Full Thread: Wolf Reintroductions
View Single Post
Old August 26th, 2008 #21
aherne
Senior Member
 
aherne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: semitically occupied territory
Posts: 2,096
Default

I agree with environmentalists: there are way too many humans in this world. A 95% population decline would indeed be ideal, BUT when it comes to the kind of humans who must lead into the decline, it's always the Whites, not the real culprits (niggers, mestizos, muds).

As for wolves, they are apex predators that can easily kill humans (after all they regularily kill buffaloes). The fact this is extraordinarily uncommon proves there is little to fear of them if we're taking the necessary precautions: don't try to approach them, don't let yourself fooled by their dog appearance. Domesticated wolves (dogs) kill a LOT more humans, but noone would dare to call for puting down all dogs. In the end, an animal is an animal: choosing to live with it can be a risk. As long as wolves' habitat is separated from that of humans, there ought to be no problems at all!

Predators play an important part in the ecosystem because they eat grazers. When they are extinguished, pray animals multiply and due to excessive grazing, the habitat becomes barren and lifeless. This is what happened in Yellowstone before wolves were reintroduced: as a consequence of that, trees started to grow back again! In addition, predators are agents of a form of selection that helps grazers dispose of their genetic balast (weak, wounded, old animals are always sought after by the keen eye of the predator).
__________________
"Any man who is not attacked in the Jewish newspapers, not slandered and vilified, is no decent German and no true National Socialist." - Adolf Hitler