View Single Post
Old July 20th, 2019 #54
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,174
notmenomore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
Former prime minister of Pissrael, Ehud Barak, was caught entering his pedophile buddy Epstein's creepy sex lair with his face hidden:


https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Re...-report-595887

yet another example of just how high in the ZOG power strata this Epstein runs. Not just in New York, but also on the island: Barak and under-aged nooky together. All innocent fun, of course.


One of the best nuggets is this one that supposedly came out of the vetting process used when Alex Acosta was being prepared for his Senate confirmation by the Trump administration:


Quote:
Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
When a senior US Attorney is told by his bosses to spike a prosecution/investigation for these reasons, the rational explanation is that the subject of the investigation is receiving "protection" from the absolute highest levels of government.


One explanation for the no-bail ruling is that keeping Epstein under lock and key is a win-win all around. Relatively little need to worry about him getting kidnapped, bumped off, or "disappearing" works nicely for all sides: it may help keep Epstein away from accessing his "doomsday" lists of videos and name and date records of the most high (which conveniently enough reduces their immediate motivation to have him "disappeared"). It also provides for a cooling-down period where ALL the lawyers (and judges) can begin working on the best deals that high-level ZOG can make.


The main reason Epstein is presently so very highly protected is likely because he has (or is certainly believed to have) some doomsday setup that will destroy with irrefutable evidence his entire client list should anything untoward befall #1 pimp. If that "evidence" could be located and contained, he probably wouldn't last as long as a fart in a hurricane.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.