The People's Voice Messages - Letters: Sunday, April 14, 2013
Sunday, April 14, 2013 - 01:20
It makes me very strong impression that everyone in the media, dealing with the "poor" illegal immigrants flooding our country every day and no one raises the issue of slavery is against them. Seeing them many times to sell various goods illegally, did nobody bother to make an inquiry about where they find the goods, what are the ones who give them to the birds? There must once have uncovered the whole network either brings illegal immigrants in our country, whether using them for profit by smuggling out? ie from one side of compassion illegal immigrants but on the other obscures the trafficking and exploitation? Such hypocrisy?
Sincerely
G.F.
Gentlemen, I am Brigadier e.a and let me because of the current day, date of birth of Ioannis Metaxas, to put before you some views-my findings, obtained through a detailed study of his life. The ultimate goal was to develop a thesis during my attendance at the School of National Defense.
Viewpoint-Conclusions
1. The ideological engulfment Metaxas did not start the 30s but much earlier. It began with the participation of the National Society and the establishment of the local portion of Nafplion. In an organization, which gradually became a "state within a state", heavily influencing political parties, dragging, thoughtlessly, in romantic enthusiasms of the age of both himself and a large number of officers and prominent citizens and moral but ypertimontas real and material forces of Greece. The company eventually played situated in stark contrast to the official line of the state, especially negative role in the events just before the Greco-Turkish War of 1897.
2. The period of the Thessalian War of 1897 was the catalyst that shaped the character of John Metaxas and that shaped the final views of the political system, the monarchy and the military leadership at all levels. Many of his views, particularly that related to the disorganized Greek army and leadership shortages (Governors units, assemblies and configurations) did not differ much from the views and opinions of the Military Officers Association of ¨ ¨ 1909. But he played a key role as one of the main authors of the official report of the Crown Prince of the proceedings of Thessalian War, restoring the image of both the army and the military leadership and therefore the Crown after the unfortunate war. With the publication of the report, the Crown Prince praised as brave Greeks, was warmly received by the audience and the type employed for very long.
3. The saga of the Balkan wars, which played an important role Capt. Ioannis Metaxas glorified Greece, the people were filled with national pride and raised the prestige of the Greek Army against the Balkan Allies and the Great Powers of Europe. The Greek Nation, strong and confident, could now look forward with confidence and optimism in the future and destiny of the Tribe, having a strong shield the Greek Army. The news of the release of Ioannina, which the Greek people welcomed with unbridled enthusiasm, commented favorably by the European press. The French newspapers admitted that the Greek Army was able to win a great victory, while the English characterized the event as a triumph of Greek tactics. Also the military circles in Vienna aptly remarked that the liberation of Ioannina was a great achievement.
4. The resignation of Metaxas in 1915 by Chief of General Staff, was discussed among the common people, but also extensive analyzes of the type for a long time. Greatly influenced relations leadership army and state (Venizelos). Since that turning point, the two worlds were adamantly face. O Arnold Joseph Toynbee, British historian, wrote, "The Great War, divided the Greek nation, like an earthquake from top to bottom." During the fervor of political passions in Greece (the period between-resignation resignation Venizelos) Metaxas was not at the center of events in any of the two political camps. However, it has been argued that in reality the military and political influence in these events and therefore the share of the responsibility for them was important. One can easily accept the direct and indirect effect of Metaxas in military issues • This appears clearly in the official statements made by the king and the prime minister, as well as records of conversations and correspondence with them. The supposed influence of broader based Metaxas probably the series of articles published in 1934, the era of civil strife with Venizelos on the subject of the National Schism.
5. Return of the clubs whose mastermind is considered by many Ioannis Metaxas, have important similarities and differences with protofasistika movements and militias veterans who appear at the end of the war in Italy, Germany and Austria. If the common elements include the former military property of their members as an organizational basis, the resulting paramilitary their nature and use of violence, and petty antifileleftherismo their composition, three critical differences according to scholars explain the evolution in non fascist movement. The reservists turned against the bourgeoisie (Venizelism stronghold) and not of the working class fighting against the entry of Greece into the war, and finally, inspired by intense monarchism, which is "fundamentally incompatible" system with fascism.
6. Ioannis Metaxas saw the impossible policy of Eleftherios Venizelos, involving the expansion of Greece in the East because of the great numerical superiority of the Turkish population in relation to the Greeks of Asia Minor, the absence of strong border protection suitable for the Greek army in the region, Turkish nationalism and the end of the insufficient support of the Allies. Metaxas asked not to further strengthening of Greece in Europe before she proceeded to expand in the East. The campaign is reminiscent of the Athenian expedition to Sicily encouraged Alcibiades and Lamachos. While Nicias who saw the disaster, did not dare directly to the municipality to oppose the merger. So in Greece forces were opposed to the Asia Minor campaign dared not question the political cost when they became government to withdraw the Army. It was certainly not easy. Only John Metaxas remained steadfast to his views on retirement.
7. The period 1909-22, during which the Ioannis Metaxas played an important role in sxeseis army-state, it has been argued that it is a separate period of military interventions in the political life of the country, with different characteristics of the previous or next to traits, motivations and goals of the intervention. The key feature is that the military is national concerns and requests are acceptable from the social body. Instead, in the next period the military intervenes in politics for reasons having to do more with the corporate issues. The causes and conditions of the military interventions in Greek politics during the period under examination, from an institutional point of view related to the crisis of the royal institution in the first case, the institutional-state crisis and again in the second, namely the conflict-King as Prime Minister to the management structure of foreign policy. Also have to do with internal processes and changes in the composition of the officer corps, which occurred during the Balkan wars and the First World War.
8. The army in the interwar period, and acted as a catalyst to the systematic interventions often affect multiple flow sociopolitical developments. H off-exchange, however, she was mixing with tolerance, acquiescence or even the stimulation of key factions (democratic and Royalists), who sought to benefit from the related disorders, which sometimes manifests itself sometimes with coups and covert pressures. A variety of senior officers played a key role in these interventions. Some of them, like John Metaxas and Nicholas Plastiras remained firmly in their views, others, such as George Kondylis acted for their own benefit, with characteristic ease shifted in the opposite camp, and there were some diversions into dictatorship (Theodoros Pangalos).
9. Regardless of the motives and objectives of the event and the failure of the movement of 1923 (Leonardopoulou-Gargalidi Movement), which was not involved directly Ioannis Metaxas, although considered by many as the leader and mentor, but was immediately aware of situation had a particularly significant impact and greatly influenced the political development of the country, accelerating the path to change state. The anti-Venizelist faction received a serious blow. In the army removed more than 1200 anti-Venizelists officers to participate or simply because the Movement or favored because they were quick to condemn. It was a purge in the army, which the Venizelists officers sought and succeeded only after the failure of the movement that had emerged against the revolution of 1922. Movement and repression exacerbated the disruptive trends in the interwar faction and sharpened the contradictions between the two wings of the conservative majority and minority progressive.
10. The August 4 was a paternalistic movement that contradicted the megaloastismo the then parliamentary parties. He had a military character hence the readiness of the Armed Forces in the epic '40s, but also racial, since Metaxas talking about the third Greek culture was the sole political spokesman, who espoused the theory of continuity of Hellenism from antiquity to Byzantium and then to the modern era. The solution syziteito imposing dictatorship since 1934, when it had become apparent inability of the bourgeoisie to promote solutions both domestically and abroad, something that happened in other European countries. Addressing a European war imminent, necessitated the establishment of a system through which would ensure political stability and uniform of the army, which are essential for the survival of a State towards the upcoming World War.
11. In Metaxas must be acknowledged that the army no longer dealt with purely military duties, that predicted the imminent destruction of WW II and he did everything humanly possible to prepare Greece. In the light of subsequent developments it is clear that a new European war was inevitable from 1936 onwards. Metaxas time he saw the inevitable, and this is something that can hardly be said of many politicians in Western Europe. The enemies always found difficulty in reconciling the accusations that were fascist and Germanophile with the fact that his country, mutatis mutandis, was better prepared to face external threat than all the other countries of Europe when the enemy attack occurred. The explanation for this paradox is partly inherent in staff orientation Metaxas, who was not in favor of either the Germans or the Italians nor the Allies, but was in favor of Greece. Thus, the greatest contribution of Ioannis Metaxas was that put the military, material and psychological foundation to enable Greece to face the storm of war. He was the architect epic 1940.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
Just a little group of masked men raided the National Bank at Oropos .. With their first assertions are immigrants who did not speak Greek clean ... All you know is to use Kalashnikovs ... All banks have been robbed in city only exception ... Alfa Police had come sooner and was arrested members of the Golden Dawn in the information activity a few months ago in our city. But now standing helpless to catch the perpetrators, who are unable to go crazy and start shooting at any citizen ... Until when will we be patient?
DP
Eventually the nursery is to serve illegal immigrants? Occurring in western Thessaloniki, where illegal immigrants seeking to operate kindergartens until 10 at night and weekends! In this way idrymatopoiountai children, operate unfairly to the needs of (illegal) immigrants in relation to the needs of all other families and burdening the operating budget of the kindergarten, at the expense of the Greek taxpayer!
AA
Διαβάστε περισσότερα:
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...#ixzz2QOhbK6x2