View Single Post
Old July 9th, 2015 #100
Paul Vogel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Christian influences are both Sub-Aryan and Semitic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
I suppose this should come as no surprise, and I find myself oddly ambivalent about it. It seems to me that White racialism is in dire need of a metaphysical dimension, and as long as we confine ourselves exclusively to the realm of physical determinism, the Imperial Idea will remain unobtainable by definition.

I think many, and even most, Christian influences are sub-Aryan, but at least they leave the door to the Absolute ajar, and as long as that door remains ajar, heroes and martyrs can arise and attempt to transcend it.

If we confine ourselves to the realm of material reductionism (biological determinism), I'm afraid we will remain forever enslaved to THEM*



* The Hebrew Emissaries of Materialism
I am neither really surprised but nor am I ambivalent about it.

Christian influences are both Sub-Aryan and Semitic and the
door to the Absolute has always been closed shut by those
Aryans or Whites mentally and spiritually trapped in that vile
Jewish cult. Only real Aryans and martyrs of actual Personal
Integrity were ever able to ever climb out of that dark cave
of superstition and out into the sunlight and finally and up or
Out of the Darkness. Slaves are made of both ATHEISTS* and
of PERSONAL THEISTS* of which both poles are CONTROLLED*
and by both THEM* and as is always by the Usual Suspects*.

*The Malignantly Narcissistic Semitic/Hebrew/Jewish/Zionist and the
Lying Hypocritical Emissaries of Global Mass Deception and Dominion.

See this potentially-fatal "compromise" to recruit "Christians" at SF all
now from the current NA Chairman Will Williams seen also here at WB:


============

Cosmotheist
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:41 pm
Re: What is the National Alliance's spirituality?
PostSat Feb 21, 2015 8:12 pm

Will Williams wrote:
Cosmotheist wrote:
What is the National Alliance's Spirituality?

We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul: it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress....
NATIONAL ALLIANCE MEMBER HANDBOOK

Cosmotheist, thanks for that policy statement -- particularly the part you highlighted -- concerning the Alliance's "spirituality," if one wants to call it that.

I'll be using that as my new signature file at the large Stormfront discussion board, since the administrators there insist on pigeon-holing Cosmotheism in their obscure "ghetto" in semi-private Theology because they have decided that any discussion of Cosmotheism belongs there, not in the much more popular and well-visited Ideology and Philosophy section. Cosmotheism is as much a philosophy of life, a world view, as it is a religion. Fact!

Cosmotheism is a new way of thinking for spiritually-minded Whites who only know Christianity because that's what their parents and grandparents and previous generations of their people were accustomed to "believing." It's not easy to break such a tradition, but break it we must and replace it with something more suitable. As we develop our creed from the foundation of it Dr. Pierce left to us, we'll find it easier to throw off generations of superstitious baggage and articulate this belief system so that our people understand it implicitly.

I was checking out a discussion thread here where the usual, anonymous "Movement" detractors are attacking our Alliance for one reason or another: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=235917&page=11 Buried in the back and forth banter is a post by former Alliance staffer, key man Fed Streed, who, in plain language, touched on what Cosmotheism is to him. I recall 12 years ago Fred wrote that working on the mountain in West Virginia for the Cause was like a religious calling to him. I know that feeling that Fred was describing, but most Americans can not grasp what he was saying.
---

Dr. Pierce, in some of his writing, not sure where, said that humanity (talking about Whitey here) is a threshold species. By that he meant that evolution, slowly, almost blindly, over millions of years of groping through a maze of false starts and dead ends, has brought man to this point, to our current level of consciousness. If we can avoid killing ourselves off in the next few centuries we can cross a threshold and accelerate and guide future evolution. We would move from natural selection to self guided selection. The jew, of course, realizes this all too well, and intends to use his knowledge to destroy us by mixing our genes with niggers and other genetic garbage. Genetic modification and dysgenic breeding used against us.

In order to supercharge our own evolution mankind will need some level of eugenics. That is potentially a hazardous course upon which to embark, if the good ship Eugenica is captured by dour moralistic English meddlers, rabid scripture spouting jackasses, mushbrained self righteous liberal nitwits, or any of a dozen or two other varieties of idiot, they will almost certainly allow it to drift into the placid stagnant waters of the Puritanical Sea, where it will drift aimlessly for a time while the crew consumes each other in orgiastic fits of mindless indignation, finally to join all the other good ships launched with good intentions only to end up wrecked by cretinous assholes. But done right, it would work. It wouldn't need to be heavy handed as long as it had the effect of increasing the reproductive rate of those on the right side of the bell curve and limiting those on the left side. As for exactly what traits to select for, or against, I will leave to the big brains. Intelligence is an obvious criteria, but not the only one.
---

Fred has a way with words that most people, if they pay attention, critically, should not only understand, but should agree with. Christianity is not grounded in reality, Cosmotheism is. Cosmotheism is grounded in eugenics -- good breeding; Christianity, being universalist, is not. It is not difficult to judge what is good for our race and what is detrimental, and act accordingly.


I prefer these in bold both before and after the quote in red:

"One thing is already clear, however: Christianity is not a religion that we can wish on future generations of our race.

We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul: it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress. Christianity, as the word is commonly understood, meets neither of these criteria.

The fact is that, completely aside from the racial question, no person who wholeheartedly believes Christian doctrine can share our values and goals, because Christian doctrine holds that this world is of little importance, being only a proving ground for the spiritual world which one enters after death. Christian doctrine also holds that the condition of this world is not man's responsibility, because an omnipotent and omniscient deity alone has that responsibility
".
--Dr. W.L. Pierce

But, then again, Stormfront being so "Christian-friendly" biased,
mostly might not be able to handle that "Whole truth" too well.

Too bad!

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

============

Last edited by Paul Vogel; July 13th, 2015 at 10:55 AM.