 31st, 2013 | #175 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
Hindsight is 20-20
I'm disappointed with myself for not being more aggressive against Diggs when he was around here. I had a low opinion of him from the get-go. In fact, he is emblematic in my recollection of my reluctance to even register as a commenter on this site. That was back when he was using that stupid Gorilla face avatar and the byline Southern Guerilla.
After being here a while, I got to where I'd give a him a hard time, but always under the guise of humor, and often deleting mocking comments I'd made. I felt bad for the guy. Donnie would routinely run circles around him that made me laugh, but the fact that Fred could never figure out the extent to which he was overmatched seemed truly pathetic. Leonard is the only one I remember who consistently displayed the character and intellectual rigor to go directly after O'Malley, or Akins either, on a straight up factual/logical basis. My hat remains off to him. Alex was, of course, ever true to his principles, but this case raises suspicions that the principles themselves may be unduly dependent on the salience of marketplace economics. With the benefit of hindsight, I think Dirt Bag Diggs should have been kicked out of here a long time ago, and no one in their right mind should ever have followed him when, at long last, he was. |
August 31st, 2013 | #176 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I do try to bring people around. That's part of the 'job,' as it were. For all of us. Only certain people can be reclaimed, some are hopeless. Quote:
|
||||
August 31st, 2013 | #177 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
That would be rich.
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #178 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
In the end, it's not worth it. People think they can buy you for a very small amount. Or not exactly buy you, but buy your time. I'm not here to gossip. Not here for personal reasons. If some interaction happens, great. I like dealing with people who are successful in their private lives, and who have some self control. People with actual knowledge, who can broaden all of our understandings of things. Donations are one aspect of things, but they don't make up for troublemaking. They don't buy you an exception from the rules. And even if one bends the rules a bit, one sees exactly why one should NOT do that. And one gets accused endlessly of being a hypocrite. YOU try doing this! Try helping people in just the right way, try correcting them or warning them or encouraging them - it's very difficult. I'm not naturally gifted at it, either. As always, IRONY dominates things. I got into writing because I could do it myself, make it perfect, put the words in order to produce exactly the effect I intended. Which was to make me chuckle, and say to myself, yeah, that's good. And I know what's good. So external approval is nice and awesome but it doesn't mean anything because I know more about what I'm doing, and the line it's in than, well, pretty much anybody. Say that's arrogant, but it's not really. But of course, I'm not writing about myself and my life to 'express myself' like idiots, I'm writing abou the world, to explain things to people and get them to laugh and see what's wrong. And a lot of people see things the way I do. And a lot can be brought around. What better thing to do with my life? I don't know. Writing, or making lines, is the one thing that has sustained my interest over my entire life. Not many other things I'm really interested in. But the irony is, you get into doing a forum, you end up doing exactly what I don't really like and I've always tried to get away from - managing other people. I have to set the rules. I don't want to play kindergarten cop. I don't get off on exercising power over people the way MANY even MOST do. it doesn't matter. I have to play kindergarten cop. I'm dragged against myself to have to do stuff I don't want to do and am not naturally good at - but that's part of actual involvement, actual politics. If no one else is doing what needs to be done, and I can, then I must. It comes at a cost, and I'm not mature enough not to vent my irritation, often. But tough shit for me, that's just how it is. This is a white-hot time to start a political party for whites only. No one will do it. I won't do it until I can commit 100%. Which means having what I think is enough bodily energy to handle it. All this stuff is related and interrelated. We get along the best we can. I explain why we need rules, what they are, and what happens if they're broken. I'm not chasing or threatening, VNNF has an agenda, and that's what will be pursued here. I believe the agenda is good for whites. I believe our approach is the only effective white political line to take. And I will defend that against anyone, and in-fight with anyone I think is wrong, as I have. Let the clowns come after me, doesn't matter. In fact, I feel this strongly. If you're going to post at Fred the Rapist's forum, don't post here. I'm not saying i'm running back and forth and checking, nor that I want people notifying me, I DON'T, but if it comes up, yeah, I think I will ban you. If you think it's cool that Fred rapes women, I don't want you here. If you think you can gloss over his rape by pretending the facts aren't in, or it's a matter of he-said she-said, I also don't want you here. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #179 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
However, like I told Mr. AA... if he really believes it... that is good enough for me. I do trust him. Last edited by Kelley; August 31st, 2013 at 02:21 PM. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #180 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Quote:
I tip my hat to you man. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|