Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 2nd, 2013 #261
HardHawk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
What I mean to say is exactly that. It is reactionary minded (as opposed to critical minded) to see a criminal conviction and automatically assume that the case was correct and just.
Well in my book.

1. If you break in someones house you are a burglar.

2. If you proceed to rape the woman been in the house against her will, you are a rapist.

3. If you after raping her or during beat also the shit out of her, you are a two bit cheap negro not worth even the bullet I use for you so a slow acid bath it be more appropriate.

Since what happened it is established I begin to think you are even lower than the white negro in question here. But carry on any way, since the mods allow you to keep posting. We may not live in a free world any more but at least this forum it is a free thinking forum.

Last edited by HardHawk; September 2nd, 2013 at 08:22 AM.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #262
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann2 View Post
Are you high?

That wasn't the first time he was charged with a crime against a woman. Are you seriously defending this POS? The guy wasn't some teen, he was a grown man.

Jesus.
Are YOU high? Yes high off life. If you misconstrued what I said to be a "defense" you are sadly mistaken. I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. All I'm saying is it can be awfully foolish to rely on the legal system to make judgments rather than your own mind to judge the fact which are at your disposal.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #263
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HardHawk View Post
Well in my book.

1. If you break in someone house you are a burglar.

2. If you proceed to rape the woman been in the house against her will, you are a rapist.

3. If you after raping her or during beat also the shit out of her, you are a two bit cheap negro not worth even the bullet I use for you so a slow acid bath it be more appropriate.

Since what happened it is established I begin to think you are even lower than the white negro in question here. But carry on any way, since the mods allow you to keep posting. We may not live in a free world any more but at least this forum it is a free thinking forum.
I care not how "low" you think of me. You are a foolish twit and I get the impression that you would be licking my boot if we ever met.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #264
HardHawk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
Are YOU high? Yes high off life. If you misconstrued what I said to be a "defense" you are sadly mistaken. I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. All I'm saying is it can be awfully foolish to rely on the legal system to make judgments rather than your own mind to judge the fact which are at your disposal.
And who told you, any one here, is not rely on their judgement and the facts and is relying on the legal system?

You assuming and ASSuming does not show very solid thinking does it now?

The truth is you defending a rapist. And a low life. Why you feel so strongly to defend this scum?
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #265
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Here is what I said you dumb shit "if a man is guilty of vile crimes by all means condemn him"


I also said that it is foolish to see a criminal conviction and immediately start hand wringing.

I'm a middle of the road type of guy. Show me evidence and ill take out my own trash, but don't expect me to join those who would instantly go along with whatever the legal system says.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #266
Ann2
Marie Antoinette
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
Are YOU high? Yes high off life. If you misconstrued what I said to be a "defense" you are sadly mistaken. I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. All I'm saying is it can be awfully foolish to rely on the legal system to make judgments rather than your own mind to judge the fact which are at your disposal.
What a cop out answer. You could say that about anything. I wasn't there, so I don't know if it really happened or not.

Just what part of those facts do you call into question? Which facts make you think "Golly gee, Ferd just might be innocent."
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #267
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HardHawk View Post
And who told you, any one here, is not rely on their judgement and the facts and is relying on the legal system?
That was my distinct impression from the first several posts by Dalvez. Oh and I'm not "defending" anyone. Read my comment to Ann. I'm saying I don't trust the court system. I'm not saying he is innocent or guilty. I don't know enough of the facts. But I do agree with the initial comment by (Gibson) which warrants skepticism when evaluating judgments made by the courts. If you didn't know this, the court system in America is viciously anti male and anti white.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #268
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann2 View Post
What a cop out answer. You could say that about anything. I wasn't there, so I don't know if it really happened or not.

Just what part of those facts do you call into question? Which facts make you think "Golly gee, Ferd just might be innocent."
Did you read my post about the time I was convicted of endangering the welfare of a minor? Yeah something about being abused by the courts changes ones attitude and effects the way the view others who MAY have been similarly victimized. Al though I made it CLEAR that I don't know in the Fred case. That's it. I'm going to work now. Bye.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #269
Fred
Commie Killer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,615
Default

Let's make this clear.

I am a different Fred! The good Fred.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #270
HardHawk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
Here is what I said you dumb shit "if a man is guilty of vile crimes by all means condemn him"


I also said that it is foolish to see a criminal conviction and immediately start hand wringing.

I'm a middle of the road type of guy. Show me evidence and ill take out my own trash, but don't expect me to join those who would instantly go along with whatever the legal system says.
NO if in what you said you dumb shit. I did not went along with what the legal system said. I went along with what the victim said as well that is no doubt as to what took place just another scum got off the hook on a technicality. Now wipe the shit off your nose and stop ass licking what is not defensible.

Your colors are begining to show.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #271
HardHawk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
That was my distinct impression from the first several posts by Dalvez. Oh and I'm not "defending" anyone. Read my comment to Ann. I'm saying I don't trust the court system. I'm not saying he is innocent or guilty. I don't know enough of the facts. But I do agree with the initial comment by (Gibson) which warrants skepticism when evaluating judgments made by the courts. If you didn't know this, the court system in America is viciously anti male and anti white.
Then you should have search as we all did, at least I have, before posting or read what others posted before posting lame excuses to my opinion. But I let it go as to me make no difference either way.

As the point is been proven.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #272
Chad Wentworth
Senior Member
 
Chad Wentworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Romania
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
2: Alex Linder is jewish; based upon a list of people who AREN'T Alex Linder, and based upon the 'suspicions' of the government free-loading, 'ephebophile' (that's a fancy word for 'paedophile', and that is accurate: Akins has professed a preference for 'very young girls' here in the past, even girls below the age of consent), lying, plagiarising, fake Scottish clan chief Akins.
Quote:
We are saying Diggs is a rapist because DIGGS IS A RAPIST, and all right-thinking people should condemn and shun rapists (unlike, say, Akins the 'ephebophile' and Martin Lindstedt the convicted child molester, who I am informed has made an alliance with Diggs the rapist) and we have provided the evidence to back up that claim. Unlike any of the claims that Diggs the rapist has made about VNN or people here.
Ironic, here are a few of their own rules:

Quote:
5) Lying is not acceptable behavior, we seek truth here.
Quote:
11) This is NOT a dating site, trolling or otherwise chasing the women here is a serious matter, so leave the women alone.
Quote:
13) Do not accuse any White Nationalist of being a Jew or Race-traitor unless you can prove it.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #273
M.N. Dalvez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
Default

Yeah, okay, so Stanley's first charge of beating his ex-wife wasn't enough for you.

His charges of sexual assault and burglary, for which he was found guilty (even on appeal, and even considering the monumental fuck-up), weren't enough for you.

His conviction for making threats against his own brother over the phone, the last time 10 minutes after the police came around to his house and told him to knock it off (which also shows that 'self-control' is yet another word that Diggs the rapist doesn't understand), weren't enough for you.

His chronic lying isn't enough for you.

His chronic sexual harassment of female members of his own board, so much so that at least two of them have left for that very reason in the short time it's been open, isn't enough for you.

I can see what's going on here. You don't believe, again, because you don't want to. When his past and present behaviour forms such a pattern, what conclusion do you draw?

'Uh... duh... that's all because the legal system was against him. Every single charge. He's an innocent man hard done by. And all the women who complained about his sexual harassment, they're all liars. And ... and ...'

When this pattern emerges about a person's actions and attitudes, there's only one conclusion a person who's not mentally retarded can make.

You're flailing at this like a nigger trying to take on a Klitschko brother.

Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; September 2nd, 2013 at 08:22 AM.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #274
M.N. Dalvez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
Default

Quote:
just another scum got off the hook on a technicality.
He didn't get off the hook, as such, he just copped a reduction in sentence due to an error made on the part of the prosecution. He did at least a year (that's how much shows up in the docket), pre-and-post trial, for that sexual battery and burglary charge.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #275
Dave from New York
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 567
Default

Quote:
You're flailing at this like a nigger trying to take on a Klitschko brother.
Love that analogy, Dalvez
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #276
HardHawk
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.N. Dalvez View Post
He didn't get off the hook, as such, he just copped a reduction in sentence due to an error made on the part of the prosecution. He did at least a year (that's how much shows up in the docket), pre-and-post trial, for that sexual battery and burglary charge.
Ok I stand corrected, but what I mean by saying he got off the hook is that he did not get what he deserved. 1 year for what he did I dont consider it punishment I consider it, a joke and a failure of an already failed system, put in place by the zios to protect their own kind and mentalities, at the expense of the goyim.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #277
M.N. Dalvez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
Default

Quote:
1 year for what he did I dont consider it punishment I consider it, a joke and a failure of an already failed system, put in place by the zios to protect their own kind and mentalities, at the expense of the goyim.
Yeah, that's fair enough.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #278
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

I'm not going to lock this thread, as there may be more that comes out worth discussing.

But Fred is dead to me, the right thing to do is ostracize him and those who post there.

If you post at Fred's forum, don't post here. You will likely be banned.

Ostracism works. But only if we use it.

Consider putting the cause ahead of your own entertainment.

Last edited by Alex Linder; September 2nd, 2013 at 11:13 AM.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #279
Anthony Lynch
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HardHawk View Post
Then you should have search as we all did, at least I have, before posting or read what others posted before posting lame excuses to my opinion. But I let it go as to me make no difference either way.

As the point is been proven.
I'm a working class man and don't have time or accesability to research this case beyond google and sundry internet sites. That is not even enough as any authentic investigation would require footwork and speaking with both parties, reading court minutes etc.

Your criticism against me is baseless as you have several times misconstrued my skepticism of our judicial system as "defending" an individual actor.

I understand it is difficult for you to see the nuance, but that's your problem. You seem to react as a disgrunteled child towards any idea that doesn't readily fall in step with your own.

You said you were going by what the witness "said". Do you know the witness personally? Can you vouch for her credibility? Here's why I ask.

Several years ago I had a girlfriend who lost here sense. One day she became violent and I mishandled the situation. I should have taken a walk, wait for her to cool off, but I mistakenly called the cops foolishly thinking it would defuse the argument. When cops arrived they quickly became agitated and began to put handcuffs on the girl. As she was escorted to the squad car she was desperate to avoid her fate. Suddenly she blurted "but he hit me too".

I half expected the cops to laugh because it was clear she was making it up as a last ditch attempt to get free, but instead they arrested me. The charge was dropped, but I spent a night in jail and realized how easily I could have fared much worse. Following the incident I researched and found that the laws enacred after the "Violence against women Act" are designed in a feminist manner and that the mere accusation of violence made by a woman demands cops arrest a man even without any evidence. Countless men have been victimized by this double standard in the feminized jewized legal system.

So I ask again, do you know the defendent? Can you vouch for her credibility? What about the prosecution the judge or the arresting officer?

Oh and for the record I don't know Fred nor did I know he had his own website. To me this isn't about Fred, but about how to judge an individual who may have a a criminal charge in their background.
 
Old September 2nd, 2013 #280
Soldatul Vostru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Lynch View Post
I'm just a working class man and don't have time or accesability to research this issue. Your criticism against me is baseless as you have several times misconstrued my skepticism of our judicial system as "defending" an individual actor.
I understand it is difficult for you to see the nuance here, but that's your problem.

Okay you said you were going by what the witness "said". Do you know the witness personally? Can you vouch for her credibility? Here's why I ask.

Several years ago I had a girlfriend who lost here sense. One day she became violent and I mishandled the situation. I should have taken a walk, wait for her to cool off, but I mistakenly called the cops foolishly thinking it would defuse the argument. When cops arrived they quickly became agitated and began to put handcuffs on the girl. As she was escorted to the squad car she was desperate to avoid her fate. Suddenly she sblurted " but but he hit me too". I half expected the cops to laugh because it was clear she was making it up as a last ditch attempt to get free, but instead they arrested me. The charge was dropped, but I spent a night in jail and realized how easily I could have fared much worse. Following the incident I researched and found that the laws enacred after the "Violence against women Act" are designed in a feminist manner and that the mere accusation of violence made by a woman demands cops arrest a man even without any evidence. Countless men have been victimized by this double standard in the feminized jewized legal system.

So I ask again, do you know the defendent? Can you vouch for her credibility? What about the prosecution the judge or the arresting officer?

Oh and for the record I don't know Fred nor did I know he had his own website. To me this isn't about Fred, but about how to judge an individual who may have a a criminal charge in their background.
That's the thing, you don't know Ferd; he beat his wife, he broke into some broad's house and raped her - twice I believe - and recently he threatened to 'pop a cap' into his own brother over some business thing. So Ferd has a history; he is out of control.

Not too long ago he posted the IP of someone on his forum that he had a problem with. That was quickly deleted but not before my source took a snap shot of it.

Oh and he was hitting on someone's wife while she was a member there; and caused at least two females to flee from his site because he wouldn't leave them alone.

So it's not even just one incident 26 years ago, but a pattern of devious behavior.

If he were innocent he would have done whatever it took to prove his innocence, including hiring a lawyer; and Ferd has the money for a top-notch lawyer -- the greediest of kikes.

Instead what does he do? -- he deletes posts linking to the case. His own actions, or lack thereof, and the way he handled the accusation clearly show that he is guiltier than a nigger on death-row.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.
Page generated in 0.70459 seconds.