View Single Post
Old June 20th, 2020 #5
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 9,612
Stewart Meadows
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
(...) As if that's not enough, RT has also defended the loathsome jewish pedophile Woody Allen and attacked people who have a problem with his disgusting behavior.
RT keeps excreting outrageous op-eds that defend the creepy, disgusting (and talentless) old jew shitbag Woody Allen. Here's an example:

Woody Allen deserves an apology. Years of unfounded demonization have failed to crush his creativity

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/490242-wood...erves-apology/

Actually, the allegations that Allen sexually abused Dylan Farrow when she was 7 years old are highly credible. Here's a good piece on this subject:

Quote:
10 UNDENIABLE FACTS ABOUT THE WOODY ALLEN SEXUAL-ABUSE ALLEGATION


BY MAUREEN ORTH

FEBRUARY 7, 2014

This week, a number of commentators have published articles containing incorrect and irresponsible claims regarding the allegation of Woody Allen’s having sexually abused his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow. As the author of two lengthy, heavily researched and thoroughly fact-checked articles that deal with that allegation—the first published in 1992, when Dylan was seven, and the second last fall, when she was 28—I feel obliged to set the record straight. As such, I have compiled the following list of undeniable facts:
(...)
5. In his 33-page decision, Judge Wilk found that Mr. Allen’s behavior toward Dylan was “grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her.” The judge also recounts Farrow’s misgivings regarding Allen’s behavior toward Dylan from the time she was between two and three years old. According to the judge’s decision, Farrow told Allen, “You look at her [Dylan] in a sexual way. You fondled her . . . You don’t give her any breathing room. You look at her when she’s naked.”

6. Dylan’s claim of abuse was consistent with the testimony of three adults who were present that day. On the day of the alleged assault, a babysitter of a friend told police and gave sworn testimony that Allen and Dylan went missing for 15 or 20 minutes, while she was at the house.

7. The Yale-New Haven Hospital Child Sex Abuse Clinic’s finding that Dylan had not been sexually molested, cited repeatedly by Allen’s attorneys, was not accepted as reliable by Judge Wilk, or by the Connecticut state prosecutor who originally commissioned them. The state prosecutor, Frank Maco, engaged the Yale-New Haven team to determine whether Dylan would be able to perceive facts correctly and be able to repeat her story on the witness stand. The panel consisted of two social workers and a pediatrician, Dr. John Leventhal, who signed off on the report but who never saw Dylan or Mia Farrow. No psychologists or psychiatrists were on the panel. The social workers never testified; the hospital team only presented a sworn deposition by Dr. Leventhal, who did not examine Dylan.

8. Allen changed his story about the attic where the abuse allegedly took place. First, Allen told investigators he had never been in the attic where the alleged abuse took place. After his hair was found on a painting in the attic, he admitted that he might have stuck his head in once or twice. A top investigator concluded that his account was not credible.

9. The state attorney, Maco, said publicly he did have probable cause to press charges against Allen but declined, due to the fragility of the “child victim.” Maco told me that he refused to put Dylan through an exhausting trial, and without her on the stand, he could not prosecute Allen.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014...abuse-10-facts

That's right, folks. Vanity Fair is more credible than RT. Amazing, isn't it?

Woody Allen. "Trust me, goyim."