Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Muehlenkamp
So if someone disagrees with your opinion he a) disagrees with "the world excluding Jews" and b) is a "relentless liar"?
As I said before, your babblings are becoming increasingly incoherent. And accordingly instructive for demonstration purposes.
|
Pride is not related to hate so spinning relentlessly over emotion that everybody understands is futile.
Quote:
|
That's further confirmation of my above assessment of your utterances, thanks.
|
This remark changes nothing: you are posting in an equal opportunity forum and I am not in an hysterical rage.
Quote:
|
Self-delusion I leave to true believers like you, my friend. One thing is setting up a challenge like Gerdes has set up. Another thing, in my opinion is responding to such a challenge. If the distinction is too hard for you to grasp, that’s your problem.
|
My problem seems to be an ability to spot your evasive subtlety.
Quote:
|
No, it’s as credible as the Wehrmacht commandant’s complaint about the stench from Treblinka, in that it is also not intended to be evidence for purposes of criminal investigation or historical research.
|
The emotions of a rabbi are not credible evidence and they have nothing to do with a complaint about stench.
Quote:
|
Oh, now "Jews hate White children, their deadliest foe". That's cute. Let’s have more such utterances from the cloud-cuckoo-land you live in, they are quite amusing.
|
Evasive non sequitur.
Quote:
|
Critical assessment and "instinctive dislike" are two different pairs of boots, except for emotional fanatics like you.
|
This is another rabbinic interpretation and it evades the point yet again. The incubus on your mind ensures that "critical assessment" consistently sides with the interests of world Jewry.
Quote:
No, but I don’t consider it necessary.
What would be an "independent" television crew for you, by the way?
|
On this matter of great importance, due to the extremes of relativism, I consider it an imperative.
Independent needs no hairsplitting definitions.