[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Joe_Smith

Great book. Jones is easily one the greatest living historians in the world right now, Catholicism and political solutions aside. He's also criminally underrated in the NS/WN scene, but that is partially his own fault.

It's no one's fault, he's not a racialist. He's anti-racialist. He doesn't shit over racialists, though, which is nice, since he's subjected to the same jewish persecution. He's a catholic. He takes the catholic line, that race is of ordinary but no special value (i paraphrase). Any higher valuation of race is always described by Jones et al (Johm Zmrack sp?) as worshipping at the altar of your own blood. Always. Catholics have set propaganda frames, just like jews. Like jews in they're handcrafted and ready made - and completely prejudicial. Catholics can't win open arguments, so they employ prejudicial framing, just the way jews do.

Speaking of Iran, E Michael Jones (if I'm not mistaken) actually won a literature prize there. A lot of people dismiss Iran, but it's important to know just how much of a turning point their revolution has been in contemporary history.

He wrote a fantastic cover story about his trip to Iran (maybe to receive that award? i dont think so.) and how it is the center of the countersexualrevolution. The jews Frankfurt us, and America spreads that mentality around the world by force, and Iran resists it. I will record that article, but it's already in PDF in this section, I think. J Roberts posted a bunch, I forget which issue, but great reading.

Unfortunately, you are over the top ideological about the topic, forcing your own beliefs on the reading when it's a stretch at best. The Gropius Haus am Horn, with all its ugliness, is used by libertarians to demonstrate the "success" of capitalism because it utilized then rare materials such as rubber. Most of the products created by the Bauhaus were so expensive only the rich could afford them, and were all the rage with German Jews and bourgeoisie. The cookie cutter structure of the style was created to favor capitalist standardization, and thus they could be mass produced for low cost and high profit (this was Gropius' specific intent, and what he promised Warburg, Hearst, and other Jew and Anglo industrialists he tried to recruit to support his project). By 1933 socialist Nazis closed the Bauhaus for being degenerate soulless Judaic bullshit, and Gropius moved to America.

I think what I said is exactly right. Wolfe makes the point in his book on bauhaus that these rich guys didnt even want what bauhaus offered, but it was so cool they were buffaloed into going along, only later to replace it, at least internally, with what they really wanted. I don't see how you can possibly deny the anti-functionality of the public housing for niggers (or for Germans) with the soullessness of socialism - the deliberate, fuck-what-real-people-want perversity of it. I think you're close to the leftist mentality that hates that poor whites can actually buy cheapish qualityish goods from Walmart. That's what mass production allowed - the little man to get a piece of something at least somewhat functional and decent. That's nothing to scoff at. Not everyone can be rich, in genes, money or everything else. As long as productive people have enough to get buy on, that others have better doesn't matter. I dont care if rich waste money on ugly art, I care when money is taken from me to buy extra niggers and warehouse them in ugly buildings that make the inhabitants even more violent and dangerous.

Jones is critiquing modernity, not socialism.

That's funny. Modernity is socialism. It failed miserably, but it still holds intellectual sway in many quarters. Academia and bureacratic office where horrid art is signed off on.

That's the reason why the "International style" became the default in soulless capitalist jew-nests like Chicago and New York, and later expanded throughout the country. Some Bauhaus students were communists and leftists, but Gropius was a businessman. The whole Bauhaus project is a great example of communists and capitalists working together to destroy the world:

Yeah, that's somewhat true, it's not a black and white thing. But where there's force rather than persuasion involved, they always go for the soulless and ugly, you notice. In public housing and art. Public insitutions are almost always ugly, and this is for a reason. They fit the souls of the people who work in them. Look at DC with the supersized public buildings - exactly what Hitler wanted to build. I don't like that, I don't support that, whether it's racial socialism or jewish socialism. It's better to keep things local and low-key. The whole power-eagle mentality just leads to misery and slavery.