|
November 13th, 2012 | #81 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
|
Quote:
As for your hero Ron Paul, why didn't Iowa or New Hampshire vote for him? You had your chance. Those states hold the first critical primaries in America. Then the primaries swing through South Carolina and Florida before moving on to a dozen or more Northern states where the race is decided. Let's try an experiment: DUMP the Northeast, West Coast, and Upper Midwest and see what happens. Problem solved. |
|
November 13th, 2012 | #82 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
|
Quote:
I replied to his email: anytime. I haven't checked my email since then. I've been too busy following all this stuff going on in the news. But anyway, I don't have the slightest problem doing an interview with Jim Giles using my real name, as everyone (including you) already knows my real name anyway. |
|
November 13th, 2012 | #83 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
New Hampshire Vote Fraud Vote Fraud by Flipping Votes from Paul to Romney Last edited by Fred O'Malley; November 13th, 2012 at 04:19 PM. |
|
November 13th, 2012 | #84 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
November 13th, 2012 | #85 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Well, it's damned near every honky for himself now, every swinging dick better get his act together and begin forming very stout alliances, if they intend to survive the coming Union of South Africa scenario the kikes have planned for us.
|
November 13th, 2012 | #86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,733
|
How is Ron Paul a Northern try? As stated he won no Northern primaries while running for President so how did the North try? He was however elected and reelected a number of times to Congress from the Southern state of Texas. His son Rand Paul has also been elected to the US Senate from the Southern state of Kentucky.
|
November 13th, 2012 | #87 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
The North tried to support Ron Paul, but the South clearly rejected his platform, except Texas, and since electronic voting is used in the primary states, nobody really knows how a fair election season would have gone. The South uses E-voting almost exclusively, to our detriment. The voting is rigged, it means only that you have a right to piss your time away voting, for the illusion of having any say in your government. Vote Fraud Iowa New Hampshire Vote Fraud Vote Fraud by Flipping Votes from Paul to Romney Last edited by Fred O'Malley; November 13th, 2012 at 07:03 PM. |
|
November 13th, 2012 | #88 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
|
Rand Paul sold out and endorsed amnesty for illegal aliens today. In the GOP primary, Ron Paul denounced the border fence and compared illegal aliens to the Jews in Nazi Germany.
As for Ron Paul, I voted for him in the 2008 GOP primary. I didn't vote for him in the 2012 GOP primary because he moved to the left on immigration. I don't get why WNs are so in the tank for Ron Paul now considering that his base are college hippies who support drug legalization. Didn't he deny writing the newsletters? Didn't he say that MLK was his hero? |
November 13th, 2012 | #89 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
|
Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard came up with this strategy of suckering the David Duke crowd into supporting them in the 1990s. They openly threw all their paleocon and racialist supporters overboard after the 2008 election.
I'm surprised Alex hasn't mentioned Justin Raimondo in this thread. That guy is a huge fan of White Nationalism. |
November 13th, 2012 | #90 |
Banned
|
Alex has explicitly stated a number of times that Ron Paul is neither a WN or racialist. What the South didn't care to get about Paul--or maybe they did get, is that he would have made life hell on the jews who own the Federal Reserve. The bible says jews are 'His' people, and he is always on the lookout tempting us to treat them badly. We will then pay in the afterlife. The South has never heard of all this? Or it heaves their nearly every move?
|
November 13th, 2012 | #91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
"Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose." |
|
November 13th, 2012 | #92 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, Paul made it pretty clear that he was gonna cut neo-khan war spending and attack the FED, first and foremost, before going after entitlements. In other words, you cannot believe the people counting the vote. Heck, I know this is anecdotal, but just talking to folk day by day, I noted FAR more support for Ron Paul than any of the other candidates.... and this is a man who was basically blacklisted from the Jews media. |
||
November 13th, 2012 | #93 | |
Master Race
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: neo-Weimar JewSA
Posts: 1,568
|
Quote:
__________________
"What are they? A religion, a race, a criminal conspiracy?" - Craig 'Chain' Cobb on the jews |
|
November 14th, 2012 | #94 | |||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
1) his program is the most pro-Southern set of policies out there - objectively - if your stated goal is secession/decentralization 2) RP had more support in the North than in the South - particularly among the young and angry any true revolution needs 3) The Republicans -- the technicians supporting Romney, the Southerners' pick, like McCain before him -- had to cheat to prevent RP from...who knows? But in any case doing considerably better than he did do, which was quite impressive 4) Ditto the mass media The RP campaign was reminiscent of nothing so much as both parties and the mass media ganging up to defeat David Duke. The South, which you seem to believe favors secession because a bunch of people who might or might not be who they say they are sign a petition, could have voted for Ron Paul, or Virgil Goode, but did not. You trumpet their vote for a Massachusetts liberal as a triumph of racial sanity. One's mind boggles at the irony. Quote:
So what's your plan? Crickets. Your plan is the same as most WN: wait for breakdown. What's so funny about the perfervidity with which you've pressed the theme of the South voting for the Massachusetts liberal whiteskin and the North not is that if two northern states, lets say Va. and Fla., had flipped, then your "white man" would have been elected. And then...what? The same thing we get now. The only thing different would have been the leftists would have been crying rather than gloating. But every other policy and demographic trend would have remained virtually unchanged with the possible exception we would eventually have gone to war against Iran too. You're overreacting. As usual. This election meant nothing other than one liberal got a couple more percentage points than another liberal in a couple of swing states. Nothing fundamental was at stake, and it's anti-White to pretend it was. But I hear we're going to have a debate next week. That will be a good time to discuss it. Last edited by Alex Linder; November 14th, 2012 at 12:40 AM. |
|||
November 14th, 2012 | #95 |
Administrator
|
The problem for all of us is gaining an accurate understanding of what is actually going on. That is easier in the age of the internet than ever before. The particular problem of the South, speaking generally, is its people are too easily satisfied with the answers they receive from those they look to as legitimate authorities. Of course, that's the problem elsewhere too; I just think a greater percentage of the population is wiling to question received wisdom outside the South.
|
November 14th, 2012 | #96 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Paul allowed racist arguments repeatedly in his own newsletter, and that he later ran from them in a manner most cowardly does not change the fact that he knows the facts about race (remember, he is a medical doctor). A guy who is a closet racist and public decentralist and Fed- and instigationist opponent ought to be everything true Southerners want - yet they prefer the likes of a vicious anti-white, pro-mud warmonger like McCain or a raceless Massachusetts liberal like Romney. |
|
November 14th, 2012 | #97 | |||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The point is not that RP is great or even good. It's that he alone supports three causes - sound money, MYOB foreign policy and free association - that would restore the South its lost freedom. Regardless of what he says about race. That's the thing about libertarians - RP is not trying to force his opinion of race on you; under his system you are free to exercise discrimination because your Constitutional right to free association has been restored. You can't get anything better than that inside the current 'democratic' System. And remember it's you, not me, who has said he has no fundamental problem with the system as such, which makes your lack of enthusiasm for Ron Paul even stranger. Last edited by Alex Linder; November 14th, 2012 at 03:20 AM. |
|||
November 14th, 2012 | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
|
rights don't come from government
. . .because your right to free association has been recognized. . .
We have the right NOW even though not recognized. "Constitutional right" implies a grant (permission) from the state. The right to free association is already included under the basic right- self ownership. The latter should be proclaimed. "Fuck you Hitler, my life is my own property" Who said that? |
November 14th, 2012 | #99 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Libertarians present no threat to WN. They don't call themselves WN (as anti-White Jared Taylor does). They don't make the same arguments we do (as the conservatives sometimes do). They don't have the guts to talk about race. So no one confuses them with us. They can't steal our thunder. But we could steal theirs. And it would work, because a fool or small child can see that the adult freedoms they advocate (I do not use adult as a jew does, to refer to things sexual or drug/drink-related [altho some of those are involved], but to real political freedoms) are only possible in a white racial context. Even libertarians know that. Sometimes they get exasperated enough to type it. Then Lewpus finds them "too hot" and cans them. It's funny and pathetic. But irrelevant. The adult freedoms they describe, and, simply, the impressive ways in which they live their lives - thinking carefully about all that they put in their mouths and their brains - are exemplary on an individual level. And white nationalism is not just about the WHITE man but about the white MAN, though this latter is usually forgotten by run of the mill NS or Rebel types. We can steal the libertarians' thunder (their appeal to whites as adult men who want to be left alone in peace and freedom) and there's nothing they can do about it save add racial appeal to their other appeals, which they will never do because then they will come under the same anathema WN do. What's funny about the strong hostility toward libertarians from you and many others is that you never pause to think that men and women who exhibit more exacting and higher-level discrimination in every aspect of their lives than 90% of WN do would somehow be less discriminating in matters of race. It's the conservatives that you, Jethro, mix openly with who present the threat. They can steal from us, and benefit themselves, without ever helping our cause. Pat Buchanan is the prime example of this. There is little we can or need steal from this group intellectually, we just need ordinary non-intellectual conservatives to realize that the world they want to live in is a function of race. Not of religion or sound social policy, but race alone. Only bold serious straight-eyed men speaking under their own name can breach the taboos and reach them. Only serious claims serious. That's why I'm delighted you've agreed to debate under your real name. It will be real personal growth and progress for you, and you will be taken more seriously, and take yourself more seriously. Conservatives can hurt us because they are making similar appeals to our own. But never direct. Only by codes and implication. It never works to defeat the left - which goes immediately and directly after the target, by labeling and destroying it as 'racist.' But it does work to keep Joe Scaredycat in the fold. By fooling him. By getting him to think there's a clever rather than a courageous way out of our national problems. By telling him the soft-cotton lies of universalist individualism, which are backed by his church. We must have no truck with these conservatives. They are a more dangerous enemy than illiberals and their boss jews when it comes to building our team and declaring our agenda. They make us invisible. Just go read the left. They don't see any difference between Mitt Romney, Brad Griffin, Joseph Goebbels, Richard Nixon - they're all the same. They hate Southrons (and Nazis) with extra sauce, but that's just because Hitler's Reich and the Old South were two places where men conscious of the value of race actually held political power. Ultimately leftist, judeo-leftist, hatred is not for this or that politics but for our very kind. Their assault is not regional, it's not even national. It's international, supranational - global. And so we must lift our heads and see what's going on, and respond accordingly. Last edited by Alex Linder; November 14th, 2012 at 03:24 AM. |
|
November 14th, 2012 | #100 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
Southerners are loyal to the people and fight to protect them, while metrosexual yankers disco. Yes, they believe in honor, and serving is an honorable way for them to serve as well as leave the backwater places they live. They believe they serve so you can lay your head down safely at night, so you can just shut the fuck up about it. I believe far more in their honor than your assessment of it. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|