Quote:
Originally Posted by john2020
Notice the recessive foreheads on most of the people in your post? that's semitic (dinaric), as are thick eyebrows, weak chins and aquiline noses.
|
I think you mean Arminoid. Dinaric is an autochthonous European phenotype. Variations of dinaric are found in nordic and keltic people in the north
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins
Obviously in Europe there is a hierarchy of more desirable and less desirable ethnicities, with northwestern Europeans being at the top of the desirable list and southern Europeans being closer to the bottom.
|
Western Civilization was created by those you deem at the bottom of your hierarchy.
I'm glad someone banned this idiot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vance Stubbs
I've seen a mapping of the way genes cluster for northern Europeans, southern Europeans, and Ashkenazi Jews. The European genes formed a sort of oval, with northerners on one side and southerners on the other side. The Jewish cluster was close to the Europeans but there was a clear gap there. This seems consistent with their own genealogical claims.
Does anyone know what the data looks like for Iranians? Obviously they haven't been a race of assholes, but I'm thinking from a purely genetic standpoint.
|
There were two migrations into Europe and Southern Europeans are descendant from the neolithic farmers, not Aryans from the pontic steppes, although they're two branches of the proto indo-European family. The most pure Southerners being Sardinians - they are genetically homozygous to Otzi, the oldest European mummy found
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96tzi_the_Iceman.
People from MENA (Middle East and North Africa) don't cluster with any Europeans. There may be some overlap because of their indo-European input, but the negro and Asiatic mixture predominates.