View Single Post
Old July 31st, 2008 #924
EireannGoddess's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,979
Blog Entries: 5

Originally Posted by Slamin2 View Post
This is irrelevant to your claim, in fact it shows you to be a liar. Recall you claim is an absolute prohibition of criminal convictions based soley on eyewitness testimony. There is no such prohibition, your statement is a lie.
No, that was your claim. My claim is that it is very hard to near impossible to convict and sentence to life imprisonment or death, based solely on eyewitness accountings in regular courts; even current day courts wherein allegations of genocide are tried.

The jewish claim to holocaust/genocide and the Nurnberg trials set aside regular rules of evidence and, the accused were convicted before trial, ex-parte so to speak. Were the Nurnberg Trials held today, the cases would fall apart, based both on the "evidence" provided as well as the eyewitness "accounts"

Common Law is the basis of the English language jurisprudence and deals equaly with white collar fraud as with any other classification of wrong doing, civil or criminal.
No, you are wrong, again. You were discussing intentional vs unintentional crimes - which falls under English Common Law as well - however, beyond that it remains an area that deals primarily with the cases specified. Which are and can be tried on both/either the civil or criminal level; depending on the degree of the crime. It deals in the main with consumer type fraud ect.

, this is also a lie, Jewish influence in early English Common Law would be minimal at best.
Of course, and I stated as much, silly. It's the one area of law that the juden tend to shy away from. Though, frankly jewish coyness about this arena of law is beyond me. That's the reason I stated that jews obviously have little to no ability to understand Gentile law. And, if they cannot make it [the law] theirs, then, thankfully they leave it alone.

You have done the reading of a few of the links I provided; yet still fail to understand or comprehend.

I'm not a Jew, neither is Roberto
I seriously doubt that in your case, Slammin - but, if you say so - you are still a jew - look up the meaning of crypto-jew. Or, "spriritual jew". Which is what Roberto is; you I am pretty sure are a half jew -

In any case; you both need to grow up and if neither of you are jews, then start behaving as Gentiles.

Last edited by EireannGoddess; July 31st, 2008 at 05:40 PM.