View Single Post
Old September 27th, 2017 #36
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolf View Post
Most WNs aren't proper racialists, but more so nationalists with some vaguely defined racial believes.

On most forums the more intelligent and disagreeable people tend to get banned or berated, often for making rational statements, which then creates a community of sycophants.

Most Christians and Liberals will also play fact games with you. Our knowledge of facts is based on placing our trust in scientists and their truthful gathering and interpretation of statistics.

So facts are ultimately determined by trust and authority. As most people believe they are rational, even though we know they are not, one should never be too certain of his own sanity.
There's truth in what you're saying, but my opinion re the parts I put in bold:

1. Facts are not determined by trust, nor authority. They are observable and are either reliable to a reasonable standard or they are not.

One need not be a genius to know certain things are not factual. One need not seek out an expert in theoretical physics to know that Luke was forgery, for example, and that people do not rise out of their graves on the regular.

That's precisely why one's thinking is either 'rational' or 'irrational'--aka 'taking it on faith'.

People have a right to take things on faith, but in doing so they are not basing their decisions on facts.

Also, re authority: if you were diagnosed with brain cancer, you would not allow a Pizza Delivery man to do neurosurgery on your noggin. You would want to know the success rate of the surgeon you choose, any malpractice in his past, does he have a steady hand?, etc. There is a fact-based reason you put your trust in the info of the expert in a field over another.

But all is still based in reality and observable fact.

2. Sanity is also measurable and observable. If one is not sure of their sanity, that would indicate something right there.

Charles Manson being a good example, and all the LSD pushers of the 60s: they promoted the concept that 'no sense makes sense' and 'only a madman knows for sure'.

I'd say Manson is wrong---there are things that make sense, and there is nonsense. And while there are certainly unknowns in this Universe, some things we can know for sure, contrary to Robert Wilson's saying.

In fact, look at that when you feel someone is being untruthful or operating a 'cult': they will spin the 'don't be arrogant, nobody knows for sure what the truth is' line. That is so you will not question.

Otherwise, they'd not mind allowing people to think, and to demand evidence before handing over their allegiance to things.

Re the very first thing said in the post: I see it as opposite. Most WNists are racial loyalists, but may have nothing else in common.

Nationalism that is not based on race is a different thing altogether---a thing that hasn't worked thus far for any who experiment with it.

Melting pots=White death and displacement.

In fact, Nationalist melting pots are a lot like Christ Insanity, in that they both teach the fairytale that you can 'teach' an ideology that will make people behave and think in a way that is cohesive and similar to one another. They don't teach the observable truth: that biology trumps all taught behavior. If one is wired violent and stupid (blacks) you will not 'love' them out of being generally violent people, nor will you 'educate' them into being highly intelligent and creative.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 27th, 2017 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Wheels of brain started turnin' and made me have to add stuff