Full Thread: Kevin Harpham
View Single Post
Old March 13th, 2011 #110
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Cobb View Post
That's a bizarre, exacting, captious legalese phraseology.
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/spokane+bomb.pdf

I find no google entry for FBI agent signatory John T Slack. Not unheard of, but a bit unusual.
All legal language is specific. They use certain terms, always, for certain things. There is specific language they use for these type of acts. But I don't know precisely what that language is. The point is, they are not making these words up, about 80% of the thing writes itself, only the details vary. They just fill in the specifics, but the general form is a template - unchanging. Slightly less room to maneuver than a journalist writing a news story, to make a side point.