View Single Post
Old November 7th, 2017 #2786
Beau Paulman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 160
Default

OK, so on page 232 in the link I posted above we see the map that we're talking about, and right above it on page 231 is figure 4.36, which identifies in the key (in blue) 11 "Probable pits identified through geophysical survey" which are numbered thusly:

G1, G4, G32, G36, G38, G44, G50, G51, G52, G53 and G54.

And the other two "Possible grave sites" labeled on the map are identified in the key as:

F16: "Depressions / open pits"

and

F1: "Vegetation change (arid / sparse)"

Now scroll down to page 472 in the appendix and you will be able to read some alleged information about each of the 13 insinuated "graves."

The thing that needs to be noted before we go on is that CSC labels the 11 blue sites as "probable pits" first and then labels them "possible grave sites" later on the map. As well, there is no pit identified at F1 and F16 is an open / empty pit.