Looks like Roberta has tucked tail and ran back to HC (Hysterical and Cowardly HIV Contagious Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and other Historical Canards). It seems the following questions were just too much for her to handle:
Now, here's what we're waiting for retardo to do:
Tell us on what dates his partner shermer was physically in the Sobibor camp.
Show us photographs that prove he was in said camps on said dates.
Tell us on what dates his other partner Kola was physically in the Sobibor camp.
Show us photographs that prove he was in said camp on said dates.
Show us photographs of Kola excavating the alleged graves.
Show us photographs proving that said graves actually exist.
Tell us what Polish government entity that commissioned Kola's "work."
Tell us what the results were of the analysis of those soil core samples that she claims are: "ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes or lime for the white stuff."
Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash.
Show us were the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of.
And last - but certainly not least, we're waiting for Roberta to publish, in "SKEPTIC" magazine, proof that there exists just one mass grave that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Sobibor and Treblinka.
Just one camp - just one mass grave - just one percent.
Just one Roberta.
What are you waiting for Roberta? (After all, you do want to put an end to holocaust denial - don't you?)
Are you some kind of coward Roberta, or what?
Now, let’s remind everyone what the mentally ill jewbitch wrote earlier:
Quote: Originally Posted by Gerdes
She hasn't been able to even prove that the "huge mass grave" of Sobibor exists;
“Actually I’m able to prove the existence of all of these mass graves by simply referring to Prof. Kola’s description.”
Yes Roberta, could you tell us again what Kola “described” finding in the “huge mass graves” of Sobibor?
“Proof is contained in Prof. Kola’s published report about his findings on site, and in the documentary and eyewitness evidence about the mass killings at Sobibor, which is compatible with Kola’s findings.”
And what were Kola’s findings again Roberta? And where can we find this published report?
“This proof is and has been accepted by historians and criminal investigators, Gerdes. So unless you can show relevant rules or standards of evidence that these people did not comply with or strong indications of evidence manipulation, it is proof for the purpose of our discussion as well (and may even be considered proof for the purpose of meeting your "challenge" by a court of law, so better be more specific about what kind of proof you want – that’s well meaning advice)... Because Prof. Kola said so and there’s no reason to doubt the statements of this renowned archeologist, especially as they are also in line with what all other known evidence tells us about Sobibor… And the reason to doubt the archeologist’s public statement that would support this "allegedly" is?”
And what did Kola say again Roberta?
Oh, and please give us a list of the "historians and criminal investigators" that have "accepted" this alleged "proof."
BTW Roberta, why do you keep running from this queation about the core samples of Sobibor:
What do the frauds at the Sobibor Archaeology Project say it is? They’re the ones who analysed the core samples – right? They DID analyse the core samples – didn't they Roberta?
Thank you Roberta.
(Have I ever told you that you're priceless?)