|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Should WN take over Wikipedia?
For better or for worse Wikipedia has become the go-to source of information for most Americans. Unfortunately Wikipedia is highly biased under the influence of it's current clique of volunteer editors, many of whom are undoubtedly either Jews or are committed to the leftist idealizations of the Jews in their outlook, which is immediately apparent when looking up certain articles.
This makes Wikipedia one of the foremost propaganda tools in our society, and as we all know, those who control information, control the public's attitudes and the way they think. It would be beneficial to WN if a team of qualified, dedicated contributors could gradually and quietly infiltrate the ranks of Wikipedia's editorial staff, and playing by their rules, set about to make irrefutable changes to the site's contents in a subtle way that would work to our benefit, yet be so irreprochable as to be resistant to reversions and revisions by the leftists who are now in complete control of it. Obviously this would be a formidable task, and one not to be attempted lightly. It would be imperative that those engaging in such have the intellectual capability and self-discipline to match wits with those already in control of Wikipedia; but I think it is something that some of the better educated and more intelligent members of the WN community could handle if they had the time and determination to do so. |
July 9th, 2012 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
|
Why aren't you volunteering your services for the above mentioned task?
Even if you aren't initially qualified, you could cut and paste a resume together to get your foot in the door. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut,_copy,_and_paste Seriously, this task has your name written all over it. |
July 9th, 2012 | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
It would be a good experiment in WN capability, to see if WN are capable of gaining control of anything. If we can't take over Wikipedia, we can forget taking over political parties or government. |
|
July 9th, 2012 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
|
Bullshit atkins, even Alex stated that he admired your evenness and calm headed composure. I hate to admit it but he is right. I see this as win-win. You are the right guy for the right job. Thats the win. The second win is that you would be preoccupied enough to give us a break from all the posts on how you sort your sock drawer.
|
July 9th, 2012 | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Honestly though, I find the whole Wiki editing experience infuriating. You can't delete what I post here. I invariably got banned every time I would make a Wikipedia account and set about editing. The task requires someone with a greater deal of subtility than I possess. Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 9th, 2012 at 08:19 PM. |
|
July 9th, 2012 | #6 |
Administrator
|
I have never tried to edit Wikipedia other than maybe my own entry years ago, as one gets tired of being defined by one's relation to jews, as though that defines anyone.
It appears to me that you would need at a minimum dozens or hundreds of people committed to the job around the clock for years. And it still probably would not work. Nothing's more frustrating than seeing the good work you do continually erased by liars. I don't see how to avoid that, unless someone had some special ins at Wikipedia. But the Wikipedia shell, or something very similar, can be created by anyone. I think we even have a larval one here, I know Varg has mentioned it a couple times. Of course, building our own will never compete with a mainstream one, but it won't get knocked down, and perhaps if it were focused on a particular subset of knowledge it would actually be used. A tall order in any case. |
November 2nd, 2014 | #7 |
Doesn't suffer fools well
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,740
|
Don't know if y'all think its worth editing WIKIPEDIA pages...
My understanding is that the State of Israel has full-time staff paid to edit, comment, etc., not just on WIKIPEDIA but anything they believe they can benefit from revising.
Some revision is pretty low-brow. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Linder Being an Asshole When Linder was born, the doctor birthing him was quoted accurately describing Linder as an "...asshole... of the crudest variety"[14] In school, Linder was often teased for being an asshole, which he self-admittedly was. His frequent blaming of the Jews and of other minorites.[15] |
November 2nd, 2014 | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 258
|
You can't edit in any pro-white views on Wikipedia. Your changes will get reverted within minutes depending on the popularity of the article and you will most likely be blocked quickly thereafter. It's like reddit and their primary political subs, if you voice any idea even hinting that white genocide might not be desirable, you will be banned from the sub and many times shadowbanned from entire reddit.
There is no discourse to be had with cultural marxists. They only understand force. |
November 2nd, 2014 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
When I posted a translation from German Wikipedia about Freddie Brocksieper, the half-Jew Jazz musician who had a career in Germany throughout Hitler's rule -- which strongly suggests that there was no Holocaust and also debunks the myth that jazz and swing were strictly banned -- the article was not just edited but removed, so that there would be no evidence of what had been deleted, and a new article was posted in its place. The fact that Brocksieper had any Jewish ancestry at all was among the facts omitted.
http://national-socialist-worldview....ipedia-is.html German Wikipedia seems to be less Jew-controlled and more accurate about these things.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com |
November 2nd, 2014 | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
In response to the question that is the title of this thread, I think that if any White Nationalists are going to participate in Wikipedia, they will need to learn the rules of Wikipedia very well, and be good at arguing about them.
I've had a few go-rounds with editing Wikipedia and the way it's set up, everything turns into something resembling a legal dispute where one of your opponents is a well-connected shyster. All editing is supposed to be justified according to rules, but those rules get bent and broken constantly. Wikipedia is policed by a variety of interest groups, not just Jews. Queers and Communists and Satanists and Mormons and probably a lot of other groups police the articles that matter to them. Since the editing of those articles is driven by agendas rather than objectivity, the argumentation for and against edits often turns out to be very crooked. So, you face shysters who twist the rules, and fanatics that are so convinced that they have the moral highground that they don't even care about rules. And they have their organized cliques on there that enable them to get away with that. I know for a fact that there are some people of national-socialist sympathies who edit Wikipedia, but they have to do it carefully. They have to know the rules very well and have their arguments together, and proceed cautiously. That's the only way anybody has a chance going against the grain on Wikipedia. The fact that National-Socialist Germany is called "Nazi Germany," which would be like calling the USSR Commie Russia, is evidence enough of the bias. And yes, the bias in the article about Linder is quite blatant. Anybody reading that should grasp that it has an anti-Linder slant. For me, all the trouble involved in editing Wikipedia seems hardly worth it, since I can just post whatever I want on my blog. I mean, if I wanted to go through that much hassle, I should probably just go into law, and make some money at it instead of putting myself in the position of having to think and talk like a lawyer while being paid nothing. But I think it's important that somebody at least point out the faults of Wikipedia.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; November 2nd, 2014 at 06:27 PM. |
November 3rd, 2014 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
|
Instead of wikipedia may I suggest using Metapedia.
__________________
Experience molds perception. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|