View Single Post
Old August 31st, 2013 #165
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.N. Dalvez View Post
Just posted by 'Marcus' at Diggs' forum:



See. This is the kind of person he is, despite his protestations. He didn't care about the truth of the allegations: his whole involvement was for the rich, juicy drama of it all.

The problem is that with a case so serious as his friend Diggs the rapist, you have to treat people, even obvious shit-stirrers, as if they're not just shit-stirring, and that their 'objections' are sincere and not just attempts to milk more drama out of these situations.

Well, as I said: Marcus, you won't be missed. You're obviously happier with Diggs the rapist, Akins the paedophile, and Brenna Wolf the alcoholic liar.
Yeah. As time goes by, through the years, one grows less tolerant. I figure these people are either up for drama, or they're dummies who suck at skepticism.

You have a non-political rape case. A jury finds the guy guilty. Unless you have some specific reasons to doubt, you have to assume the jury is right. You're "reserving judgment," oh ok. That's like a little kid trying on mommy's shoes. Yeah, we reserve judgment until the facts are in. The fact is, this man has been convicted of a serious felony.