|
August 17th, 2008 | #21 | ||
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
If all you were going to do was draft simple wills, you could get by with a lot less than the full curriculum. But law school doesn't work like that. You get the full program -- Property law, Evidence law, Contract law, Constitutional law, Tort law, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Criminal Law, Sales & Financing, Corporate Law. Plus, all of this stuff ties in together. Wills can't be separatied from property law. Property law can't be completely separated from contract law which also ties into Constitutional law &c. Quote:
|
||
August 17th, 2008 | #22 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Jews don't ''control the law'' in a day to day sense in all places, but they certainly hold ultimate authority over its parameters and the substantive rights therein. |
|
August 17th, 2008 | #23 |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Slightly off topic:
The legal field is so flooded with aspiring new lawyers right now it's scary. These kids are coming out of law school and many of them have absolutely no hope of finding a job in the field that they have spent 3 years and up to 100K training for. Some law firms are laying off lawyers. Yes, experienced lawyers still make a pretty good living, but I wouldn't commend the idea of law school to anyone right now unless it has absolutely been your life-long ambition. GREL |
August 17th, 2008 | #24 |
Das Ende
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Midwestern "United States of America"
Posts: 1,488
|
At Yale...
http://www.law.yale.edu/faculty/faculty.htm
Again, I've left out "borderline" names. There's probably a few more jews on the faculty than what is listed here. 1. Howard E. Abrams 2. Jack M. Balkin 3. Aharon Barak (alumnus, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) 4. Robert A. Burt 5. Morris L. Cohen 6. Jules L. Coleman 7. Daniel J. Freed 8. Paul Gewirtz 9. Dan M. Kahan 10.Paul W. Kahn 11.Jay Katz 12.S. Blair Kauffman 13.Anthony T. Kronman 14.Yair Listokin 15.Daniel Markovits 16.W. Michael Reisman (alumnus, Hebrew University) 17.Judith Resnik 18.Susan Rose-Ackerman 19.Jed Rubenfeld 20.Peter H. Schuck 21.Alan Schwartz 22.Ian Shapiro 23.Scott Shapiro 24.Robert J. Shiller 25.Reva Siegel 26.Dan Simon (alumnus, Tel Aviv University) 27.Robert Solomon 28.Alex Stein (alumnus, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) 29.Lior Strahilevitz 30.Stephen Wizner (Sackler Professor of Law at Tel Aviv University) 98 total 30/98 = 31%
__________________
An anti-semite is someone who knows what's going on. |
August 17th, 2008 | #25 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 53
|
There is a white gentile critic of the "overlawyering" of America named Walter Olson, who runs a blog called "overlawyered.com" I read this blog, and his other writings, and he's got an Aryan instinct for the big scam, but says nothing about Jews. In fact, after several years of blogging, he took on a Jewish sidekick named Ted Frank, whose posts are greasy and self-serving compared to the cool and witty writing of Olson. The gentile-Jew split manifests itself in their own postings: Olson will decry such things as Holocaust denial laws in Europe, while Frank enjoys bashing Ron Paul as a crank.
__________________
Life to Whites |
August 18th, 2008 | #26 |
Das Ende
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Midwestern "United States of America"
Posts: 1,488
|
At Stanford...
http://www.law.stanford.edu/directory/
1.Joseph Bankman 2.Paul Brest 3.Joshua Cohen 4.William Cohen 5.Michele Landis Dauber 6.Barbara H. Fried 7.Lawrence M. Friedman 8.Paul Goldstein 9.Joseph A. Grundfest 10.Thomas C. Heller 11.Pamela S. Karlan 12.Mark G. Kelman 13.Amalia D. Kessler 14.Michael Klausner 15.Larry Kramer (Dean) 16.Lawrence Lessig 17.Lawrence C. Marshall (alumnus,Beth Hatalmud College,Jerusalem) 18.David W. Mills (co-chairman of the Board of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund) 19.Alison D. Morantz 20.A. Mitchell Polinsky 21.Robert L. Rabin 22.David Rosenhan 23.Jane Schacter 24.Jeff Strnad 25.Allen Weiner 26.Robert Weisberg 66 Total 26/66 = 39%
__________________
An anti-semite is someone who knows what's going on. |
August 18th, 2008 | #27 |
Das Ende
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Midwestern "United States of America"
Posts: 1,488
|
At Columbia...
http://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/full_time_fac
1.Mark Barenberg 2.Barbara Aronstein Black 3.Lori Fisler Damrosch 4.Ariela Dubler 5.Jeffrey A. Fagan (Research/Courses Taught: Racial Profiling; Social Contagion of Violence) 6.Jane C. Ginsburg 7.Suzanne Goldberg 8.Victor P. Goldberg 9.Harvey J. Goldschmid 10.Zohar Goshen (alumnus, Hebrew University) 11.Jack Greenberg (Argued before U.S. Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, 1954) 12.Philip Hamburger 13.Michael A. Heller 14.Avery W. Katz 15.Benjamin L. Liebman 16.Carol B. Liebman 17.James S. Liebman 18.Lance Liebman 19.Eben Moglen 20.Joseph Raz (alumnus, Hebrew University) 21.Daniel C. Richman 22.Peter Rosenblum 23.Charles F. Sabel 24.Carol Sanger 25.Barbara Schatz 26.David M. Schizer (Dean) 27.Michael I. Sovern (alumnus, Tel Aviv University) 28.Jane M. Spinak 29.Susan P. Sturm 87 total 29/87 = 33%
__________________
An anti-semite is someone who knows what's going on. |
August 19th, 2008 | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Anyone who wonders why this is important should sometime look up the backgrounds of presidential appointees and other political appointees in the executive branch. They are at the subcabinet level in the cabinet departments (such as assistant secretary and deputy assistant secretary), and in similar posts in regulatory agencies. These are the people who really make public policy, by channeling information up to the better-known higher-ups, by framing the major alternatives (and disregarding any others), and by directly making all sorts of lesser decisions that can add up to major impact. One example is the role of the Jew Douglas Feith in making the case for the Iraq war, but this goes on in all agencies. These people are especially powerful in the regulatory agencies, which are subject to very limited oversight by any other branch of government.
You’ll find that a huge share of these political appointees are lawyers, most from the brand name law schools featured in this thread (Feith went to #14 Georgetown, following #1 Harvard College). That is true even excluding specifically legal positions such as at the Department of Justice and the General Counsel of other agencies. That is, most of these lawyers are not practicing law, they are deciding the substance of public policy. It may seem strange, in that there are people who seem to have more relevant credentials to do that, such as degrees in public policy itself, and in all sorts of technical fields related to specific policies. Those people are of course in government, more commonly as civil servants. But more often than not they work for politically-appointed lawyers, and carry out those lawyers’ wishes. I’m not sure why this is, and it isn’t as typical in Europe. It may just be that lawyers’ facility with words (quibbling) helps them to sell dubious policies to others like themselves (such as Congressmen, also mostly lawyers) and to the media. It may also be that the big D.C. law firms are convenient, lucrative places to be when out of office. Whatever the case, these lawyers are immensely powerful, and who’s indoctrinated them and to believe what should be of interest to the rest of us. |
August 22nd, 2008 | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,139
|
as Mario Puzzo wrote in The Godfather, "a lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns."
|
August 27th, 2008 | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta,GA
Posts: 3,377
|
I remember reading an article in The Economist magazine that came
out in the early 90's about the large number of lawyers in America and the negative effect it had on GNP. The article stated that the "ideal" number of lawyers for economic efficiency would be no more than 400,000. I believe at the time there were 1 million lawyers in America. So basically all these lawyers slow down the economy by a signifigant amount. America needs more scientists and engineers and fewer lawyers in order to compete with the rest of the world.
__________________
"To Undo a Jew is charity and not a sin." -Christopher Marlowe |
September 1st, 2008 | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
Full curriculum? Someone with a bachelor in paralegal studies covered all those classes. Louisiana has Civil Law Notaries that are allowed to draft contracts, wills, trusts, do house closings, etc. and the world does not come to an end. Including lost wages it cost $300,000 to become a lawyer, paid for my the government and/or the lawyer. It is a scam to keep the competition out. |
|
September 2nd, 2008 | #32 | ||||
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I'm perfectly comfortable with having some minimum standards that people have to meet before practicing law. As much so as with practicing medicine. There are enough idiots practicing law even with the requirements. I don't want to think about what it would be like if all that was required to be licensed was to raise a hand. But as the barriers to entry go, law school is the easy part. The bar exam is what's a bitch. Different states have different degrees of difficulty, and suprisingly, Mississippi's is considered to be the 5th hardest in the nation. Three 8 hour days of solid testing. A group of niggers had a lawsuit against the bar association a few years ago complaining that the bar exam was too hard and washed out too many negros who had successfully completed law school but couldn't pass the bar exam. GREL Last edited by Marse Supial; September 2nd, 2008 at 02:04 PM. |
||||
September 2nd, 2008 | #33 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
2. Ole Miss is a public school, so the taxpayer is paying. My figures including lost wages are accurate. 3. Almost all countries only require a bachelor degree to be a lawyer. You did not explain why someone with a bachelor degree in paralegal studies, 10 years experience, pass the National Certified paralegal exam, the state exam, background check will be put in jail for writing a will for a person, without giving a cut to a lawyer that did nothing. Medical Doctors? Nurse Practitioners prescribe medicine without MD supervision and in most states have their own practices, so do not compare the legal monopoly to medicine where there is consumer choice. Besides, an MD actually does good for the world. 4. Old Miss does not have part time, I went to the site. In addition, every site I went to says ABA rules says P/T must be done in 4 years. Quote:
Louisiana Civil Law Notary Association: http://www.pclna.org/ From Old Miss Law School Quote:
Last edited by seeer; September 2nd, 2008 at 09:04 PM. |
|||
September 2nd, 2008 | #34 | ||||||
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Don't be so angry seeer. We're on the same side, bro.
Quote:
Some states (namely California) are changing to allow para professionals to handle routine drafting tasks. But I can tell you from personal experience, I get a lot of business straightening out things that clients tried to do things on the cheap with a 'will kit' or 'legal zoom' or some such. And invariably these clients spend 5 times as much getting a mess straightened out as they would have had it been done right the first go round. I've seen people literally and absolutely unnecessarily lose their homes because they tried to file bankruptcy by copying their friend's petition and filing it themselves. So I send legal zoom a 'Merry Christmas' card every year. "Keep up the good work, boys." Quote:
Quote:
You keep going back to wills. Most wills are easy. So easy in fact, that it's hard to justify charging more than $100 bucks or so for the very simple ones. But if you want to do some estate planning that may have some tax implications, you better know what you're doing. And that requires a semeter or two of studying the tax code and the applicable federal regulations. Lots of professions have licensing requirements. Plumbing is a good example. Any idiot can put a new flapper in a toilet. Any idiot can put a new flapper in their best friend's or their next door neighbors toilet. But if you're going to hold yourself out as a professional plumber and charge people money for it, you've got to pass the test and get a license. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But that being said, a litigant CAN ask the judge to make a ruling on what the law is. It comes in the form of a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or motion for summary judgment, or a declaratory judgment action or a number of other ways. Last edited by Marse Supial; September 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 PM. |
||||||
September 3rd, 2008 | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
Last edited by seeer; September 3rd, 2008 at 09:23 PM. |
|
September 4th, 2008 | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
I don't understand that either. Why can't you just go to college here and major in law the way you major in engineering? If you're old enough to learn ODE, why not SEC?
Last edited by Mike Parker; September 4th, 2008 at 07:51 AM. |
September 8th, 2008 | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
|
This is only the tip of the iceberg. This f'ed up situation goes all the way up to the top. To the supreme court. Now you can get an inkling as to why Matt Hale was so pissed off.
|
September 11th, 2008 | #38 |
Doesn't suffer fools well
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,740
|
"The effect of Jewish Supreme Court Justices on constitutional law"
Whatever else you may think of him, Peter J. Peters made an outstanding, and not preachy at all, tape series called They and Us. It is likely the best tapes he ever made for our purposes.
One is especially good and contains a commencement speech by a law school dean on the above subject, which is remarkable. If we had more archive space for attachments and for audio, I'd upload that one, if I could find it. |
September 23rd, 2008 | #39 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Did we cover Univ of Chicago, Epstein and the Jewish "Chicago School of Law and Economics?" The guys who helped lay the intellectual foundation for the snafus that have lead to the current trillion dollar bailout of Jewish operated wall st banks making its way through Congress sponsored by Jewish Ben Shalom Bernanke head of the Fed.
Here is an example of what Jewish partisans do in law school. Slander the Catholics, promote the Jews. Try to make sure that the Jewish profit / genocide operation called "freedom of choice" (to murder goyim babies in the womb) continues. http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=1&gl=us note this blog post date eh? Irony, the Jews always caballistically watch the numbers. here is what the jew says: Quote:
|
|
October 20th, 2008 | #40 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 75
|
The Jew
The jew prides himself as an expert in law as well as experts in greed
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|