Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev
This, right here, is how the pop stars keep getting away with it.
If Townshend had been the creepy old bloke who lived in the end house and who offered sweeties to their six year olds, these DM commenters would have been the first to put his windows through. Yet because he's a "star" they give him a free pass.  |
It is incredible how they "all know" apparently because he can write and perform pop songs.Even if we allow his "fame" as justification for being "different" from the rest of us there can be no reason to exonerate him.One of these court nuts claims that he knows that only an innocent man would present such a defence and justification,and there, right there is the rub.Credulous rubes are the default in popular culture.As in "the movement" these airheads are legion.
Look at the police booted out of their jobs including the soham blighter,look at ronnie barkers son,look at campell,look at townsends claim that the police were intimidating him,all smart jewish bullshit.The only way an intelligent person could attach credence to townsends claim would be if all of this with supporting evidence had been shown at the time.Townsend should have taken a couple of million of his fortune (Just the royalties from csi would cover it) and presented his evidence and justification.An innocent man with real concerns about paedophiles on the prowl would want to do this for all the silent victims.A bloke like townsends with his money can get a face to face with Putin.Given irrefutable evidence in the public arena and Putin will have destroyed whatever alleged paedophiles were operating in Russia.
Townsends "smart" alibi is too little too late those who give it credence are either imbeciles or malicious paedophile sympathisers themselves.I bet the permanent juvenile guitar playing teacher would have supported townsend