|
September 2nd, 2013 | #261 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Quote:
1. If you break in someones house you are a burglar. 2. If you proceed to rape the woman been in the house against her will, you are a rapist. 3. If you after raping her or during beat also the shit out of her, you are a two bit cheap negro not worth even the bullet I use for you so a slow acid bath it be more appropriate. Since what happened it is established I begin to think you are even lower than the white negro in question here. But carry on any way, since the mods allow you to keep posting. We may not live in a free world any more but at least this forum it is a free thinking forum. Last edited by HardHawk; September 2nd, 2013 at 08:22 AM. |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #262 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Are YOU high? Yes high off life. If you misconstrued what I said to be a "defense" you are sadly mistaken. I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. All I'm saying is it can be awfully foolish to rely on the legal system to make judgments rather than your own mind to judge the fact which are at your disposal.
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #263 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #264 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Quote:
You assuming and ASSuming does not show very solid thinking does it now? The truth is you defending a rapist. And a low life. Why you feel so strongly to defend this scum? |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #265 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Here is what I said you dumb shit "if a man is guilty of vile crimes by all means condemn him"
I also said that it is foolish to see a criminal conviction and immediately start hand wringing. I'm a middle of the road type of guy. Show me evidence and ill take out my own trash, but don't expect me to join those who would instantly go along with whatever the legal system says. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #266 | |
Marie Antoinette
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
Just what part of those facts do you call into question? Which facts make you think "Golly gee, Ferd just might be innocent." |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #267 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
That was my distinct impression from the first several posts by Dalvez. Oh and I'm not "defending" anyone. Read my comment to Ann. I'm saying I don't trust the court system. I'm not saying he is innocent or guilty. I don't know enough of the facts. But I do agree with the initial comment by (Gibson) which warrants skepticism when evaluating judgments made by the courts. If you didn't know this, the court system in America is viciously anti male and anti white.
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #268 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Did you read my post about the time I was convicted of endangering the welfare of a minor? Yeah something about being abused by the courts changes ones attitude and effects the way the view others who MAY have been similarly victimized. Al though I made it CLEAR that I don't know in the Fred case. That's it. I'm going to work now. Bye.
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #269 |
Commie Killer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,615
|
Let's make this clear.
I am a different Fred! The good Fred. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #270 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Quote:
Your colors are begining to show. |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #271 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Quote:
As the point is been proven. |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #272 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Romania
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
September 2nd, 2013 | #273 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Yeah, okay, so Stanley's first charge of beating his ex-wife wasn't enough for you.
His charges of sexual assault and burglary, for which he was found guilty (even on appeal, and even considering the monumental fuck-up), weren't enough for you. His conviction for making threats against his own brother over the phone, the last time 10 minutes after the police came around to his house and told him to knock it off (which also shows that 'self-control' is yet another word that Diggs the rapist doesn't understand), weren't enough for you. His chronic lying isn't enough for you. His chronic sexual harassment of female members of his own board, so much so that at least two of them have left for that very reason in the short time it's been open, isn't enough for you. I can see what's going on here. You don't believe, again, because you don't want to. When his past and present behaviour forms such a pattern, what conclusion do you draw? 'Uh... duh... that's all because the legal system was against him. Every single charge. He's an innocent man hard done by. And all the women who complained about his sexual harassment, they're all liars. And ... and ...' When this pattern emerges about a person's actions and attitudes, there's only one conclusion a person who's not mentally retarded can make. You're flailing at this like a nigger trying to take on a Klitschko brother. Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; September 2nd, 2013 at 08:22 AM. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #274 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #275 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 567
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #276 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: a LAND that never been occupied
Posts: 1,933
|
Ok I stand corrected, but what I mean by saying he got off the hook is that he did not get what he deserved. 1 year for what he did I dont consider it punishment I consider it, a joke and a failure of an already failed system, put in place by the zios to protect their own kind and mentalities, at the expense of the goyim.
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #277 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
|
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #278 |
Administrator
|
I'm not going to lock this thread, as there may be more that comes out worth discussing.
But Fred is dead to me, the right thing to do is ostracize him and those who post there. If you post at Fred's forum, don't post here. You will likely be banned. Ostracism works. But only if we use it. Consider putting the cause ahead of your own entertainment. Last edited by Alex Linder; September 2nd, 2013 at 11:13 AM. |
September 2nd, 2013 | #279 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: CSA
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
Your criticism against me is baseless as you have several times misconstrued my skepticism of our judicial system as "defending" an individual actor. I understand it is difficult for you to see the nuance, but that's your problem. You seem to react as a disgrunteled child towards any idea that doesn't readily fall in step with your own. You said you were going by what the witness "said". Do you know the witness personally? Can you vouch for her credibility? Here's why I ask. Several years ago I had a girlfriend who lost here sense. One day she became violent and I mishandled the situation. I should have taken a walk, wait for her to cool off, but I mistakenly called the cops foolishly thinking it would defuse the argument. When cops arrived they quickly became agitated and began to put handcuffs on the girl. As she was escorted to the squad car she was desperate to avoid her fate. Suddenly she blurted "but he hit me too". I half expected the cops to laugh because it was clear she was making it up as a last ditch attempt to get free, but instead they arrested me. The charge was dropped, but I spent a night in jail and realized how easily I could have fared much worse. Following the incident I researched and found that the laws enacred after the "Violence against women Act" are designed in a feminist manner and that the mere accusation of violence made by a woman demands cops arrest a man even without any evidence. Countless men have been victimized by this double standard in the feminized jewized legal system. So I ask again, do you know the defendent? Can you vouch for her credibility? What about the prosecution the judge or the arresting officer? Oh and for the record I don't know Fred nor did I know he had his own website. To me this isn't about Fred, but about how to judge an individual who may have a a criminal charge in their background. |
|
September 2nd, 2013 | #280 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
Not too long ago he posted the IP of someone on his forum that he had a problem with. That was quickly deleted but not before my source took a snap shot of it. Oh and he was hitting on someone's wife while she was a member there; and caused at least two females to flee from his site because he wouldn't leave them alone. So it's not even just one incident 26 years ago, but a pattern of devious behavior. If he were innocent he would have done whatever it took to prove his innocence, including hiring a lawyer; and Ferd has the money for a top-notch lawyer -- the greediest of kikes. Instead what does he do? -- he deletes posts linking to the case. His own actions, or lack thereof, and the way he handled the accusation clearly show that he is guiltier than a nigger on death-row. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|