Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts
Local Blogs
Miscellaneous


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old May 7th, 2009 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 37,876
Blog Entries: 2
Alex Linder
Default How to Keep Nigs Out of Your Restaurant or Bar

[The jews outlawed free association in the name of nigger liberation, but clever restauranteurs find legal ways to keep the noxious bushmen out of their dining establishments. Great article!]

Sociobiology
Stuff White People Like
by Robert Weissberg on May 07, 2009

The Subtle Art of Exclusion

Freedom of association, like private property, is a core American legal principle whose importance to liberty seemed so self-evident, so fundamental that the Founding Fathers apparently took it for granted. At best, the First Amendment alludes to it when it prohibits Congress from infringing on the right of free assembly. And, happily, for about 175 years, its bedrock status remained unchallenged. The 1964 Civil Rights Act that banned racial discrimination in public accommodations—hotels, movie theatres and restaurants—changed everything. This was soon followed by an avalanche of similar anti-discrimination laws and court decisions, and virtually no aspect of our existence—even choosing one’s neighbors—now escaped government meddling.

That increasingly precarious nature of this right is evident in recent Supreme Court decisions. In Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984) the Court acknowledged that groups (here the male-only Jaycees) enjoyed the right to determine its own membership, but—and there is always a but—a Minnesota public accommodation law required the Jaycees to admit women despite the Jaycee’s desires to be male only. Minnesota, the Court reasoned, had a compelling interest in providing Minnesota women the economic benefits that male Jaycee members enjoyed. Associate Justice O’Connor further added that the Jaycees were a commercial organization and thus subject to state regulation of its membership. And, in January of 2000 by only a single vote in a 5-4 split decision did the Court uphold the right of New Jersey Boy Scouts to exclude homosexuals. No doubt, this keep-the-gays-out issue will come before the Court again, and the outcome might well go the other way.

Meanwhile, the list of groups “protected” from discrimination likewise expanded, and it has become increasingly more difficult to insist that “freedom of association” has any meaning. The burden of proof now seems entirely on those wishing to exclude outsiders, and potential litigation costs alone often counsel surrender to the atheist anxious to join the campus Christian group. Worse, “freedom of association” had been publicly transformed into an alleged ruse to injure African Americans, women, homosexuals, the elderly, the childless and families with children, the odd appearing, the disabled, those of different faith and on and on. Government-mandated “inclusion” is now America’s passion, far out-shining freedom to choose one’s compatriots.

Nevertheless, freedom of association fans have some good news, though it is almost never admitted in public and is invisible to the untrained eye. A guerilla push-back war on behalf of homogeneity is one way to put it. As government shoves harder and harder to deprive, say, WASPy men from mingling with other WASPy men, below-the-radar but perfectly legal subterfuges evolve. An almost evolutionary back and forth adaptive quality informs this process in which bureaucrats impose new, more coercive inclusion edicts and targets subtly adjust to minimize the hated directives. This sabotage is not inherently anti-black, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-Semitic or whatever; it merely reflect an often economically driven effort to satisfy a clientele that prefers to mingle with its own. Everything is, moreover, absolutely neutral and totally legal in principle—tactics are about keeping unwanted people, regardless of stripe, away. Perchance, black lesbians will one day use the very same tactics to exclude white gay males from their favorite Dyke Bar.

At the risk of revealing hidden trade secrets, let me recount a few tactics derived from the restaurant business taught to me by a family member who must, naturally, be kept nameless. Disclaimer: I personally find all this tactics morally reprehensive but only report them to satisfy the public’s right to know. Imagine a restaurant anxious to attract middle-class female customers located within walking distance of a housing project populated by poor, hip-hop inclined young men. Though the “nice ladies” will vehemently deny it, they will go elsewhere if forced to mingle with these “threatening” young men. How, then, can the eatery survive without running afoul of discrimination complaints or, worse, a Denny’s-like hugely expensive lawsuit?

First, softly pipe in classical music, preferably of the Baroque style. It’s not that these women adore Vivaldi, or prefer it over Telemann; rather they find this sound “comforting.” Young black males, however, are almost unconsciously uncomfortable in its presence—classical music, Baroque in particular, is the very essence of “white.” Together with décor, age and ethnic staff composition, background music is an especially effective and legally bulletproof way to “shape” a clientele. It is no accident that successful retail chains obsess over background musical programming while inept rivals often permit staff to select music willy-nilly, a policy that almost always brings trouble given horrific teenager tastes. A jukebox entrepreneur friend once explained to me that his “white trash” bar owners insisted that his machines include at least one hardcore Stand-by-Your-Man country-western tune available to bartenders when undesired scruffy types asked for service.

The menu is also critical. Our devious proprietor will exclude any items known to be favorites among certain lower class types—inexpensive “fast food” fried dishes while pricing everything just a bit beyond what McDonald’s or Burger King offers. And no hamburgers or cheeseburgers, never! Further sprinkle a few intimidating foreign words on the menu—at least five types of Quiches. The coup de grace will be offering all sandwiches with “gourmet” five-grain bread, everything topped with alfalfa sprouts and arugula, only using low-sodium, low-fat deli meats, offering soups of the cream of broccoli or lobster bisque variety, plus a mind-boggling selection of exotic herbal teas, among other “white” delicacies. If a potato side-dish is to be offered, make it organic German vinegar/sour cream red potato salad, never French fries. Sit-down only service is also preferable help since restaurant owners recognize that lower-class blacks prefer counter-service or take-out, and view having to tip waiters a deal killer when making their choices.

Location is also vital, so a savvy restaurateur will avoid entrances through malls populated by rambunctious teenagers (black and Hispanic teenagers, even gangs, prefer enclosed, climate-controlled spaces for congregating). No middle-class customer wants to run this disconcerting gauntlet. The ideal location is one safely distant from where feral youth loll about and, at least I’ve been told, that new, more upscale California malls no longer have roofs or central meeting points that attract scruffy teenagers (McDonald’s overcame this “delinquent” problem by banning cigarette vending machines and with loitering teenagers gone, “nice” families arrived.).

Higher end urban establishments appealing to affluent males also enjoy a repertory of perfectly legal customer-shaping strategies. It is not that these establishments dislike blacks; rather, they realize that if certain minorities show up, their regulars will feel uncomfortable and this destroys business. Next time one enters a fancy bar catering to well-heeled patrons in an urban setting observe the liquors featured at the bar. Chances are there will be no conspicuous displays of certain super high-status Cognacs, especially Courvoisier “Initiale Extra” or Hennessy “Paradis Cognac” and even their lower-priced “VS” versions may be off to the side (more prominent might be Spanish brandies like Fundador). The reason is simple: wealthy whites might order a $200 bottle of French chateau-bottled wine at the meal but not, say, a $100 sniffer of Hennessy Paradis Cognac beforehand. These fiendishly expensive brandies are especially appealing to certain types of show-off customers, and while their lucre may be much appreciated, management seldom appreciates this clientele. As with public schools, a tip point exists—as more flamboyantly-dressed African American customers (and their ladies in tow) flock in for their $25 Hennessy XO’s, the atmosphere shifts, and the uneasy regulars drift elsewhere. Better to just not carry these items.

Subtle differences in pricing can be decisive. To keep an upscale whites, proprietors will price drinks high but also increase quantity to maintain decent value. If you charge $12 for a single malt scotch, pour an ounce and half (a very generous shot) but never, as cheap gin mills do, charge $5 for two-thirds of an ounce in a glass that magnifies content. This will invite the “wrong people.” Similarly, make sure that the cheapest menu item is relatively expensive, but not over-priced for what is provided. Lower-class patrons will reject a $25 for a hamburger even if quality and quantity justify price. For them, the absolute price—$25—is what counts, not the ratio of costs to benefits. The comparison is McDonald’s and they that a $25 burger is a swindle and thus never enter the establishment, let alone return.

Once this perfectly legal, actually benign approach to managing the social environment is understood, all sorts of oddities become apparent. Freedom of association is preserved but only on the sly. A standing joke concerns how WASPy clubs can exclude Jews, and avoid lawsuits: just serve bland, somewhat over-priced food (especially acquired taste dishes like creamed spinach or pot pies). Rest assured, no self-respecting Jew would clamor for membership. If that fails, forbid any menu substitutions and post multiple signs saying, “No loud talking And/Or Exaggerated Bragging About One’s Children.” Gays can also be kept outside the doors quite easily: There is nothing illegal about filling up the jukebox with classic 1970s rock—and removing all the Broadway show tunes. And then follow up with hors d’oeuvres of messy Buffalo wings, only inexpensive domestic beers on tap, and a TV permanently fixed on ESPN. It is hard to be sued by a gay rights group for one’s tacky hors d’oeuvres options.

Our examples are all from the food industry, but similar clientele management tactics undoubtedly exist elsewhere. Humans have an instinctive sense of “being welcome” versus knowing where it might be “dangerous” to tread, easily recognize the tell-tale signals and this is beyond government eradication. For half a century, whites (and Asians) have avoided court-order education micro-managing by simply moving, enrolling their children in private schools, or home-schooling. Even within a forcefully “integrated” school, racial and ethnic groups tend to self-segregate, and this is irreversible. Ethnic-based organizations resist Big Brother’s inclusionary intervention by conducting all business in Korean or Chinese (and their restaurants and other “public” places often follow the same keep-the-outsiders-out strategy). “Black only” establishments play the same discrimination game with music and ambiance, and whites never complain. Conceivably, a Fifth Avenue apartment building seeking “the right” clientele might decorate its lobby with oil paintings of sailboat, bronze statutes of thoroughbred horses and other WASPy decorations as its version of the (selective) welcome mat. Perhaps there are professionals who slyly specialize in this carefully hidden management—experts who will insure that the “right” glossy real-estate magazines are placed in an expensive doctor’s office to make some patients feel at ease while providing those on Medicaid nothing to read (and play only Bach for good measure).

Examples could doubtlessly be multiplied, but the point should be clear: no matter how forcefully government tries to homogenize society, create a colorful mosaic of the sort pictured on those multi-culti 8th grade geography textbooks, people will resist. This reflects biological instinct but is aided by economic self-interest. Those who can discern a way to make customers comfortable will prosper just as private school Headmasters who boast of superb golf and cross-country teams will attract the “right” students. Humans are devious, and thankfully so. The bad news is that today’s apparatchiki never cease in their quest to break down all the “artificial” barriers to inclusion. So, the games continue and let us hope that one of these inclusivity-driven bureaucrats does not discover that Vivaldi creates a hostile environment and should immediately be replaced by Public Enemy.
 
Old May 7th, 2009 #2
Gman
Junior Member
 
Gman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NY, nigger and fag capitol of the east!!
Posts: 93
Gman
Default

Interesting article. I would prefer to skip all the subtle tactics and just put a sign out front that said NO NIGGERS!!!!
__________________
Diversity Sensitivity Trainer
 
Old May 7th, 2009 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 37,876
Blog Entries: 2
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman View Post
Interesting article. I would prefer to skip all the subtle tactics and just put a sign out front that said NO NIGGERS!!!!
If this were a free country, you could do that.
 
Old May 7th, 2009 #4
Julian Lüchow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 888
Julian Lüchow
Post

It hasn't been a free country in any of our lifetimes. As William F. Buckley said in the fifties he fully expected a "totalitarian bureaucracy" to be immediately instated in DC to wage the phony "Cold War" (though he of course cloaked it in fear-monger propaganda). And the rest is history.
 
Old May 7th, 2009 #5
Rex E. Cuto
This Is Executor
 
Rex E. Cuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 1,441
Rex E. Cuto
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
If this were a free country, you could do that.
If this were a truly free country, you wouldn't have to do that.
__________________
The world doesn't change; its laws are eternal. --- Adolf Hitler

You have to become a terrible thought... you have to become an idea.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #6
Peer Fischer
Senior Member
 
Peer Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,606
Peer Fischer
Default

Doesn't seem like a devious strategy, just what businessmen do all the time already without even thinking about it.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #7
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 7,542
N.B. Forrest
Default

Wanna keep the nigs, fags & kikes out? One word: TAXIDERMY! Put stuffed critters wherever you can get away with it. Those mostly urbanite scum will have an atavistic flight response.....
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #8
Frank Toliver
Formerly Cowboy Zeke
 
Frank Toliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,040
Frank Toliver
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
Wanna keep the nigs, fags & kikes out? One word: TAXIDERMY! Put stuffed critters wherever you can get away with it. Those mostly urbanite scum will have an atavistic flight response.....
HAHA I thought you meant nigger taxidermy.

I wonder if I could pay bums and aids infected nigs for their bodies after death and taxiderm them into tribal dioramas of africans killing each other.
__________________
Channon and Chris; gone but not forgotten.

Fuck you hippie, you are the system.

Jews are not just a race or just a religion; they are a race who worship themselves religiously.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #9
Marse Supial
Creepy-Ass Cracker
 
Marse Supial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
Marse Supial
Default

Hang racially offensive pictures on the wall:

Slaves picking cotton:



Blackface:



Pickaninnies:



Put a lawn jockey or two at the entrance:

 
Old May 8th, 2009 #10
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Kievsky
Default

If you are ever trying to talk someone out of an inter-racial adoption, make sure to say,

"Are you sure the African/Guatemalan/Chinese baby will match the furniture? What about family pictures? The ones with a child of a different race always look so uncomfortable and forced."

Years before I discovered that there were still White nationalists and a national WN movement, I started instinctively moving away from multicult Amerikwan culture. When I was 19 I took up Russian language with plans to emigrate to Russia permanently. At 23 I took up violin.

I have advocated taking up so called high culture on this board before and met with some outrage that I was being an elitist. But I think the above passage about how Baroque music pushes away black teenagers vindicates this elitist view.

My kid grew up speaking Russian from her mother and grandmother, and I crack the whip to keep her practicing her piano and studying math and reading classical literature, and I have kept most pop culture out of the house. My goal has been to make her as culturally and intellectually different as possible from the race-mixing riff raff, so she will be bored and uncomfortable around them, and they will probably hate her.

I think this model should be pretty reliable at raising White children -- make them as "elite" as possible. In this model they will definitely come into a lot of contact with Asians. However, the Asian parents are as opposed to race-mixing as we are! I have met plenty of middle to upper class Asians from the classical music world, and any time I have found occasion to say, "I think whites should marry whites, blacks marry blacks, Chinese marry Chinese," these Asian parents vehemently agree. I'm not idealizing Asians; I'm just letting you know that it's safe to express anti-race-mixing opinions to them, and they will in turn feel more support in telling their children that only same race relationships are permitted since a "native" told them.

My daughter and I go to a music school that is part of a university. Now you might think such a "liberal" place would be full of divershitty. You'd be wrong. Blacks and Latinos don't bother with music schools if the liberals don't beg them to come and give them scholarships, etc. There's mountains of African and Latino "diversity" right up the street, but NONE at the music school. Zero.

As the economy contracts, we'll have more time to home school our kids, and start local classical music ensembles and the public schools will shut down. The blackbrowns and brownblacks will not even get a semblance of an education; there will be total illiteracy among them, and probably even poor hygiene. They won't maintain any civilization for themselves; they'll revert to utter savagery. And so White kids will become that much more obviously different than them, as the difference between animals and people.
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #11
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,310
Mike Parker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
A standing joke concerns how WASPy clubs can exclude Jews, and avoid lawsuits: just serve bland, somewhat over-priced food (especially acquired taste dishes like creamed spinach or pot pies). Rest assured, no self-respecting Jew would clamor for membership. If that fails, forbid any menu substitutions and post multiple signs saying, “No loud talking And/Or Exaggerated Bragging About One’s Children.”
Interesting how the "racialist" Jew never fails to include Jew-apologist propaganda in its own "stuff" for white consumption. Here the argument is that Jews are basically good humored, self-confident and non-confrontational, unlike those troublemaker minorities. Maybe Weissberg could advise the Germans and Swiss how to avoid Jewish lawsuits.

Quote:
If you charge $12 for a single malt scotch, pour an ounce and half (a very generous shot) but never, as cheap gin mills do, charge $5 for two-thirds of an ounce in a glass that magnifies content.
That's a standard shot, not generous at all. Pour more if you want a tip.

Last edited by Mike Parker; May 8th, 2009 at 07:57 AM.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #12
George Witzgall
Senior Member
 
George Witzgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,118
George Witzgall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Gays can also be kept outside the doors quite easily: There is nothing illegal about filling up the jukebox with classic 1970s rock—and removing all the Broadway show tunes. And then follow up with hors d’oeuvres of messy Buffalo wings, only inexpensive domestic beers on tap, and a TV permanently fixed on ESPN. It is hard to be sued by a gay rights group for one’s tacky hors d’oeuvres options.
fags are a restaurant's dream clientele. they can only wish they could attract us to their establishment.

plus, do straights really like budweiser?
__________________
I understand and do not understand.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #13
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Kievsky
Default

There's a town which shall remain unnamed that has a yearly "ham and bean dinner."

The modern residents of this town probably don't put 2 and 2 together, but I suspect that the founders of the "ham and bean dinner" way back whenever it was started, were sending a message to a certain group of people.
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #14
Curtis Stone
Senior Member
 
Curtis Stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,057
Curtis Stone
Default

That article should be called Jewish restaraunteur secrets.

How Jews keep non-Jews away- They say "This is a Jewish club." Most whites don't even know what Jewish food is, exactly, and if they tasted it they wouldn't like it. Perhaps Jews eat icky stuff just to make us keep away.

White freedom of association: Open restaurant door. See a bunch of black faces. Turn around and get in car.

The "keep Jews away comments" sound completely bogus. Bacon and ham are big jokes to Jews. But that would open up the Muslim can of worms, too, wouldn't it?
__________________
Blood on the Menorah (1948) Robert Mitchum. In post-war Europe, an American newspaper man foresees the coming doom of transition to a Judaic society. Worth seeing. (Dir: Bill White, 99 mins.)
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #15
Marse Supial
Creepy-Ass Cracker
 
Marse Supial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
Marse Supial
Default

You could also use the word "niggard" prominently on your menu and advertisements:

"No Niggards Allowed!!" "We believe in EXTRA generous serving sizes!!"
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #16
MarkP
.
 
MarkP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: England
Posts: 764
MarkP
Default

What about "We serve Food, NOT Niggers!!!"
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #17
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 37,876
Blog Entries: 2
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Parker View Post
Interesting how the "racialist" Jew never fails to include Jew-apologist propaganda in its own "stuff" for white consumption. Here the argument is that Jews are basically good humored, self-confident and non-confrontational, unlike those troublemaker minorities. Maybe Weissberg could advise the Germans and Swiss how to avoid Jewish lawsuits.
? I don't get that at all. He's essentially saying make stuff boring and what his jews would call whitebread so that jews aren't attracted in the first place. Because if they were, then the whole smear-and-sue charade would begin.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #18
cillian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,977
cillian
Default

If you want to keep jews out just have all meats either wrapped in bacon or topped with prawns/shrimp/scallops. - This also works on muslims.

For nig repellent, don't serve chicken and play country music or classical if its an upscale place.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #19
Nick Apleece
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 643
Nick Apleece
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by General_Lee View Post
You could also use the word "niggard" prominently on your menu and advertisements:

"No Niggards Allowed!!" "We believe in EXTRA generous serving sizes!!"
I love using "niggardly" and "niggling" in conversation. It tends to freak people out, even White liberals who know what the words mean. And if the conversation involves niggers somehow, it's even more fun. "A waitress told me that Morgan Freeman was so niggardly", etc.
 
Old May 8th, 2009 #20
Signal
Senior Member
 
Signal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: standing on the moon
Posts: 1,555
Signal
Default

Tactics similar to those mentioned in this article do work. A small increase in a price of a menu item or a slight surcharge for "special requests" will keep certain elements of what we call "society" out of your restaurant.

The owners of one night club I worked at a few years ago sold the place to niggers. Prior to this sale the establishment had a large regular clientele of White people.

After the sale the nigs turned the place into a nigger club. Soon after that they stopped paying the former owners, stole most of equipment from the kitchen and all of the televisions from the dining room and bar area and disappeared in the middle of the night. The original owners then took back over, brought the old White staff back in and reopened, hoping to regain the former White clientele that had kept the place in business for years prior to the sale.

The problem at this point was keeping the niggers who began to frequent the place under the nigger ownership out so that the White people would return.

It's a known fact that niggers like chicken, especially chicken wings. So when the place reopened we had a constant flow of niggers coming in and calling ordering chicken wings to go. In a bar you don't really want to cater to "to go" orders, because when people are just coming in, picking up food and leaving they aren't buying any booze and they aren't tipping the bartenders and waitresses.

As most would know chicken wings are generally sold in increments of 10 (10, 20, 30, 50, 100, etc) and most places offer a variety of flavors, i.e. mild, medium, hot, atomic, bar-b-que, lemonpepper, etc.

After the first few weeks, while looking over the receipts and orders from the kitchen I realized that we were having an overwhelming amount of "split orders" for chicken wings. What I mean by "split order" is that someone was ordering say 10 chicken wings, but instead of 10 mild, medium, hot or whatever the tickets were marked with shit like "10 wings - 3 medium, 3 mild, and 4 lemonpepper" or "10 wings - 8 lemonpepper and 2 bar-b-que". The majority of these orders were generally "to go" as well.

We then began to watch closely to see who exactly was placing these split orders. Yep, you guessed it. It was niggers.

This provided a simple fix. We started charging $1.00 extra for a split order and an additional .50 for a to go order. Within a week we had virtually no split orders coming in and the niggers began to get their wings from a wing trailer down the road.

Did the kitchen lose business because of this? Some would say yes, but it was unwanted "nigger business" and once the Whites saw that there was not a constant flow of niggers coming in and out buying chicken wings to go, the Whites began to spend more time drinking in the bar (liquor is where the profit comes from) and the money they spent there more than made up for any loss from the decline in chicken wing sales.

Also, eliminating the "lemonpepper" flavoring seemed to cut back on the nigger traffic as well. I don't know why but for some reason those black bastards love that rancid shit.
__________________
 
Reply

Tags
free association, free pork for jews, jewey jewstein, restaurants

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.
Page generated in 0.12761 seconds.

VNN on Twitter