|
September 2nd, 2013 | #281 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #282 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
I believe it was a pathetic one year sentence. Something to do with some legal fuck-up or something. So he got off easy.
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #283 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
You're taking a sound principle, to be cautious about believing what you hear in the media/from the courts, and misapplying it to a specific situation. There is not one reason to doubt that Fred is guilty as charged. Also, it's not just one incident. It's a collection of incidents demonstrating a pattern. A pattern we saw from ourselves when the guy posted here. What he did isn't remotely comparable to your own case, as you describe it. |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #285 |
Celebrating My Diversity
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #286 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #287 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #288 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #289 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #290 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Yes that may be true, Alex. I respect your judgment and I never "defended" Fred, I merely questioned the epistemological value of relying solely on a court system for knowledge, which the initial comments suggested to me. However, maybe i misinterpreted that. If you have personal knowledge of Fred or solid reasons to believe his accuser, than I accept of course accept your wisdom in making fitting conclusions.
I do not know Fred. I do not know the case. I'm a working man who doesn't have time to investigate it. I have time to voice my opinion and share my experiences with the court system, inspite of "master of the one liner" rouse and others who see fit to call me a negro, thumb down my sincere comments, and insult my intelligence. I sure hope these folks would understand that even if they are more intelligent and knowledgeable than I, doesn't mean they have to act like pompous jerks. I personally deserve more respect than that from faceless anonomoys internet personas. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #291 | |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Fred himself is an awfully dubious sort, what with they lying about not being a rapist and all. That leaves the victim, or one of Fred's friends who knew him at that time. I'd imagine that Fred surrounds himself with liars in his personal life.
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #292 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #293 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Don't "prey tell" me, Nigel.
It's unnecessarilly pompous and I've had enough of that. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #294 | |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
You are being a bit hostile, no?
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
|
September 3rd, 2013 | #295 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
I know what it means, Nigel. I've never heard the phrase used by anyone not engaging in blatant snobbery. However, maybe you're in Europe and if things are different there I send my sincerest apologies.
Etymology From*pray*(“ask (politely)”) +*tell(“explain”) Interjection 1. Pray*tell(archaic)*Please explain (something the requester does not yet understand).Pray tell*us, how will they fare while you are away? 2. (idiomatic,*usually*sarcastic)Expressing incredulity, please explain (some claim or position the speaker doubts). |
September 3rd, 2013 | #296 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Enough with the strawman nonsense. In all seriousness, if you cannot trust the legally binding sentence handed down by the court and then court of appeals, then you must think that someone, somewhere, somehow has a more credible position on what actually happened.
If that is the case and we are to give Fred a pass because, well, all the evidence that is stacked against him isn't credible because local city courts are Jewed, then you must have some semblance of an idea of what exactly it would take to definitively prove that Fred is a liar, a rapist, a batterer of women, a fraud/con-artist, someone who engages in online sex stalking (we have evidence of that on this forum), and someone who threatens his own brother and kin based off of his paranoia, all of which has been disseminated in this very thread. If that is the case then it would stand to reason that all WN who engage in criminal activities that are in no way related to politics, or in any way are conducted in a way which does not show bias towards that person based upon his politics get a free pass because, hey, Anthony Lynch knows each and every single town court is Jewed to the ninth power and says that, well, court dockets are just not enough to convict rapist criminals for crime anymore. They must be handed down on some other criteria, namely, I'd imagine, whatever you think is the case, regardless of reality and justice.
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
September 3rd, 2013 | #297 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Trust whomever you want, Nigel. I guess I sort of got Iin the way of the intended purpose of this thread with my skepticism. That being said, I do not trust the court system. Does that mean I "defend" all persons accused of crime? Of course not. To assume so is a poisonous twisting of my position which I have already stated as being thus I do not know Fred. I do not know his case. I haven't investigated it. For all I know he (whoever he is) is guilty as a nigger in a white neighborhood at night.
|
September 3rd, 2013 | #298 | |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
You either have an opinion one way or another, or you're wasting your time and ours coming into this thread just to say "I don't know lol." Seriously, that is your position right now. You won't even grace us with some kind of opinion beyond what could possibly be considered a neutral fallacy, claiming a neutral conclusion while tacitly trying your darnedest to undermine the authority of a jury-approved conviction by directing the audience's attention to an obscure, abstract universal applied to the justice system overall. Therefore the question really is: why are you even here?
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
|
September 3rd, 2013 | #299 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
September 3rd, 2013 | #300 | ||
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Why haven't you elucidated on just how your claim that the court in question isn't credible at all and why your neutral fallacy is the legitimate position to take? Tread lightly, this is a multiple felon you are inadvertently defending. Quote:
Go on, tell us by what measure am I upset.
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|