|
July 9th, 2012 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Should WN take over Wikipedia?
For better or for worse Wikipedia has become the go-to source of information for most Americans. Unfortunately Wikipedia is highly biased under the influence of it's current clique of volunteer editors, many of whom are undoubtedly either Jews or are committed to the leftist idealizations of the Jews in their outlook, which is immediately apparent when looking up certain articles.
This makes Wikipedia one of the foremost propaganda tools in our society, and as we all know, those who control information, control the public's attitudes and the way they think. It would be beneficial to WN if a team of qualified, dedicated contributors could gradually and quietly infiltrate the ranks of Wikipedia's editorial staff, and playing by their rules, set about to make irrefutable changes to the site's contents in a subtle way that would work to our benefit, yet be so irreprochable as to be resistant to reversions and revisions by the leftists who are now in complete control of it. Obviously this would be a formidable task, and one not to be attempted lightly. It would be imperative that those engaging in such have the intellectual capability and self-discipline to match wits with those already in control of Wikipedia; but I think it is something that some of the better educated and more intelligent members of the WN community could handle if they had the time and determination to do so. |
July 9th, 2012 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
|
Why aren't you volunteering your services for the above mentioned task?
Even if you aren't initially qualified, you could cut and paste a resume together to get your foot in the door. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut,_copy,_and_paste Seriously, this task has your name written all over it. |
July 9th, 2012 | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
It would be a good experiment in WN capability, to see if WN are capable of gaining control of anything. If we can't take over Wikipedia, we can forget taking over political parties or government. |
|
July 9th, 2012 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
|
Bullshit atkins, even Alex stated that he admired your evenness and calm headed composure. I hate to admit it but he is right. I see this as win-win. You are the right guy for the right job. Thats the win. The second win is that you would be preoccupied enough to give us a break from all the posts on how you sort your sock drawer.
|
July 9th, 2012 | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Honestly though, I find the whole Wiki editing experience infuriating. You can't delete what I post here. I invariably got banned every time I would make a Wikipedia account and set about editing. The task requires someone with a greater deal of subtility than I possess. Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 9th, 2012 at 08:19 PM. |
|
July 9th, 2012 | #6 |
Administrator
|
I have never tried to edit Wikipedia other than maybe my own entry years ago, as one gets tired of being defined by one's relation to jews, as though that defines anyone.
It appears to me that you would need at a minimum dozens or hundreds of people committed to the job around the clock for years. And it still probably would not work. Nothing's more frustrating than seeing the good work you do continually erased by liars. I don't see how to avoid that, unless someone had some special ins at Wikipedia. But the Wikipedia shell, or something very similar, can be created by anyone. I think we even have a larval one here, I know Varg has mentioned it a couple times. Of course, building our own will never compete with a mainstream one, but it won't get knocked down, and perhaps if it were focused on a particular subset of knowledge it would actually be used. A tall order in any case. |
July 9th, 2012 | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
|
Atkins, no we should not think like jews so as to beat them. Should we think like niggers to beat them? I am not jew so there fore I fail right off the bat when using your comment as strategy. You are advocating jew-supremacy when you say we must think like them if we want to beat them. The jew system of thought is like a black widow. This creature has one weapon that is venom. After that this creature is very weak and vulnerable not only to the elements of nature but to predators as well. This creature is committed to habit for which it can not escape. Once you get past the fear factor, all that is required is to squash that pesky insect.
How would you edit this link? |
July 9th, 2012 | #9 |
reasonradionetwork.com
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 1,475
|
I would encourage White nationalists who have good English skills and diplomatic skills who are not engaged in other activist projects to become Wikipedia editors. If qualified White nationalists do not do so, then the articles about White nationalist individuals, organizations, and projects are only going to become more and more skewed and defamatory over time.
I am not an expert on Wikipedia, but from what I know of it, the people at the top do take their NPOV principle seriously. On the other hand, do not enter this venue unless you have ample patience, thick skin, and are willing to learn their unique subculture and rules. You need to set limited goals. You will probably not be able to impart a WN POV on major WP articles, but you will perhaps be able to neutralize or at least lessen the blatant Jewish hostility. I think Alex is right, this is a project that would need dozens if not hundreds of intelligent, capable WN volunteers to make any real impact, and only with limited chance and degree of success. With millions of viewers, that still opens the possibility of enormous good. |
July 9th, 2012 | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
Quote:
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #11 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Karl what's his name on here would be a good candidate. |
|
July 9th, 2012 | #13 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Rudyard Kipling dedicated this poem to the Picts, but he probably had the Jews in mind when it wrote it: Quote:
Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 9th, 2012 at 09:35 PM. |
||
July 9th, 2012 | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
Quote:
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #16 |
reasonradionetwork.com
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 1,475
|
It's not a question of thinking like Jews or not. It's a question of thinking effective, practical, winning.
The White generations in centuries ahead won't care how we won. Only that we did. |
July 9th, 2012 | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
|
July 9th, 2012 | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|