Originally Posted by MikeTodd
Well,Rabbi, as someone who had worked for years in the criminal court system I can tell you that if the prosecution had to rely solely on eyewitness testimony they would never get a conviction, assuming the defense attorney was competent of course! No evidence is more easily discredited and debunked than that of the eyewitness, even if they think they're telling the truth! Sans corroborating evidence even the eyewitness testimony of the police can be demonstrated to be unreliable and impeachable! Imagine how easy it would be to call into question the veracity of a lying kike! Chew on that foreskin for awhile, Rabbi! LOL!
Your bond hearings are hardly evidence - however, please cite the legal precedence that holds that eyewitness testimony alone CANNOT result in a conviction.
Because this is her claim.
But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you.
Last edited by Slamin2; July 28th, 2008 at 09:45 PM.