View Single Post
Old July 24th, 2008 #811
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Muehlenkamp
No, it’s an appropriate attitude for a German with sufficient brains to realize what harm your beloved Führer did to Germany.

Hate is not pride, Bert, no matter how you spin.
It may be a consequence of pride, and that’s what I’m saying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
No, I didn’t. RODOH is a place frequented by both "Revisionists" and critics of "Revisionism", where Gerdes would have opponents and supporters in more or less equal numbers. This forum, on the other hand, is frequented almost exclusively by supporters of Gerdes’ articles of faith.

A rather lame attempt at humor. Got nothing better? In the context of online debate this is a hostile environment for who does not adhere to anti-Semitic and/or Nazi-apologetic claptrap.

No humour intended; you imply that this forum is not equal opportunity, which is simply wrong, no matter how you spin.
Depends on how you define equal opportunity. Being up against several opponents on lone's own is usually not having an equal opportunity, as I see it. In the case of me against you beautiful people is may be, for sure – but that’s just because none of my opponents has got much to offer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
Maybe concerning your brand of "irony", but that’s no loss.

Sorry if I misunderstood your complaints about my "Brad Pitting".

Irony is irony, no matter how you spin.

A clarification for you: Brad Pitting - shitting.
Whatever makes you happy, my friend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
You mean making (yourselves) believe that there’s something to your preconceived notions and articles of faith? Thanks for the confirmation!

Archaeological work that I expect to also bring along the bursting of your bubble is under way, and I'm observing it with interest.

Good, I'm excited. Are you?
Enhancement of knowledge is always an exciting prospect, don’t you agree?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
Well, at least you tried to think, mistaken though the results were. Some of your friends don’t even do that.

TBH, Bert, I was being ironic. This was how you started:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berty
...setting up this sick challenge – offering a money reward in exhange for digging up the remains of murdered human beings – you are displaying the kind of contemptible behavior...

...just expressing my opinion that offering a money reward in exchange for digging up the remains of murdered human beings is contemptible.

and this is where we're at now:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berty
but I wouldn’t set up a public challenge promising a money reward to who shows me mass graves and remains of murdered human beings. And that’s not a matter of courage, it’s a matter of elementary human dignity. Setting up such kind of challenge is something only a sick mind like yours can conceive.

As I’m not making such idiotic claim, I would have no reason to set up such a challenge even if I had a mind as sick as yours.

No, Gerdes, it's because it takes a sick puppy like you to set up a challenge that goes like "show me a mass grave and a certain amount of remains of murdered people and you’ll get 100,000 dollars". No man with a minimum of human dignity and empathy would do that. Only a skunk like you would. Not even your "filthy greasy stinking rich jews" would sink to such levels of depravity. Only dog-shit like you would.

No, Mr. Gerdes. Your challenge is contemptible

It is quite another to offer a reward and require dead bodies to be disinterred in order to make believe that the reward’s not being claimed sustains the articles of faith of a bunch of fanatical crackpots claiming that no dead bodies exist. The former is legitimate, the latter is contemptible.

It seems as though you are preparing an escape route. Tell me it's not true, Bert.
If you had read my post # 794 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=794 with more attention, you might have noticed the following (emphasis added):

Quote:
If it is looking for evidence that matches your challenge requirements, that’s what I am doing (though my part is more that of an observer than anything else), and as to my fellow HC bloggers, you should address them directly, as I suggested you do and you have so far lacked the courage to do. They may consider that responding to your challenge is as miserable as setting it up (an opinion I do not share), or they may want to become my competitors or my partners in this undertaking. Either way, I’m sure they will tell you if you ask them directly. But you’re too much a coward to do that, aren’t you?
Clear enough now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Quote:
Like when you complain about my "repudiating White heritage to boot" and such, I guess.

Wouldn’t that be "indignation", by the way?

Non sequitur. Jews use emotionalism to prevent the unveiling of lies. It's run of the mill deception.
I see. Thanks for giving me further insight into your articles of faith. Or shall we call them superstitions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
Honestly, Shorty, you're barking up the wrong tree as usuall;
Barking I usually leave to your barking-mad brother-in-spirit Gerdes. Where am I supposed to have barked up the wrong tree before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CS
my remark was not in the slightest indignance but a pointer to a demonstration of Jew religio.
Do you have a problem with religious attitudes? I definitely have, but you shouldn’t – after all you’re clinging to what can only be called a faith.

And shouldn’t that be "indignation", by the way?