Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 6th, 2014 #1
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default Angela Merkel greatest leader in Europe, says Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton has called Angela Merkel "the greatest leader in Europe" during a visit to Berlin and said it was high time America had a female leader too – though without confirming that she would seek the job.

In an appearance at a Berlin theatre on Sunday to promote her book Hard Choices, the former US secretary of state also referred to Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, as a "tough customer with a pretty thin skin".

Clinton is widely expected to run for the White House in 2016 and has cited Merkel, the German chancellor, as a good argument for the US having a female president soon.

"I think we are ready for a woman to break through the glass ceiling," Clinton said in an interview with Bild am Sonntag newspaper, adding that she would decide whether to run for president "at the end of this year or early next year".

Clinton joked at the Schiller Theatre about her and Merkel's shared taste for trouser suits, and voiced admiration for the chancellor's leadership during the eurozone debt crisis.

"I say in the book I think she is the greatest leader in Europe, I think she is a great leader globally, I think she carried Europe on her shoulders and it wasn't easy," she said.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-merkel-leader
 
Old July 12th, 2014 #2
Samuel Toothgold
Charachature incarnate
 
Samuel Toothgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Already in accordance with the future Repulsive Tapir Avatar Mandate
Posts: 4,068
Default Orangutan 1 travelling on taxpayers' expense, ignoring animal abuse and junk-dumping into German markets:

Why doesn't someone invite it to see the real thing?

https://www.google.nl/search?q=badis...s%3B803%3B1024



That diplorable land whale thinks nothing of doing unrestricted business with subhumans who are allowed to do everything which is prohibited to do in human countries:


The Imperial Japanese witnessed all of this and concluded that Zipperheads are truly Subhumans. Thus, worthy of extermination. Unfortunately, Roosevelt got into their way, through embargoing oil which led to the Pearl Harbor Revenge Act. Note the indifference to the fact that those living dogs are well aware of their fate. If they did care one bit, they wouldn't butcher dogs right in front of others. The method that is used to kill these dogs is comparatively humane, being that the skinning alive of animals in China isn't rare:


Last edited by Samuel Toothgold; July 12th, 2014 at 05:58 AM.
 
Old July 17th, 2014 #3
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default

The greatest leader in Europe has just turned 60.

Quote:
Angela Merkel is now 60, it is celebrated everywhere and the stupid population is apparently largely satisfied with it. In this case, Merkel is the stupidest, most dangerous, characterless , insidious, most expensive, most destructive and disastrous head of government in Germany since Hitler. She is the biggest traitor German interests since the foundation of the FRG. No Federal politician has so often and so badly broken the law and told untruths told as Merkel has.
http://www.pi-news.net/2014/07/merke...wird-heute-60/

http://www.n24.de/n24/Nachrichten/Po...la-merkel.html

Ofcourse, PI has to insert more whining about Hitler, which has nothing to do with Merkel, and references an alleged FRG "constitution" which does not infact exist.

Last edited by Englisc; July 17th, 2014 at 05:02 AM.
 
Old July 17th, 2014 #4
Samuel Toothgold
Charachature incarnate
 
Samuel Toothgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Already in accordance with the future Repulsive Tapir Avatar Mandate
Posts: 4,068
Default

It's hard to say if she's more destructive than Gerhard Schröder. I can understand P.I. rating Hitler, since he started the Barbarossa Campaign way too early and didn't equip his soldiers for winter (perhaps, he thought they would have finished the invasion, before the unusually early cold weather outbreak). Not to mention, his impulsive declaration of war against the U.S.A. immediately following Japan's.
I guess, it would be safe to say Schröder was more destructive for ethnic Germans than pre-war Hitler. He and Peter Hartz initiated policies which resembled those initiated in the 3rd Reich and fraudulently named them other than what they really were. For instance, Die "Gesundheitsreform" (healthcare reform) was actually close to the Racial Hygiene policy, except for culling out handicapped persons or denying medical care to non or mixed Germans (if that was even the case) his legislation initiative was to cull out persons according to social status of which it was unlikely that non-Germans were to be targeted. Case in point: An unmarried couple where spouse was employed and earning above a certain wage made the officially unemployed partner subject to withdrawal of medical insurance. Therefore, if that partner was to develop an illness such as cancer which could be cured before it was allowed to spread, this person would be cleansed from society. Since unemployed Muds are almost always married (mostly to old country imports), the taxpayer is left to cover for their medical treatment, as well as the numerous instances of entering an obstetrics ward.
If a private entity were to act against that unemployed White in such a manner, this would carry a murder charge, if that person was to die of that aforementioned illness. The court, however, could dillute this act through a negligent homicide or something along those lines which is often the case, since intent has to be proved in post-war litigation.
Schröder also started making it easier to outsource and to facilitate import dumping. The resulting increase in actual unemployment was dealt with through abolishing traditional unemployment legislation, replacing it with an inexpensive form of welfare called "Hartz IV".

Last edited by Samuel Toothgold; July 17th, 2014 at 05:28 AM.
 
Old July 17th, 2014 #5
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default

Every leader is probably more destructive than the last. It is a snowball effect. Merkel has built on all already existing things (mass immigration, Nazi guilt cult, etc.) and has just made them worst, but also added new disasters like the "Energiewende" and robbing of German taxpayers to pay S. European countries.

"7 signs that Merkel's power is waning"
http://www.wiwo.de/politik/deutschla.../10208074.html

On various forums I've known quite a few German nationalists who do not like Hitler, and that is fair enough as his actions did ultimately lead to disastrous consequences for the German people, but these nationalists look back to pre-1933 German conservatism and the Kaiserreich for their inspiration.

edit: Two comments at PI against "Kewil"'s Hitler criticism. One of them:

Quote:
Was gegen Hitler spricht:

Er hat den linken Straßenterror beseitigt.
Er hat Millionen Deutsche in Arbeit gebracht. Ihnen die Würde wiedergegeben.
Er hat es versäumt, Millionen Kulturfremder zu importieren.
Er hat das Versailler Diktat zerrissen, das Deutschland verpflichtete, seine Einnahmen den “Kriegssiegern” zu überlassen.
Er hat es geschafft, daß die Mehrzahl der Deutschen wieder optimistisch in die Zukunft blickte.
Wissenschaft und Forschung florierten.
Er hat das Ansehen der Familie gestärkt.

Das waren seine schlimmsten Verbrechen bis zum 01.09.1939.

Das Alles kann man Frau Merkel nicht vorwerfen. Sie deshalb in einem Atemzug mit Hitler zu nennen, ist darum ungeheuerlich.

Last edited by Englisc; July 17th, 2014 at 07:50 AM.
 
Old July 17th, 2014 #6
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default

Merkel disgusted by the FRG's flag, election celebrations 2013


Here is a summary article on Merkel's reelection last year. The original source is no longer available.

Quote:
"Merkel Gets Biggest Victory Since Kohl’s Reunification Vote" - this was the news headline of Bloomberg. And at the first glance it seems correct: Angela Merkel's party – the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) – got 41.5% of the votes. The Social Democrats with their candidate Peer Steinbrück only received 25.7%, not even close to Merkel´s tally. The Greens took 8.4%, and the post-communist Left Party 8.6%. Merkel´s former coalition partner, the liberal FDP failed to reach the 5% threshold needed to gain representation in the Bundestag, getting just under the "magic number" with 4.8% of the vote. The new Eurosceptic party "Alternative für Deutschland" didn't manage to get 5 percent either.

On the night of the election, we witnessed kafkaesque scenes at the victory party of Merkel's CDU, with the leading staff of an outfit, typically described as “conservative”in the international media, clapping hands and singing along to a song of the left-wing band "Die Toten Hosen" (the Dead Trousers). The general secretary of the CDU, Hermann Gröhe, in particular was afflicted with an embarrassing case of "dad dancing."

German and international media have been referring to the "great victory" of Angela Merkel, both celebrating it and expressing concern about her "new power." Some international journalists have asked the question why "the Germans" love Angela Merkel so much. Others have started analyzing how conservative the Germans are – after all they voted for the "conservative party." To say it frankly, everything, from the "conservativeness" of the CDU to its "great victory," is not quite what it seems to be.

Despite the party name, Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats do not stand for any idea or ideology – except that of collecting votes for Angela Merkel. The CDU has simply became her political-machine. In Bavaria the CDU's sister party, the CSU, is at least partly conservative, but elsewhere CDU-politicians campaign for multiculturalist and liberalist aims. It has now become the party where you find the old, stubborn traditional catholic alongside the gay rights activist, and the pro-life activist sharing space with the feminist. Above all, Angela Merkel and her dancing team on the stage are completely "liberated" from any ideological foundation.

Merkel´s party is everything and nothing at the same time: Social Democratic, ecologist, liberal, sometimes Christian, sometimes Muslim or Jewish, feminist, transatlanticist, pro-EU, pro-Euro currency, pro-Israel, pro-"Human Rights"... It is hard for any other political party to compete with this all-embracing political machine.

Do all those things make Angela Merkel special? Not at all. She and her party represent in a perfect way the understanding of governance in the Western world. As ever, the key question is: What would change for Europe and the World if the government in Germany changed from CDU/CSU to SPD? The answer is short and simple: Nothing.

It has became a sort of "nice tradition" for any new government to declare that policies towards the EU and foreign policies in general will not change. These things are somehow magically "fixed" without any alternative, according to German establishment politicians. At the end of the day, the German citizen can decide whether taxes here or there are increased or decreased a bit, if driving a car becomes more expensive, or if our secret service has more or fewer undercover agents. But, even in these marginal areas, who knows if the new government really keeps its promise?

In all important questions, the vote merely influences the speed at which the big political direction is pursued, but not the direction itself. This is, of course, a common thing in the Western world. In the UK it doesn't matter what party the actual warmonger prime minister belongs to. A "New Labour" Blair and a "Conservative" Cameron seem like political twins in terms of foreign politics. In France the "conservative" Sarkozy loved "humanitarian interventions" just as much as his "socialist" successor Hollande. In the Western motherland, the USA, it is hard for a foreigner to recognize any difference whether it is a Republican or a Democrat ordering the drone attacks. There is this joke circulating: A US general is delivering a speech in front of his troops in Vietnam. He talks about the great mission of the US-army in bringing freedom and democracy. The general gives an example: He mentions that there is now a McDonald's and a Burger King in Saigon. "This is the freedom of choice, this is democracy!"

During the election campaign we Germans saw at street intersections huge posters with Merkel's frowsty face with the following words written nesxt to it: "Kanzlerin für Deutschland" (Chancellor for Germany). No political content, just those three words! Nothing made it clearer that it is all about collecting votes, nothing else.

In her speeches she repeated over and over again, "We are the most successful government since the reunification!" as if engaged in some moronic mind-control experiment. Even on the night of her victory, she didn't waste time with political positions. She said: "I see the next four years in front of me and I can promise that we will face many tasks, at home, in Europe and in the world." A big round of applause, no questions asked.

Some foreign journalists were confused. Why didn't the NSA scandal play any role in the elections? Why was the discussion about the future of the EU and the Euro currency so measly? Why was there no discussion about the German participation in international NATO-operations? And why didn't the parties discuss the demographic decline in our country?

The answer is easy. There is no dissent between the established parties on all these existential questions. They are all pro-Western, "friends of the US," pro-Euro, pro-NATO, and dedicated to solving the demographic problem simply by more immigration. Just one example: Some top figures of the former "pacifist" Greens were calling for military aggression against Syria. And how could the Social Democrats use the revelation that the US has been spying on Germany as a campaign issue when they themselves have collaborated with Washington when in government? And how could the Liberals be credible criticizing Germany's role as the paymaster of Europe when they have supported all those "Euro rescue measures"? Only the Left Party plays a small oppositional role here and there when it comes to the international military operations. But now already some top figures of the party are trying to "reform" those aspects in order to become "capable of forming a coalition."

How glorious is the victory of the CDU really? Almost one third of eligible voters don't participate anymore in the federal elections for many reasons. Only 71.5% voted. The "party of the nonvoters" became the second biggest in Germany. And around 15% of the votes cast will not be represented in parliament: This is the result of the 5% hurdle, designed to stifle support for smaller parties closely aligned with people's actual interests. When we take into account all these facts, the CDU/CSU got around 30% of the eligible vote, with nonvoters at 29%, Social Democrats 18%, Left and Greens with 6%, and 11 percent for the non-represented parties.

What is wrong with a country where more and more people are losing interest in participating in the elections? Are these all lazy idiots or are these citizens "arrogant" as the German news magazine Der Spiegel wanted to make us believe one week before the elections? Or is it maybe the sign of a serious crisis of the political system?
 
Old July 17th, 2014 #7
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default

Kohl (chief architect of enforced European unification and the Euro) congratulates Merkel

http://www.n24.de/n24/Nachrichten/Po...eburtstag.html


The Bild also lavishes love on Merkel. Their front page right now http://www.bild.de/politik/inland/an...2774.bild.html




Quote:
Germans call her a Machtfrau, meaning "a woman of power", and her rise in a male-dominated world has added to her popularity. 71% of Germans are happy or very happy with her work, according to an Infratest dimap poll in July this year. And a Forsa poll on Wednesday showed that 59% of Germans would vote for her in a head-to-head contest with her main rival, the SPD chairman Sigmar Gabriel.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...tes-leadership

Last edited by Englisc; July 17th, 2014 at 07:43 AM.
 
Old July 23rd, 2014 #8
Englisc
Amor Patriae Nostra Lex
 
Englisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,382
Default

No surprises. After the WC circus,

Quote:
The popularity Angela Merkel (CDU) has reached a new peak in Germany. (...) 62 percent prefer Merkel as chancellor
http://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deut...ebter-denn-je/
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.
Page generated in 0.13908 seconds.