View Single Post
Old September 1st, 2017 #17
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

To me, Jones is a surpassingly odd writer. He is very smooth. Or would be if he edited his works. The writing is excellent. But he, as said, does not anticipate and respond to objections.

Put yourself in his position. You have to prove that jews ARE NOT a racial type, not a kind, not a specific type of animal. Rather, they are men like all others. They need the jebus. And the jebus salvation etc.

I would be sweating like ten niggers if I had to defend Jones's proposition. I'd be like...Jesus christ...wherever you plop down in history -- England in 1100s, or Poland in 900s, or Israel or USA today, or Germany in 1900, or France in 1870, or Russia in 1920, or or or... you find jews doing exactly the same thing. How the fuck am I going to claim they're NOT an actual RACE, or TYPE, or KIND.

It is exactly like claiming that termites just choose to act that way (eat wood, from their perspective; destroying our housing frames, from ours). And that if they embrace the Jeboo, they will totally do a 180.

To which Jones can only respond, termites are animals, not men! True but irrelevant. Look at the successful conversion rate, Jonesy: it's damn near the same. 100% of termites are uncoverted, whereas it's only 99.9999999% of jews.

Jones's case cannot be made successfully. It will only appeal to those who accept it as a religious proposition. The evidence runs entirely against it. To the extent any man of any party writes factually about jewish behavior, he is going to advance the racialist view: jews are a race. Their behavior is predictable, in the same way any other species' behavior is predictable, and for the same reason.