View Single Post
Old June 8th, 2009 #5
Nick Apleece
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 643
Nick Apleece
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
Your reply is a perfect example of the fact that belief in the efficacy of government/regulation is every bit as religious and unfounded as the belief in Jesus. There needs to be a word for people who don't believe in government, the same was there was invented a word for those who don't believe in thing called 'god.' Anarchists is not that word.
I believe that both big government and mega-businesses are enemies of our people. Part of the solution lies in much smaller government, as local as possible, for reasons of accountability. Oligarchs living thousands of miles from the common folk they screw (under color of law) feel untouchable. A local politician, whose kids go to school with yours, who buys his groceries at the same store as his constituents? He has to make sure he doesn't piss people off too badly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
You think business is out to poison people to make a profit, but government is out to protect people and not make a profit. You have it reversed. Your assumption has been planted in your brain since birth, through all authority and media, in precisely the same way the big lie about racial equality has. Government hurts the individual infinitely more than private corporations do. You think, without, perhaps, realizing your assumption, that regulation is a better guarantee of safe/effective products than competition. This is demonstrably false.
Government hurts us more than private corporations? They are two sides of the same Jewish coin, working hand in hand to destroy the White race. Usurious bankers, pharmaceutical companies pumping out poisons (always coming out with "maintenance" drugs instead of looking for cures), and of course the vast majority of media with their multitude of anti-White perfidies. A list including every large corporation culpable of significant anti-White behavior would be a long one.

Hoppe's solution would not be better for all societies. In an all-White society, sure. Why no other? Because Big Jew is the mouthpiece. Would an expose equivalent to Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" be published today? Only if it didn't conflict with the interests of Big Jew. In a libertarian system, the average White man is absolutely going to get screwed by the fatcats, unless that system is totally free of kikes and other non-Whites. Even then, if unrestricted capitalism is practiced, we end up with entities like Wal-Mart. How is that good for our people?

I don't have all the answers, but two things I endorse are the complete removal of Jews and non-Whites from our lands, and implementing an economy based neither on pure capitalism nor pure socialism. A Third Way. Think Small. I favor Distributism, or something akin to it. With a Distributist system, ensuring product quality would be in the self-interest of respective guilds. The regional Doctor/Health Practitioner Guild would have an interest in not using bad medicines and techniques, for example, because it would negatively affect their customer base, who also happen to be their neighbors. Watchdog groups and media would have a place here, too.