View Single Post
Old February 4th, 2014 #1
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default 'Nazis': A Jewish Creation

'Nazis': A Jewish Creation


Nazis are a creation of the jews: this probably seems to my audience like an out-of-character statement for me to make especially as I identify as a National Socialist. However let me explain myself on this score.

My point is simply this: that the idea of the 'Nazi'; the prototype of all evil in the modern world, is both firstly obviously a phantasm (i.e. a fantasy that has no basis in any sort of historical fact) and secondly a fantasy of the jews. That the idea of the 'Nazi' is a fantasy of the jews projected upon a historic country (the Third Reich) and a political creed (National Socialism) needs little defence if we but note that 'Nazis' are always at their most visceral and extreme as a stereotype among the jews.

The fact that this idea of the 'Nazi' has largely not clung on among popular literary tropes other than in their treatment of the jews and in jewish writing is suggestive of the stereotype's origin. After all it is not difficult to read the early jewish accounts of the pogroms in the Russian Empire from the 1880s to the 1920s and to see in their descriptions of the perpetrators (the Tsarist authorities and the Black Hundreds) a prototype for the modern 'Nazi' stereotype.

The pogromist is a callous creation motivated by jealously and irrational hatred of the jews into performing the most beastly of acts against them when given the opportunity to do so. The pogromist will bayonet pregnant jewesses after repeatedly raping them and any female jewess encountered (regardless of age), club jewish babes to death, torture rabbis by lighting their beards and fringes, force pious Chasidim to eat pork and so on. (1)

Sounds familiar: doesn't it?

That is because like the 'holocaust': it is a presentation born out of the troubled arena of the Pale of Settlement during the reign of the last members of the Romanov dynasty. These elements naturally form part of atrocity propaganda in general and more specifically Allied propaganda against the Germans during the First World War. However what marks out the 'Nazi' stereotype is that it is essentially a synthesis of Anglo-French hangover propaganda from the First World War that has been meshed with the jewish nationalist narrative of eternal victim hood and brutal persecution at the hands of non-jews.

As has been commented elsewhere propaganda of this kind is very difficult to undo and take back, because things said and popularly believed cannot be unsaid or popularly disbelieved very easily. Indeed the fact is that if we look merely to cinema as being representative the tropes of the eternally evil Germans turned into the nasty Nazis were still in use well into the 1970s and 1980s, but only then had the audiences who had been originally fed this information begun to die off and the popularity of the 'eternally evil enemy' (of the completely plastic and dastardly variety) begun to wane.

Such a two-dimensional view of 'the enemy' (so-to-speak) has only continued really among jews who continue to propagate (albeit often in somewhat more sophisticated form than the original) the stereotype in their own work as well as trying to get others to buy into it. Recent examples of this at the box office are 'Schindler's List', 'The Boy in the Stripped Pyjamas' and the latest bit of farcical nonsense: 'The Monuments Men'.

The reason that this has continued to be propagated among the jews is; as a biographer of Hitler observed in relation to the 'Hitler as Occultist' claims, (2) that to consider their enemies any other way than as two-dimensional 'Nazis' would be an invitation to consider the possibility that the jews share at least some of the responsibility for their own 'persecution' throughout history.

To even consider this possibility is to doubt the central defining element of jewish identity since the expulsion of the jews from Palestine by the Emperor Hadrian: that the jews have been eternally persecuted because of how unique (i.e. they are punished for disobeying Yahweh by his getting others to persecute them) or how capable they are (i.e. they are persecuted because gentiles are inherently less able and thus are jealous of the jews). Both come down obviously to a distinct sense of superiority over non-jews among the jews.

To doubt this narrative (and thus to doubt one's superiority over gentiles) means to doubt one's identity as a jew and as such means that the jew in question begins to 'self-hate' (to use Zionist parlance) as they begin to critically look at their own jewish heritage and thus begin to understand that what jews as a group has done has often smelt more of manure than roses.

Essentially to consider the opponents of the jews as anything other than 'Nazis' (aka irrational psychopaths who want to kill all jews because they are jews in spite of 'everything they have done for humanity') is to doubt one's self for your average jew. The stereotype is a necessary emotional and intellectual crutch for jews, because it allows them to continue to believe the unbelievable about their own history (i.e. jews never did anything wrong and were always wonderful) as well as their present (i.e. jews are eternally being persecuted thus all gentiles have an obligation to follow jewish instructions to cease the persecution or help persecute those who the jews say want to persecute them).

This irrationality in believing your opponents (of whatever stripe) to be ipso facto irrational is a way of rationalizing, contextualizing and justifying ones own behaviour as I will explain in the companion article to this one ('Why do Zionists behave like Nazis?'). However the origin of the 'Nazi' is nothing to do with National Socialism or the Third Reich, but rather to do with jewish perceptions of themselves being projected as the negative end of a duality onto those who they regard (rightly or wrongly) as their opponents.

We can see this in the fact that the description and tales offered by jews of the pogromists in the 1880s to the 1920s in Russia were the almost identical to those they have offered since 1933 about 'Nazis' and since 1945 about anyone who dares to criticise the jews or Israel. This then informs us that what we are dealing with here is not a factual representation of a particular sub-section of society or civilization, but rather a fantasy of a group who believe the proverbial bogeyman is eternally out to get them.

In essence then we can see that the concept of the 'Nazi' as represented by the jews today is not a factual one, but rather a fantasy of their creation which acts as a kind of make believe stalker following the delusional paranoids (the jews) around. There will never be an end to 'Nazis' for jews precisely because 'Nazis' do not have any existence other than in jewish brains.


References

(1) For a suitable example of this type of atrocity propaganda see Elias Heifetz, 1921, 'The Slaughter of the Jews in the Ukraine in 1919', 1st Edition, Thomas Seltzer: New York
(2) J. Sydney Jones, 1983, 'Hitler's Weg begann in Wien, 1907-1913', 1st Edition, Niedermayer und Schulter Verlag: Munich, p. 126

----------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...-creation.html
__________________