Full Thread: #1 Alt-Right Thread
View Single Post
Old March 3rd, 2017 #98
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
Haha at least they aren't Jews! I think...
Nobody knows who Manson's Daddy is.

Robert Anton Wilson studied Psychology from a bunch of Jews. Had no trouble getting his gobbledygook books publish. He sounded just like you on Jews-they run everything because they are so wonderful:

http://www.mavericksofthemind.com/raw-int.htm

http://www.rawillumination.net/2011/...oing-this.html

Some interesting excerpts of RAW's 'mystic agnostic' shit:

".. As European civilization conquered and exploited the Third World, ideas from these places came drifting back to Europe. Diderot, Voltaire, Rousseau, the whole enlightenment was influenced by the ideas of these "primitives" having a more natural and happier way of life than we do. Democracy, socialism, anarchism, and all the radical ideas of the last two hundred years were inspired by studying stone-age cultures from the first proto-anthropologica1 reports.

I've been an advocate for a partnership society for years, before Eisler used that term. The term I used was "voluntary association" which comes out of the American Anarchist tradition. This was a school of philosophical anarchists in New England in the nineteenth century who are very little known. I got fascinated by them in the sixties and read most of their books. The idea of voluntary association migrated to Europe and became syndicalism, only the syndicalists added to it the idea of overthrowing the existing system by violence, so the whole idea developed a bad reputation. I think the basic idea of voluntary association, or partnership, is the one towards which we should aspire. It's the most human, just, fair, decent and intelligent form of society.."

That is straight up Cultural Marxism. Disguised as Libertarian 'live and let live.'

Because if you believe in free association, you don't force 'partnership' societies on the populace as a whole.

And then he sounds a lot like you here, George:

"..I'm a mystical agnostic, or an agnostic mystic. That phrase was coined by Olaf Stapledon, my favorite science fiction writer. When I first read it, it didn't mean anything to me, but over the years I've gradually realized that "agnostic mystic" describes me better than any words I have found any where else.

DJB: How about "transcendental agnostic"?

ROBERT: Yeah. The word agnostic has gained the association of somebody who's just denying, but what I mean is something more like the ancient Greek concept of the zetetic. I find the universe so staggering that I just don't have any faith in my ability to grasp it. I don't think the human stomach can eat everything, and I'm not quite sure my mind can understand everything, so I don't pretend that it can.."

So we 'understand but don't understand', therefore, why bother learning anything? It's all a big befuddling mess. No sense makes sense.
We need to make the primitives our equals and stop being so gosh danged arrogant. Cuz "only a madman really knows for sure."
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; March 3rd, 2017 at 05:06 PM.