View Single Post
Old August 15th, 2019 #116
bradfromjoeford
Senior Member
 
bradfromjoeford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradfromjoeford View Post
The thing is, when dealing with cranks like joefronbradford, even if court paperwork could be produced, and if that paperwork proved that there was no sexual element to the crime in question, then joe would just state the paperwork had been falsified by either the person it belonged to, or that persons "handlers". Unfortunately that paperwork is unavailable but as previously stated, if someone wants to contact Kingston Crown Court - the trial took place in October 1991 and I'm sure for a fee the court would supply depositions and full transcripts of the trial and sentencing. The only other proof that a sexual crime was not committed is an official print out of the persons criminal record. The part relevant to prove this was no more than a conviction for GBH will be put up on this forum in the next few days. Alas, even that will not be good enough for the tinfoil hat brigade...

So long ago, got the date wrong -actually Jan 91.
__________________
.