|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
|
Wow, Roberta is just getting her AIDS infested ass kicked over at - The Revisionist Workshop:
http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum/index.php
Quote:
eric:
Quote:
|
As much as no one likes looking at the same spammed message, he's [Mr. Gerdes] only spamming because Roberto is dodging his questions.
|
Yes he is eric, but I think what you mean to say is: roberto is cravenly dodging my questions. Anyway:
So this is the final tally.
This is - THE BEST - that roberto / the jooos can do.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!
Of course, what is NOT funny is the fact that people are arrested, fined and thrown in prison (usually for 5 years) in numerous countries around the world for refusing to believe these absurd lies. (Holocaust “denial” is explicitly or implicitly illegal in at least 16 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Switzerland.)
What kind of “truth” requires lies to defend it?
What kind of “truth” requires laws to protect it?
* * * * *
I asked roberto / the jooos to provide the name of THE ONE JEW of which there was THE MOST PROOF who died by means of poison gas in a so-called “homicidal gas chamber / van” operated by the Germans during WW II at / by one of these 28 sites / groups / operations, which are still being fraudulently alleged by exterminationists - after all these years and despite all the historical facts to the contrary - to be sites / groups / operations where so-called "homicidal gassing operations" took place.
And this is how he responded:
1 - Auschwitz / Birkenau - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Auschwitz / Birkenau were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
2 - BdS Belgrad / Semlin - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at BdS Belgrad / Semlin were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
3 - Belzec - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Belzec were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
4 - Bernburg - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Ilse Bock: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=562 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
5 - Brandenburg - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Felix Berghoff: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=563 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
6 - Chelmno - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Chelmno were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
7 - Dachau - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Dachau were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
8 - Einsatzgruppe A - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” by Einsatzgruppe A were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
9 - Einsatzgruppe B - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” by Einsatzgruppe B were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
10 - Einsatzgruppe C - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” by Einsatzgruppe C were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
11 - Einsatzgruppe D - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” by Einsatzgruppe D were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
12 - Fort VII, Poznan - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Fort VII, Poznan were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
13 - Grafeneck - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Martha Goge: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=564 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
14 - Gusen - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Gusen were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
15 - Hadamar - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Rebecka Schwan: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=565 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
16 - Hartheim - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Antonie Greese: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=566 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
17 - Majdanek - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Majdanek were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
18 - Maly Trostinec - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Maly Trostinec were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
19 - Mauthausen - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Mauthausen were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
20 - Mogilev - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Mogilev were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
21 - Natzweiler - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Natzweiler were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
22 - Neuengamme - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Neuengamme were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
23 - Ravensbrück - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Ravensbrück were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
24 - Sachsenhausen - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Sachsenhausen were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
25 - Sobibor - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Nathan Nathans: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=567 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
26 - Sonnenstein - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Johanna Hedwig Schiller: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=568 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
27 - Stutthof - roberto admits that his answer is no, thus affirming the historical fact that all claims of “homicidal gassings” at Stutthof were and are false and thus - FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED.
28 - Treblinka - roberto claims that his answer is yes, and he has submitted the name - Guta Strawczynski: http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum....php?f=9&t=484 - to the so-called "skeptic" james randi for his endorsement. However, randi refuses to endorse roberto's fraudulently alleged "proof" - go figure.
* * * * *
roberto,
You are now 0 for 8 / 28 with your fraudulently alleged "gassed jew proofs."
And:
You are now 0 for 14 / 54 with your fraudulently alleged "huge mass grave proofs."
So roberto,
# 1 - Do you deny the fact that you are now a combined 0 for 22 / 82 in your pathetic attempt to get a prominent skeptic to endorse your fraudulently alleged holohoax "proofs?"
Yes or No?
# 2 - Who is the most prominent skeptic to endorse so-much-as one of your fraudulently alleged - "gassed jew / huge mass grave proofs?"
* * * * *
roberto's dodge count continues.
|
|